Skip to main content
Download PDF

Regulation of oxytocin receptor gene expression in obsessive–compulsive disorder: a possible role for the microbiota-host epigenetic axis

Clinical Epigenetics volume 14, Article number: 47 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) is a prevalent and severe clinical condition. Robust evidence suggests a gene-environment interplay in its etiopathogenesis, yet the underlying molecular clues remain only partially understood. In order to further deepen our understanding of OCD, it is essential to ascertain how genes interact with environmental risk factors, a cross-talk that is thought to be mediated by epigenetic mechanisms. The human microbiota may be a key player, because bacterial metabolites can act as epigenetic modulators. We analyzed, in the blood and saliva of OCD subjects and healthy controls, the transcriptional regulation of the oxytocin receptor gene and, in saliva, also the different levels of major phyla. We also investigated the same molecular mechanisms in specific brain regions of socially isolated rats showing stereotyped behaviors reminiscent of OCD as well as short chain fatty acid levels in the feces of rats.

Results

Higher levels of oxytocin receptor gene DNA methylation, inversely correlated with gene expression, were observed in the blood as well as saliva of OCD subjects when compared to controls. Moreover, Actinobacteria also resulted higher in OCD and directly correlated with oxytocin receptor gene epigenetic alterations. The same pattern of changes was present in the prefrontal cortex of socially-isolated rats, where also altered levels of fecal butyrate were observed at the beginning of the isolation procedure.

Conclusions

This is the first demonstration of an interplay between microbiota modulation and epigenetic regulation of gene expression in OCD, opening new avenues for the understanding of disease trajectories and for the development of new therapeutic strategies.

Background

Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) is a psychiatric condition responsible for a significant impairment of daily functioning and reduction in quality of life, for both patients and their caregivers [1,2,3].

Available treatments for OCD are, as yet partially effective, psychotherapy and medications [4]. Of note, only one-third of people seek help for their OCD, and less than 10% receive evidence-based treatment [5, 6]. Moreover, OCD patients might present themselves in a relatively healthy way when compared to subjects with other psychiatric conditions, and diagnostic criteria might not be effective for subjects with subthreshold symptoms [7]. Additional research is thus urgently needed to elucidate the pathophysiology and the neurobiological bases of OCD. As yet, many studies have focused on the inherited component of OCD. However, the available data identifying DNA sequence-based causes are inconclusive with sometimes conflicting results [8]. Environmental risk factors (e.g., stressful life events, trauma and impoverished social context), known to be relevant in the development of OCD [9,10,11], can modify genes transcription regulation via epigenetic mechanisms [12]. How epigenetics might play a role in OCD has been already investigated in previous clinical studies comparing subjects with the disorder and healthy controls. For instance, Yue et al. [13] found that 2190 genes were differentially methylated in OCD. In particular, differential DNA methylation has been reported for gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor subunit 1 (GABBR1) in blood samples at birth and for myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) genes at the time of diagnosis [14]. Also, lower DNA methylation and higher DNA hydroxymethylation have been reported in OCD patients [15]. Finally, lower methylation levels were observed at oxytocin receptor (OXTR) exon 2 [16], whereas higher levels have been reported at exon 3 [17, 18] in OCD. All the above-mentioned studies were performed on blood samples. Interestingly, a few studies have reported changes in genes regulation in saliva, where significantly higher DNA methylation levels were observed in the first intron of the SLC6A4 (serotonin transporter) gene in pediatric OCD patients compared to healthy controls and adult OCD patients [19]. Again, the OXTR gene was found to be epigenetically modulated, but in this case at the level of the first intron [20].

Epigenetic events in the cells are driven by endogenous metabolites responsible for the activity of all those enzymes needed for dynamic epigenetic modifications [21]. In the last few years, research started to investigate how gut microbiota metabolism may regulate the concentration and/or activity of metabolites in the host that lead to altered epigenetic marks [22,23,24]. The possibility of a microbiota-host epigenetic axis is thus attracting growing attention [25]. Such an axis needs to be interrogated also in mental illnesses, where the role of the gut microbiome appears particularly relevant [26, 27]. This is particularly true for OCD, where an impact of gut bacteria has been suggested [28,29,30].

Against this background, here we decided to further interrogate the epigenetic regulation of OXTR in OCD by analyzing its transcriptional regulation in both blood and saliva patients’ samples, evaluating in the latter also the distribution of the major bacterial phyla, compared to healthy subjects. In particular, we ascertained the role of gene DNA methylation and of oral microbiota in driving a potentially different modulation due to the disorder. It should be recalled that recent research is focusing on saliva samples as a valuable alternative to blood for molecular assays, also because some salivary components derive indeed from blood [31, 32]. Moreover, saliva collection is clearly less invasive and without the risks potentially occurring when using blood [33]. Remarkably, good quality DNA can be easily isolated from saliva and used not only for genetic studies [34] but also for epigenetic analysis [35,36,37,38,39]. Finally, salivary microbiota is stable enough for analysis of its composition, partly overlaps with gut microbiota and is affected by diet and lifestyle [40, 41]. Unsurprisingly, studies are now pointing out on the link between microbiota of mouth and gut of humans, and an “oral–gut axis” has been recently proposed [42]. In order to corroborate human data, we also analyzed molecular outcomes in socially isolated rats displaying, during a critical developmental window, behavioral abnormalities that might be evocative of certain behavioral symptoms are shown by OCD patients. We thus explored the transcriptional regulation of OXTR gene at central level (in the amygdala, hypothalamus and prefrontal cortex) as well as fecal short chain fatty acid levels.

Methods and materials

Subjects

A total of 64 patients (30 women and 34 men; age: 38.03 ± 13.77) followed up at the OCD tertiary outpatient Clinic of the University Department of Psychiatry of Milan, Luigi Sacco Hospital, were included in the study. Diagnoses were assessed by the administration of a semi-structured interview based on DSM-5 criteria (SCID 5 research version, RV) [43]. In case of psychiatric comorbidity, OCD had to be the primary disorder and illness severity was measured through the Yale-Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale [44]. The presence of medical condition and/or drug abuse represented exclusion criteria. All patients were for at least one month on stable pharmacological treatment chosen according to international guidelines in the field [4]. A total of 51 age and sex-matched controls (31 women and 20 men; age: 37.22 ± 13.48) were volunteers without any psychiatric disorder, as determined by the nonpatient edition of the SCID and no positive family history for major psychiatric disorders in the first-degree relatives [45]. All subjects had given their written informed consent to participate in the study, which included the use of personal and clinical data as well as blood drawing for genotyping and methylation analysis. The study protocol had been previously approved by the local Ethics Committee. Demographic and clinical characteristics for the OCD subjects as well as psychotropics used are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Socio-demographic and clinical features of OCD patients
Full size table

Animal model of social isolation

Female Wistar rats (Charles River, Calco (Lecco) Italy), weighing 250 ± 15 g, were mated overnight. Food and water were available ad libitum. Pregnant rats were singly housed in Macrolon cages (40 (length) × 26(width) × 20 (height) cm), under controlled conditions (temperature 20–21 °C, 55–65% relative humidity and 12/12 h light cycle with lights on at 07:00 h). On postnatal day (PND) 1, the litters were culled to eight animals (six males and two females), to reduce the litter size-induced variability in the growth and development of pups during the postnatal period. The experiments were carried out on the male offspring. On PND 21, the pups were weaned and randomly housed either one per cage (ISO group) or three per cage (CTRL group). The sample size was based on our previous experiments and power analysis performed with the software G power. The experiments were performed in agreement with the Animals in Research: Reporting in vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines [46, 47], with the guidelines released by the Italian Ministry of Health (D.L. 26/14) and the European Community Directive 2010/63/EU.

