Skip to main content
Download PDF

Detecting multiple differentially methylated CpG sites and regions related to dimensional psychopathology in youths

Clinical Epigenetics volume 11, Article number: 146 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Psychiatric symptomatology during late childhood and early adolescence tends to persist later in life. In the present longitudinal study, we aimed to identify changes in genome-wide DNA methylation patterns that were associated with the emergence of psychopathology in youths from the Brazilian High-Risk Cohort (HRC) for psychiatric disorders. Moreover, for the differentially methylated genes, we verified whether differences in DNA methylation corresponded to differences in mRNA transcript levels by analyzing the gene expression levels in the blood and by correlating the variation of DNA methylation values with the variation of mRNA levels of the same individuals. Finally, we examined whether the variations in DNA methylation and mRNA levels were correlated with psychopathology measurements over time.

Methods

We selected 24 youths from the HRC who presented with an increase in dimensional psychopathology at a 3-year follow-up as measured by the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). The DNA methylation and gene expression data were compared in peripheral blood samples (n = 48) obtained from the 24 youths before and after developing psychopathology. We implemented a methodological framework to reduce the effect of chronological age on DNA methylation using an independent population of 140 youths and the effect of puberty using data from the literature.

Results

We identified 663 differentially methylated positions (DMPs) and 90 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) associated with the emergence of psychopathology. We observed that 15 DMPs were mapped to genes that were differentially expressed in the blood; among these, we found a correlation between the DNA methylation and mRNA levels of RB1CC1 and a correlation between the CBCL and mRNA levels of KMT2E. Of the DMRs, three genes were differentially expressed: ASCL2, which is involved in neurogenesis; HLA-E, which is mapped to the MHC loci; and RPS6KB1, the gene expression of which was correlated with an increase in the CBCL between the time points.

Conclusions

We observed that changes in DNA methylation and, consequently, in gene expression in the peripheral blood occurred concurrently with the emergence of dimensional psychopathology in youths. Therefore, epigenomic modulations might be involved in the regulation of an individual’s development of psychopathology.

Background

Mental disorders contribute significantly to the global burden of disease, ranking among the top 10 causes of disability in developed countries worldwide [1]. Recent research approaches have focused on describing the genetic contribution to these disorders. The advent of large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) has enabled the hypothesis-free exploration of genetic risk factors. These endeavors have been highly successful: a recent large-scale GWAS meta-analysis identified 102 independent genomic loci exhibiting a genome-wide significant association with depression, a psychiatric disorder with relatively low heritability [2]. Moreover, a recent study that quantified the genetic sharing of 25 brain disorders from GWAS identified a significant sharing of common variant risk among mental disorders and between mental disorders and brain phenotypes, including cognitive measures [3].

However, there is considerable uncertainty regarding whether genes identified in GWAS are causally involved in the pathogenesis of mental disorders and how their functions are regulated. Since many factors could impact gene expression, the field of epigenomic variation, including DNA methylation, has evolved into a sophisticated perspective on the basic mechanisms of gene regulation, which occur at the interface between a static genome and a dynamic environment [4]. DNA methylation is the best-characterized epigenetic modification, influencing gene expression via the disruption of transcription factor binding in promoter regions and the recruitment of methyl-binding proteins that initiate chromatin compaction and gene silencing [5]. Methylation primarily occurs at cytosine residues within CpG dinucleotides, and it represents a true epigenetic mechanism since it is faithfully maintained in the absence of the inducing signal, i.e., it is heritable.

There is a vast literature on DNA methylation studies in mental disorders [6, 7]. However, the dynamic nature of epigenetic modification means that a range of potentially important confounding factors needs to be considered, including tissue or cell type, age, sex, and lifestyle exposures [8, 9]. Moreover, most studies to date have two important limitations: cross-sectional designs, limiting the inferences that can be drawn about the etiological processes; and the use of adult samples with psychiatric disorders, a clinical group with higher exposure to the disease process, medication, and environmental lifestyle confounders. In addition, the greatest burden of mental disorders occurs during childhood and adolescence [10], which are critical periods for brain development, plasticity, and maturation. Recent research implicates neurodevelopmental processes in the pathophysiology of several mental disorders, even in clinical syndromes that typically show their first symptoms in late stages of life, such as Alzheimer’s disease [11, 12]. Therefore, a longitudinal study of DNA methylation changes associated with psychopathology in a cohort of youths has considerable potential to be informative regarding the early mechanisms of mental disorders.

In this longitudinal study with repeated blood sampling, we aimed to identify changes in the genome-wide DNA methylation patterns that are associated with the emergence of dimensional psychopathology during the transition from childhood to adolescence. Moreover, we tested whether differences in DNA methylation corresponded to differences in mRNA transcripts by analyzing the gene expression levels in the blood and by correlating the variation of DNA methylation values with the variation of mRNA levels in the same individuals. Finally, we examined whether variations in DNA methylation and mRNA levels were correlated with psychopathology measures across time (see Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Overview of the study design. We selected 24 youths from the Brazilian High-Risk Cohort (HRC) for psychiatric disorders who presented with an increase in dimensional psychopathology after 3 years of follow-up as measured by the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). After implementing a methodological framework to reduce the effect of important confounders (chronological age and puberty) on the results, genome-wide DNA methylation was investigated in the context of both differentially methylated positions (DMPs) and differentially methylated regions (DMRs). Moreover, for differentially methylated genes, we verified whether differences in DNA methylation corresponded to differences in mRNA transcripts by analyzing gene expression levels in the blood from the same individuals. Finally, we examined whether there were correlations between (a) the variation in DNA methylation (ΔDNAm) and the variation in gene expression (ΔmRNA); (b) the variation in the total score of the CBCL (ΔCBCL) and ΔDNAm; and (c) ΔCBCL and ΔmRNA. The variations were calculated by subtracting wave 1 (W1) values from wave 0 (W0) values

Full size image

Methods

Study procedures and participant selection

We selected a subsample from a large, prospective, community school-based study, the Brazilian High-Risk Cohort (HRC) for psychiatric disorders. The cohort characteristics and study design are detailed elsewhere [13] and in the Additional file 1. Briefly, we assessed subjects from two Brazilian cities (São Paulo and Porto Alegre) in two different waves: wave 0 (W0, representing the baseline) and wave 1 (W1, representing a 3-year follow-up). For both waves, the evaluations were performed over multiple visits, including a household parent interview and, on a separate visit, a collection of blood samples to assess peripheral biomarkers. In the household parent interview, the participants were assessed using a structured diagnostic interview, the Development and Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA) [14], to evaluate their psychiatric diagnosis according to the DSM-IV. On the day of the blood collection, dimensional psychopathology measures were assessed using the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) [15].

The CBCL is a widely used inventory that provides parent-report information on a wide array of behavioral problems in youths. See the Additional file 1 for more detail about the CBCL and validation literature from the CBCL. The Research Ethics Committee approved the research protocol. All parents and children/youths provided written informed consent before inclusion in the cohort. See the Additional file 1 for more detail about the CBCL.

From the pool of subjects with good-quality blood samples available for both waves, we selected subjects who met the following four criteria: (1) they lived in São Paulo (to exclude site effects) at both time-points; (2) they did not fulfill DSM-IV criteria for any mental disorder in the DAWBA and presented with low levels of dimensional psychopathology at the baseline (CBCL total score < 30.5 at W0); (3) they presented with high levels of dimensional psychopathology at the 3-year follow-up (CBCL total score ≥ 30.5 at W1); and (4) they presented with important changes in dimensional psychopathology levels between assessments (ΔCBCL = CBCLW1–CBCLW0 > 15). Cutoff values for the total CBCL were based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis using the CBCL score as a predictor of categorical mental disorders according to the DAWBA. The ROC analysis and cutoffs are described in Additional file 1. These criteria were met by 33 subjects, but only 24 had gene expression data available. Therefore, the final sample comprised 24 individuals from the HRC with low levels of dimensional psychopathology at W0, as measured by the CBCL total score, and high levels at W1.

