DNA methylation and gene expression of HIF3A: cross-tissue validation and associations with BMI and insulin resistance
- Ailsa Maria Main†1,
- Linn Gillberg†1, 2Email author,
- Anna Louisa Jacobsen1,
- Emma Nilsson1, 3,
- Anette Prior Gjesing4,
- Torben Hansen4,
- Oluf Pedersen4,
- Rasmus Ribel-Madsen1, 5 and
- Allan Vaag1, 2
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 25 July 2016
Accepted: 24 August 2016
Published: 2 September 2016
Associations between BMI and DNA methylation of hypoxia-inducible factor 3-alpha (HIF3A) in both blood cells and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) have been reported. In this study, we investigated associations between BMI and HIF3A DNA methylation in the blood and SAT from the same individuals, and whether HIF3A gene expression in SAT and skeletal muscle biopsies showed associations with BMI and insulin resistance. Furthermore, we aimed to investigate gender specificity and heritability of these traits.
We studied 137 first-degree relatives of type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients from 48 families, from whom we had SAT and muscle biopsies. DNA methylation of four CpG sites in the HIF3A promoter was analyzed in the blood and SAT by pyrosequencing, and HIF3A gene expression was analyzed in SAT and muscle by qPCR. An index of whole-body insulin sensitivity was estimated from oral glucose tolerance tests.
BMI was associated with HIF3A methylation at one CpG site in the blood, and there was a positive association between the blood and SAT methylation levels at a different CpG site within the individuals. The SAT methylation level did not correlate with HIF3A gene expression. Interestingly, HIF3A expression in SAT, but not in muscle, associated negatively with BMI and whole-body insulin resistance. We found a significant effect of familiality on HIF3A methylation levels in the blood and HIF3A expression levels in skeletal muscle.
Our findings are in line with the previously reported link between BMI and DNA methylation of HIF3A in the blood. The tissue-specific results of HIF3A gene expression indicate that SAT is the more functional tissue in which a low expression may adversely affect whole-body insulin sensitivity.
KeywordsEpigenetics Obesity Type 2 diabetes Heritability Insulin sensitivity
HIF3A belongs to the transcription factor family of hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) which regulate the cellular response to hypoxia . HIFs are dimers of an α-subunit (HIF-1α, HIF-2α, or HIF-3α) and a ß-subunit where complexes of HIF-3α are thought to oppose the actions of those formed by HIF-1α and HIF-2α [1, 2]. It has been shown that adipose tissue-specific Hif3a knockout mice are resistant to weight gain and have a better glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity . HIF-3α is highly expressed in adipocytes and acts as an accelerator of adipogenesis  and may also be involved in the regulation of glucose metabolism since it is upregulated by both insulin and 2-deoxy-d-glucose-induced glucoprivation .
The etiology of type 2 diabetes (T2D) consists of both genetic and environmental factors . One mechanism whereby environmental factors can contribute to T2D is epigenetics. Epigenetics is the study of heritable changes in DNA that affect gene transcription irrespective of the DNA sequence, such as methylation of DNA cytosine residues (mainly CpG sites) . Twin studies indicated that both environmental and heritable factors affect epigenetic modifications . Other studies have shown that epigenetic patterns can be changed by age [9, 10] and environmental factors such as diet and exercise [11–14]. Methylation of gene promoter regions can lead to silencing of gene expression whereas DNA methylation in intron-spanning regions of the gene body may result in alternative splicing .
A genome-wide study of DNA methylation found positive associations between BMI and DNA methylation levels of three sites in the first intron of HIF3A in whole blood from 479 individuals of both genders and in subcutaneous adipose tissue from 635 women . Aside from the relation between methylation status and BMI, these results also underline the potency in whole blood DNA methylation profiling as a marker for epigenetic changes in other human tissues [9, 16]. For one of the investigated CpG sites, the methylation level was inversely associated with HIF3A gene expression in adipose tissue. Recently, other studies replicated the findings of BMI-associated DNA methylation of HIF3A in the blood from men and women [17, 18] and in adipose tissue where the association was only significant in women .
In this study of 137 first-degree relatives of T2D patients from 48 families, our aim was to determine whether HIF3A methylation in the blood and SAT, and HIF3A gene expression in SAT and skeletal muscle, are associated with BMI and whole-body insulin sensitivity. Furthermore, we aimed to investigate if these associations are gender specific and whether these traits are heritable.