After weaning at PND 21, ISO rats were housed individually for five weeks (from PND 21 to PND 54), while CTRL rats were housed in groups of three animals per cage for the same period (Fig. 1). Animals from both experimental groups performed behavioral tests at PNDs 55–58. At T0 (one day before isolation), T1 (one week after isolation), T2 (three weeks after isolation) and T3 (five weeks after isolation) fecal samples were collected and immediately stored at − 80 °C until use. At PND 61, rats were rapidly decapitated, their brains were removed and immediately frozen.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic representation of the experimental design that was used to investigate the effects of social isolation in rats. Behavioral and molecular analysis was conducted at the indicated time points

Full size image

Details of the behavioral tests performed (Open Field, Hole-board, Elevated plus maze and Forced Swim) are described in Additional file 1.

Molecular studies

Nucleic acids were isolated from dissected rats brain regions (amygdala, hypothalamus and prefrontal cortex) and from human PBMCs, as previously described [48], to analyze mRNA abundance and DNA methylation levels of OXTR (see Figs. 2a and Additional file 1: Fig. S1 for analyzed sequences). Genomic DNA from saliva samples was prepared using a modified version of the salting-out method as described previously [49, 50]. Details for the analysis of genes expression and microbiota using human and rat genomic materials are reported in Additional file 1.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Transcriptional regulation of OXTR gene in PBMCs of OCD and control (CTRL) subjects. a Schematic representation of human OXTR gene. Translation start codon (ATG), exons and introns are depicted. Coding regions of exons are shown darker. Sequence of the CpG island under study is also reported. Bold text indicates the 4 CpG sites analyzed; b OXTR mRNA levels in PBMCs from patients diagnosed with OCD and CTRL subjects. Scattered plots represent 2 (−DDCt) values calculated by the DDCt method [****p < 0.001]; c OXTR exon III DNA methylation levels in PBMCs of OCD and CTRL subjects represented as scattered plot for individual CpG sites under study as well as of the average (AVE) of the 4 CpG sites [*p < 0.05]; d correlation between OXTR gene expression and % change of DNA methylation in the overall human population under study. Data were compared by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient

Full size image

Analysis of DNA methylation

As previously described [15] 500 ng of DNA from each purified sample was subjected to bisulfite modification using the EZ DNA Methylation-GoldTM Kit (Zymo Research, Orange, CA, USA), inducing chemical conversion of unmethylated cytosine residues to uracil. The DNA methylation status of each CpG site in OXTR CpG island was assessed using a pyrosequencing assay. The schematic representation of the CpG islands under study at OXTR human and rat genes is shown in Fig. 2a and Additional file 1: Fig. S1, whereas the exact locations of the CpG sites analyzed are reported in Additional file 1: Table S2. DNA, after bisulfite treatment, was first amplified by PyroMark PCR Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with a biotin labeled primer (Hs_OXTR_01_PM PyroMark CpG assay, PM00016821; Rn_Oxtr_02_PM PyroMark CpG assay, PM00546546) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. PCR conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 15 min, followed by 45 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 57 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s and, finally, 72 °C for 10 min. Specificity of PCR products was then verified by electrophoresis. The sequencing was performed on a PyroMark Q24 ID using Pyro Mark Gold reagents (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), after immobilizing the amplified product to Streptavidin Sepharose High-Performance (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) beads via biotin affinity and denatured to allow the annealing with the sequencing primer. DNA methylation level was analyzed through the PyroMark Q24 ID version 1.0.9 software which calculates the methylation percentage mC/(mC + C) (mC = methylated cytosine, C = unmethylated cytosine) for each CpG site, allowing quantitative comparisons. The quantitative methylation results were expressed both as a percentage of every single CpG site and as the average of the methylation percentage of all the 4 CpG sites under study.

Evaluation of short chain fatty acid levels

SCFAs extracted from rat fecal samples and samples derivatization for LC–MS/MS analysis were carried out following the method described by Han et al. [51] and Liebisch et al. [52] with slight modifications. Details are reported in Additional file 1.

Statistical analysis

All results were expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical differences in both human and animal samples were determined using GraphPad Prism® 8 (Graph-Pad Software, San Diego, CA). Data from the behavioral experiments in rats were analyzed with Student’s t-tests.

Changes in gene expression (OXTR mRNA levels and phyla quantification) and SCFA levels were analyzed using nonparametric Mann–Whitney test. DNA methylation at each CpG site was analyzed using the Mann–Whitney test and Sidak–Bonferroni correction was used for the multiple comparisons. All the data were compared by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. The P-values < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Human studies

Molecular analysis performed in PBMCs

We report a significant downregulation of OXTR mRNA levels in PBMCs of OCD subjects when compared to healthy controls (OCD: 0.35 ± 0.05; CTRL: 1.10 ± 0.10; p < 0.0001) (Fig. 2b) and, consistently, a significant increase in OXTR DNA methylation within gene exon III in OCD subject at CpG site 4 (OCD: 7.10 ± 0.56; CTRL: 4.75 ± 0.42; p = 0.036) and in the average of the 4 CpG sites investigated (OCD: 5.21 ± 0.32; CTRL: 3.74 ± 0.15; p = 0.006) (Fig. 2c). An inverse correlation between gene expression (2(−DDCt) values) and DNA methylation considering the average of all the CpG sites analyzed was also observed (Spearman’s r = − 0.364, p = 0.032) (Fig. 2d). Moreover, stratifying data according to gender, we show a lower DNA methylation at CpG site 4 in PBMC of OCD men when compared to women (men: 5.65 ± 0.66; women: 8.47 ± 0.76; p = 0.045) (Additional file 1: Fig. S3a).

Molecular analysis performed in saliva

A significant increase of OXTR DNA methylation levels in OCD patients compared to healthy subjects was observed again both at CpG site 4 (OCD: 6.76 ± 0.40; CTRL: 4.64 ± 0.58; p = 0.037) and in the average of the 4 CpG sites investigated (OCD:4.43 ± 0.31; CTRL: 2.95 ± 0.27; p = 0.021) (Fig. 3a). A significant positive correlation between the percentage of DNA methylation levels in PBMCs and in saliva, considering the AVE of the 4 CpG sites (Spearman correlation analysis: r = 0.649; p = 0.004) (Fig. 3b), was observed. In OCD women, levels in DNA methylation in the average of the 4 CpG sites were higher compared with respective matching healthy controls (OCD: 4.58 ± 0.35; CTRL: 3.33 ± 0.27; p = 0.049) (Additional file 1: Fig S3e). Moreover, the epigenetic mark significantly directly correlates with years from disease onset (r = 0.298; p = 0.043) (Additional file 1: Fig. S3g) and age in OCD patients (r = 0.338 , p = 0.029) but not in healthy controls (Additional file 1: Table S5). Finally, DNA methylation does not result altered when comparing subjects under any pharmacological treatment with drug-naïve patients (Additional file 1: Fig. S4) and no correlation was observed between OXTR DNA methylation and Y-BOCS values (Additional file 1: Table S6).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Transcriptional regulation of OXTR gene in saliva of OCD and control (CTRL) subjects. a DNA methylation levels of OXTR exon III in human saliva samples of OCD and CTRL subjects represented as scattered plot for individual CpG sites under study as well as of the average (AVE) of the 4 CpG sites [*p < 0.05]; b Spearman correlation analysis between AVE of DNA methylation from PBMCs (x-axis) and from saliva (y-axis)

Full size image

Microbiota characterization in saliva

The quantification of major phyla using rRNA-gene-based PCR is reported in Fig. 4a–e. A selective increase in Actinobacteria (CTRL: 1.30 ± 0.13; OCD: 2.97 ± 0.25; p < 0.0001, Mann–Whitney test) and Firmicutes (CTRL: 1.19 ± 0.11; OCD: 1.41 ± 0.09; p = 0.026) was observed in OCD subjects when compared to healthy individuals. No differences were observed in Bacteroidetes (CTRL: 1.57 ± 0.19; OCD: 1.81 ± 0.21; p = 0.706), Proteobacteria (CTRL: 2.56 ± 0.58; OCD: 17.13 ± 5.66; p = 0.079) and Fusobacteria (CTRL: 2.58 ± 0.56; OCD: 2.03 ± 0.42; p = 0.563). Moreover, it was observed a significant decrease in Fusobacteria to Actinobacteria ratio in OCD patients compared to controls (CTRL: 2.90 ± 0.72; OCD: 0.86 ± 0.44; p = 0.025. Figure not shown). No differences have been observed in Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio in OCD and controls (CTRL: 2.16 ± 0.46; OCD: 2.13 ± 0.48; p = 0.902. Figure not shown). We also observed a significant correlation between the levels of DNA methylation (AVE) and the abundance of Actinobacteria (expressed as 2(-DDCt) value) (r = 0.302, p = 0.016) (Fig. 4f), but not between the epigenetic mark and Firmicutes levels (r = 0.085, p = 0.498).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Relative abundance of the bacterial phyla (a Actinobacteria, b Bacteroidetes, c Firmicutes, d Proteobacteria, e Fusobacteria) quantified in the saliva of OCD and CTRL groups. Scattered plots represent 2(−DDCt) values; f Spearman correlation analysis between DNA methylation AVE levels of the 4 CpG sites under study in saliva (y-axis) and relative abundance of Actinobacteria (x-axis). ****p < 0.0001, *p < 0.05 vs CTRL

Full size image

Rat studies

Open field test

The two experimental groups did not differ in locomotor activity (crossing: t = 1.58, p = 0.13, df = 14; data not shown). The ISO rats showed an anxious-like phenotype compared to CTRL animals, as they spent less time in the center (t = 4.31, p < 0.001, df = 14; Fig. 5a) and more time on the peripheral parts of the arena compared to CTRL rats (t = 4.81, p < 0.001, df = 14; data not shown). Moreover, ISO rats showed stereotypic behaviors as they displayed a higher frequency of wall rearing (t = 9.56, p < 0.001, df = 14; Fig. 5b) compared to CTRL rats. There were no significant differences between ISO and CTRL rats in rearing frequency (t = 1.87, p = 0.081, df = 14; data not shown).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Behavioral and molecular analysis in ISO rats. a ISO rats (n = 8) housed individually for five weeks (from PND 21 to PND 54, ISO) showed an anxious-like phenotype in the open field test, as they spent less time in the center of the arena compared to CTRL animals (n = 8). Moreover, ISO rats showed stereotypic behaviors as they displayed a higher frequency of wall rearing (b) and more head dippings in the hole-board test (c); d–g Oxtr relative gene expression in the AM, PFC, HYP and DStr of ISO and CTRL rats. Scattered plots represent 2 (−DDCt) values calculated by the DDCt method [** p < 0.01]; h–j correlations between Oxtr expression and behavioral outcomes. Data were compared by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient

Full size image

Hole-board test

The ISO rats showed stereotyped behaviors in the hole-board test; in fact, they made more head dippings (t = 4.69, p < 0.001, df = 14; Fig. 5c) compared to the CTRL group.

No differences were found between ISO and CTRL rats in the forced swim and elevated plus-maze tests (see Additional file 1: Fig. S5a–f).

Molecular analysis performed in brain tissues

Overall changes in Oxtr mRNA levels are reported in Fig. 5d–g. Statistical analysis showed that 5 weeks of social isolation determined selective changes of Oxtr gene expression in the prefrontal cortex (ISO: 0.55 ± 0.10, CTRL: 1.10 ± 0.20; p = 0.007, Fig. 5e). No significant differences between ISO and CTRL rats were observed in the other brain regions analyzed (Fig. 5d, f, g). Moreover, in the PFC, we report significant correlations between Oxtr gene expression changes and performance in the open field (time center percentage: Spearman's r = 0.554, p = 0.035; wall rearing frequency: Spearman's r = − 0.521, p = 0.040) and hole-board test (number of head dipping: Spearman's r = − 0.613, p = 0.017) (Fig. 5 h-j). No differences in DNA methylation of the Oxtr CpG island in the PFC of ISO rats with respect to controls (Additional file 1: Fig. S5g) as well as no correlation between the gene expression and DNA methylation were observed (Additional file 1: Fig. S5h).

Microbiota characterization in feces

The levels of the main bacterial phyla are reported in Fig. 6a–d. A selective decrease was observed in Actinobacteria in ISO animals when compared to CTRL group (CTRL: 1.38 ± 0.38; ISO: 0.49 ± 0.07; p = 0.049) (Fig. 6a). No differences were observed in Bacteroidetes (CTRL: 1.28 ± 0.32; OCD: 1.45 ± 0.14; p = 0.46), Firmicutes (CTRL: 1.33 ± 0.37; OCD: 0.81 ± 0.11; p = 0.44) and Proteobacteria (CTRL: 1.24 ± 0.39; OCD: 0.95 ± 0.24; p = 0.48) (Fig. 6b–d), whereas it was not possible a quantitative detection of Fusobacteria in the rat stool by qPCR.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Relative abundance of the bacterial phyla (a Actinobacteria, b Bacteroidetes, c Firmicutes, d Proteobacteria) quantified in the feces of ISO (n = 8) and CTRL (n = 8) rats collected at social isolation time point T1. Scattered plots represent 2 (−DDCt) values calculated by the DDCt method. Concentration of fecal total SCFA (e) and butyrate (f) quantified using fecal samples collected at social isolation time point T1. ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05 vs CTRL group

Full size image

Evaluation of short chain fatty acid levels in feces

The SCFA content was quantified using fecal samples collected at different social isolation time points (T0, T1, T2 and T3) and measuring total SCFAs, as well as acetate, propionate, butyrate and valerate levels (Additional file 1: Table S7). Total SCFA levels were significantly reduced one week after isolation (T1) in ISO rats feces when compared to CTRL group (CTRL: 38.92 ± 7.42; ISO: 20.83 ± 3.59; p = 0.049) (Fig. 6e). Moreover, a significant decrease of butyrate concentration was observed in the same experimental group at the same time point (CTRL: 11.65 ± 1.54; ISO: 6.69 ± 1.35; p = 0.049) (Fig. 6f), whereas acetate, propionate and valerate levels were not affected by social isolation. Consistently, a correlation between SCFA levels and the behavioral outcomes was also observed considering both experimental groups at T1 (Additional file 1: Table S8). Further data analysis is reported in Additional file 1: Section (Additional file 1: Tables S9 and S10).

Discussion

The first main outcome of this investigation is that we observe an altered transcriptional regulation of the OXTR gene in biological samples from OCD patients when compared to healthy controls. OXTR binds to its endogenous nonapeptide ligand oxytocin that is associated with several social behaviors and emotional regulation as well as to mood disorders [53,54,55]. The gene coding for OXTR, located on human chromosome 3p25.3 [56, 57], is expressed both in the brain and within peripheral organs. The OXTR gene spans 17 kilobytes (kb) and contains 3 introns and 4 exons. Exons 1 and 2 correspond to non-coding regions, while exons 3 and 4 encode for the OXTR involved in the activation of different second messengers in the cell [58]. Moreover, we report higher DNA methylation levels at specific CpG sites in exon 3 of OXTR in PBMCs collected from OCD patients, when compared to controls. A similar hypermethylation in blood collected from OCD patients has been already reported a few years ago [17], and more recently by Schiele et al. [18].

Several environmental factors, such as stress and adverse early life experiences, have been blamed for causing OCD [59,60,61,62], and remarkably OXTR DNA methylation at exon 3 has been suggested to be responsive to the environment [63,64,65]. For instance, higher DNA methylation at two CpG sites located within exon 3 has been reported in child abused [63]. Trier social stress test induces rapid increase in OXTR DNA methylation, again within exon 3, going back to normal levels 90 min after the test [64]. Adverse early life experience, as low childhood maternal care, has also been associated with increased OXTR exon 3 DNA methylation in adults [65]. Moreover, besides OCD, OXTR DNA methylation at exon 3 has been associated with other central nervous system disorders such as anxiety disorder [66], autism spectrum disorder [67], depression [68] and psychopathy [69]. Among the CpG sites we here investigated, we report, in particular, a key role for the one we named CpG site 4. Of interest, Unternaehrer and colleagues reported for the same CpG site an increase in DNA methylation evoked by stress [64]. Of note, based on PROMO database (http://alggen.lsi.upc.es/cgi-bin/promo_v3/promo/promoinit.cgi?dirDB=TF_8.3), it is possible to identify putative transcription factors binding to this CpG site, such as T3R-beta1, TFII-I, STAT4, E2F-1, c-Ets-1, Elk-1 and GR-alpha. Further studies are needed to specifically define their role in OXTR gene regulation. However, it is also needed to address whether an altered DNA methylation status might become fixed or respond to new and positive environmental stimuli over time, and this could be of particular relevance for OXTR gene level in OCD when alterations are evoked during developmentally sensitive time-periods.

Others already reported reduction in OXTR gene expression in patients with mental disorders, for instance a decrease in autism cases [67] and in schizophrenia patients [70] in brain regions involved in social cognition. OXTR expression was found significantly higher also in peripheral blood lymphocytes of first episode schizophrenia patients [71], and in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of individuals with major depression and bipolar disorder [72].

The same pattern of changes in the epigenetic mark occurs in DNA obtained from saliva samples of OCD patients and healthy controls, and there is a significant correlation between these alterations and those observed in blood. Altered DNA methylation in saliva of OCD patients, yet at different CpG sites at OXTR gene (specifically in intron 1), was also observed very recently by others [20]. We thus confirm previous reported OXTR hypermethylation at exon 3 in OCD patients in blood and observed for the first time this epigenetic modulation in saliva. It should be mentioned that the correlation between blood and saliva DNA methylation has not always been reported, due to the high variability in individual cellular composition, even at different time points [73], overall affecting the proportion of white blood cells and buccal keratinocytes [74, 75]. However, the use of saliva samples to evaluate DNA methylation as biomarker has been already suggested, for example, for borderline personality disorder [76], schizophrenia [77], stress [78] or as a predictor of childhood obesity [79]. In terms of epigenetic modifications, it has been reported that there is higher correlation between saliva and brain tissues when compared to brain and blood [80].

Moreover, we show that alterations in the epigenetic mark seem to be larger in women then in men, an observation that is in line with other studies reporting a higher sensitivity in female compared to male subjects along with a sex-specificity of the OXT system [81]. There is also a positive correlation between the increase in the levels of the epigenetic mark and the age in OCD patients, but not in healthy controls, as well as the years from OCD onset in patients but not the rate of severity measured by Y-BOCS. These data might suggest that alteration of the molecular outcome is connected with the progression of the disease but not with its severity. Finally, in subjects under any pharmacological treatment the epigenetic mark was not affected when compared to drug-naïve patients, in agreement with a previous report by Cappi and co-workers [17].

Last but not least, we analyzed the microbiota in OCD saliva samples, specifically focusing on the expression of the major phyla. Nowadays dysregulation of the gut–brain axis has been recognized as a new area of research to better understand the pathophysiology of mental illnesses [82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90]. In the same way, the human oral microbiota has become a new research area aimed at promoting the progress of disease diagnosis, complementing disease treatment, and developing personalized medicines. Disturbance to the oral microbiota has been found to be associated not only with infectious oral diseases but also with systemic diseases [91], and it might function as potential biomarker for several human conditions [41, 91,92,93,94,95]. Bacteria in the mouth can reach the brain under particular conditions, for instance when permeability of the blood–brain barrier is higher [96], thus exposing the brain to bacterial metabolites [97]. We here show a selectively higher relative abundance in Actinobacteria phylotype in saliva samples from OCD patients, when compared to healthy controls, without changes for the other phyla analyzed. Similar alterations in saliva Actinobacteria levels have been previously reported in children with autism spectrum disorder [98], and increased levels of Actinobacteria were also reported in fecal material of patients suffering from major depressive disorder [99,100,101] and bipolar disorder [101] patients, when compared to controls.

We also show a lower Fusobacteria to Actinobacteria ratio in OCD cases when compared to controls, consistently with what it has been very recently reported [102]. Within the phylum of Actinobacteria, a relevant role is played by Bifidobacteria known to produce folate which, beside its relevance in many metabolic pathways, is crucial for the production of S-adenosylmethionine. The latter in turn is a methyl-donating substrate for DNA methyltransferases [103], and thus, it contributes to DNA methylation [104]. Interestingly, we here report a significant correlation between the increase in DNA methylation at OXTR gene and that in the expression of Actinobacteria. We also observed higher levels of Firmicutes phylotype in OCD subjects compared to controls, albeit to a lesser extent. However, no differences between the two groups were observed in Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio, widely accepted as relevant in maintaining normal intestinal as well as mouth homeostasis [105]. Moreover, these changes were not correlated with the alterations observed in OXTR DNA methylation, differently from what observed for Actinobacteria. These preliminary results add information to the relationship between host epigenome and gut microbiome, suggesting how they might influence each other and might impact on OCD.

In line with the clinical data, we also evaluated the role of central Oxtr transcriptional regulation in rats socially isolated for 5 weeks that showed stereotyped behaviors reminiscent of OCD. Alterations in the oxytocinergic system might thus be induced by social isolation, and this also resulted in anxious and somewhat stereotypic, OCD-like behaviors. Besides peripheral release, oxytocin acts within the brain as a neurotransmitter playing a pivotal role in numerous social behaviors [106,107,108,109,110]. Consistently with the human data, we report the down-regulation of Oxtr gene expression selectively in the PFC of socially-isolated rats and this alteration correlates with anxiety-like as well as stereotyped behaviors displayed by the animals. The PFC abundantly expresses Oxtr [111,112,113,114] and contains oxytocin sensitive neurons [115], receiving projections from the hypothalamus [116, 117]. Moreover, a brain imaging study reported higher Oxtr methylation associated with increased brain activity in cortical areas involved in social perception [118]. Interestingly, we also observe a reduction in feces levels of both butyrate and total SCFA at early stages of the social isolation procedure and these are correlated with the alterations we observe in Oxtr gene expression, even if not significantly. Butyrate inhibits histone deacetylases (HDACs) activity; thus, it might be hypothesized that, in socially isolated rats where butyrate is reduced, the involvement of another epigenetic mark, with the recruitment of HDACs, might be involved contributing to the reduction in the transcriptional activity. We also report a reduction in rat feces of actinobacteria, known to promote butyrate production [119]. It should be noticed that this microbiota modulation in rat feces is opposite to the one observed in human saliva. This might be due of course to the different matrix as well to the different organism investigated and it would reflect the potentially different epigenetic mechanism involved as we here propose. In fact, in rats we do not observe any change in gene DNA methylation and this might support what stated above.