DNA methylation—Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip

A total of 10 mL of whole blood was collected in EDTA tubes (Becton Dickinson (BD), Franklin Lakes, NJ). Subsequently, DNA was isolated using a Gentra Puregene Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The DNA was treated with bisulfite, hybridized to Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChips (“EPIC array”—Illumina, San Diego, CA), and scanned using the manufacturer’s protocol. To minimize systematic bias, the samples were randomly distributed onto the BeadChips, which held eight samples per BeadChip.

Gene expression—HumanHT-12 v4 Expression BeadChips

Blood was collected using PAXgene RNA tubes (PreAnalytix, Hombrechtikon, Switzerland) and RNA was isolated using a PAXgene Blood RNA Kit (Qiagen, Stockach, Germany). A total of 200 ng of RNA was used with the Illumina® Total Prep™ RNA Amplification Kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) to synthesize cRNA, which was hybridized to Human HT-12 v4 Expression BeadChips (Illumina).

Quality control

All the steps and analyses performed are summarized in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Flowchart of all the steps and analyses performed. HRC high-risk cohort. PNC Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort. DMPs differentially methylated positions. DMRs differentially methylated regions. DEGs differentially expressed genes. The other abbreviations are described in the text

Full size image

Genome-wide quantification of DNA methylation

The raw intensity files (idat) generated by the EPIC arrays were imported into the R programming environment (v3.5.1) using RStudio (v1.1.453). The methylation level at each CpG site was calculated as a beta value [β = methylated intensity/(methylated intensity + unmethylated intensity)], which varied from 0 (no methylation) to 1 (complete methylation). Before the quality control (QC), we converted the EPIC array (866,238 probes) into a 450 K virtual array (452,832 probes) in order to compare it to an independent population of youths and to the Almstrup et al. study [16].

The QC of the data was verified using different R packages and was adapted from Hannon et al. (2016) [17] and Maksimovic et al. (2016) [18]. We performed 12 QC steps, which are detailed in the Additional file 1. From these steps, four were to check: (i) the similarities and differences between the samples using multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) plots; (ii) the bisulfite conversion; (iii) the methylated and unmethylated signal intensities; and (iv) the samples/probes that failed based on detection p values.

Normalization of the DNA methylation data was performed using the preprocessFunnorm() function in the minfi package (v1.26.2) [19]. We did not find a relevant batch effect (Additional file 1: Figure S1). None of the HRC samples were excluded during QC, which totaled 48 biological samples from 24 individuals. From the 452,832 probes, 63,170 were excluded during QC, with 389,662 probes remaining for subsequent analysis.

Identification and exclusion of CpG sites related to chronological age and pubertal transition

Many studies have investigated the relationship between DNA methylation patterns and chronological age [20,21,22]. Aiming to reduce the influence of chronological age on our longitudinal results, we verified which DNA methylation markers were associated with age in an independent population of youths. Thus, we selected healthy youths from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort (PNC), which has been described elsewhere [23]. The selection criteria were as follows: (1) similar ancestry compared to the HRC, based on a principal component analysis (PCA) generated from the SNP array data (Additional file 1: Figure S2). For this analysis, we selected individuals who were within the ranges of − 0.035 < PC1 < 0.028 and PC2 > − 0.1. These ranges were chosen based on a visual inspection of the PC1 × PC2 plot; and (2) an age at the date of the blood collection within the age range of the HRC samples (from 7 to 17 years of age). Thus, the selection comprised 140 children and adolescents without psychiatric disorders. Raw intensity files generated by Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChips (450Karrays-Illumina) were imported into R, and QC was performed as for the HRC samples. The bisulfite conversion was not successful for two samples, and another sample showed lower methylated and unmethylated signal intensities (see Additional file 1). Therefore, these three samples were excluded, and we analyzed DNA methylation data from 137 individuals. Linear regression models were used to identify the probes associated with age (independent variable) without including any covariates. We excluded all CpG sites associated with chronological age from further analysis.

Based on Tanner’s classification [24], all 24 children from our sample had pubertal onset after W0 and before W1 blood collection. In a recent study, Almstrup et al. [16] reported that changes in single methylation sites in whole blood were associated with physiological pubertal transition and reproductive function. Therefore, we also excluded from the final analyses all CpGs associated with pubertal age (false discovery rate; FDR < 0.001), and all CpGs that were correlated with more than three of the five analyzed circulating reproductive hormones (FDR < 0.05) reported by Almstrup et al. (2016). Finally, as the PNC and Almstrup et al. assessed DNA methylation using 450 K arrays, we excluded all EPIC probes that were not included in the 450 K array.

Genome-wide quantification of gene expression

The raw data were pre-analyzed using GenomeStudio software and then imported into R. QC was performed using the lumi package (v2.32.0). We performed a background correction using the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) [25] and, to ensure that the different BeadChips were comparable to one another, we used a robust spline normalization (RSN). The QC resulted in 6322 probes with high-quality data available for the differentially expressed gene analyses. After QC, two participants were excluded because the reported sex was different from predicted sex using probes on sexual chromosomes. Thus, 22 participants had available DNA methylation and gene expression data from both waves.

Statistical analysis

DNA methylation

While β values were used for the visualization and interpretation of the results because the value range of methylation is easily interpretable, the M values [M value = log2(methylated intensity/unmethylated intensity)] were used for the differential methylation analysis [26]. To find DMPs, i.e., analysis for each CpG site, we used regression models with subjects included as dummy variables (comparison within-subjects). The outcome variables were the M values from each CpG, the independent variable was the time point (W0 or W1), and we adjusted for batch effects (BeadChip number and BeadChip position) to ensure that our analysis was not influenced by any kind of batch effect unidentified. To verify the influence of medication (use or not) on the results, we repeated the regression models using the batch effects and medication as covariates. To account for multiple testing, an FDR procedure using the Benjamini–Hochberg (BH) method [27] was applied, with values below 0.05 considered significant.

Although performing CpG-wise analysis is useful and informative, it is also important to know whether several proximal CpG sites are simultaneously differentially methylated, i.e., to identify the DMRs. We investigated the DMRs using the DMRcate package [28]. DMRcate identifies and ranks the most differentially methylated regions across the genome based on the tunable kernel smoothing method. A bandwidth of 1000 nucleotides (lambda = 1000) and a scaling factor of 2 (C = 2) were used as recommended by the DMRcate authors. The results were corrected for multiple comparisons using the BH method. Probe location and the gene annotation were taken from Illumina reference files. Annotation was performed according to hg19.

We checked whether the blood cell composition estimates were different between the waves using generalized estimating equations (GEE). Gaussian distribution and independence were used as the expected autocorrelation structure, and we found no significant differences between the waves. Moreover, we checked whether all participants had similar genetic ancestry by verifying whether the first two PCs generated from the SNP array data were correlated with the first 10 PCs from the methylation data, and did not find any significant correlation. As our sample size was small and the number of variables in the model could prevent us from identifying interesting findings purely owing to an overfitting problem, the cell-composition estimates and genetic ancestry were not added as covariates to the regression models. See the Additional file 1 for the full description.

Gene expression

Differential expression analyses were performed only for the genes that were mapped to or near to the DMPs/DMRs. We defined that a DMP/DMR was mapped near to a gene when a CpG site or region was located 0–1500 bases upstream of the transcriptional start site (TSS) of a gene. We used regression models with subjects included as dummy variables in which the expression levels were the outcome and the waves were the independent variable, adjusting for the RNA integrity number (RIN), cRNA input, and BeadChip number. We considered p values below 0.05 without correction for multiple comparisons to be significant.

DNA methylation, gene expression, and CBCL score correlation

To verify whether the methylation at the DMPs mapped to differential expressed genes was correlated with gene expression, a Pearson correlation between the ΔDMPs (M values DMPW1–M values DMPW0) and ΔmRNA levels (mRNAW1–mRNAW0) was used. For the DMRs mapped to differentially expressed genes, we first took the mean of the M values for all CpGs within a DMR (mDMR), and then used a Pearson correlation between the ΔmDMRs (mDMRW1–mDMRW0) and ΔmRNA levels.