Study design and population
One hundred and thirty-seven Danish individuals (51 men and 86 women) from 48 different families were recruited in 2005–2007 as part of the EUGENE2 Consortium study population . They were all first-degree relatives of patients with T2D. The subjects were recruited regardless of their own current glucose tolerance status. In total, there were 48 families represented by one member (n = 13), two (n = 12), three (n = 10), four (n = 5), five (n = 4), six (n = 2), eight (n = 1), or ten members (n = 1). Twenty-six individuals had T2D of which nine received insulin treatment and were asked to discontinue their treatment 12 h in advance of the clinical examination . The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (KA 05041g, 21-04-2005). All participants signed a consent form after written and oral information.
A standard 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed in the morning in the fasting state  in all participants, and blood samples were drawn before and 30, 60, and 120 min after ingestion of the glucose load. Plasma glucose and insulin levels were measured in all samples. Glucose tolerance status was determined based on WHO guidelines . Whole-body insulin sensitivity was estimated from fasting plasma glucose and insulin levels by calculating the Matsuda insulin sensitivity index [19, 21].
Subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) biopsies from the abdomen and skeletal muscle biopsies from the vastus lateralis muscle were taken with a Bergström needle, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C until analysis . For both biopsies, Xylocain (20 mg/ml) was used as a local anesthetic.
DNA methylation analysis
Genomic DNA was extracted from SAT using QIAamp DNA Mini Kits (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and from whole blood using blood QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kits (Qiagen)
The PyroMark PCR kit (Qiagen) was used to amplify the bisulfite-converted DNA according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and PCR amplicons were visualized after electrophoresis through a GelRed-stained 3 % agarose gel. The PyroMark Q96 Vacuum Workstation (Qiagen) was used for preparation of the samples, and pyrosequencing was performed with the Pyromark Q96 ID Instrument (Qiagen). The data was analyzed using the PyroMark Q96 software v.18.104.22.168 and validated manually. Samples with unreliable methylation results were re-run (uncertainties due to baseline shift, low signal-to-noise ratio, low peak height, and large peak height deviation at positions that were close to the CpG sites analyzed). All DNA methylation results from the re-run that did not meet the quality criteria were excluded. The final analysis is based on 105–108 individuals in the blood and 83–84 individuals in SAT (Additional file 1: Table S1).
Gene expression analysis
Total RNA from SAT (n = 137) was extracted with the miRNeasy Kit (Qiagen) and converted to complementary DNA (cDNA) by the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Grand Island, NY, USA). Total RNA was extracted from muscle tissue (n = 129) using TRI Reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and converted to cDNA using the QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen) . The HIF3A gene expression in both tissues was determined by quantitative real-time PCR on a ViiA 7 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using SYBR® Green RT-PCR Reagents Kit (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) and primers specific for HIF3A messenger RNA (mRNA) (NM_152794, forward primer: 5′-CTTTCTGCTCTTTCCTCTCAGC-3′, reverse primer: 5′-GCTCATTCAGGTTCAGGAGTG-3, Tag Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark). The HIF3A mRNA quantity was normalized to the mRNA expression of the housekeeping gene HPRT1 (forward primer: 5′-TGACCTTGATTTATTTTGCATACC-3′, reverse primer: 5′-CGAGCAAGACGTTCAGTCCT-3′). Each sample was run in duplicates, and we used the ΔΔCt method for quantification of mRNA levels. mRNA results with Ct values above 33 cycles or a Ct difference >0.35 on duplicates were re-run (SAT HPRT1: 34 samples; SAT HIF3A: 0; skeletal muscle HPRT1, HIF3A: 0), and samples still exceeding the cut-offs after re-analysis were excluded. The final analysis is based on 117 individuals in SAT and 120 individuals in skeletal muscle (Additional file 1: Table S1).
