Skip to main content
Download PDF

Association of prenatal alcohol exposure with offspring DNA methylation in mammals: a systematic review of the evidence

Clinical Epigenetics volume 14, Article number: 12 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE) is associated with a range of adverse offspring neurodevelopmental outcomes. Several studies suggest that PAE modifies DNA methylation in offspring cells and tissues, providing evidence for a potential mechanistic link to Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD). We systematically reviewed existing evidence on the extent to which maternal alcohol use during pregnancy is associated with offspring DNA methylation.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted across five online databases according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Google Scholar and CINAHL Databases were searched for articles relating to PAE in placental mammals. Data were extracted from each study and the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) was used to assess the potential for bias in human studies.

Results

Forty-three articles were identified for inclusion. Twenty-six animal studies and 16 human studies measured offspring DNA methylation in various tissues using candidate gene analysis, methylome-wide association studies (MWAS), or total nuclear DNA methylation content. PAE dose and timing varied between studies. Risk of bias was deemed high in nearly all human studies. There was insufficient evidence in human and animal studies to support global disruption of DNA methylation from PAE. Inconclusive evidence was found for hypomethylation at IGF2/H19 regions within somatic tissues. MWAS assessing PAE effects on offspring DNA methylation showed inconsistent evidence. There was some consistency in the relatively small number of MWAS conducted in populations with FASD. Meta-analyses could not be conducted due to significant heterogeneity between studies.

Conclusion

Considering heterogeneity in study design and potential for bias, evidence for an association between PAE and offspring DNA methylation was inconclusive. Some reproducible associations were observed in populations with FASD although the limited number of these studies warrants further research.

Trail Registration: This review is registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42020167686).

Background

Alcohol use during pregnancy is a preventable cause of offspring neurodevelopmental impairments. Alcohol exposure in utero has been associated with birth defects [1], as it passes freely across the placenta, and unlike adults, the exposed fetus has minimal ability to metabolise alcohol. The timing, dose and frequency of consumption is associated with the severity of prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE) on fetal development [2]. PAE can cause Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD), a diagnostic term that encompasses a spectrum of physical, cognitive, behavioural and neurodevelopmental abnormalities with life-long health consequences [3]. FASD is a significant health burden globally affecting approximately 7.7 per 1000 individuals, with a significantly higher burden identified among specific disadvantaged and Indigenous communities, within corrective and psychiatric services, and children in foster care [4]. At moderate to low doses the evidence for harmful effects on child development is controversial [5,6,7,8]. PAE is necessary but not sufficient to cause FASD in all exposed individuals and research is needed to better understand disease etiology including the genetic and other environmental cofactors potentially influencing the clinical manifestation of FASD [9]. Improvements in screening and diagnosis are research priorities [10] in order to facilitate timely and appropriate interventions, and for this to occur a clearer understanding of mechanisms is required.

Recent evidence suggests epigenetic processes such as DNA methylation as a potential mediator of PAE on offspring neurodevelopment and FASD. Epigenetic processes are reversible structural and functional modifications to the genome that play an important role in the regulation of fetal gene expression. Evidence from both human [11,12,13] and animal studies [14,15,16] suggests that PAE and FASD are associated with changes to global and gene-specific levels of DNA methylation. The addition of methyl groups to cytosine residues on DNA can modify the structural density of DNA, and its compaction within the nucleus, with consequences for regulation of fetal gene expression. Ethanol is readily able to cross the placenta and accumulate in the fetal tissues at levels proportional to the maternal blood alcohol concentrations [17]. Studies suggest this can affect the patterning of DNA methylation through either direct inhibition of DNA methyltransferase enzymes, or through antagonist effects on dietary methyl donors such as folate and choline, which are substrates for these enzymes [18]. Evidence to date has been inconsistent, with multiple different associations reported in murine models and in human populations with clinical FASD [19]. This is in contrast to evidence from multiple birth cohorts which suggest low to moderate PAE does not affect offspring DNA methylation [20]. Potential confounding factors represent a major challenge since multiple dietary and environmental exposures in pregnancy also influence offspring DNA methylation outcomes. Due to these inconsistencies and limitations in the literature, we conducted a systematic review of the extant research in this field to synthesise current evidence for DNA methylation as a mediator of PAE. Considering the problem of residual confounding in observational studies, we synthesized evidence for an association between PAE and offspring DNA methylation outcomes in placental mammals by examining evidence from both human studies and controlled animal models.

Methods

This systematic review was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines [21]. The protocol for this systematic review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Ongoing Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 05 July 2020 (registration number: CRD42020167686) [22].

Inclusion criteria

Studies of prenatal alcohol exposure in placental mammals, in which DNA methylation was measured as an outcome were considered for inclusion.

Exclusion criteria

In vitro models or postnatal exposure studies were excluded as they do not reflect placental contribution to the exposure. Case reports, narrative reviews and studies without DNA methylation outcomes were also excluded.

Types of studies and participants

The review included cross-sectional studies, longitudinal cohorts and randomised control studies in humans and animals. Participants were placental mammals with confirmed PAE or diagnosis of FASD. Non-mammals, solely paternal, postnatal, or pre-conception exposure studies were excluded along with case reports and in vitro only studies.

Interventions and comparisons

The primary intervention among included studies was in utero exposure to ethanol, by any delivered method and dose, for any duration. To be eligible, studies were required to have a comparison group with no alcohol exposure at any time during pregnancy. We also included studies reporting on cohorts with a confirmed diagnosis of FASD with a comparison group of typically developing controls.

Outcome measures and timing

Studies were required to provide quantitative offspring DNA methylation outcomes, either in a CpG or non-CpG context. DNA methylation was able to be reported across the entire methylome or within a specific locus or loci. The main outcome assessed was differences in DNA methylation between the PAE case and non-PAE control groups, as indicated by use of a statistical test assessing differences in DNA methylation between the case and control groups.