To verify whether biological measures were correlated with psychopathology, a Pearson correlation was used for the ΔCBCL and the (i) ΔDMP, (ii) ΔmDMR, and (iii) ΔmRNA levels. We considered p values below 0.05 without correction for multiple comparisons as significant correlations.

Correlation between methylation in blood and brain

To verify the correlation between DNA methylation in the whole blood and brain for the DMPs and DMRs, we used the IMAGE-CpG tool. This tool is based on the DNA methylation data for blood, saliva, and buccal and live brain tissue using an EPIC array [29]. We only verified the correlation between the brain and blood for DMPs/DMRs mapped to genes that were differentially expressed in the blood. We considered a correlation between methylation in the brain and blood for Spearman rho > 0.20.

Enrichment analysis

Enrichment analysis was performed for the DNA methylation results using the tools available in the WEB-based GEne SeT AnaLysis Toolkit (WEB-Gestalt) [30], selecting Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) as the enrichment method. We performed two enrichment analyses: one using the DMP results and the other using the DMR results. For both enrichment analyses, we used all the genes for which the DMPs/DMRs were mapped to or near to the genes. We uploaded the gene ID and metric table (see Additional file 1) into WEB-Gestalt, selecting 1000 permutations and setting the minimum and maximum number of genes in the category as 5 and 500, respectively, and the mean between duplicate genes as the collapse method. We performed analyses for enriched GO (gene ontology) and KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathways. FDR < 0.05 using the BH method was considered significant.

Results

The demographic characteristics of the participants are given in Table 1, Additional file 1: Table S1, and Additional file 1: Figure S3. The CBCL total score was higher in the females as compared to the males in wave 0. However, as we performed comparisons within-subjects, this difference did not influence our results. There was no difference in the ΔCBCL between the males and females across time [ΔCBCL mean (SD): males = 29.93 (10.31); females = 28.40 (8.24); p = 0.551]. On the day of the blood collection in W1, two participants reported using medications, but they were not able to report what those medications were.

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants
Full size table

CpG sites related to chronological age and puberty transition

Our initial analysis to quantify the genome-wide patterns of DNA methylation used the EPIC array and included covariates for batch effects. The top-ranked DMPs were annotated to MEIOB (cg14976596), ANO2 (cg23363039), NTRK3 (cg20664238), KCNAB3 (cg14918082), and VPS35 (cg10271672) (Additional file 2: Table S2), which have been previously associated with the biological events of puberty, such as meiotic recombination and primary follicle transition, or with age-correlated DNA methylation [22, 31,32,33,34]. As described in the “Methods” section, we excluded the CpG sites associated with age and puberty to address this issue. In total, 738 probes associated with chronological age (Additional file 2: Table S3) or the puberty transition were excluded, providing us with 388,924 probes for subsequent analysis (after exclusion of the EPIC probes that were not present in 450 K arrays). We divided the following results into DMPs and DMRs.

DMPs associated with the emergence of dimensional psychopathology

After filtering the CpGs, we next repeated our genome-wide analysis using batch effects as covariates. We identified 663 DMPs associated with an increase in the CBCL total score. The DMPs were evenly distributed across all autosomes (Fig. 3 and Additional file 2: Table S4). The 20 top-ranked DMPs are given in Table 2. The 663 DMPs were annotated to or near to 531 genes, and these genes were used to search for significant enrichment. We found significant enrichment of the cell-cell adhesion via the plasma-membrane adhesion molecule GO biological process (GO: 0098742; FDR = 0.03) and of the post-synapse GO cellular component (GO: 0098794; FDR = 0.02) (Additional file 2: Table S5). To verify whether the use of the reported medications influenced our results, we repeated the analysis using batch effects and medication as covariates. The 663 DMPs associated with the emergence of dimensional psychopathology remained significant, indicating no influence of the reported medications on the results (Additional file 2: Table S6).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Manhattan plot showing the association p values (y-axis, −log10 scale) comparing the CpG methylation between W0 and W1 against the genomic location (x-axis) for the genome-wide analysis of the emergence of dimensional psychopathology in youths. Batch effects were used as covariates. Differentially methylated positions (DMPs) (above the red line, FDR < 0.05) are distributed across all autosomal chromosomes

Full size image
Table 2 The 20 most differentially methylated positions (DMPs) associated with the emergence of dimensional psychopathology
Full size table

DMPs and gene expression

Of the 531 genes overlapped by DMPs, 103 had gene expression in the peripheral blood identified by a gene expression microarray, corresponding to 122 probe sets. We found that 15 genes (16 probe sets) were differentially expressed (Table 3 and Additional file 2: Table S7).

Table 3 Results of DNA methylation and gene expression for the genes in which CpG sites were associated with the emergence of dimensional psychopathology
Full size table

Regarding the DNA methylation correlation between the brain and blood for the DMPs mapped to these differentially expressed genes, previous analyses have shown that the methylation levels of 13 DMPs (86.7% of the total) are correlated to the levels in the brain (Additional file 2: Table S8) [29].

DMPs, gene expression, and CBCL score correlation

We verified whether the ΔmRNA levels of the 16 probe sets were correlated with ΔDMP methylation values (Additional file 2: Table S9). There was a correlation between the cg08517799 ΔDMP and RB1CC1 ΔmRNA level (r = − 0.580; p = 0.005, Additional file 1: Figure S4). cg08517799 was mapped to the RB1CC1 intron. Regarding the dimensional psychopathology, no ΔDMP values were correlated with the ΔCBCL scores (Additional file 2: Table S9). There was a correlation between the ΔCBCL and KMT2E ΔmRNA levels (r = 0.436; p = 0.042, Additional file 1: Figure S5), and also between the ΔCBCL and FAM217B ΔmRNA levels (r = 0.475; p = 0.025, Additional file 1: Figure S6).

DMRs associated with the emergence of dimensional psychopathology

We searched for genomic regions (in a window of 1000 bases) where the DNA methylation was associated with the emergence of dimensional psychopathology in youths in a coordinated manner. We identified 90 DMRs that were annotated to or near to 86 genes and that spanned between 3 and 32 CpG sites. The 20 top-ranked DMRs are given in Table 4, and all the coordinates and information about the DMRs are given in Additional file 2: Table S10. The most significant DMR was a region on chromosome 10 that contained the promoter and the first exon of the PPP2R2D gene, spanning 9 CpG sites. Furthermore, it contained DNase hypersensitive areas and was hypermethylated in W1 as compared to W0 (Additional file 1: Figure S7). Overall, 11 DMRs were situated in the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) on chromosome 6, and five were mapped upstream of imprinted genes (GNAS, GNASAS, ASB4, HYMAI, PLAGL1, FAM50B, KCNQ1OT1). Interestingly, we found three DMRs in the GNAS gene (GNAS complex locus), a region that has a highly complex imprinted expression pattern. Moreover, four DMRs were located at genes (VPS52, TCIRG1, and TRIM39) that were found to be differentially methylated in the largest schizophrenia (SCZ) whole-blood epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) to date [17].

Table 4 The 20 most differentially methylated regions (DMRs) associated with the emergence of dimensional psychopathology
Full size table

We found that 41 DMRs (45% of the total) were upstream of the TSS of genes. Of these, 11 overlapped with CpG islands (CpGIs), 10 were located at CpG shores (~ 2 kb from CpGIs) and 3 were located at CpG shelves (~ 4 kb from CpGIs). Moreover, it was observed that 10 DMRs (11.1% of the total) were located in intergenic regions, and 52 DMRs (57.8% of the total) were located in gene bodies (coding regions). Of the DMRs in gene bodies, two DMRs overlapped with genes that are highly expressed in the brain (MOG and PDE10A). We found significant enrichment in the regulation of the sequence-specific DNA-binding transcription factor activity GO biological process (GO: 0051090; FDR = 0.01) (Additional file 2: Table S5).