The data was analyzed by a linear mixed model in R version 3.1.0 (http://www.r-project.org) with family number as a random factor and sex, age, BMI, and HbA1c as fixed factors in all models. All components of the mixed model were checked for distribution normality by evaluation of histograms. Factors that did not show normal distribution were transformed by natural logarithm. Residuals from the mixed model analyses were checked for normality by qq-plots. Furthermore, all analyses were run separately for each sex and without inclusion of T2D patients. The results from the mixed models are presented as β (effect estimate) with 95 % confidence intervals and P values. For logarithmically transformed variables, β corresponds to percentage change. P values ≤0.05 were considered significant. Spearman’s correlations (r) were used to analyze associations between methylation levels. Using the SOLAR software (solar-eclipse-genetics.org), the influence of familiality (i.e., genetic and shared environmental effects combined) on DNA methylation and gene expression of HIF3A was estimated from a polygenic model as the proportion of the additive genetic variation and shared environmental effects on the total variation (the variance component approach). In the SOLAR models, familiality of HIF3A DNA methylation and gene expression was adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and HbA1c levels.
Anthropometrical and metabolic characteristics of the family population
Men (n = 51)
Women (n = 86)
53.8 ± 12.0
53.9 ± 10.7
90.7 ± 16.8
76.3 ± 15.9
177.2 ± 7.9
165.8 ± 6.4
28.8 ± 3.8
27.90 ± 6.0
Glucose tolerance status
NGT (normal glucose tolerance)
26 (51 %)
61 (71 %)
IFG (impaired fasting glucose)
3 (6 %)
4 (5 %)
IGT (impaired glucose tolerance)
10 (20 %)
7 (8 %)
T2D (type 2 diabetes mellitus)
12 (24 %)
14 (16 %)
Fasting glucose (mmol/l)
6.9 ± 3.0
6.0 ± 2.1
Fasting insulin (pmol/l)
54.3 ± 35.5
46.2 ± 41.0
5.8 ± 1.3
5.7 ± 1.0
Whole-body insulin sensitivity
6.27 ± 4.06
8.73 ± 5.29
HIF3A DNA methylation in the blood and SAT
Several individuals showed a methylation level of zero on CpG site 1 (16 individuals, 19 %) and CpG site 3 in SAT (26 individuals, 31 %).
There were no significant differences in HIF3A DNA methylation levels between T2D patients and non-diabetics.
HIF3A methylation levels in the blood
HIF3A DNA methylation levels at CpG sites 2 and 4 in the blood were significantly higher in women compared to men (Fig. 2a). At CpG site 1, we found a significant positive association between BMI and DNA methylation (cg22891070: β = 0.263 (0.023; 0.502) P = 0.03). The association between BMI and HIF3A methylation at CpG site 1 persisted when T2D patients were excluded (β = 0.354 (0.111; 0.597) P = 0.004).
No significant associations between BMI and HIF3A methylation were detected in women or men separately, and we found no associations between whole-body insulin sensitivity and the level of HIF3A DNA methylation in the blood for any of the four examined methylation sites.
HIF3A methylation levels in SAT
In SAT, we found no significant effect of sex on HIF3A DNA methylation (Fig. 2b).
Also, we found no significant association between BMI and HIF3A methylation in SAT in all individuals or in women or men separately for any of the four CpG sites. However, after exclusion of T2D individuals, methylation at CpG site 3 showed a significant association with BMI (β = 0.304 (0.006; 0.602) P = 0.05).
HIF3A DNA methylation in SAT did not show significant associations with the estimate of whole-body insulin sensitivity.
Association between DNA methylation and gene expression in SAT
DNA methylation levels of the four investigated CpG sites in the HIF3A promoter did not show any significant association with the HIF3A gene expression level in SAT.
HIF3A mRNA expression
HIF3A gene expression in SAT
Gene expression of HIF3A in SAT was negatively associated with BMI in all individuals (β = −2.858 % (−5.351; −0.30) P = 0.030) and in women alone (β = −3.052(−5.918; −0.20) P = 0.039). This association was not found in SAT from men alone.
Whole-body insulin sensitivity was significantly associated with SAT HIF3A gene expression when corrected for sex, age, BMI, and HbA1c (β = 1.813 (0.483; 3.144) P = 0.008). The positive association between whole-body insulin sensitivity and HIF3A gene expression persisted after exclusion of T2D patients (β = 1.985 (0.398; 3.573) P = 0.014). When stratified for sex, the association was significant in men (β = 2.415 (0.843; 3.987) P = 0.003), but not in women (P = 0.12).