Study limitations

One limitation of the present study is that post-weaning social isolation is not an animal model of OCD [120]. Studies showed that social isolation in rodents has a negative impact on cognitive flexibility [121,122,123,124]), even if others reported increased cognitive flexibility in rats socially isolated [125]. However, since our aim was to address epigenetic regulation of gene transcription, we decided to use socially isolated rats as an environmental animal model, where we definitively observed certain behavioral abnormalities, such as stereotypic-like behaviors in the hole-board test, which anyhow may only be evocative of certain behavioral symptoms showed by OCD patients. Another limitation of our study is that we did not use female rats. However, most of the studies on the impact of social isolation on oxytocin system have been carried out on male rodents [126], further investigations would be needed to address potential sex-related differences.

Regarding human data, future studies are needed to investigate the possible impact on the microbiome of confounding factors. Indeed, the microbiome has shown to be influenced by dietary habits, smoking, body mass index, physical exercise and lifestyle factors [127] that have not been assessed in the present study. Moreover, it would be interesting to compare patients with different OCD phenotypes (not recorded in the present study), considering their potential indirect impact on the microbiome (e.g., patient with contamination obsessions might have particular food restrictions that ultimately influence the microbiome).

Conclusions

Our data confirm the relevance of OXTR gene regulation in OCD and support the possible role of microbiota-derived metabolites as potential biomarkers for early diagnosis and prognosis of OCD as already suggested for other diseases [128]. The use of saliva samples to collect genomic material in OCD patients is a relevant strategy allowing an easier analysis also considering different ages (children, elderly) and/or sensitive subjects. It is indeed important to recall that OCD is characterized by contamination fears and that associated with blood withdrawal is often present [129]. Moreover, the use of saliva would allow to easily collect multiple samples at different time points [130, 131], giving the opportunity to monitor the development of the disease. Finally, the animal data definitely corroborate the clinical ones at central level and further point out to a possible microbiota-host epigenetic axis.

Availability of data and materials

The data used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Abbreviations

OCD:

Obsessive–compulsive disorder

OXTR:

Oxytocin receptor gene

GABR1:

Gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor subunit 1

MOG:

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein

BDNF:

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor

SLC6A4:

Serotonin transporter

SCID:

Semi-structured interview based on DSM-5 criteria

PND:

Postnatal day

ISO:

Social isolation

T0:

One day before isolation

T1:

One week after isolation

T2:

Three weeks after isolation

T3:

Five weeks after isolation

PBMC:

Peripheral blood mononuclear cell

PFC:

Prefrontal cortex

AM:

Amygdala

HYP:

Hypothalamus

DStr:

Dorsal striatum

SCFA:

Short chain fatty acid

CpG:

Cytosine-phosphate-guanine

References

  1. Fontenelle IS, Fontenelle LF, Borges MC, Prazeres AM, Rangé BP, Mendlowicz MV, et al. Quality of life and symptom dimensions of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2010;179:198–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dell’Osso B, Altamura AC, Mundo E, Marazziti D, Hollander E. Diagnosis and treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder and related disorders. Int J Clin Pract. 2007;61:98–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5 Diagnostic Classification. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 2013.

  4. Koran LM, Simpson HB. Guideline watch (March 2013): Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. APA Practice Guidelines. 2013.

  5. Levy HC, McLean CP, Yadin E, Foa EB. Characteristics of individuals seeking treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Behav Ther. 2013;44:408–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. García-Soriano G, Rufer M, Delsignore A, Weidt S. Factors associated with non-treatment or delayed treatment seeking in OCD sufferers: a review of the literature. Psychiatry Res. 2014;220:1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. De Bruijn C, Beun S, De Graaf R, Ten Have M, Denys D. Subthreshold symptoms and obsessive-compulsive disorder: evaluating the diagnostic threshold. Psychol Med. 2010;40:989–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bellia F, Vismara M, Annunzi E, Cifani C, Benatti B, Dell’Osso B, et al. Genetic and epigenetic architecture of obsessive–compulsive disorder: in search of possible diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. J Psychiatr Res. 2021;137:554–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Faravelli C. Childhood stressful events, HPA axis and anxiety disorders. World J Psychiatry. 2012;2:13–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Gothelf D, Aharonovsky O, Horesh N, Carty T, Apter A. Life events and personality factors in children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder and other anxiety disorders. Compr Psychiatry. 2004;45:192–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Morina N, Sulaj V, Schnyder U, Klaghofer R, Müller J, Martin-Sölch C, et al. Obsessive-compulsive and posttraumatic stress symptoms among civilian survivors of war. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16:115.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Jaenisch R, Bird A. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: How the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat Genet. 2003;33(Suppl):245–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yue W, Cheng W, Liu Z, Tang Y, Lu T, Zhang D, et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis in obsessive-compulsive disorder patients. Sci Rep. 2016;6:31333.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Nissen JB, Hansen CS, Starnawska A, Mattheisen M, Børglum AD, Buttenschøn HN, et al. DNA methylation at the neonatal state and at the time of diagnosis: preliminary support for an association with the estrogen receptor 1, gamma-aminobutyric acid B receptor 1, and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein in female adolescent patients with OCD. Front Psychiatry. 2016;7:35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. D’Addario C, Bellia F, Benatti B, Grancini B, Vismara M, Pucci M, et al. Exploring the role of BDNF DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation in patients with obsessive compulsive disorder. J Psychiatr Res. 2019;114:17–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Park CIL, Kim HW, Jeon S, Kang JI, Kim SJ. Reduced DNA methylation of the oxytocin receptor gene is associated with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Clin Epigenetics. 2020;12:101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Cappi C, Diniz JB, Requena GL, Lourenço T, Lisboa BCG, Batistuzzo MC, et al. Epigenetic evidence for involvement of the oxytocin receptor gene in obsessive-compulsive disorder. BMC Neurosci. 2016;17:79.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Schiele MA, Thiel C, Kollert L, Fürst L, Putschin L, Kehle R, et al. Oxytocin receptor gene DNA methylation: a biomarker of treatment response in obsessive-compulsive disorder? Psychother Psychosom. 2021;90:57–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Grünblatt E, Marinova Z, Roth A, Gardini E, Ball J, Geissler J, et al. Combining genetic and epigenetic parameters of the serotonin transporter gene in obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Psychiatr Res. 2018;96:209–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Siu MT, Goodman SJ, Yellan I, Butcher DT, Jangjoo M, Grafodatskaya D, et al. DNA methylation of the oxytocin receptor across neurodevelopmental disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2021;51:3610–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Katada S, Imhof A, Sassone-Corsi P. Connecting threads: epigenetics and metabolism. Cell. 2012;148:24–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Krautkramer KA, Kreznar JH, Romano KA, Vivas EI, Barrett-Wilt GA, Rabaglia ME, et al. Diet-microbiota interactions mediate global epigenetic programming in multiple host tissues. Mol Cell. 2016;64:982–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Aleksandrova K, Romero-Mosquera B, Hernandez V. Diet, gut microbiome and epigenetics: emerging links with inflammatory bowel diseases and prospects for management and prevention. Nutrients. 2017;9:962.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Romano KA, Martinez-del Campo A, Kasahara K, Chittim CL, Vivas EI, Amador-Noguez D, et al. Metabolic, epigenetic, and transgenerational effects of gut bacterial choline consumption. Cell Host Microbe. 2017;22:279-290.e7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Miro-Blanch J, Yanes O. Epigenetic regulation at the interplay between gut microbiota and host metabolism. Front Genet. 2019;10:638.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Spichak S, Bastiaanssen TFS, Berding K, Vlckova K, Clarke G, Dinan TG, et al. Mining microbes for mental health: determining the role of microbial metabolic pathways in human brain health and disease. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021;125:698–761.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Foster JA, McVey Neufeld KA. Gut-brain axis: how the microbiome influences anxiety and depression. Trends Neurosci. 2013;36:305–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Turna J, Grosman Kaplan K, Anglin R, Van Ameringen M. “What’s bugging the Gut in OCD?” A review of the gut microbiome in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Depress Anxiety. 2016;33:171–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rees JC. Obsessive-compulsive disorder and gut microbiota dysregulation. Med Hypotheses. 2014;82:163–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Turna J, Grosman Kaplan K, Anglin R, Patterson B, Soreni N, Bercik P, et al. The gut microbiome and inflammation in obsessive-compulsive disorder patients compared to age- and sex-matched controls: a pilot study. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020;142:337–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Aps JKM, Martens LC. Review: The physiology of saliva and transfer of drugs into saliva. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;150:119–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chiappin S, Antonelli G, Gatti R, De Palo EF. Saliva specimen: A new laboratory tool for diagnostic and basic investigation. Clin Chim Acta. 2007;383:30–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Henson BS, Wong DT. Collection, storage, and processing of saliva samples for downstream molecular applications. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, NJ). 2010;666:21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Abraham JE, Maranian MJ, Spiteri I, Russell R, Ingle S, Luccarini C, et al. Saliva samples are a viable alternative to blood samples as a source of DNA for high throughput genotyping. BMC Med Genomics. 2012;5:19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Bruinsma FJ, Joo JE, Wong EM, Giles GG, Southey MC. The utility of DNA extracted from saliva for genome-wide molecular research platforms. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11:8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Chuang YH, Paul KC, Bronstein JM, Bordelon Y, Horvath S, Ritz B. Parkinson’s disease is associated with DNA methylation levels in human blood and saliva. Genome Medicine. 2017;9:76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Murata Y, Fujii A, Kanata S, Fujikawa S, Ikegame T, Nakachi Y, et al. Evaluation of the usefulness of saliva for DNA methylation analysis in cohort studies. Neuropsychopharmacology Reports. 2019;39:301–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Nishitani S, Parets SE, Haas BW, Smith AK. DNA methylation analysis from saliva samples for epidemiological studies. Epigenetics. 2018;13:352–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Wikenius E, Moe V, Smith L, Heiervang ER, Berglund A. DNA methylation changes in infants between 6 and 52 weeks. Sci Rep. 2019;9:17587.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Belstrøm D. The salivary microbiota in health and disease. J Oral Microbiol. 2020;12:1723975.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Franzosa EA, Morgan XC, Segata N, Waldron L, Reyes J, Earl AM, et al. Relating the metatranscriptome and metagenome of the human gut. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:E2329–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Kastl AJ, Terry NA, Wu GD, Albenberg LG. The structure and function of the human small intestinal microbiota: current understanding and future directions. CMGH. 2020;9:33–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. First MB, Reed GM, Hyman SE, Saxena S. The development of the ICD-11 Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines for Mental and Behavioural Disorders. World Psychiatry. 2015;14:82–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Goodman WK, Price LH, Rasmussen SA, Mazure C, Fleischmann RL, Hill CL, et al. The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale: I. Development, use, and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989;46:1006–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Maxwell JAJ, Maxwell. A Model for qualitative research design. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. 2013;62.

  46. Kilkenny C, Browne W, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Animal research: reporting in vivo experiments: the ARRIVE guidelines. Br J Pharmacol. 2010;160:1557–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. PercieduSert N, Hurst V, Ahluwalia A, Alam S, Avey MT, Baker M, et al. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animal research. Br J Pharmacol. 2020;177:3617–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Pucci M, Di Bonaventura MVM, Vezzoli V, Zaplatic E, Massimini M, Mai S, et al. Preclinical and clinical evidence for a distinct regulation of mu opioid and type 1 cannabinoid receptor genes expression in obesity. Front Genet. 2019;10:523.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Aidar M, Line SRP. A simple and cost-effective protocol for DNA isolation from buccal epithelial cells. Braz Dent J. 2007;18:148–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Goode MR, Cheong SY, Li N, Ray WC, Bartlett CW. Collection and extraction of saliva DNA for next generation sequencing. J Vis Exp. 2014;2014: 517697.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Han J, Lin K, Sequeira C, Borchers CH. An isotope-labeled chemical derivatization method for the quantitation of short-chain fatty acids in human feces by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta. 2015;854:86–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Liebisch G, Ecker J, Roth S, Schweizer S, Öttl V, Schött HF, et al. Quantification of fecal short chain fatty acids by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry—investigation of pre-analytic stability. Biomolecules. 2019;9:121.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Hollander E, Bartz J, Chaplin W, Phillips A, Sumner J, Soorya L, et al. Oxytocin increases retention of social cognition in autism. Biol Psychiat. 2007;61:498–503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Cyranowski JM, Hofkens TL, Frank E, Seltman H, Cai HM, Amico JA. Evidence of dysregulated peripheral oxytocin release among depressed women. Psychosom Med. 2008;70:967–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Kirsch P. Oxytocin in the socioemotional brain: implications for psychiatric disorders. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2015;17:463–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Kimura T, Tanizawa O, Mori K, Brownstein MJ, Okayama H. Structure and expression of a human oxytocin receptor. Nature. 1992;356:526–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Mizumoto Y, Kimura T, Ivell R. A genomic element within the third intron of the human oxytocin receptor gene may be involved in transcriptional suppression. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1997;135:129–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Gimpl G, Fahrenholz F. The oxytocin receptor system: structure, function, and regulation. Physiol Rev. 2001;81:629–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Adams TG, Kelmendi B, Brake CA, Gruner P, Badour CL, Pittenger C. The role of stress in the pathogenesis and maintenance of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Chronic Stress. 2018;2:2470547018758043.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Brooks SJ, Naidoo V, Roos A, Foucheá JP, Lochner C, Stein DJ. Early-life adversity and orbitofrontal and cerebellar volumes in adults with obsessive-compulsive disorder: voxel-Based morphometry study. Br J Psychiatry. 2016;208:34–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Grisham JR, Fullana MA, Mataix-Cols D, Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Poulton R. Risk factors prospectively associated with adult obsessive-compulsive symptom dimensions and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychol Med. 2011;41:2495–506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Visser HA, Van Minnen A, Van Megen H, Eikelenboom M, Hoogendoorn AW, Kaarsemaker M, et al. The relationship between adverse childhood experiences and symptom severity, chronicity, and comorbidity in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2014;75:1034–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Smearman EL, Almli LM, Conneely KN, Brody GH, Sales JM, Bradley B, et al. Oxytocin receptor genetic and epigenetic variations: association with child abuse and adult psychiatric symptoms. Child Dev. 2016;87:122–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Unternaehrer E, Luers P, Mill J, Dempster E, Meyer AH, Staehli S, et al. Dynamic changes in DNA methylation of stress-associated genes (OXTR, BDNF) after acute psychosocial stress. Transl Psychiatry. 2012;2: e150.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Unternaehrer E, Meyer AH, Burkhardt SCA, Dempster E, Staehli S, Theill N, et al. Childhood maternal care is associated with DNA methylation of the genes for brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and oxytocin receptor (OXTR) in peripheral blood cells in adult men and women. Stress. 2015;18:451–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Ziegler C, Dannlowski U, Bräuer D, Stevens S, Laeger I, Wittmann H, et al. Oxytocin receptor gene methylation: converging multilevel evidence for a role in social anxiety. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015;40:1528–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Gregory SG, Connelly JJ, Towers AJ, Johnson J, Biscocho D, Markunas CA, et al. Genomic and epigenetic evidence for oxytocin receptor deficiency in autism. BMC Med. 2009;7:62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Chagnon YC, Potvin O, Hudon C, Préville M. DNA methylation and single nucleotide variants in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and oxytocin receptor (OXTR) genes are associated with anxiety/depression in older women. Front Genet. 2015;6:230.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Dadds MR, Moul C, Cauchi A, Dobson-Stone C, Hawes DJ, Brennan J, et al. Methylation of the oxytocin receptor gene and oxytocin blood levels in the development of psychopathy. Dev Psychopathol. 2014;26:33–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Uhrig S, Hirth N, Broccoli L, von Wilmsdorff M, Bauer M, Sommer C, et al. Reduced oxytocin receptor gene expression and binding sites in different brain regions in schizophrenia: a post-mortem study. Schizophr Res. 2016;177:59–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Yang X, Tang Y, Wei Q, Lang B, Tao H, Zhang X, et al. Up-regulated expression of oxytocin mRNA in peripheral blood lymphocytes from first-episode schizophrenia patients. Oncotarget. 2017;8:78882–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Lee MR, Sheskier MB, Farokhnia M, Feng N, Marenco S, Lipska BK, et al. Oxytocin receptor mRNA expression in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in major psychiatric disorders: a human post-mortem study. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2018;96:143–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Bearer EL, Mulligan BS. Epigenetic changes associated with early life experiences: saliva, a biospecimen for DNA methylation signatures. Curr Genomics. 2018;19:676–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Godderis L, Schouteden C, Tabish A, Poels K, Hoet P, Baccarelli AA, et al. Global methylation and hydroxymethylation in DNA from blood and saliva in healthy volunteers. BioMed Res Int. 2015;2015: 845041.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Wu HC, Wang Q, Chung WK, Andrulis IL, Daly MB, John EM, et al. Correlation of DNA methylation levels in blood and saliva DNA in young girls of the LEGACY girls study. Epigenetics. 2014;9(929):933.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Thomas M, Knoblich N, Wallisch A, Glowacz K, Becker-Sadzio J, Gundel F, et al. Increased BDNF methylation in saliva, but not blood, of patients with borderline personality disorder. Clin Epigenetics. 2018;10:109.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Abdolmaleky HM, Nohesara S, Ghadirivasfi M, Lambert AW, Ahmadkhaniha H, Ozturk S, et al. DNA hypermethylation of serotonin transporter gene promoter in drug naïve patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2014;152:373–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Papale LA, Seltzer LJ, Madrid A, Pollak SD, Alisch RS. Differentially methylated genes in saliva are linked to childhood stress. Sci Rep. 2018;8:10785.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Rushing A, Sommer EC, Zhao S, Po’e EK, Barkin SL. Salivary epigenetic biomarkers as predictors of emerging childhood obesity. BMC Med Genetics. 2020;21:34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Braun PR, Han S, Hing B, Nagahama Y, Gaul LN, Heinzman JT, et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation comparison between live human brain and peripheral tissues within individuals. Transl Psychiatry. 2019;9:47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Dumais KM, Veenema AH. Presence and absence of sex differences in structure and function of the brain oxytocin system: implications for understanding the regulation of social behavior. Sex Differ Cent Nerv Syst. 2015;12:33.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Liang S, Wu X, Jin F. Gut-brain psychology: Rethinking psychology from the microbiota–gut–brain axis. Front Integr Neurosci. 2018;12:33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Stefano GB, Pilonis N, Ptacek R, Raboch J, Vnukova M, Kream RM. Gut, microbiome, and brain regulatory axis: relevance to neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2018;38:1197–206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Nguyen TT, Kosciolek T, Eyler LT, Knight R, Jeste DV. Overview and systematic review of studies of microbiome in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. J Psychiatr Res. 2018;99:50–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Severance EG, Yolken RH, Eaton WW. Autoimmune diseases, gastrointestinal disorders and the microbiome in schizophrenia: more than a gut feeling. Schizophr Res. 2016;176:23–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Rea K, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Gut microbiota: a perspective for psychiatrists. Neuropsychobiology. 2020;79:50–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Codagnone MG, Spichak S, O’Mahony SM, O’Leary OF, Clarke G, Stanton C, et al. Programming bugs: microbiota and the developmental origins of brain health and disease. Biol Psychiat. 2019;85:150–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Sherwin E, Sandhu KV, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. May the force be with you: the light and dark sides of the microbiota–gut–brain axis in neuropsychiatry. CNS Drugs. 2016;30:1019–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Mood by microbe: towards clinical translation. Genome Medicine. 2016;8:36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Foster JA, Lyte M, Meyer E, Cryan JF. Gut microbiota and brain function: an evolving field in neuroscience. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016;19:pyv114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Maitre Y, Micheneau P, Delpierre A, Mahalli R, Guerin M, Amador G, et al. Did the brain and oral microbiota talk to each other? A review of the literature. J Clin Med. 2020;9:3876.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Jia G, Zhi A, Lai PFH, Wang G, Xia Y, Xiong Z, et al. The oral microbiota—a mechanistic role for systemic diseases. Br Dent J. 2018;224:447–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Sampaio-Maia B, Caldas IM, Pereira ML, Pérez-Mongiovi D, Araujo R. The oral microbiome in health and its implication in oral and systemic diseases. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2016;97:171–210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Lu M, Xuan S, Wang Z. Oral microbiota: a new view of body health. Food Science and Human Wellness. 2019

  95. Willis JR, Gabaldón T. The human oral microbiome in health and disease: from sequences to ecosystems. Microorganisms. 2020;8:308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Kealy J, Greene C, Campbell M. Blood-brain barrier regulation in psychiatric disorders. Neurosci Lett. 2020;726: 133664.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Olsen I, Hicks SD. Oral microbiota and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). J Oral Microbiol. 2020;12:1702806.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Ragusa M, Santagati M, Mirabella F, Lauretta G, Cirnigliaro M, Brex D, et al. Potential associations among alteration of salivary mirnas, saliva microbiome structure, and cognitive impairments in autistic children. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:6203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Chen Z, Li J, Gui S, Zhou C, Chen J, Yang C, et al. Comparative metaproteomics analysis shows altered fecal microbiota signatures in patients with major depressive disorder. NeuroReport. 2018;29:417–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Chung YCE, Chen HC, Chou HCL, Chen IM, Lee MS, Chuang LC, et al. Exploration of microbiota targets for major depressive disorder and mood related traits. J Psychiatr Res. 2019;111:74–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Rong H, Xie XH, Zhao J, Lai WT, Wang MB, Xu D, et al. Similarly in depression, nuances of gut microbiota: Evidences from a shotgun metagenomics sequencing study on major depressive disorder versus bipolar disorder with current major depressive episode patients. J Psychiatr Res. 2019;113:90–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Domènech L, Willis J, Alemany-Navarro M, Morell M, Real E, Escaramís G, et al. Changes in the stool and oropharyngeal microbiome in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Sci Rep. 2022;12:1448.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Hesson LB. Gut microbiota and obesity-related gastrointestinal cancer : a focus on epigenetics. Transl Gastrointest Cancer. 2013;2:204–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Mischke M, Plösch T. More than just a gut instinct-the potential interplay between a baby’s nutrition, its gut microbiome, and the epigenome. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2013;304:R1065–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Stojanov S, Berlec A, Štrukelj B. The influence of probiotics on the firmicutes/bacteroidetes ratio in the treatment of obesity and inflammatory bowel disease. Microorganisms. 2020;8:1715.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Bosch OJ, Neumann ID. Both oxytocin and vasopressin are mediators of maternal care and aggression in rodents: from central release to sites of action. Horm Behav. 2012;61:293–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Bale TL, Davis AM, Auger AP, Dorsa DM, McCarthy MM. CNS region-specific oxytocin receptor expression: Importance in regulation of anxiety and sex behavior. J Neurosci. 2001;21:2546–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. Engelmann M, Ebner K, Wotjak CT, Landgraf R. Endogenous oxytocin is involved in short-term olfactory memory in female rats. Behav Brain Res. 1998;90:89–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Lukas M, Toth I, Reber SO, Slattery DA, Veenema AH, Neumann ID. The neuropeptide oxytocin facilitates pro-social behavior and prevents social avoidance in rats and mice. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011;36:2159–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Popik P, Vetulani J. Opposite action of oxytocin and its peptide antagonists on social memory in rats. Neuropeptides. 1991;18:23–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Insel TR, Shapiro LE. Oxytocin receptor distribution reflects social organization in monogamous and polygamous voles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:5981–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. Gould BR, Zingg HH. Mapping oxytocin receptor gene expression in the mouse brain and mammary gland using an oxytocin receptor-lacZ reporter mouse. Neuroscience. 2003;122:155–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Liu W, Pappas GD, Carter CS. Oxytocin receptors in brain cortical regions are reduced in haploinsufficient (+/-) reeler mice. Neurol Res. 2005;27:339–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Smeltzer MD, Curtis JT, Aragona BJ, Wang Z. Dopamine, oxytocin, and vasopressin receptor binding in the medial prefrontal cortex of monogamous and promiscuous voles. Neurosci Lett. 2006;394:146–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Ninan I. Oxytocin suppresses basal glutamatergic transmission but facilitates activity-dependent synaptic potentiation in the medial prefrontal cortex. J Neurochem. 2011;119:324–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Sofroniew MV. Morphology of vasopressin and oxytocin neurones and their central and vascular projections. Prog Brain Res. 1983;60:101–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Knobloch HS, Charlet A, Hoffmann LC, Eliava M, Khrulev S, Cetin AH, et al. Evoked axonal oxytocin release in the central amygdala attenuates fear response. Neuron. 2012;73:553–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Jack A, Connelly JJ, Morris JP. DNA methylation of the oxytocin receptor gene predicts neural response to ambiguous social stimuli. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;6:280.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. Rios-Covian D, Gueimonde M, Duncan SH, Flint HJ, De Los Reyes-Gavilan CG. Enhanced butyrate formation by cross-feeding between Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Bifidobacterium adolescentis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2015;362:fnv176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Alonso P, López-Solà C, Real E, Segalàs C, Menchón JM. Animal models of obsessive–compulsive disorder: utility and limitations. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015;11:1939–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. Fone KCF, Porkess MV. Behavioural and neurochemical effects of post-weaning social isolation in rodents-relevance to developmental neuropsychiatric disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008;32:1087–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Amitai N, Young JW, Higa K, Sharp RF, Geyer MA, Powell SB. Isolation rearing effects on probabilistic learning and cognitive flexibility in rats. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014;14:388–406.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Li N, Wu X, Li L. Chronic administration of clozapine alleviates reversal-learning impairment in isolation-reared rats. Behav Pharmacol. 2007;18:135–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Baarendse PJJ, Counotte DS, O’Donnell P, Vanderschuren LJMJ. Early social experience is critical for the development of cognitive control and dopamine modulation of prefrontal cortex function. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38:1485–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. Fei XY, Liu S, Sun YH, Cheng L. Social isolation improves the performance of rodents in a novel cognitive flexibility task. Front Zool. 2019;16:43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. Krimberg JS, Lumertz FS, Orso R, Viola TW, de Almeida RMM. Impact of social isolation on the oxytocinergic system: a systematic review and meta-analysis of rodent data. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022;134: 104549.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Chen LL, Abbaspour A, Mkoma GF, Bulik CM, Rück C, Djurfeldt D. Gut microbiota in psychiatric disorders: a systematic review. Psychosom Med. 2021;83:679–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. Agus A, Clément K, Sokol H. Gut microbiota-derived metabolites as central regulators in metabolic disorders. Gut. 2021;70:1174–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Rachman S. Fear of contamination. Behav Res Therapy. 2004;42:1227–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  130. Bonne NJ, Wong DTW. Salivary biomarker development using genomic, proteomic and metabolomic approaches. Genome Medicine. 2012;4:82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. Yoshizawa JM, Schafer CA, Schafer JJ, Farrell JJ, Paster BJ, Wong DTW. Salivary biomarkers: toward future clinical and diagnostic utilities. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013;26:781–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially funded by the University of Teramo ‘Progetto FARDIB anno 2019’ to CD and by the Italian Ministry for Universities and Research (FISR2019_00202) to CD. The authors acknowledge Monica Macellaro and Eugenia Annunzi for their careful manuscript revision and Neuraxpharm for their unconditioned and unrestricted grant support.

Funding

See Acknowledgments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Bioscience, University of Teramo, Teramo, Italy

    Claudio D’Addario, Mariangela Pucci, Fabio Bellia, Antonio Girella, Annalaura Sabatucci, Federico Fanti & Manuel Sergi

  2. Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

    Claudio D’Addario

  3. Department of Mental Health, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences “Luigi Sacco”, University of Milano, Milano, Italy

    Matteo Vismara, Beatrice Benatti, Luca Ferrara, Federica Fasciana, Laura Celebre, Caterina Viganò, Luca Elli & Bernardo Dell’Osso

  4. Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy

    Mauro Maccarrone

  5. European Center for Brain Research/Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy

    Mauro Maccarrone

  6. Department of Science, Roma Tre University, Rome, Italy

    Valeria Buzzelli & Viviana Trezza

  7. Faculty of Bioscience and Technology for Food, Agriculture and Environment, University of Teramo, Via Renato Balzarini, 1, 64100, Teramo, Italy

    Claudio D’Addario

  8. Department of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences “Luigi Sacco”, Psychiatry Unit 2, ASST Sacco-Fatebenefratelli, Via G.B. Grassi, 74, 20157, Milan, Italy

    Bernardo Dell’Osso

Authors
  1. Claudio D’Addario
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mariangela Pucci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fabio Bellia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Antonio Girella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Annalaura Sabatucci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Federico Fanti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Matteo Vismara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Beatrice Benatti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Luca Ferrara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Federica Fasciana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Laura Celebre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Caterina Viganò
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Luca Elli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Manuel Sergi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Mauro Maccarrone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Valeria Buzzelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Viviana Trezza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Bernardo Dell’Osso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CD, VT and BD conceived and designed the experiments; MP, FB, AG, AS, FF and VB performed the experiments; MV, BB, LF, FF, LC, CV and LE collected samples and patient information; CD, VT and MS analyzed the data; CD, VT and BD contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; CD, VT, BD and MM wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Claudio D’Addario or Bernardo Dell’Osso.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

In accordance with Italian law, all subjects had given their written informed consent to participate in the study, which included the use of personal and clinical data as well as blood drawing for genotyping and methylation analysis. The study protocol had been previously approved by the local Ethics Committee. Animal studies were performed in agreement with the Animals in Research: Reporting in vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines, with the guidelines released by the Italian Ministry of Health (D.L. 26/14) and the European Community Directive 2010/63/EU.

Consent for publication

The authors give consent for the publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Supplementary material: methods, results, tables and figures.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

D’Addario, C., Pucci, M., Bellia, F. et al. Regulation of oxytocin receptor gene expression in obsessive–compulsive disorder: a possible role for the microbiota-host epigenetic axis. Clin Epigenet 14, 47 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-022-01264-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-022-01264-0

Keywords

  • Oxytocin receptor
  • DNA methylation
  • Gene expression
  • Obsessive–compulsive disorder
  • Microbiota
  • Saliva

Clinical Epigenetics

ISSN: 1868-7083

Contact us