DMRs and their gene expression

Of the 86 genes that were overlapped by or were near to the DMRs, 15 had an expression in the peripheral blood that was identified by a gene expression array (Additional file 2: Table S11). We found that ASCL2, RPS6KB1, and HLA-E were differentially expressed in the blood at W0 and W1 (Fig. 4). The DMRs were located 200–1500 bases upstream of the transcriptional start sites of these genes. Two of the DMRs (upstream of ASCL2 and RPS6KB1 genes) overlapped with CpGIs, while the other one was located at a CpG shore. Furthermore, the DMR upstream of RPS6KB1 was located (1) at a DNase hypersensitive region for different cell lines; (2) in a region that included several potential transcription factor binding sites; and (3) in a region enriched for the H3K27Ac histone mark (often found near active regulatory elements) for different cell types.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Overview of the differentially methylated regions (DMR) and of their genomic context and box plots of the gene expression levels for the (a) RPS6KB1, (b) ASCL2, and (c) HLA-E genes. The β values of the CpGs that constitute the DMRs are represented by dots. All regions were located 200–1500 bp upstream of the transcriptional start sites. The CpG island track was obtained from the UCSC database. Gene annotation was taken from Illumina reference files according to hg19. Wave 0 was used as the reference. a DMR (4 CpG probes; Stouffer transformation p value = 0.021; adjusted p value for the most significant probe = 4.32 × 10−6; mean β fold change = − 0.018) and the gene expression levels (logFC = − 0.194) of RPS6KB1. b DMR (17 CpG probes; Stouffer transformation p value = 0.598; adjusted p value for the most significant probe = 3.78 × 10−6; mean β fold change = 0.014) and the gene expression levels (logFC = 0.185) of ASCL2. c DMR (5 CpG probes; Stouffer transformation p value = 0.015; adjusted p value for the most significant probe = 1.01 × 10−5; mean β fold change = 0.032) and the gene expression levels (logFC = 0.185) of HLA-E

Full size image

Regarding the correlation between DNA methylation in the brain and blood for these DMRs, seven and two CpG sites located at the DMRs upstream of ASCL2 and HLA-E genes, respectively, were correlated to the methylation levels in the brain according to the IMAGE-CpG tool [29]. Moreover, a correlation between methylation in the brain and blood for all CpGs located at DMRs upstream of the RPS6KB1 gene was shown by this tool (Additional file 2: Table S12).

DMRs, gene expression, and CBCL score correlation

There were no correlations between the ΔmDMR and ΔmRNA levels (ASCL2: r = − 0.015; p = 0.949; HLA-E: r = − 0.120; p = 0.596; RPS6KB1: r = 0.194; p = 0.388). Moreover, we did not find any correlation between ΔCBCL scores and ΔmDMRs (ASCL2: r = − 0.083; p = 0.715; HLA-E: r = − 0.224; p = 0.316; RPS6KB1: r = 0.160; p = 0.478). However, there was a correlation between the ΔCBCL and RPS6KB1 ΔmRNA levels (r = 0.442; p = 0.040). The higher the increase in CBCL scores between W0 and W1, the higher the difference in RPS6KB1 mRNA levels between the waves (Additional file 1: Figure S8). We did not observe a correlation between the ΔCBCL scores and ΔmRNA levels of the ASCL2 and HLA-E genes (ASCL2: r = − 0.224; p = 0.3171; HLA-E: r = 0.145; p = 0.5198).

Discussion

Epigenetic studies performed on samples collected before and after the increase of psychopathology have the potential to reveal predictors of mental disorders. We performed a longitudinal epigenome-wide association study on the emergence of dimensional psychopathology during the transition from childhood to adolescence, quantifying the methylation in DNA samples isolated from whole blood. After implementing a methodological framework to reduce the effect of chronological age and the puberty transition on the DNA methylation, we identified 663 DMPs and 90 DMRs associated with the emergence of psychopathology. We observed that 15 DMPs were mapped to genes that were differentially expressed in the blood and that differences in the RB1CC1 mRNA levels were correlated with differences in DNA methylation between the waves. Furthermore, the variation of KMT2E mRNA was correlated with the increase of dimensional psychopathology levels over time. We found that almost half of the total DMRs were located upstream of transcriptional start sites. As promoter regions are generally located in close proximity to the 5′ end of genes [35], these DMRs could be involved in the regulation of gene transcription. Indeed, three genes (ASCL2, RPS6KB1, and HLA-E) were differentially expressed in whole blood of the same individuals, and the mRNA levels of RPS6KB1 were correlated with the ΔCBCL; this indicated that when the difference in gene expression was greater across time, a greater increase in dimensional psychopathology was observed. Moreover, 4 DMRs were located at genes that were found to be differentially methylated in the blood of chronic patients with SCZ [17], 11 DMRs were situated in MHC loci (the locus most strongly associated with SCZ [17]), and 5 DMRs were located upstream of imprinted genes (many imprinted genes affect behavior). To our knowledge, this is the first human longitudinal study evaluating the association of within-subject changes in DNA methylation with changes in dimensional measurements of psychopathology. We tested the relationship between altered DNA methylation, gene expression, and psychopathology measurements, and our findings suggest the involvement of novel genes in adolescent psychopathology.

Differentially methylated positions

The differentially methylated positions (DMPs) mapped to genes that were enriched for cell-cell adhesion biological processes and postsynaptic cellular components, suggesting that the differentially methylated genes were involved in cell attachment and that their proteins were located in subcellular structures that are important to brain development. We did not observe an overlap between genes indicated by the 20 top-ranked DMPs and DMRs. The neighboring CpGs of these DMPs are probably not included in the 450 K arrays and were excluded from our analysis. The exclusion of these probes might have influenced the chromosomal regions of the 20 top-ranked DMPs in the DMR analysis.

We observed that 15 genes that overlapped with the DMPs had alterations in their expression levels. Among them were BCL11A, KMT2E, and RB1CC1. Two gene expression probes for BCL11A were downregulated in W1 as compared to W0. The corresponding protein product is a transcription factor associated with the mammalian BAF SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex in human T cells [36]. A study demonstrated that BCL11A haploinsufficiency is implicated in intellectual developmental disorders [37]. Moreover, we found a significant positive correlation between the KMT2E ΔmRNA level and ΔCBCL, indicating that there was higher variation in KMT2E expression (upregulation in W1 compared to W0) with a higher increase in dimensional psychopathology. KMT2E (also known as MLL5) is a chromatin regulator expressed throughout the cell cycle and plays a role in hematopoiesis and spermatogenesis [38]. However, an exome sequencing study reported that KMT2E is strongly associated with autism spectrum disorder [39]. Finally, we found a significant negative correlation between the cg08517799 ΔDMP and RB1CC1 ΔmRNA levels, indicating that as CpG methylation increases, the gene expression of RB1CC1 decreases. RB1CC1 encodes a tumor-suppressing protein that interacts with signaling pathways to regulate cell growth, proliferation, migration, apoptosis, and autophagy. However, methylation changes in a single CpG are less likely to promote downstream biological consequences. It is more likely that coordinated DNA methylation changes in genomic regions (i.e., DMRs) would have a downstream biological effect.

Differentially methylated regions

The differentially methylated regions (DMRs) mapped to or near to genes that were enriched for the biological process of the regulation of sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activity, suggesting that the differentially methylated genes could be involved in gene expression regulation. In our analysis, the most significant DMR contained a region upstream of the TSS and the first exon of PPP2R2D (protein phosphatase 2 regulatory subunit Bdelta). This DMR also contained DNase hypersensitive areas. This region was hypermethylated in W1 as compared to W0, but we did not observe the differential expression of PPP2R2D in whole blood between the waves. This gene encodes a regulatory subunit of protein phosphatase 2A that plays a key role in the cell cycle by controlling mitosis entry and exit [40]. PPP2R2D is selectively expressed in the mouse hippocampus and is upregulated in the hippocampus of rats during early rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep after they are exposed to novel objects [41, 42]. A cross-sectional study that aimed to identify the DNA methylation signatures at genes modulating dopamine signaling that are associated with obesity features found that PPP2R2D is hypermethylated in the blood of adults with abdominal obesity [43]. Although we performed comparisons within-subjects, and our sample was composed of youths and not adults, we could not determine whether body mass index influenced our results, as this information was unavailable.

We identified three DMRs that mapped to 200–1500 bases upstream of the TSS of genes for which the expression levels in blood were altered between the waves. First, DMR hypermethylation and ASCL2 gene expression upregulation were observed in W1 compared to W0. ASCL2 (achaete-scute family bHLH transcription factor 2) is a member of the basic helix-loop-helix family of transcription factors, which are downstream targets of Wnt signaling [44], and it is involved in the determination of neuronal precursors in the peripheral and central nervous systems. Highly expressed in the skin, ASCL2 is associated with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, which is the most common pediatric overgrowth syndrome [45]. Second, DMR hypermethylation and HLA-E gene expression upregulation were observed in W1 as compared to W0. Highly expressed in whole blood, HLA-E (major histocompatibility complex, class I, E) is a protein-coding gene that belongs to the non-classical group of MHC-Ib molecules and is mapped to the MHC locus on the short arm of the chromosome 6 [46]. Lastly, DMR hypomethylation and RPS6KB1 gene expression downregulation were observed in W1 as compared to W0. RPS6KB1 (ribosomal protein S6 kinase B1) encodes a ribosomal kinase that responds to mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) signaling activation to promote protein synthesis, cell growth, and cell proliferation. The highest median expression is in the ovary and has been associated with human cancer [47,48,49]. Although we did not find a significant correlation between the methylation and expression of these genes, we observed that hypermethylation did not repress their gene expression, suggesting additional mechanisms of gene expression regulation.

Although none of these genes has been directly associated with psychiatric phenotypes, we identified a differentially methylated region of a gene involved in neurogenesis (ASCL2). In particular, the DNA methylation levels of almost half of the CpG sites located within this DMR were correlated with the levels in the brain, based on previous analysis [29]. Indeed, studies have shown altered expression of a key gene in Wnt signaling in the hippocampus of patients suffering from neuropsychiatric disorders [50]. Moreover, we identified a differentially methylated and differentially expressed gene located at the MHC region (HLA-E), which is the most robustly associated locus in the largest SCZ GWAS and the top-ranked DMR identified in the largest SCZ EWAS to date [17, 51]. Notably, 12% of our results for differentially methylated regions were mapped to the MHC locus, suggesting the involvement of this region in psychiatric symptomatology in adolescence. Furthermore, although there are known to be significant differences in the overall and specific methylation levels between different tissue types [52], few methylation changes were observed in CpG shores between immune system cells [53]. As the DMR that mapped to HLA-E is located at a CpG shore, this suggests that methylation of HLA-E might not represent a cell type-specific methylation and might be involved in adolescent psychopathology. In addition, we found that a ribosomal kinase that responds to mTOR was differentially methylated and expressed between time points (RPS6KB1). As observed in the IMAGE-CpG tool, the DNA methylation levels of all CpGs located at this DMR were correlated with the methylation levels in the brain [29]. Given the rich literature on the role of mTOR in age-related diseases and the evidence of its association with advanced biological aging and mental disorders [54,55,56,57], it is striking that the methylation and expression levels of a downstream target of mTOR were altered in a sample that increased in psychopathology over time. Interestingly, we observed that higher expression levels of RPS6KB in W1 as compared to W0 were correlated with increased dimensional psychopathology across time. Although we observed hypomethylation of RPS6KB1, its expression was downregulated overall between W1 and W0. Thus, more studies are needed to elucidate this relationship.

Another interesting result was the identification of DMRs located at genes that were found to be differentially methylated in the SCZ EWAS [17]. SCZ is a psychiatric disorder with higher heritability, and although it is not yet known if some subjects in our sample will develop SCZ in the future, our results confirm that these genes might be involved in the development of mental disorders, including SCZ. Moreover, we found that some DMRs were located at imprinted genes. Many imprinted genes are expressed in the brain and affect behavior [58]. In adults, imprinted genes are associated with behaviors such as maternal care, sex, feeding, and cognition [59]. In addition, we found three DMRs that mapped to GNAS. This locus has a highly complex imprinted expression pattern. It gives rise to maternally, paternally, and biallelically expressed transcripts. In a recent study that investigated the epigenetic profiles of select youth, monozygotic twin pairs who were discordant for anxiety, the differential methylation of loci that were annotated to GNAS was associated with anxiety [60]. In addition, we found two DMRs that mapped to MOG (myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein) and PDE10A (phosphodiesterase 10A), genes that are highly expressed in the brain [47]. However, these DMRs were mapped to the gene body, and the DNA methylation patterns between blood and brain are very distinct, particularly in the gene body [61].

Strengths of the study

First, our study design was longitudinal, and it combined the collection of clinical and DNA methylation data at a baseline and at a 3-year follow-up; this could help to elucidate the temporality of the relationship between the development of psychopathology and methylation changes. Second, we used an epigenome-wide approach to investigate DNA methylation. This approach, without a hypothesis a priori, is crucial for identifying new relevant CpG sites and regions associated with the emergence of dimensional psychopathology in youths. Third, dimensional psychopathology exists on a continuum in the general population, and population-based studies have demonstrated that symptoms, when considered dimensionally, vary with neurobiological features [62, 63], providing further support for the examination of dimensional psychopathology. Indeed, recent initiatives to elucidate the biological causes of mental disorders, such as the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC), focus on the dimensional distribution of several behavioral traits and their neural correlates [64]. Fourth, we studied youths, a group that has had shorter exposure to environmental events that could influence DNA methylation, such as smoking, relative to adults. All 24 of the investigated youths reported that they had never smoked cigarettes or chewed tobacco. Moreover, psychiatric symptomatology during childhood and adolescence predicts persistent mental illness later in life [65]. Fifth, we found DNA methylation changes in blood, a tissue that is accessible via minimally invasive procedures. Sixth, our results seem not to be influenced by medication, as all the DMPs remained significant after the medication was included as a covariable in the analysis.

Limitations of the study

Despite its longitudinal design and dimensional assessment of psychopathology, the results of this study should be interpreted in light of some limitations. First, methylation patterns are tissue-specific; thus, the methylation differences observed in blood might serve as a marker for phenotypic risk but might not reflect the brain methylome. Nevertheless, our results of most interest showed a correlation between DNA methylation in the brain and blood, as shown in a previous analysis [29], highlighting the possible biological relevance of our findings on the emergence of psychopathology. Second, DNA methylation patterns are also influenced by other factors, such as body mass index and blood cell composition [66]. Because of our sample size, we did not correct our methylation model for estimations of cell composition. Thus, blood cell composition remains a probable confounding factor for the methylation analysis. However, the correspondence of both altered DNA methylation and gene expression is powerful evidence that should be considered even with this limitation. Third, we did not correct gene expression and correlation analyses for multiple comparisons since we chose to be less strict statistically in order to preserve the biological data. Fourth, we did not have a longitudinal control group from the same population to verify whether the DNA methylation differences observed in this study were related to the dynamic nature of DNA methylation, as methylation is the result of complex interactions between genes and the environment that take place over the lifetime of an individual [67]. To overcome these limitations, we employed a DNA methylation marker selection to exclude probes associated with chronological age and the puberty transition in the whole blood of the youths. However, we might have lost DMPs and DMRs associated with the emergence of psychopathology since we had to exclude EPIC probes that were not present in 450 K arrays. Fifth, it is unknown whether the DNA methylation differences observed in this study of blood samples will remain stable over time or will change at the onset of a full-blown psychiatric disorder, since methylation is dynamic throughout development. However, the low stability and high comorbidity patterns of categorical psychopathology in this age range, as assessed by our current classification (e.g., DSM), support our dimensional approach to psychopathology. Sixth, as our analysis focused on the CBCL total score, our results were related to global non-specific psychopathology and not to specific symptoms which could be evaluated by CBCL subscales. Finally, as we performed multiple comparisons in the epigenome-wide approach, we had to correct for multiple testing. Although this correction is necessary, it increases the occurrence of false-negative results.

Conclusions

In summary, the emergence of dimensional psychopathology appeared concurrently with changes in the patterns of DNA methylation in whole blood cells. Changes in the methylation of single CpGs (DMPs) and regions (DMRs) were observed simultaneously with changes in gene expression levels that were associated with the emergence of psychopathology in youth. Among them, we highlighted those that were annotated to ASCL2, which is involved in neurogenesis; to HLA-E, which maps to the MHC loci; and to RPS6KB1, the gene expression of which was correlated to an increase in dimensional psychopathology. Our data indicate that peripheral blood is a valuable surrogate tissue for the assessment of pathophysiology of behavioral symptoms in youths and could be used to reveal putative peripheral biomarkers. Future epigenetic studies of an independent longitudinal cohort will be required to replicate these findings and to complement this research in order to identify early epigenetic biomarkers for the development of psychopathology.

Availability of data and materials

The HRC DNA methylation data analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. In the near future, the DNA methylation data of HRC will be available in the ArrayExpress Archive of Functional Genomics Data (European Bioinformatics Institute).

Abbreviations

BH:

Benjamini–Hochberg

CBCL:

Child Behavior Checklist

CpGIs:

CpG islands

DAWBA:

Development and Well-Being Assessment

DMPs:

Differentially methylated positions

DMRs:

Differentially methylated regions

EWAS:

Epigenome-wide association study

FDR:

False discovery rate

GO:

Gene ontology

GSEA:

Gene Set Enrichment Analysis

GWAS:

Genome-wide association studies

HRC:

High-risk cohort

KEGG:

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

MHC:

Major histocompatibility complex

PC1:

First principal component derived from PCA

PC2:

Second principal component derived from PCA

PCA:

Principal components analysis

PCs:

Principal components derived from PCA

PNC:

Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort

QC:

Quality control

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

SCZ:

Schizophrenia

TSS:

Transcriptional start site

W0:

Wave 0, representing baseline

W1:

Wave 1, representing 3 years of follow-up

WEB-Gestalt:

WEB-based GEne SeT AnaLysis Toolkit

References

  1. Whiteford HA, Degenhardt L, Rehm J, Baxter AJ, Ferrari AJ, Erskine HE, et al. Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders: findings from the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2013;382(9904):1575–86 Epub 2013/09/03.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Howard DM, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis of depression identifies 102 independent variants and highlights the importance of the prefrontal brain regions. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22(3):343–52.

  3. Anttila V, Bulik-Sullivan B, Finucane HK, Walters RK, Bras J, Duncan L, et al. Analysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain. Science. 2018;360(6395). Epub 2018/06/23.

  4. Bredy TW, Sun YE, Kobor MS. How the epigenome contributes to the development of psychiatric disorders. Dev Psychobiol. 2010;52(4):331–42 Epub 2010/02/04.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Yin Y, Morgunova E, Jolma A, Kaasinen E, Sahu B, Khund-Sayeed S, et al. Impact of cytosine methylation on DNA binding specificities of human transcription factors. Science. 2017;356(6337) Epub 2017/05/06.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hubel C, Marzi SJ, Breen G, Bulik CM. Epigenetics in eating disorders: a systematic review. Mol Psychiatry. 2018;24(6):901–15. Epub 2018/10/26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Forsberg SL, Ilieva M, Maria MT. Epigenetics and cerebral organoids: promising directions in autism spectrum disorders. Transl Psychiatry. 2018;8(1):14 Epub 2018/01/11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Turecki G, Ota VK, Belangero SI, Jackowski A, Kaufman J. Early life adversity, genomic plasticity, and psychopathology. Lancet Psychiatry. 2014;1(6):461–6 Epub 2015/09/12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Mill J, Heijmans BT. From promises to practical strategies in epigenetic epidemiology. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14(8):585–94 Epub 2013/07/03.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mathers CD, Loncar D. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med. 2006;3(11):e442 Epub 2006/11/30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Paus T, Keshavan M, Giedd JN. Why do many psychiatric disorders emerge during adolescence? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9(12):947–57 Epub 2008/11/13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Axelrud LK, Santoro ML, Pine DS, Talarico F, Gadelha A, Manfro GG, et al. Polygenic risk score for Alzheimer’s disease: implications for memory performance and hippocampal volumes in early life. Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175(6):555–63 Epub 2018/03/03.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Salum GA, Gadelha A, Pan PM, Moriyama TS, Graeff-Martins AS, Tamanaha AC, et al. High risk cohort study for psychiatric disorders in childhood: rationale, design, methods and preliminary results. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2015;24(1):58–73 Epub 2014/12/04.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goodman R, Ford T, Richards H, Gatward R, Meltzer H. The development and well-being assessment: description and initial validation of an integrated assessment of child and adolescent psychopathology. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2000;41(5):645–55 Epub 2000/08/18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA. Manual for the ASEBA School-age Forms & Profiles. Burlington: Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families, University of Vermont; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Almstrup K, Lindhardt Johansen M, Busch AS, Hagen CP, Nielsen JE, Petersen JH, et al. Pubertal development in healthy children is mirrored by DNA methylation patterns in peripheral blood. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28657 Epub 2016/06/29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Hannon E, Dempster E, Viana J, Burrage J, Smith AR, Macdonald R, et al. An integrated genetic-epigenetic analysis of schizophrenia: evidence for co-localization of genetic associations and differential DNA methylation. Genome Biol. 2016;17(1):176 Epub 2016/08/31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Maksimovic J, Phipson B, Oshlack A. A cross-package Bioconductor workflow for analysing methylation array data. F1000Res. 2016;5:1281 Epub 2017/04/26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Aryee MJ, Jaffe AE, Corrada-Bravo H, Ladd-Acosta C, Feinberg AP, Hansen KD, et al. Minfi: a flexible and comprehensive bioconductor package for the analysis of Infinium DNA methylation microarrays. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(10):1363–9 Epub 2014/01/31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Horvath S. DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol. 2013;14(10):R115 Epub 2013/10/22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Bell JT, Tsai PC, Yang TP, Pidsley R, Nisbet J, Glass D, et al. Epigenome-wide scans identify differentially methylated regions for age and age-related phenotypes in a healthy ageing population. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(4):e1002629 Epub 2012/04/26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Freire-Aradas A, Phillips C, Giron-Santamaria L, Mosquera-Miguel A, Gomez-Tato A, Casares de Cal MA, et al. Tracking age-correlated DNA methylation markers in the young. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018;36:50–9 Epub 2018/06/23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Calkins ME, Merikangas KR, Moore TM, Burstein M, Behr MA, Satterthwaite TD, et al. The Philadelphia neurodevelopmental cohort: constructing a deep phenotyping collaborative. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015;56(12):1356–69 Epub 2015/04/11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Fortin JP, Triche TJ Jr, Hansen KD. Preprocessing, normalization and integration of the Illumina HumanMethylationEPIC array with minfi. Bioinformatics. 2017;33(4):558–60 Epub 2016/12/31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Allen JD, Chen M, Xie Y. Model-based background correction (MBCB): R methods and GUI for Illumina Bead-array data. J Cancer Sci Ther. 2009;1(1):25–7 Epub 2009/01/01.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Du P, Zhang X, Huang CC, Jafari N, Kibbe WA, Hou L, et al. Comparison of Beta-value and M-value methods for quantifying methylation levels by microarray analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:587 Epub 2010/12/02.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Benjamini Y, Drai D, Elmer G, Kafkafi N, Golani I. Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research. Behav Brain Res. 2001;125(1–2):279–84 Epub 2001/10/30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Peters TJ, Buckley MJ, Statham AL, Pidsley R, Samaras K, Lord RV, et al. De novo identification of differentially methylated regions in the human genome. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2015;8:6. Epub 2015/05/15.

  29. Braun PR, Han S, Hing B, Nagahama Y, Gaul LN, Heinzman JT, et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation comparison between live human brain and peripheral tissues within individuals. Transl Psychiatry. 2019;9(1):47 Epub 2019/02/02.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang J, Duncan D, Shi Z, Zhang B. WEB-based GEne SeT AnaLysis Toolkit (WebGestalt): update 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Web Server issue):W77–83 Epub 2013/05/25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Souquet B, Abby E, Herve R, Finsterbusch F, Tourpin S, Le Bouffant R, et al. MEIOB targets single-strand DNA and is necessary for meiotic recombination. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(9):e1003784 Epub 2013/09/27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Cordero-Martinez J, Reyes-Miguel T, Rodriguez-Paez L, Garduno-Siciliano L, Maldonado-Garcia D, Roa-Espitia AL, et al. TMEM16A inhibition impedes capacitation and acquisition of hyperactivated motility in guinea pig sperm. J Cell Biochem. 2018;119(7):5944–59 Epub 2018/03/31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nilsson E, Dole G, Skinner MK. Neurotrophin NT3 promotes ovarian primordial to primary follicle transition. Reproduction. 2009;138(4):697–707 Epub 2009/07/09.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Da Ros M, Hirvonen N, Olotu O, Toppari J, Kotaja N. Retromer vesicles interact with RNA granules in haploid male germ cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2015;401:73–83 Epub 2014/12/09.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Medina-Rivera A, Santiago-Algarra D, Puthier D, Spicuglia S. Widespread enhancer Activity from Core promoters. Trends Biochem Sci. 2018;43(6):452–68 Epub 2018/04/21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kadoch C, Hargreaves DC, Hodges C, Elias L, Ho L, Ranish J, et al. Proteomic and bioinformatic analysis of mammalian SWI/SNF complexes identifies extensive roles in human malignancy. Nat Genet. 2013;45(6):592–601 Epub 2013/05/07.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Dias C, Estruch SB, Graham SA, McRae J, Sawiak SJ, Hurst JA, et al. BCL11A Haploinsufficiency causes an intellectual disability syndrome and dysregulates transcription. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;99(2):253–74 Epub 2016/07/28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang X, Novera W, Zhang Y, Deng LW. MLL5 (KMT2E): structure, function, and clinical relevance. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2017;74(13):2333–44 Epub 2017/02/12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dong S, Walker MF, Carriero NJ, DiCola M, Willsey AJ, Ye AY, et al. De novo insertions and deletions of predominantly paternal origin are associated with autism spectrum disorder. Cell Rep. 2014;9(1):16–23 Epub 2014/10/07.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen HF, Lin LN, Chen YX, Wan JX, Luo J, Zhang CZ, et al. Identification and functional analysis of variant haplotypes in the 5′-flanking region of protein phosphatase 2A-Bdelta gene. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35524 Epub 2012/04/28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Meyer MA. Highly expressed genes within hippocampal sector CA1: implications for the physiology of memory. Neurol Int. 2014;6(2):5388 Epub 2014/07/06.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Calais JB, Ojopi EB, Morya E, Sameshima K, Ribeiro S. Experience-dependent upregulation of multiple plasticity factors in the hippocampus during early REM sleep. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2015;122:19–27 Epub 2015/01/28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ramos-Lopez O, Riezu-Boj JI, Milagro FI, Martinez JA. Dopamine gene methylation patterns are associated with obesity markers and carbohydrate intake. Brain Behav. 2018;8(8):e01017 Epub 2018/07/13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Massari ME, Murre C. Helix-loop-helix proteins: regulators of transcription in eucaryotic organisms. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20(2):429–40 Epub 1999/12/28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Tunster SJ, Van de Pette M, HDJ C, Lefebvre L, John RM. Fetal growth restriction in a genetic model of sporadic Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Dis Model Mech. 2018;11(11). Epub 2018/08/31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Sullivan LC, Clements CS, Rossjohn J, Brooks AG. The major histocompatibility complex class Ib molecule HLA-E at the interface between innate and adaptive immunity. Tissue Antigens. 2008;72(5):415–24 Epub 2008/10/25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. GTEx Consortium. The genotype-tissue expression (GTEx) project. Nat Genet. 2013;45(6):580–5. Epub 2013/05/30.

  48. Chen B, Yang L, Zhang R, Gan Y, Zhang W, Liu D, et al. Hyperphosphorylation of RPS6KB1, rather than overexpression, predicts worse prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer patients. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0182891 Epub 2017/08/10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang Y, Mei H, Shao Q, Wang J, Lin Z. Association of ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 with cellular radiosensitivity of non-small lung cancer. Int J Radiat Biol. 2017;93(6):581–9 Epub 2017/03/10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hussaini SM, Choi CI, Cho CH, Kim HJ, Jun H, Jang MH. Wnt signaling in neuropsychiatric disorders: ties with adult hippocampal neurogenesis and behavior. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;47:369–83 Epub 2014/09/30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium. Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci. Nature. 2014;511(7510):421–7. Epub 2014/07/25.

  52. Jones PA. Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13(7):484–92 Epub 2012/05/30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Deaton AM, Webb S, Kerr AR, Illingworth RS, Guy J, Andrews R, et al. Cell type-specific DNA methylation at intragenic CpG islands in the immune system. Genome Res. 2011;21(7):1074–86 Epub 2011/06/02.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Johnson SC, Rabinovitch PS, Kaeberlein M. mTOR is a key modulator of ageing and age-related disease. Nature. 2013;493(7432):338–45 Epub 2013/01/18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Rosner M, Hanneder M, Siegel N, Valli A, Fuchs C, Hengstschlager M. The mTOR pathway and its role in human genetic diseases. Mutat Res. 2008;659(3):284–92 Epub 2008/07/05.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Han LKM, Aghajani M, Clark SL, Chan RF, Hattab MW, Shabalin AA, et al. Epigenetic aging in major depressive disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175(8):774–82 Epub 2018/04/17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Rizzo LB, Costa LG, Mansur RB, Swardfager W, Belangero SI, Grassi-Oliveira R, et al. The theory of bipolar disorder as an illness of accelerated aging: implications for clinical care and research. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;42:157–69 Epub 2014/02/20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Wilkinson LS, Davies W, Isles AR. Genomic imprinting effects on brain development and function. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8(11):832–43 Epub 2007/10/11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Peters J. The role of genomic imprinting in biology and disease: an expanding view. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15(8):517–30 Epub 2014/06/25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Alisch RS, Van Hulle C, Chopra P, Bhattacharyya A, Zhang SC, Davidson RJ, et al. A multi-dimensional characterization of anxiety in monozygotic twin pairs reveals susceptibility loci in humans. Transl Psychiatry. 2017;7(12):1282 Epub 2017/12/12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Hannon E, Lunnon K, Schalkwyk L, Mill J. Interindividual methylomic variation across blood, cortex, and cerebellum: implications for epigenetic studies of neurological and neuropsychiatric phenotypes. Epigenetics. 2015;10(11):1024–32 Epub 2015/10/13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Blanken LM, Mous SE, Ghassabian A, Muetzel RL, Schoemaker NK, El Marroun H, et al. Cortical morphology in 6- to 10-year old children with autistic traits: a population-based neuroimaging study. Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172(5):479–86 Epub 2015/01/15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Mous SE, Muetzel RL, El Marroun H, Polderman TJ, van der Lugt A, Jaddoe VW, et al. Cortical thickness and inattention/hyperactivity symptoms in young children: a population-based study. Psychol Med. 2014;44(15):3203–13 Epub 2014/07/30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Insel T, Cuthbert B, Garvey M, Heinssen R, Pine DS, Quinn K, et al. Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167(7):748–51 Epub 2010/07/03.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Hofstra MB, van der Ende J, Verhulst FC. Child and adolescent problems predict DSM-IV disorders in adulthood: a 14-year follow-up of a Dutch epidemiological sample. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002;41(2):182–9 Epub 2002/02/12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Jaffe AE, Irizarry RA. Accounting for cellular heterogeneity is critical in epigenome-wide association studies. Genome Biol. 2014;15(2):R31 Epub 2014/02/06.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Numata S, Ye T, Hyde TM, Guitart-Navarro X, Tao R, Wininger M, et al. DNA methylation signatures in development and aging of the human prefrontal cortex. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;90(2):260–72 Epub 2012/02/07.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The opinions, hypothesis, conclusions, and recommendations of this study are the responsibility of the authors, and are not necessarily representative of the opinion of the funding agencies. The authors are grateful to FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo), CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior); CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico), and the Center for Applied Genomics (CAG) for funding this research. The authors also thank the CAG team for performing the experimental work and Danilo Micali for creating Fig. 1. This is a study by the National Institute of Developmental Psychiatry for Children and Adolescents (INPD). The authors would like to thank the children, their families, and all INPD and CAG teams for their participation in this study.

Funding

This study was funded by FAPESP (grant numbers 2016/25374-9 and 2015/10733-0 as a scholarship for LMS; 2016/04983-7, 2014/07280-1, and 2017/05339-7 as a research project for JJM, SIB, and VKO, respectively), and CAPES (scholarship; Finance Code 001). HRC was funded by INPD and supported by CNPq (465550/2014-2) and FAPESP (2014/50917-0).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Genetics Division, Department of Morphology and Genetics, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Botucatu 740, Ed. Leitão da Cunha, Vila Clementino, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

    Leticia M. Spindola, Marcos L. Santoro, Vanessa K. Ota, Gabriela Xavier, Carolina M. Carvalho, Fernanda Talarico & Sintia I. Belangero

  2. LiNC - Laboratory of Integrative Neuroscience, UNIFESP, São Paulo, Brazil

    Leticia M. Spindola, Marcos L. Santoro, Pedro M. Pan, Vanessa K. Ota, Gabriela Xavier, Carolina M. Carvalho, Fernanda Talarico, Jair J. Mari, Ary Gadelha, Rodrigo A. Bressan & Sintia I. Belangero

  3. Department of Psychiatry, UNIFESP, São Paulo, Brazil

    Leticia M. Spindola, Marcos L. Santoro, Pedro M. Pan, Carolina M. Carvalho, Elisa Brietzke, Jair J. Mari, Ary Gadelha, Rodrigo A. Bressan & Sintia I. Belangero

  4. Center for Applied Genomics, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, USA

    Patrick Sleiman, Michael March, Renata Pellegrino & Hakon Hakonarson

  5. Brain Institute, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, Brazil

    Rodrigo Grassi-Oliveira

  6. Department of Psychiatry, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil

    Euripedes C. Miguel

  7. Department of Psychiatry, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil

    Luis A. Rohde & Giovanni A. Salum

  8. Center for Sleep and Circadian Neurobiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA

    Diego R. Mazzotti

  9. Center of Mathematics, Computing and Cognition, Universidade Federal do ABC, Santo André, Brazil

    João R. Sato

Authors
  1. Leticia M. Spindola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marcos L. Santoro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pedro M. Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vanessa K. Ota
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gabriela Xavier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Carolina M. Carvalho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Fernanda Talarico
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Patrick Sleiman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Michael March
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Renata Pellegrino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Elisa Brietzke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Rodrigo Grassi-Oliveira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Jair J. Mari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Ary Gadelha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Euripedes C. Miguel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Luis A. Rohde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Rodrigo A. Bressan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Diego R. Mazzotti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. João R. Sato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Giovanni A. Salum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Hakon Hakonarson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Sintia I. Belangero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The study was conceived and designed by LMS, MLS, PMP, VKO, HH, GAS, JRS, and SIB. HRC sample collection was performed by LMS, MLS, PMP, VKO, GX, CMC, FT, EB, RGO, JJM, AG, ECM, LAR, RAB, GAS, JRS, and SIB. Access to PNC data was supported by PS, MM, RP, and HH. Processing of PNC data was performed by LMS with support from PS, MM, RP, and HH. Statistical analysis was performed by LMS with support from MLS, DRM, and JRS. The manuscript was written by LMS with support from MLS and VKO. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sintia I. Belangero.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the National Commission for Research Ethics (CONEP–Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa–CAAE: 74563817.7.1001.5327) and the Ethics Committees from UFRGS, UNIFESP, and FMUSP. The Research Ethics Committee approved the research protocol. All parents and children/youth provided written informed consent before inclusion in this cohort.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

PMP received a Post-Doctoral Scholarship from CAPES (Finance Code 001). LAR has received grant or research support from, served as a consultant to, and served on the speakers’ bureau of Eli Lilly and Co., Janssen, Medice, Novartis, and Shire. The ADHD and Juvenile Bipolar Disorder Outpatient Programs chaired by LAR have received unrestricted educational and research support from the following pharmaceutical companies: Eli Lilly and Co., Janssen, and Novartis. LAR has received authorship royalties from Oxford Press and ArtMed and travel grants from Shire to take part in the 2018 APA annual meeting and from Novartis to take part of the 2016 AACAP annual meeting. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1:

Table S1. Description of CBCL total, internalizing and externalizing scores. Figure S1. Multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) plots colored by BeadChip number, BeadChip position and waves. Figure S2. PC1 x PC2 plot from principal components analysis generated from SNParray data. Figure S3. Line plot of chronological age between Wave 0 and Wave 1 for the 24 HRC individuals, grouped by gender. Figure S4. Scatter plot of the variation of cg08517799 DNA methylation values and the variation of RB1CC1 mRNA levels (rp = − 0.580; p = 0.005). Figure S5. Scatter plot of the variation of total score of CBCL and the variation of KMT2E mRNA levels (rp = 0.436; p = 0.042). Figure S6. Scatter plot of the variation of total score of CBCL and the variation of FAM217B mRNA levels (rp = 0.475; p = 0.025). Figure S7. Overview of the most significant differentially methylated region (DMR) and of its genomic context. Figure S8. Scatter plot of the variation of total score of CBCL and the variation of RPS6KB1 mRNA levels (rp = 0.442; p = 0.040). Figure S9. Plot of bisulfite conversion median value for each sample from High-Risk Cohort (HRC). Figure S10. Plot of bisulfite conversion median value for each sample from Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort (PNC). Figure S11. Error bar plot comparing blood cell type estimations (CD19+ B cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, granulocytes, CD14+ monocytes and CD56+ natural killer cells) between Wave 0 and Wave 1. Figure S12. Principal components analysis plot of the 24 HRC participants and of the population from 1000 genomes.

Additional file 2:

Table S2. The 100 top-ranked differentially methylated CpGs associated with dimensional psychopathology using all the CpG sites of the EPIC array and included covariates for batch effects. Table S3. The differentially methylated CpGs associated with chronological age in the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort (PNC). Table S4. The differentially methylated CpGs (DMPs) associated with the emergence of dimensional psychopathology using batch effects as covariates. Table S5. Overview of significant results from the enrichment analysis obtained using all genes for which the DMPs/DMRs were mapped to or near to the genes. Table S6. Statistics, beta fold change and adjusted p-values for the 663 differentially methylated CpGs (DMPs) associated with the emergence of dimensional psychopathology using batch effects and medication as covariates. Table S7. Gene expression results of genes for which the DMPs were mapped to or near to the genes. Table S8. DNA methylation correlation between brain and blood for DMPs mapped or near to differentially expressed genes. Correlation results are from IMAGE-CpG (Braun, P et al., 2019). Table S9. Information about correlations between: a) the variation of the DNA methylation of the differentially methylated positions (ΔDNAm) and the variation of the expression of genes that were differentially expressed in whole blood (ΔmRNA); b) the variation of the total score of CBCL (ΔCBCL) and ΔDNAm; and c) ΔCBCL and ΔmRNA. The variations were calculated subtracting wave 1 (W1) values from wave 0 (W0) values. Table S10. Differentially methylated regions from DMRCate analysis. Table S11. Gene expression results of genes for which the DMRs were mapped to or near to the genes. Table S12. DNA methytion correlation between brain and blood for CpG site from DMRs mapped or near to differentially expressed genes. Correlation results are from IMAGE-CpG (Braun, P et al., 2019).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spindola, L.M., Santoro, M.L., Pan, P.M. et al. Detecting multiple differentially methylated CpG sites and regions related to dimensional psychopathology in youths. Clin Epigenet 11, 146 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-019-0740-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-019-0740-z

Keywords

Clinical Epigenetics

ISSN: 1868-7083

Contact us