SAT HIF3A expression levels were not significantly different in men (0.82 ± 0.48) and women (0.74 ± 0.42) or between T2D patients (0.70 ± 0.64) and non-diabetics (0.79 ± 0.39).
HIF3A skeletal muscle gene expression
In skeletal muscle, the gene expression of HIF3A was similar in women (1.07 ± 0.48) and men (0.93 ± 0.32). HIF3A gene expression in skeletal muscle tissue was not significantly associated with BMI. The gene expression levels in skeletal muscle did not show any significant association with whole-body insulin sensitivity.
Skeletal muscle HIF3A expression levels were not significantly different in T2D patients (0.95 ± 0.39) and non-diabetics (1.04 ± 0.44).
Finally, the gene expression level of HIF3A in skeletal muscle was significantly associated with the gene expression level of HIF3A in SAT (β = 0.16 (0.027; 0.30) P = 0.017).
Familiality of DNA methylation and gene expression of HIF3A
Familiality (%) of HIF3A DNA methylation and gene expression
Blood (h 2 %)
SAT (h 2 %)
Skeletal muscle (h 2 %)
HIF3A DNA methylation
CpG 1 (cg22891070)
56 ± 25
55 ± 37
61 ± 27
44 ± 34
CpG 3 (cg16672562)
64 ± 24
34 ± 39
51 ± 26
41 ± 33
HIF3A gene expression
12 ± 20
43 ± 21
In line with previous studies, our current Danish study of 137 first-degree relatives of T2D patients showed the same positive association between BMI and HIF3A DNA promoter methylation in the blood. This association was also present in SAT among non-diabetic participants. We also found an association between DNA methylation on one site in the blood and SAT from the same individuals, which is in line with the previous proposals of whole blood DNA methylation profiling as a marker for epigenetic changes in other human tissues [9, 16]. The methylation level was not associated with HIF3A gene expression in SAT. The gene expression level was negatively associated with BMI and interestingly also positively with insulin sensitivity independent of BMI. This finding suggests that SAT is a putative functional tissue for Hif3a with the derived potential implications for metabolic diseases.
Positive associations between BMI and HIF3A methylation in the blood have been demonstrated in men and women [16–18], whereas the association between BMI and HIF3A methylation in SAT only has been shown in females [9, 16]. We used a mixed-sex population, and we did not find any sex-specific difference in the association between BMI and DNA methylation in the blood or SAT when men and women were studied separately. The HIF3A DNA methylation level in the blood, however, was higher in women than in men at two of the four CpG sites.
By including individuals from the same families, we were able to estimate the influence of familiality (genetic and shared environment effects) on DNA methylation of HIF3A. Interestingly, DNA methylation levels in the blood showed a relatively high level of familiality (51–64 %), and the DNA methylation pattern in SAT showed borderline significant estimates of familiality. Hence, the heritability and thereby potential genetic influence on HIF3A DNA methylation in the blood is at the same magnitude as that seen for obesity and T2D [6, 22]. A recent epidemiological study suggested a strong influence of vitamins B2 and B12 intake on the methylation level of the HIF3A locus, providing an example of one, potentially among several, environmental factors influencing HIF3A DNA methylation levels .
The possible physiological importance of HIF3A in SAT was highlighted by our novel findings of significant negative associations between HIF3A expression in SAT and both BMI and whole-body insulin resistance. The association with BMI was predominantly driven by the female participants whereas the association with whole-body insulin sensitivity was significant in men, but not in women. Taken together, our results point to a regulation of SAT HIF3A expression by BMI that is most predominant in women. On the other hand, the putative impact of SAT HIF3A expression on glucose metabolism seems more pronounced in men. Even though T2D and non-diabetic individuals did not show alternating gene expression levels, the exclusion of T2D patients did not change the association between HIF3A mRNA expression levels in SAT and whole-body insulin sensitivity. This suggests that the association is present already in early stages of insulin resistance in peripheral tissues.
In line with our findings, it has previously been demonstrated that a lower expression level of HIF3A in adipocytes renders these cells less mature and less able to take up fatty acids  which could infer insulin resistance in peripheral tissues like skeletal muscle. No significant associations between muscle HIF3A expression and BMI or insulin sensitivity were demonstrated pointing towards SAT as a putative functional tissue for HIF3A.