Any tissue or cell type extracted from the mammal was considered. We also considered whether changes in the DNA methylation from PAE were dependent on the tissue or cell type.

Search strategy

A literature search was conducted on 30 January 2020 to identify relevant articles across five databases: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Google Scholar and CINAHL Plus. The keyword search terms used for each database were: methylat* and (alcohol* or ethanol*) and (foetal* or fetal* or prenatal* or antenatal* or perinatal* or pregnan* or maternal* or utero* or foetus* or fetus* or intrauterine* or alcohol-related birth disorder* or alcohol-related neurodevelopmental disorder*). Only English language articles were included in this review. There was no restriction on the publication period.

The literature search was repeated on 17 July 2021 across the same databases to identify any additional articles that were published during the time period.

Synthesis of the data

References were imported into EndNote software to remove duplicates, non-original research articles and articles that were not in English. Titles and abstracts were double screened independently by two authors (MB and MS) using Covidence software. Disagreements were resolved through discussion with a third screener (DM). Following the same procedure as the title and abstract screening, Covidence was again used for full-text screening.

Due to the small number of articles in the updated search, articles underwent title and abstract screening followed by full-text screening.

Data extraction was conducted by two researchers (MB and MS) using a pre-designed form adapted from the James Cook University Data Extraction Form (Additional file 1: Fig. 1). Data extracted from each study included: study design, population studied (i.e., species), methods for recruitment, sample size and demographics, cell types (including heterogeneity) that underwent DNA methylation analysis, pattern of PAE, DNA methylation assay used, reported candidate loci and, DNA methylation measures. Participant demographics included age, sex, ethnicity, smoking status, diet, socio-economic status, and rodent strain, where appropriate were extracted. Two researchers (MB and MS) each conducted 50% of the data extraction, after which they cross-checked the other’s data extraction. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus and reviewed by a third party (DM). Studies were grouped by species, cell or tissue type, whether they assessed the entire genome or only certain loci and method of DNA methylation analysis.

For human studies potential for bias was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) approach by two researchers independently (DM and MS) with disagreements resolved through discussion [23].

Results

Search results

Figure 1 shows the PRISMA flowchart outlining the study selection process across both searches. A total of 1373 articles were obtained from the original and updated searches. The number of articles obtained by database were: PubMed (n = 254), Web of Science (n = 426), EMBASE (n = 543), Google Scholar (n = 106) and CINAHL Plus (n = 42). After removal of duplicates (n = 550), non-English articles, books, theses and conference abstracts, 442 references were imported into Covidence for title and abstract screening. A total of 344 articles were removed in the title and abstract screening phase, resulting in 98 articles that underwent full-text screening. A total of 58 articles were excluded during full-text screening (Fig. 1). A total of 42 articles were included in the review.

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA flowchart outlining the study selection process across both searches

Full size image

Characteristics of included studies

Forty-two of the included articles were published between 1991 and 2020. There were 26 animal studies with approximately 1373 subjects, and 16 human studies with approximately 6788 participants. However, sample sizes are approximations as the information provided in some studies was unclear and only estimated from the articles. There were nine studies assessing total nuclear DNA methylation content, eleven MWAS and 24 studies that assessed DNA methylation within a specific locus or loci. This includes three studies that assessed total nuclear DNA methylation content and DNA methylation content within specific loci. Organism and number of participants, year published, study design, exposure pattern, tissues studied and DNA methylation analysis platform used are summarised in Table 1.

Table 1 Summary table of articles included in this systematic review
Full size table

The repeat of the literature searches on 17 July 2021 identified two new studies that were compliant with the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this review.

Study design and participants

Human studies comprised 38% of the studies included in this review (16/42). Among the human studies there was substantial heterogeneity in study design (56% case–control studies, 38% observational studies, 6% meta-analytic studies); the tissue used (50% buccal swabs, 44% varying types of blood cells, including cord blood, 12% placental tissue, 6% brain tissue); and the platform used to measure DNA methylation outcomes (50% microarray, 31% sequencing, 19% mass spectrometry, 19% polymerase chain reaction, 12% enzyme digest/immunohistochemistry) (Table 1). Multiple platforms and tissue types were used in some studies. Most human studies were either targeted candidate gene analyses (6/16) or methylome-wide association studies (MWAS) of PAE (4/16) or FASD (4/16). The remaining two human studies used a global measure of total nuclear DNA methylation content.

All of the animal studies employed an intervention case–control design with all but one model being a rodent species (58% mouse, 42% rat) and a single model using non-human primates. The majority of animal studies measured DNA in brain tissue (21/26, 81%). Other tissues analysed included placenta, heart, tail, liver, blood and embryonal tissue. Most animal studies were targeted candidate gene analyses (19/26, 73%) and/or used a global measure of total nuclear DNA methylation content (7/26, 27%), with only three studies (12%) performed at methylome-wide scale. The dosage of PAE varied between animal studies including light (1/26, 4%), moderate (10/26, 38%), moderate-high (3/26, 12%), high (6/26, 23%), and unclear (6/26, 23%). The timing of PAE also varied in the animal studies including PAE across pregnancy (5/26, 19%), the first trimester only (6/26, 23%), the second trimester only (1/26, 4%), the third trimester only (2/26, 8%), an alternative PAE pattern (9/26, 35%), or an unclear timing (3/26, 12%).

Risk of bias assessment

Risk of bias was only assessed for the human studies since bias is inherently more problematic in these types of study designs than in controlled animal models. Bias due to baseline confounding or effect modification was a major issue as many studies did not consider or appropriately control for the effects of maternal smoking, diet, ethnicity or cellular heterogeneity, all of which can influence DNA methylation results (Fig. 2). Exposure groups were generally clearly defined, although usually determined through self-reporting, which may underestimate true exposure [24]. Many studies provided inadequate information on whether the same criteria were used to define cases and controls, or on missing outcome or covariate data (Fig. 2). Individual study bias scores are provided in Additional file 1: Fig. 1.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Summary chart of risk of bias assessment for human studies. The Percentage of studies scored for each bias domain is shown

Full size image

Summary of outcomes

Global measures of DNA methylation

There were eleven studies that assessed total nuclear DNA methylation content including two human studies and nine animal models. Of the former, Loke et al. reported no association between PAE and total placental DNA methylation, but reported hypermethylation (1.5%, p = 0.012) in stratified analysis of males exposed to any level of alcohol throughout pregnancy, after adjusting for confounders [25]. Jarmasz et al. reported hypomethylation of nuclei from hippocampal CA1 region neurons (p = 0.02) in postmortem early fetal tissues (21–25 weeks post conception) with a history of alcohol abuse, although the analysis was not adjusted for multiple testing and no measure of effect size was given [11]. The authors did not reproduce this association in a non-human primate model of high dose exposure in CA1 neurons using the same techniques.

Among the animal studies, Chen et al. reported that moderate-high alcohol doses (4% ethanol, Gestational Day (GD) 7–16) given to C57Bl/6 dams were associated with alterations in DNA methylation during fetal hippocampus development [15]. Immunostaining for DNA methylation and DNA hydroxy methylation were significantly lower in the neuroepithelial layer, but higher in the intermediate zone and CA1 neurons in affected embryos. At postpartum day seven, methylation levels were higher in the outer shell layer of the dentate gyrus, whilst hydroxy methylation levels were lower in both the inner and outer shell layers. Öztürk et al. replicated the study and reported hypermethylation within CP subcortical regions in the exposed embryos, but no effect on other subcortical regions [26]. Abbott et al. reported global hypomethylation in neocortex samples in CD1 pups exposed to a high dose exposure regime across pregnancy (25% ethanol, GD0.5-GD19) [27]. Garro et al. also reported global DNA hypomethylation using a DNA methyl acceptor assay in unspecified fetal tissue from Swiss-Webster dams exposed to high levels of ethanol (3 g of 50% ethanol per kilogram body weight) by gavage in part of the second trimester of pregnancy (GD9-11) [28]. Govorko et al. found no evidence of global changes in DNA methylation in the arcuate nucleus brain region of offspring of Sprague–Dawley rats exposed to moderate levels of ethanol during gestation (variable 1.7–5.0% ethanol ad libitum within liquid diet during GD7-10 followed by 6.7% ethanol during GD11-21) [29]. Similarly, Kaminen-Ahola et al. also found no evidence of global changes to DNA methylation in tail or forebrain samples from C57Bl/6 offspring mice of dams exposed to moderate levels of alcohol for eight days after fertilization (10% ethanol, GD0.5–8.5) [30]. Murillo-Fuentes et al. also reported no difference in global DNA methylation in liver tissue among Wistar pups exposed to moderate-high doses across pregnancy (5–15% ethanol) and then maintained at 20% for a further 5 weeks during lactation [31].

Taken together, human and animal study evidence of an effect of PAE on overall nuclear level of DNA methylation was inconsistent, and no correlations between the timing and dose of exposure and methylation outcomes were identified.

Candidate gene studies

Candidate gene studies assessed DNA methylation at imprinted genes (IGF2/H19 [13, 32,33,34,35,36,37,38], Snrpn [37], PEG3 [35, 37], KvDMR1 [13], ZAC1 [39], IG-DMR [13]), genes sensitive to nutritional programming (Avy allele [30], Pomc [29, 40, 41]), neurological function (SLC17A6 [42], OLFR110 [43], OLFR601 [43], VMN2R64-ps158 [43], D2r [44], Bdnf [45], Pdyn [46, 47], Kor [46, 47], SLC6A4 [48], Nr3c1 [48], Gfap [49], Gad67 [14], DRD4 [12], PER2 [50], SLC6A4 [48], SERT [51], MECP2 [51]), transcriptional regulation (Hist1h2ai [43]), and immune function (Vpreb2 [43]). Table 2 summarises all candidate gene studies in this review that assessed the Igf2/H19 locus,.

Table 2 Summary table of candidate gene studies assessing DNA methylation in the Igf2/H19 locus
Full size table

Among the imprinted genes, the IGF2/H19 locus was the most consistently studied candidate region in eight different articles (3 human studies [13, 32, 38], 5 mouse models [33,34,35,36,37]). This transcriptional unit plays a central role in placental and embryonic growth. The locus contains several differentially methylated regions (DMRs) that are methylated in a parent of origin specific manner, and an imprinting control region (ICR) that modulates the transcription of IGF2 and H19 in an allele-specific manner [52].

Masemola et al. reported on four imprinted genes (H19-ICR, IG-DMR, KvDMR1, PEG3) of the genome in a South African cohort of FASD cases and controls in blood and buccal tissues [13]. Locus-wide hypomethylation was reported PEG3 (average 7% lower in PAE cases), KvDMR1 (effect size 1.49% lower in PAE cases) and IG-DMR1.B (average 0.84% lower in PAE cases), after adjusting for age and sex. No differences were observed at the H19 ICR. The authors did not control for multiple testing in their analysis.

Marjonen et al. assessed DNA methylation at the H19-ICR and H19-DMR loci in placental tissue with high levels of PAE compared with and unexposed controls [32]. Overall, there was no difference observed between groups. Hypomethylation was reported at multiple CpG sites across the H19 CTCF6 among carriers of the rs10732516 A/G genotype in the alcohol exposed group (effect size ~ 10–15% decrease), however this provided weak evidence for an association as it did not survive multiple testing correction.

Two mouse models of early exposure ranging from acute high to moderate dosages both examined effects on DNA methylation at IGF2/H19 in embryos and placentas [33, 35]. Haycock et al. reported allele-specific hypomethylation on the paternal allele of H19-ICR in alcohol exposed placentas (effect size ~ 12–22% decrease) of C57Bl/6 & CastEi Hybrid Mouse but no difference in mid-gestation embryos [33]. Marjonen et al. did not report any significant differences in DNA methylation at the same regions in early embryos and placenta of C57Bl/6 mice with moderate PAE during the first trimester (10% ethanol w/v in drinking water, GD0.5–8.5), although they did not examine allele specific effects [35].

Zhou et al. reported hypomethylation at Igf2 DMR locus in fetal heart (Igf2-DMR1), brain (Igf2-DMR2) and at the H19 DMR locus in placental tissue from a C57Bl/6 mouse model of high dose exposure over the first 15 days of gestation (0.025 ethanol, GD0.5–15.5), which was twice the duration of the two previous studies. Effect sizes were 2–5% lower in the ethanol exposed fetal tissues. Tissue-specific effects of alcohol exposure were reported in this study, however allele specific effects were not examined. Downing et al. reported a small decrease in methylation at IGF2-DMR1 in embryonic tissue of C57Bl/6 mice following acute PAE (20% ethanol solution, GD0-8.5) but not in placental tissue (effect size ~ 7%) [34].

Stouder et al. examined trans-generation effects of low dose PAE in mid to late gestation (0.5 g/kg dam weight/day of ethanol, GD10-18) on eight week old offspring imprinted genes in normal FVB/N mice [37]. Hypomethylation at H19-ICR was reported in the sperm of F1 offspring, but not in somatic tissues (muscle, tail, brain, liver). Interestingly, this exposure-associated hypomethylation was not observed in F2 germ cells but rather in somatic brain tissues. Effect sizes ranged from 3–5% decrease in methylation after adjustment for multiple testing.

Meta-analysis of IGF2/H19 regions was not feasible due to the lack of numerical reporting of methylation levels in some studies and differences in quantitative assays used to measure DNA methylation. Overall, there was limited but suggestive evidence for a reduction in DNA methylation at IGF2/H19 regions in somatic tissues, but this was not entirely consistent, even among studies of the same tissue.

Methylome-wide association studies of PAE

There were four methylome-wide association studies (MWAS) assessing PAE, including two human studies using population based cohorts of PAE spanning birth to school age [53, 54] and two mouse models [16, 55]. All human studies employed the Infinium HumanMethylation450k array, and the two murine studies both employed methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP). Tissues examined included whole blood, buccal swabs and cord blood, except for the mouse study which examined brain tissue.

Frey et al. conducted MWAS on buccal cell DNA from 156 primary school children with objectively measured PAE by ethyl glucuronide metabolite test (32 exposed, 124 unexposed) [53]. They report weak evidence of an association with PAE at 193 differentially CpGs (P < 0.001), however the effect was no longer evident after correcting for multiple tests.

Timms et al. conducted an MWAS on human cord blood samples from a UK based cohort of 253 newborns with PAE and 530 unexposed controls based on maternal self-report [54]. Their analysis reported on 192 genome-wide CpG sites with significant differences (false discovery rate < 0.05) associated with PAE.

Sharp et al. performed a meta-analysis from cord blood samples across six human cohorts (1147 PAE and 1928 non-PAE controls), and reported no significant differences in DNA methylation associated with PAE [20]. Confounding factors that were controlled for in all models included maternal age, educational attainment and smoking status in pregnancy. The control cohort was defined by PAE before and during the first trimester of pregnancy, compared to the case cohort that was defined by PAE both before and across pregnancy. Consequently, the study lacked a suitable control cohort characterised by no PAE. Technically this article meets our exclusion criteria, but we describe it here due to the scale and robustness of the study.

In a C57Bl/6 mouse model of voluntary maternal drinking (10% ethanol w/v in drinking water) in pregnancy (GD0-10), Laufer et al. used genome-wide analysis by Methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation (MeDIP-chip) of CpG islands in adult offspring whole brain DNA extracts [16]. The study found weak evidence for 6660 differentially methylated regions (un-adjusted P < 0.01) in alcohol-exposed mice. They also reported hypermethylation of imprinted regions H19/Igf2, as observed in placental tissue by Haycock [33], albeit in the opposite direction. There was no overlap in the aforementioned 3 MWAS studies of PAE with respect to CpG regions identified.

Alberry and Singh also adopted a C57Bl/6 mouse model with voluntary maternal drinking of 10% ethanol w/v in drinking water, but provided the ethanol throughout pregnancy and alongside plain drinking water. MeDIP sequencing was performed on the promoter regions of genes that are known to be associated with PAE or early life stress in hippocampal tissue from male offspring on postnatal day 70. The total number of genes that had promoters sequenced as part of the study is unclear, however the study identified 614 genes with hypomethylated promoters, 630 genes with hypermethylated promoters and 20 genes with both hypomethylated and hypermethylated promoters (unadjusted p < 0.01) before FDR correction. After FDR correction, no genes had promoters with a q-value below 0.01 which was defined as the statistical significance threshold in the study. If significance is defined as q < 0.05, three genes were identified as hypomethylated from PAE (Krtap5-3 q = 0.03, Hbegf q = 0.03, 2310034C09Rik q = 0.04) and one gene was hypermethylated from PAE (Myo1a q = 0.03) [55].

In summary, the PAE MWAS provide inconsistent evidence for any association between PAE and DNA methylation. Although each MWAS identified candidate DNA methylation loci that were significantly associated with PAE, there was a lack of replicated associations between studies.

Methylome-wide association studies of FASD

There have been four MWAS on children with FASD, which all employed the Infinium HumanMethylation450k array. Laufer et al. performed genome-wide methylation array analysis of buccal samples from 12 children (3–10 years) with FASD, and 11 age-matched controls of Northern European ancestry [56]. They report weak evidence of 269 differentially methylated regions (un-adjusted P < 0.005). Portales-Casamar et al. identified 658 CpG sites across the genome that were associated (FDR < 0.05) with FASD in a Canadian cohort of child and adolescent human buccal samples (110 FASD and 96 controls), including 41 CpG sites with a greater than 5% change in methylation [9]. Of the 658 CpGs identified as significant, 356 were hypermethylated in FASD cases and 302 were hypomethylated relative to controls (effect sizes 0.16–13.1%).

In a more recent study, Lussier et al. validated 161 of the 658 CpG sites associated with FASD in human buccal samples from an independent Canadian cohort of 48 children, reporting a similar direction of effect and statistically significant effect size [57]. Overall, the MWAS suggested moderate evidence for an association between DNA methylation and FASD with replicated associations reported in two of four studies. However, there was risk of bias arising from these studies where control groups were commonly children who had attended a clinic for a FASD diagnosis and not received a diagnosis [9, 56, 57] or the method for recruiting control groups was unclear [13, 58]. This suggests that control participants had developmental difficulties that may have been partly caused by epigenetic modifications and therefore did not represent a “typically developing” population. Secondly, a group of studies [9, 57] had imbalanced ethnicities between control and FASD groups (disproportionate number of First Nations children within case cohorts) and this may have affected their results even after they attempted to correct for this via statistical methods.

Okazaki et al. re-examined the cohorts from Lussier and Portales-Casamar studies to identify an association between FASD and five DNA methylation-based epigenetic clocks. The analysis was also performed on two peripheral blood cohorts, which included one Polish cohort and a second cohort from the Netherlands. The study identified one of the epigenetic clocks (GrimAge) was significantly associated with FASD in one buccal and both blood datasets, but no significant associations were reported with the other epigenetic clocks. Meta-analysis of datasets by tissue type also reported a significant association between FASD and the GrimAge epigenetic clock in peripheral blood, but no significant association was reported in buccal cells [59].

Conclusions

Alcohol consumption in pregnancy has been linked to changes in offspring DNA methylation, which may be mechanistically important in mediating the harmful effects of alcohol on neurodevelopment. We have undertaken a systematic review of studies reporting associations between PAE and variations in DNA methylation. On balance, the results did not support a clear and consistent effect of PAE on DNA methylation, underscoring methodological limitations including substantial heterogeneity in study design, tissues examined, and methodologies used to assess DNA methylation, in addition to the risk of potential bias due to cellular heterogeneity within the tissues examined and inadequate control for confounding factors such as maternal diet and smoking, ancestry and cellular heterogeneity in tissues. Current knowledge regarding the epigenetic mechanisms of PAE remain unclear and findings from previous studies have not been reproducible to date. In contrast, studies examining the epigenetic changes from prenatal cigarette smoking have been found to be very reproducible across multiple cohorts [60, 61]. Ongoing cigarette smoking is likely to be more frequent than heavy alcohol use, which may explain the difference. If we consider the FASD phenotype to reflect heavy exposure, then some reproducible effects were observed although future studies will need to confirm this. Thus the supposition that PAE has no effect on offspring DNA methylation could not be ruled out. Results are reviewed in the context of these limitations with directions for future research.

Studies at imprinted regions, in particular, IGF2/H19, were the easiest to compare since methylation in this region is germline encoded and does not vary substantially across tissues and is less influenced by environmental exposures. We might reasonably expect that if alcohol were to have a strong effect on DNA methylation, substantial variation would be observed at these regions. On the contrary however, small hypomethylation differences were observed that were not consistent across studies with comparable exposure patterns. It is possible that compensatory mechanisms may exist, for example, the ZFP57 gene encodes a transcriptional regulator that functions to maintain gene imprinting [62] in response to extracellular stimuli [63]. Similarly, studies that employed a marker of total nuclear DNA methylation content suggested that overall methylation levels were reasonably conserved. It is also possible that ethanol may have non-specific inhibitory regional effects on DNA methylation that would increase overall variability in methylation outcomes, even within the same tissue. If this were the case, we might expect this to be reflected in repeat elements of the genome or in global methylation assays. Two studies identified differential DNA methylation associated with FASD within the same loci [9, 57]. Such methylation changes might accumulate over time either as a consequence of FASD or through a causal mechanism, however further research is needed in other FASD populations. Given that the functional outcomes for those diagnosed with FASD can be completely different across a wide range of neurodevelopmental and physical domains, it could be hypothesised that the effects of PAE on DNA methylation are highly individualised. Potential contributing factors include the timing and dosage of alcohol exposure, characteristics of the parents including diet and health status, genetic factors, and other as yet unknown factors. Large individual differences could potentially be overlooked in the typical statistical approaches examining mean differences between groups. Therefore, personalised approaches looking for significant differences in DNA methylation between individuals prenatally exposed to alcohol compared and non-exposed populations might need to be considered.

In summary, there is a need for studies to employ more uniform designs and analysis plans including pre-defined criteria for assessing alcohol exposure and adjustment for a wider range of confounding factors including, but not necessarily limited to, mother’s age, diet (including folate and choline supplementation), child parity and gender, weeks of gestation, and ethnicity. Effect modifiers such as cell composition within tissues examined are equally important. These issues could be addressed by employing a matched study design or through adjustment during data analysis. For studies investigating FASD, samples were generally collected from 4 to 18 years after the exposure and birth. We know that children with FASD generally have additional life stressors compared with those who do not, such as increased adverse childhood experiences, and contact with the justice system (Lange et al., 2017). These in turn may have effects on epigenetic profiles within target tissues.

Other areas of study design were identified during the bias analysis that could generally be improved. A consistent issue in human studies was inclusion into the study criteria based on specimen availability. Given the stigma associated with alcohol use in pregnancy those who have used alcohol may be less likely to provide biological specimens. It is therefore imperative that analysis is undertaken to determine any potential bias this might introduce. Additionally, the questions used to ascertain PAE status were rarely specified, often involved retrospective collection and, as with all PAE studies, did not have use of an objective PAE biomarker. We additionally recommend more consistent reporting of methylation group mean differences to enable future meta-analyses. Finally, to address current limitations of cell heterogeneity in biospecimens such as blood and buccal, analysis of purified cell populations or single cell studies are likely to be informative in future research.

Limitations of the review

This review focused exclusively on the association of offspring DNA methylation with maternal PAE. The advantage of including animal models in this review is that they are largely unaffected by confounding factors influencing DNA methylation in humans. Yet DNA methylation results from animal models may not be generalisable to humans due to differences between species. It is possible that some non-significant results were due to a lack of statistical power because of their small sample sizes and presence of residual confounding. Ensuring sample sizes have sufficient power to detect true effects is essential. However, several of the human studies that returned null results were of a reasonably large sample size. More research is warranted on DNA methylation from preconception alcohol exposure, including paternal alcohol use, and postnatal alcohol exposure transmitted through breastmilk, however these studies were outside the scope of this systematic review. Furthermore, studies such as those by Finegersh and Homanics suggest that paternal alcohol exposure can also affect the epigenetic outcomes for offspring. Whilst these studies were outside the scope of this review [64], this is an important area of future enquiry. Additionally, a meta-analysis could not be included in this review due to the differing tissues, species, sequencing methods and for targeted studies, loci, that were assessed between studies.

Prenatal alcohol exposure is a significant public health issue, and mechanistic understanding of the impact of this exposure on fetal development is urgently needed. This review summarises the current state of research and focus for future efforts to advance this area of science. Currently the evidence was inconsistent and inconclusive regarding maternal PAE as a critical exposure on offspring DNA methylation. Future studies in well characterized populations that focus on purified cells, or single cell analyses, will likely be informative.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Grewal J, Carmichael SL, Ma C, Lammer EJ, Shaw GM. Maternal periconceptional smoking and alcohol consumption and risk for select congenital anomalies. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2008;82(7):519–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. O’Leary CM, Nassar N, Zubrick SR, Kurinczuk JJ, Stanley F, Bower C. Evidence of a complex association between dose, pattern and timing of prenatal alcohol exposure and child behaviour problems. Addiction. 2010;105(1):74–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Clarke ME, Gibbard WB. Overview of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders for mental health professionals. Can Child Adolesc Psychiatr Rev. 2003;12(3):57–63.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lange S, Probst C, Gmel G, Rehm J, Burd L, Popova S. Global prevalence of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder among children and youth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(10):948–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Henderson J, Gray R, Brocklehurst P. Systematic review of effects of low-moderate prenatal alcohol exposure on pregnancy outcome. BJOG. 2007;114(3):243–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Patra J, Bakker R, Irving H, Jaddoe VW, Malini S, Rehm J. Dose-response relationship between alcohol consumption before and during pregnancy and the risks of low birthweight, preterm birth and small for gestational age (SGA)—a systematic review and meta-analyses. BJOG. 2011;118(12):1411–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. O’Keeffe LM, Greene RA, Kearney PM. The effect of moderate gestational alcohol consumption during pregnancy on speech and language outcomes in children: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2014;3:1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Mamluk L, Edwards HB, Savović J, Leach V, Jones T, Moore THM, et al. Low alcohol consumption and pregnancy and childhood outcomes: time to change guidelines indicating apparently “safe” levels of alcohol during pregnancy? A systematic review and meta-analyses. BMJ Open. 2017;7(7):e015410.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Portales-Casamar E, Lussier AA, Jones MJ, MacIsaac JL, Edgar RD, Mah SM, et al. DNA methylation signature of human fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2016;9:25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bower C, Elliott EJ, Zimmet M, Doorey J, Wilkins A, Russell V, et al. Australian guide to the diagnosis of foetal alcohol spectrum disorder: a summary. J Paediatr Child Health. 2017;53(10):1021–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Jarmasz JS, Basalah D, Del Bigio MR, Stirton H, Davie JR, Clarren SK, et al. Global DNA methylation and histone posttranslational modifications in human and nonhuman primate brain in association with prenatal alcohol exposure. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019;43(6):1145–62.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Fransquet PD, Hutchinson D, Olsson CA, Wilson J, Allsop S, Najman J, et al. Perinatal maternal alcohol consumption and methylation of the dopamine receptor DRD4 in the offspring: the Triple B study. Environ Epigenet. 2016;2(4):023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Masemola ML, van der Merwe L, Lombard Z, Viljoen D, Ramsay M. Reduced DNA methylation at the PEG3 DMR and KvDMR1 loci in children exposed to alcohol in utero: a South African Fetal Alcohol Syndrome cohort study. Front Genet. 2015;6:85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lu J, Jiao ZX, Yu Y, Zhang C, He X, Li Q, et al. Programming for increased expression of hippocampal GAD67 mediated the hypersensitivity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in male offspring rats with prenatal ethanol exposure. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9.

  15. Chen YY, Ozturk NC, Zhou FC. DNA methylation program in developing hippocampus and its alteration by alcohol. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(3).

  16. Laufer BI, Mantha K, Kleiber ML, Dieh EJ, Addison SMF, Singh SM. Long-lasting alterations to DNA methylation and ncRNAs could underlie the effects of fetal alcohol exposure in mice. Dis Model Mech. 2013;6(4):977–92.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Tai M, Piskorski A, Kao JC, Hess LA, de la Monte S, Gündoğan F. Placental morphology in fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Alcohol Alcohol. 2017;52(2):138–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Varela-Rey M, Woodhoo A, Martinez-Chantar ML, Mato JM, Lu SC. Alcohol, DNA methylation, and cancer. Alcohol Res. 2013;35(1):25–35.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lussier AA, Weinberg J, Kobor MS. Epigenetics studies of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: where are we now? Epigenomics. 2017;9(3):291–311.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sharp GC, Arathimos R, Reese SE, Page CM, Felix J, Kupers LK, et al. Maternal alcohol consumption and offspring DNA methylation: findings from six general population-based birth cohorts. Epigenomics. 2018;10(1):27–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Booth A, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Moher D, Petticrew M, Stewart L. An international registry of systematic-review protocols. Lancet. 2011;377(9760):108–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:4919.

  24. Muggli E, Cook B, O’Leary C, Forster D, Halliday J. Increasing accurate self-report in surveys of pregnancy alcohol use. Midwifery. 2015;31(3):e23–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Loke YJ, Muggli E, Nguyen L, Ryan J, Saffery R, Elliott EJ, et al. Time- and sex-dependent associations between prenatal alcohol exposure and placental global DNA methylation. Epigenomics. 2018;10(7):981–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Öztürk NC, Resendiz M, Öztürk H, Zhou FC. DNA Methylation program in normal and alcohol-induced thinning cortex. Alcohol. 2017;60:135–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Abbott CW, Rohac DJ, Bottom RT, Patadia S, Huffman KJ. Prenatal Ethanol exposure and neocortical development: a transgenerational model of FASD. Cereb Cortex. 2018;28(8):2908–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Garro AJ, McBeth DL, Lima V, Lieber CS. Ethanol consumption inhibits fetal DNA methylation in mice: implications for the fetal alcohol syndrome. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1991;15(3):395–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Govorko D, Bekdash RA, Zhang CQ, Sarkar DK. Male germline transmits fetal alcohol adverse effect on hypothalamic proopiomelanocortin gene across generations. Biol Psychiat. 2012;72(5):378–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kaminen-Ahola N, Ahola A, Maga M, Mallitt KA, Fahey P, Cox TC, et al. Maternal ethanol consumption alters the epigenotype and the phenotype of offspring in a mouse model. PLoS Genet. 2010;6(1).

  31. Murillo-Fuentes ML, Artillo R, Ubeda N, Varela-Moreiras G, Murillo ML, Carreras O. Hepatic S-adenosylmethionine after maternal alcohol exposure on offspring rats. Addict Biol. 2005;10(2):139–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Marjonen H, Kahila H, Kaminen-Ahola N. rs10732516 polymorphism at the IGF2/H19 locus associates with a genotype-specific trend in placental DNA methylation and head circumference of prenatally alcohol-exposed newborns. Hum Reprod Open. 2017;2017(3):hox014.

  33. Haycock PC, Ramsay M. Exposure of mouse embryos to ethanol during preimplantation development: effect on DNA methylation in the h19 imprinting control region. Biol Reprod. 2009;81(4):618–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Downing C, Johnson TE, Larson C, Leakey TI, Siegfried RN, Rafferty TM, et al. Subtle decreases in DNA methylation and gene expression at the mouse Igf2 locus following prenatal alcohol exposure: effects of a methyl-supplemented diet. Alcohol. 2011;45(1):65–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Marjonen H, Toivonen M, Lahti L, Kaminen-Ahola N. Early prenatal alcohol exposure alters imprinted gene expression in placenta and embryo in a mouse model. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(5):e0197461.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhou JZ, Qian YY, Zhou QJ, Xiong Y, Wang HJ, Ma D, et al. Tissue-specific differential DNA methylation at Igf2/H19 locus in a mouse model for embryonal ethanol exposure. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2016;9(4):4862–71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Stouder C, Somm E, Paoloni-Giacobino A. Prenatal exposure to ethanol: a specific effect on the H19 gene in sperm. Reprod Toxicol. 2011;31(4):507–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. XXX

  39. Azzi S, Sas TCJ, Koudou Y, Le Bouc Y, Souberbielle JC, Dargent-Molina P, et al. Degree of methylation of ZAC1 ( PLAGL1) is associated with prenatal and post-natal growth in healthy infants of the EDEN mother child cohort. Epigenetics. 2014;9(3):338–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gangisetty O, Bekdash R, Maglakelidze G, Sarkar DK. Fetal alcohol exposure alters proopiomelanocortin gene expression and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function via increasing MeCP2 expression in the hypothalamus e113228. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(11).

  41. Bekdash R, Zhang C, Sarkar D. Fetal alcohol programming of hypothalamic proopiomelanocortin system by epigenetic mechanisms and later life vulnerability to stress. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2014;38(9):2323–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang CR, Ho MF, Vega MCS, Burne THJ, Chong S. Prenatal ethanol exposure alters adult hippocampal VGLUT2 expression with concomitant changes in promoter DNA methylation, H3K4 trimethylation and miR-467b-5p levels. Epigenetics & Chromatin. 2015;8.

  43. Marjonen H, Sierra A, Nyman A, Rogojin V, Grohn O, Linden AM, et al. Early maternal alcohol consumption alters hippocampal DNA methylation, gene expression and volume in a mouse model. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(5):e0124931.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Gangisetty O, Wynne O, Jabbar S, Nasello C, Sarkar DK. Fetal alcohol exposure reduces dopamine receptor D2 and increases pituitary weight and prolactin production via epigenetic mechanisms. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(10):e0140699.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Maier SE, Cramer JA, West JR, Sohrabji F. Alcohol exposure during the first two trimesters equivalent alters granule cell number and neurotrophin expression in the developing rat olfactory bulb. J Neurobiol. 1999;41(3):414–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Wille-Bille A, Miranda-Morales RS, Pucci M, Bellia F, D’Addario C, Pautassi RM. Prenatal ethanol induces an anxiety phenotype and alters expression of dynorphin & nociceptin/orphanin FQ genes. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018;85:77–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Wille-Bille A, Bellia F, Jimenez Garcia AM, Miranda-Morales RS, D’Addario C, Pautassi RM. Early exposure to environmental enrichment modulates the effects of prenatal ethanol exposure upon opioid gene expression and adolescent ethanol intake. Neuropharmacology. 2020;165:107917.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ngai YF, Sulistyoningrum DC, O’Neill R, Innis SM, Weinberg J, Devlin AM. Prenatal alcohol exposure alters methyl metabolism and programs serotonin transporter and glucocorticoid receptor expression in brain. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2015;309(5):R613–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Valles S, Pitarch J, Renau-Piqueras J, Guerri C. Ethanol exposure affects glial fibrillary acidic protein gene expression and transcription during rat brain development. J Neurochem. 1997;69(6):2484–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Sarkar DK, Gangisetty O, Wozniak JR, Eckerle JK, Georgieff MK, Foroud TM, et al. Persistent changes in stress-regulatory genes in pregnant women or children exposed prenatally to alcohol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019;43(9):1887–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Lee BY, Park SY, Ryu HM, Shin CY, Ko KN, Han JY, et al. Changes in the methylation status of DAT, SERT, and MeCP2 gene promoters in the blood cell in families exposed to alcohol during the periconceptional period. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015;39(2):239–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Pidsley R, Fernandes C, Viana J, Paya-Cano JL, Liu L, Smith RG, et al. DNA methylation at the Igf2/H19 imprinting control region is associated with cerebellum mass in outbred mice. Mol Brain. 2012;5:42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Frey S, Eichler A, Stonawski V, Kriebel J, Wahl S, Gallati S, et al. Prenatal alcohol exposure is associated with adverse cognitive effects and distinct whole-genome DNA methylation patterns in primary school children. Front Behav Neurosci. 2018;12:125.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Timms JA, Relton CL, Sharp GC, Rankin J, Strathdee G, McKay JA. Exploring a potential mechanistic role of DNA methylation in the relationship between in utero and post-natal environmental exposures and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Int J Cancer. 2019;145(11):2933–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Alberry BLJ, Singh SM. Hippocampal DNA methylation in a mouse model of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder that includes maternal separation stress only partially explains changes in gene expression. Front Genet. 2020;11:70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Laufer BI, Kapalanga J, Castellani CA, Diehl EJ, Yan LY, Singh SM. Associative DNA methylation changes in children with prenatal alcohol exposure. Epigenomics. 2015;7(8):1259–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Lussier AA, Morin AM, Maclsaac JL, Salmon J, Weinberg J, Reynolds JN, et al. DNA methylation as a predictor of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Clin Epigenet. 2018;10.

  58. Cobben JM, Krzyzewska IM, Venema A, Mul AN, Polstra A, Postma AV, et al. DNA methylation abundantly associates with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder and its subphenotypes. Epigenomics. 2019;11(7):767–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Okazaki S, Otsuka I, Shinko Y, Horai T, Hirata T, Yamaki N, et al. Epigenetic clock analysis in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2021;45(2):329–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Joubert BR, Felix JF, Yousefi P, Bakulski KM, Just AC, Breton C, et al. DNA Methylation in newborns and maternal smoking in pregnancy: genome-wide consortium meta-analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;98(4):680–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Rauschert S, Melton PE, Burdge G, Craig JM, Godfrey KM, Holbrook JD, et al. Maternal smoking during pregnancy induces persistent epigenetic changes into adolescence, independent of postnatal smoke exposure and is associated with cardiometabolic risk. Front Genet. 2019;10:770.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Takahashi N, Coluccio A, Thorball CW, Planet E, Shi H, Offner S, et al. ZNF445 is a primary regulator of genomic imprinting. Genes Dev. 2019;33(1–2):49–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Amarasekera M, Martino D, Ashley S, Harb H, Kesper D, Strickland D, et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling identifies a folate-sensitive region of differential methylation upstream of ZFP57-imprinting regulator in humans. FASEB J. 2014;28(9):4068–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Finegersh A, Homanics GE. Paternal alcohol exposure reduces alcohol drinking and increases behavioral sensitivity to alcohol selectively in male offspring. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(6):e99078.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by research grants from The National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (Grant Number 1141601) and the NHMRC FASD Research Australia Centre of Research Excellence (Grant Number 1110341).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia

    Mitchell Bestry & Martyn Symons

  2. National Drug Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia

    Martyn Symons

  3. Wal-yan Respiratory Research Centre, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, Australia

    Alexander Larcombe & David Martino

  4. School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia

    Alexander Larcombe

  5. Victorian Infant Brain Studies, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia

    Evelyne Muggli

  6. Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia

    Evelyne Muggli, Jeffrey M. Craig, Delyse Hutchinson & Jane Halliday

  7. Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia

    Jeffrey M. Craig, Delyse Hutchinson & David Martino

  8. IMPACT – the Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia

    Jeffrey M. Craig

  9. Public Health Genetics, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia

    Jane Halliday

  10. Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development and Centre for Drug, Alcohol and Addiction Research, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia

    Delyse Hutchinson

  11. Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

    Delyse Hutchinson

  12. National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

    Delyse Hutchinson

Authors
  1. Mitchell Bestry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martyn Symons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alexander Larcombe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Evelyne Muggli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jeffrey M. Craig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Delyse Hutchinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jane Halliday
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. David Martino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The database searches were performed by MB. Please see Methods section for author contributions with the data extraction process. The draft manuscript was written by MB, MS and DM. All remaining authors read and provided feedback on the draft manuscript, which was then incorporated to produce the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Martino.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Fig. 1

. Individual study bias scores across all domains. Data are summarized as Figure 1 in the manuscript text.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bestry, M., Symons, M., Larcombe, A. et al. Association of prenatal alcohol exposure with offspring DNA methylation in mammals: a systematic review of the evidence. Clin Epigenet 14, 12 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-022-01231-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-022-01231-9

Keywords

Clinical Epigenetics

ISSN: 1868-7083

Contact us