We were not able to replicate the previously reported inverse association between a HIF3A promoter methylation and HIF3A gene expression in SAT . Also, we found no significant effect of familiality on HIF3A expression in SAT. In the muscle, we demonstrated a significant effect of familiality on the HIF3A expression which suggests tissue differences of genetic regulation of HIF3A in the muscle and SAT. However, we found a positive association between HIF3A gene expression levels in the SAT and skeletal muscle suggesting some degree of co-regulation.
The number of participants in our study was lower than in the study by Dick et al. where the blood from 479 individuals of both genders and SAT from 635 women were included and this may explain why we could only just replicate the associations between BMI and HIF3A methylation. Methylation data from SAT were only available from a subset, and tissue from several individuals showed no methylation. This may have lowered the statistical power of our association analyses and familiality estimates in the SAT compared to the blood. A major strength of our study population is, however, the detailed phenotypic characterization that allowed an integrative physiological assessment, including insulin action, of the molecular findings. Causality, however, could not be examined in the present cross-sectional study design. Also, our study population had a higher risk of T2D by being first-degree relatives of T2D patients, and this may therefore not be representative of a random population. However, this fact may increase the relevance of the present findings for the understanding of the mechanisms underlying the development of T2D.
Our findings are in line with the previously reported positive association between BMI and HIF3A methylation in the human blood. In the adipose tissue, however, we did not find significant positive associations between HIF3A methylation and BMI or whole-body insulin sensitivity. Furthermore, we provide novel insights into the tissue-specific regulation of HIF3A expression. Our findings point to a role of SAT, but not muscle, HIF3A expression for whole-body insulin sensitivity, with insulin-resistant individuals having the lowest expression levels. Further studies are needed to increase our understanding of the role of HIF3A in metabolic disease.
M Modest and L S Koch, Steno Diabetes Center, provided technical support for the experiments. We are especially thankful for all the study participants.
Funding for this project was received from The Danish Council for Independent Research, The Danish Diabetes Academy supported by the Novo Nordisk Foundation, Region Hovedstaden, Augustinus Fonden, The Danish Strategic Research Council, P. Carl Petersens fond, Steno Diabetes Center, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences at Copenhagen University.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets obtained and analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
AV, TH, and OP made substantial contributions to conception and design of the human studies. AMM, LG, ALJ, EN, and RR-M made substantial contributions to the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data. APG analyzed the familiality. AMM, LG, RR-M, and AV wrote the paper, and all authors read, revised, and approved the final manuscript.
AMM, LG., ALJ, EN, and APG declare that they have no competing interests. TH, OP, RR-M, and AV hold stock shares in Novo Nordisk A/S.
Consent for publication
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (KA 05041g, 21-04-2005). All participants signed a consent form after written and oral information.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Girgis CM, Cheng K, Scott CH, Gunton JE. Novel links between HIFs, type 2 diabetes, and metabolic syndrome. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2012;23:372–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heikkila M, Pasanen A, Kivirikko KI, Myllyharju J. Roles of the human hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-3alpha variants in the hypoxia response. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2011;68:3885–901.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jiang C, Qu A, Matsubara T, Chanturiya T, Jou W, Gavrilova O, Shah YM, Gonzalez FJ. Disruption of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 in adipocytes improves insulin sensitivity and decreases adiposity in high-fat diet-fed mice. Diabetes. 2011;60:2484–95.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hatanaka M, Shimba S, Sakaue M, Kondo Y, Kagechika H, Kokame K, Miyata T, Hara S. Hypoxia-inducible factor-3alpha functions as an accelerator of 3T3-L1 adipose differentiation. Biol Pharm Bull. 2009;32:1166–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heidbreder M, Qadri F, Johren O, Dendorfer A, Depping R, Frohlich F, Wagner KF, Dominiak P. Non-hypoxic induction of HIF-3alpha by 2-deoxy-D-glucose and insulin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;352:437–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Willemsen G, Ward KJ, Bell CG, Christensen K, Bowden J, Dalgard C, Harris JR, Kaprio J, Lyle R, Magnusson PK, et al. The Concordance and Heritability of Type 2 Diabetes in 34,166 Twin Pairs From International Twin Registers: The Discordant Twin (DISCOTWIN) Consortium. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2015;18:762–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bird A. Perceptions of epigenetics. Nature. 2007;447:396–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ribel-Madsen R, Fraga MF, Jacobsen S, Bork-Jensen J, Lara E, Calvanese V, Fernandez AF, Friedrichsen M, Vind BF, Hojlund K, et al. Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation differences in muscle and fat from monozygotic twins discordant for type 2 diabetes. PLoS One. 2012;7:e51302.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ronn T, Volkov P, Gillberg L, Kokosar M, Perfilyev A, Jacobsen AL, Jorgensen SW, Brons C, Jansson PA, Eriksson KF, et al. Impact of age, BMI and HbA1c levels on the genome-wide DNA methylation and mRNA expression patterns in human adipose tissue and identification of epigenetic biomarkers in blood. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(13):3792–813.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johansson A, Enroth S, Gyllensten U. Continuous aging of the human DNA methylome throughout the human lifespan. PLoS One. 2013;8:e67378.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Jacobsen SC, Brons C, Bork-Jensen J, Ribel-Madsen R, Yang B, Lara E, Hall E, Calvanese V, Nilsson E, Jorgensen SW, et al. Effects of short-term high-fat overfeeding on genome-wide DNA methylation in the skeletal muscle of healthy young men. Diabetologia. 2012;55:3341–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brons C, Jacobsen S, Nilsson E, Ronn T, Jensen CB, Storgaard H, Poulsen P, Groop L, Ling C, Astrup A, Vaag A. Deoxyribonucleic acid methylation and gene expression of PPARGC1A in human muscle is influenced by high-fat overfeeding in a birth-weight-dependent manner. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:3048–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ronn T, Volkov P, Davegardh C, Dayeh T, Hall E, Olsson AH, Nilsson E, Tornberg A, Dekker Nitert M, Eriksson KF, et al. A six months exercise intervention influences the genome-wide DNA methylation pattern in human adipose tissue. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003572.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gillberg L, Jacobsen SC, Ronn T, Brons C, Vaag A. PPARGC1A DNA methylation in subcutaneous adipose tissue in low birth weight subjects--impact of 5 days of high-fat overfeeding. Metabolism. 2014;63:263–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jones PA. Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13:484–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dick KJ, Nelson CP, Tsaprouni L, Sandling JK, Aissi D, Wahl S, Meduri E, Morange PE, Gagnon F, Grallert H, et al. DNA methylation and body-mass index: a genome-wide analysis. Lancet. 2014;383:1990–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang S, Song J, Yang Y, Zhang Y, Wang H, Ma J. HIF3A DNA methylation is associated with childhood obesity and alt. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0145944.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Demerath EW, Guan W, Grove ML, Aslibekyan S, Mendelson M, Zhou YH, Hedman AK, Sandling JK, Li LA, Irvin MR, et al. Epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) of BMI, BMI change and waist circumference in African American adults identifies multiple replicated loci. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24:4464–79.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gillberg L, Jacobsen S, Ribel-Madsen R, Gjesing AP, Boesgaard TW, Ling C, Pedersen O, Hansen T, Vaag A. Does DNA methylation of PPARGC1A influence insulin action in first degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes? PLoS One. 2013;8:e58384.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organization, 2006. Definition and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and intermediate. hyperglycemia. Report of a WHO/IDF Consultation. [https://www.idf.org/webdata/docs/WHO_IDF_definition_diagnosis_of_diabetes.pdf].
- Matsuda M, DeFronzo RA. Insulin sensitivity indices obtained from oral glucose tolerance testing: comparison with the euglycemic insulin clamp. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:1462–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Allison DB, Kaprio J, Korkeila M, Koskenvuo M, Neale MC, Hayakawa K. The heritability of body mass index among an international sample of monozygotic twins reared apart. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1996;20:501–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huang T, Zheng Y, Qi Q, Xu M, Ley SH, Li Y, Kang JH, Wiggs J, Pasquale LR, Chan AT, et al. DNA methylation variants at hif3a locus, b-vitamin intake, and long-term weight change: gene-diet interactions in two U.S. Cohorts. Diabetes. 2015;64:3146–54.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar