Skip to main content
Download PDF

Identified in blood diet-related methylation changes stratify liver biopsies of NAFLD patients according to fibrosis grade

Clinical Epigenetics volume 14, Article number: 157 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

High caloric diet and lack of physical activity are considered main causes of NAFLD, and a change in the diet is still the only effective treatment of this disease. However, molecular mechanism of the effectiveness of diet change in treatment of NAFLD is poorly understood. We aimed to assess the involvement of epigenetic mechanisms of gene expression regulation in treatment of NAFLD. Eighteen participants with medium- to high-grade steatosis were recruited and trained to follow the Mediterranean diet modified to include fibre supplements. At three timepoints (baseline, after 30 and 60 days), we evaluated adherence to the diet and measured a number of physiological parameters such as anthropometry, blood and stool biochemistry, liver steatosis and stiffness. We also collected whole blood samples for genome-wide methylation profiling and histone acetylation assessment.

Results

The diet change resulted in a decrease in liver steatosis along with statistically significant, but a minor change in BMI and weight of our study participants. The epigenetic profiling of blood cells identified significant genome-wide changes of methylation and acetylation with the former not involving regions directly regulating gene expression. Most importantly, we were able to show that identified blood methylation changes occur also in liver cells of NAFLD patients and the machine learning-based classifier that we build on those methylation changes was able to predict the stage of liver fibrosis with ROC AUC = 0.9834.

Conclusion

Methylomes of blood cells from NAFLD patients display a number of changes that are most likely a consequence of unhealthy diet, and the diet change appears to reverse those epigenetic changes. Moreover, the methylation status at CpG sites undergoing diet-related methylation change in blood cells stratifies liver biopsies from NAFLD patients according to fibrosis grade.

Background

Caloric access and decreasing physical activity is a leading cause of epidemic of obesity and metabolic syndrome. The comorbidity associated with this lifestyle is non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The prevalence of NAFLD in general population has been shown to range from 11.2 to 37.2% and increase [1,2,3]. NAFLD is characterized by the presence of hepatic steatosis (diagnosed either by imagining or by histology) that cannot be attributed to excessive alcohol consumption. This condition leads to lipotoxicity and liver damage and, in the long term, significantly increases the risk of progression to steatohepatitis, cirrhosis and even to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [4,5,6].

On cellular level, NAFLD is a consequence of the accumulation of the lipid droplets (LD) in hepatocytes, of which catabolism initiated normally by nutrient deprivation or acute LD overload is impaired. Quite a large number of medications and new compounds are in the I–III phase of clinical trials for NAFLD and NASH [7]. However, apart from the use of pioglitazone and vitamin E for patients with biopsy-proven NASH, no specific treatment is recommended for this disease [7]. Consequently, in the absence of the effective therapy the lifestyle modification including low caloric diet, exercise, and weight loss are generally recommended treatments for patients with NAFLD [8, 9].

It is well recognized that epigenetic mechanisms of gene expression regulation can be influenced by the environmental factors such as diet or exercise, and disruption of those mechanism leads to the disease.

Enzymatic addition of methyl group to cytosines in DNA strand is referred to as DNA methylation. It is one of the major epigenetic mechanisms of gene expression regulation that in humans takes place almost exclusively within CpG dinucleotide. In general terms, when cytosines in the gene promoter are methylated, the gene is not expressed. This epigenetic mechanism of gene expression regulation is the most researched in the context of diet and methylation of various genes that have already been shown to be affected not only by specific nutrients such as dietary folate [10] or keto bodies [11] but also, more importantly, by diets including Mediterranean diet or Make Better Choices 2 (MBC2) [12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Moreover, it becomes increasingly clear that apart from direct influence of the nutrition on methylome of the cells, the balance of the gut microbiota which is primarily regulated by diet plays a significant role in the nutritional status of the body and thus can influence epigenetic mechanisms of gene expression regulation [19].

As liver cells are affected in NAFLD, the investigation of casual effects of this disease should be performed using liver biopsies from the patients. We were not able to obtain liver biopsies in our study; however, previous research has already indicated that diet-induced epigenetic changes in blood and blood cells can to some extent be considered a surrogate of the effector cells [20,21,22,23,24]. Thus, we performed genome-wide methylation analyses of blood cells of NAFLD patients at the baseline and after 30 and 60 days from significant diet change. We then used publicly available data to investigate whether similar methylation changes occur in liver cells of NAFLD patients. Overall, we observed a pronounced effect of the dietary intervention on the methylome of blood cells. Moreover, we showed that methylation levels at loci identified to undergoing methylation change in blood cells during our study could also stratify liver biopsies according to the hepatic fibrosis grade.

Results

Participants adhered to the diet during study period

The median value of MDQI at inclusion was 5.5, clearly indicating that participants in general did not follow the Mediterranean diet. After 30 days (second timepoint), the index reached a median value of 7 indicating a significant improvement in the diet and at 60 days (third timepoint) the median index reached 8, which reflects close to ideal compliance with the Mediterranean diet (p value < 0.05) (Table 1 part A). Apart from the improvement in the MDQI, analysis of the components of the patients' diet showed that participants reduced the total daily fat as well as the total intake of carbohydrates and cholesterol (p value < 0.05) (Table 1 part B), increased the consumption of fibre (p value < 0.05), as well as food reach in methyl donors and cofactors involved in the metabolism of DNA methylation including folates, methionine, magnesium, vitamin B12, and riboflavin (vitamin B2) (p value < 0.05) (Table 1 part B).

Table 1 Characteristics of participants
Full size table

Effect of the diet on anthropometric, biochemical, liver steatosis, stiffness status and SCFAs of participants

Considering changes in the indicators of the compliance with dietary recommendation during the study, not surprisingly, we observed a statistically significant decrease in weight and BMI (p value < 0.05), which at inclusion indicated obesity. However, the decrease was rather minor and the change in other parameters did not reach statistical significance (Table 1 part C). Furthermore, we observed an improvement in the key biochemical parameters (Table 1 part D) including GGTP, total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol (p value < 0.05). We also analysed the concentration of SCFAs in stool and blood of study participants. The SCFAs are the products of gut bacterial anaerobic fermentation of dietary fibre and likely reflect an improvement in the gut microbiome. Although concentration of all analysed SCFAs in stool increased, the increase reached statistical significance for only acetic acid and butyric acid (p value < 0.05) (Table 1 part E). The SCFAs levels in plasma generally decreased during the study, and the changes in levels of three of them, including 2-methylbutyric, valeric and isocaproic acids, were statistically significant (p value < 0.05) (Table 1 part F). But there was no statistically significant correlation between levels of SCFAs (measured in blood or stool) and hepatic steatosis status. The most interesting observation in this part of the study was the statistically significant decrease in liver steatosis (Table 1 part G) from a baseline of 310 dB/m, characteristic for medium- to high-grade steatosis to 279.5 dB/m at the third timepoint (p value < 0.05). The median liver stiffness of participants was also reduced, but that change was not statistically significant (Table 1 part G).

Change in the dietary habits appears to reduce acetylation levels of lymphocytes and monocytes

With the indication that the intervention in our study not only improved the anthropometric, biochemical and liver steatosis status, we investigated the relative change in the histone acetylation of the lymphocytes and monocytes. This change would suggest a potential effect of intervention on epigenome. The peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stained with antibodies specific to acetylated histone H3, and we used the flow cytometry to measure the fluorescence intensity of stained lymphocytes and monocytes. The change in the fluorescence levels for lymphocytes was statistically significant between the first and both the second and the third timepoints (p value < 0.05) (Fig. 1A). For monocytes, we observed a statistically significant decrease between the first and the third timepoints (p value < 0.05) (Fig. 1B). At the same time, the change in the fluorescence was not statistically significant between the second and third timepoints (Fig. 1A, B). Deacetylation of histone H3 on lysines 9 and 14 has long been associated with actively transcribed loci [25, 26] and inversely correlated with the DNA methylation [27]; therefore, we went on to assess the influence of diet modification on methylome of blood cells.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Analysis of relative histone acetylation changes in lymphocytes (A) and monocytes (B) between study timepoints. A The change in the fluorescence levels for lymphocytes was statistically significant between the first and both the second and the third timepoints. B In monocytes, we observed a statistically significant decrease in detected fluorescence between the first and the third timepoints. The change was not statistically significant between the first and second timepoints. We did not observe statistically significant differences in the levels of fluorescence intensity between the second and third timepoints in neither lymphocytes (A) nor monocytes (B)

Full size image

The diet change influences methylation pattern of blood cells

To assess the influence of the diet change on genome-wide methylation patterns of the blood cells, we first compared the methylation profiles between study timepoints. Additionally, we used methylation profiles of blood from healthy controls as a reference in that comparison. Already initial principal component analysis (PCA) based on combined methylation changes at 666,589 informative CpGs obtained for each of the participants in the study showed that methylation profiles from the second and third study timepoints were very similar and grouped together (green and orange colours for second and third timepoints in Fig. 2A, respectively). Those profiles also clearly represented intermediate methylation between the first study timepoint (marked in blue in Fig. 2A) and healthy blood controls (marked in red in Fig. 2A), indicating that the change in genome-wide methylation patterns during the study was towards the pattern characteristic for healthy blood. We then calculated and compared median global methylation levels between study timepoints and healthy blood controls. Also in this analysis, the most pronounced change in the median global methylation was between the first and second/third timepoints (Fig. 2B), whereas the median global methylation levels at the second and the third timepoints were intermediate between the first timepoint and the healthy blood.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Analyses of global methylation changes between study timepoints. A PCA plot indicating that genome-wide methylation of blood profiles of participants before intervention (blue colour) are different and more heterogeneous than profiles from the second timepoint (green colour), third timepoint (orange colour) and healthy controls (red colour). B Comparison of median global methylation levels indicates an increase in methylation between the first and both the second and the third timepoints of the study with global methylation levels at the second and third timepoint resembling the methylation level of healthy blood (red colour)

Full size image

We also tested whether observed in PCA plots heterogeneity between methylation profiles at the first study timepoint is attributed to any of the physiological parameters we recorded for the participants or proportions of the cell fractions in the samples. Pearson correlation between each of those parameters and the median global methylation levels was not statistically significant (adj. p value > 0.05) (Additional file 1: Table S1), and the proportions of the cells in blood samples at the first study timepoint were not statistically significantly different from the levels of those cells in healthy blood (p value > 0.05) (Additional file 1: Fig. S1).

Diet change affects methylation levels only at a specific subset of CpG sites

Then, to identify CpG sites most affected by the diet change, we compared the methylation levels at each of the informative CpGs, between the first and the average methylation level at the second and third study timepoints. The detailed description of the analysis is in Additional file 1: Methods 1, and for the result of validation of this method see Additional file 1: Fig. S2. This analysis resulted in 11,627 deferentially methylated CpG sites with more than 10% methylation difference. As expected, the majority of the observed methylation changes were gains of methylation with 11,485 CpG sites displaying hypermethylation and only 142 hypomethylation (for the examples of methylation changes at specific CpGs see: Additional file 1: Fig. S3). The median methylation levels at this subset of CpG sites at the second and the third timepoints of the study were again intermediate between the first study timepoint and healthy blood, but very similar to the methylation levels in healthy blood (Fig. 3A). Interestingly, observed methylation changes were larger than median global methylation changes, indicating that these CpG sites were indeed most affected by the diet change. Also, the variance of the methylation levels at these CpG sites was statistically significantly higher at the first timepoint (var = 0.0058) than at all other timepoints and healthy blood (second timepoint var = 0.0002, third timepoint var = 0.00036 and healthy blood var = 0.00005; p value < 0.05). Again, here we tested the association of the average methylation levels at this subset of CpGs sites with the biochemical parameters recorded for patients at this timepoint and found no statistically significant associations (Additional file 1: Table S2).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Comparison of the methylation changes at a subset of CpG sites that we identify to display diet-related methylation changes. A Comparison of the median methylation levels for analysed groups including: first (blue), second (green), third (orange) timepoints and healthy controls (red). The difference at identified CpGs is significantly larger than the ones observed in Fig. 3B, indicating that methylation at this subset of CpG sites was most affected in the study. B PCA plot based on the identified subset of CpG sites indicates a significant change in the methylation profile of this subset of CpG sites between the first and the second/third timepoints. C Heatmap illustrating unsupervised clustering analyses indicates significant hypomethylation (blue colour in the heatmap) at the first study timepoint and significant increase in the methylation level towards the levels observed in healthy controls (red colour in the heatmap) at the second/third timepoints

Full size image

We then performed PCA and unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis of methylation levels at this subset of CpG sites. The first component in this PCA (Fig. 3B) explained more than 83% of the variance confirming that the global methylation changes that we observed in previous analysis were mainly driven by the methylation changes at this subset of CpG sites. Moreover, both PCA and unsupervised clustering showed that the direction of the diet-induced methylation changes at the second and the third timepoints (marked with green and orange in Fig. 3B, C, respectively) was clearly towards methylation changes observed in healthy blood samples (marked with red in Fig. 3B, C).

Diet-related methylation changes are enriched in region not directly involved in gene expression regulation

We then analysed whether identified CpG sites are enriched in specific functional genomic regions such as gene elements, CpG islands and gene regulatory regions (Additional file 1: Fig. S4). This analysis showed that the identified CpG sites were enriched in the regions not directly involved in gene expression regulation including Exon boundary (FC = 1.45), Gene Body (FC = 1.27), 3’UTR (FC = 1.83), Open Sea (FC = 1.52), North Shelf (FC = 1.5), South Shelf (FC = 1.48), Enhancer (FC = 1.65) and Open chromatin region (FC = 1.47) and depleted in regions considered to directly control gene expression including TSS1500 (FC = 0.7), TSS200 (FC = 0.2), 5’UTR (FC = 0.8), 1st Exon (FC = 0.2), CGIs (FC = 0.03), North Shore (FC = 0.46) and South Shore (FC = 0.45), Promoters (FC = 0.11) and CTCF binding site (FC = 0.53). At the same time, the frequency of the CpG sites with intervention-related methylation changes was almost the same as expected by chance in Promoter flanking region (FC = 1.04) and TF binding site (FC = 1.1). The identified CpG sites also did not localize to specific chromosomes and were not significantly enriched in histone binding sites (Additional file 1: Table S3) and in specific transcription factor bounding sites (Additional file 1: Table S4).

Functional annotation of the diet-related methylation changes

The previous analysis indicated that the majority of the identified 11,627 CpG sites displaying methylation changes in our study despite that they mapped to 9956 genes (listed in Additional file 2) were not located in the regions traditionally associated with gene expression regulation (e.g. promoters). Recently, however, the regulatory function of the methylation changes outside of traditional regulatory regions is reported in increasing number of publications [28,29,30]. Therefore, we mapped the identified CpGs to the gene regions and used FUMA pipeline for functional mapping and annotation of obtained gene set [31]. This analysis showed that liver was one of four tissue types where identified genes were shown to undergo downregulation. Other tissue types identified in this analysis were “Kidney_Cortex”, “Artery_Tibial” and “Nerve_Tibial”. Interestingly, we were able to find publications linking all of those tissues types to NAFLD (Additional file 1: Table S5A). We then explored the functional annotation of genes in this gene set in nine gene term databases (listed in Additional file 1: Table S5B) and interrogated Google Scholar for the publications reporting result associating NAFLD with top hit terms in each of the databases. Surprisingly, we were able to reference more than 70% of terms identified in each of the databases to the publications describing physiological processes involved in pathology of the NAFLD. The details of this analysis and references to the identified literature are listed in Additional file 1: Table S5.

Methylation changes observed in blood separate liver biopsies from NAFLD patients according to the fibrosis grade

As already mentioned, the major limitation of studies like ours is the inability to obtain liver tissue from the participants, which would allow identification of the methylation changes directly implicated in NAFLD. There is, however, evidence that at least to some extent the methylation changes observed in blood cells can be considered a proxy of changes observed in effector tissue [20,21,22, 24]. In recently published paper, the association of the methylation changes in liver with the fibrosis progression was investigated [32]. We used data from this study that included methylation profiles of the 341 liver biopsies to validate to what extent observed in blood cells methylation changes reflect the methylation aberrations in liver cells of NAFLD patients. The unsupervised clustering of liver biopsies based on methylation changes at the subset of CpG sites was able to remarkably accurately separate liver biopsies according to the grade of the fibrosis with p value = 2.62e−38 (Chi2) (Fig. 4). Moreover, we used tree-based automated machine learning (ML) [33] to assess the accuracy of classification of grade 0 and grade 3 + fibrosis based on this subset of CpG sites (for details of ML analysis see Additional file 1: Methods 2). With the ML approach, we were able to distinguish grade 0 and grade 3 + fibrosis with the accuracy of 0.93 and the ROC from this analysis had AUC = 0.9834 (Fig. 4B).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Classification of the NAFLD biopsies. A Heatmap representing unsupervised clustering of the biopsies and the fibrosis grade assessed by the pathologist. B ROC curve describing the accuracy of the ML-based classification of NAFLD patients

Full size image

Methylation changes in blood as a biomarker of the methylation changes in liver

We also used unsupervised clustering to compare the methylation levels at the identified subset of CpGs between liver biopsies, healthy blood, healthy liver and blood from all the timepoints in our study. This analysis showed that the methylation levels at those CpGs were very similar between healthy blood (Fig. 5A—red colour) and liver (Fig. 5A—brown colour) but significantly different from blood of our participants before diet change (Fig. 5A—blue colour). At the same time, the methylation levels at the second and the third timepoint of our study (Fig. 5A—green and orange colours) were very similar (clustered together) to healthy blood. This suggests a potential use of the methylation changes at these CpGs as blood-based biomarkers of the NAFLD. We also compared the methylation levels at the single CpG site between all groups of patients in the study. The representative results from this comparison are shown in Fig. 5B, C and corroborate the results of the heatmap.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Comparison of the methylation levels at the subset of the CpG sites identified in our study between our study timepoints, healthy blood (GSE123914), healthy livers (GSE136380) and the liver biopsies of NAFLD patients (GSE180474). A Unsupervised clustering that includes liver biopsies and our study participants. B–E Box plots with the examples of the tissue-specific methylation changes

Full size image

Fibrosis-specific methylation changes

Interestingly, the unsupervised clustering analyses depicted in Fig. 5 showed that a subset of CpG sites displays very similar methylation levels in healthy liver (brown colour) and Grade 0 biopsies (grey colour) (Fig. 5A—Box 1, Fig. 5B, C). At the same time, those CpG sites display specific methylation changes in biopsies with grade 3 fibrosis (pink colour) (Fig. 5—Box 2, Fig. 5B, C). This suggests that methylation at this subset of CpG sites is tissue-specific and the progression of fibrosis not surprisingly involves changes of tissue-specific methylation patterns. We also compared the methylation levels at these CpG sites in blood between timepoints of our study (Fig. 5A—Box 3, Fig. 5D, E). This analysis again showed that methylation of this subset of CpG sites was also altered by the diet change in blood cells and can be a potential biomarker of the fibrosis progression. However, as our study did not include analysis of the methylation of blood from patients with grade 0 and 3 + fibrosis, this needs further investigation.

Discussion

Diet has been shown to have a pronounced effect on the methylomes of blood cells [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]; for example, LINE-1 elements of blood cells not only differ between cases and controls following and not following the diet, but more importantly between groups reporting different levels of adherence to the diet [34]. Moreover, recently patients with NASH have been shown to exhibit epigenetic age acceleration measured by methylation changes in blood [35].

We studied genome-wide methylation changes in blood from individuals with NAFLD who changed the dietary habits and followed Mediterranean diet for 60 days that resulted in a statistically significant improvement in the liver function measured by liver steatosis.

Our analysis identified a subset of 11,627 CpG sites at which the methylation levels were significantly altered after diet change. This indicates a pronounced effect of the dietary intervention on the blood cells’ methylome of individuals with NAFLD. The most interesting, however, was finding that the identified methylation changes did not include gene regulatory regions such as transcription start sites (TSS) but span gene body, exon boundary and 3’UTR. The presence of methylation in gene body has been shown to increase the fidelity and efficiency of gene transcription by confining the transcription to the canonical promoters [36, 37]. Moreover, it has been shown in cancer that intragenic methylation can alter expression of at least some genes [38]. Our results therefore suggest that the change in the diet in our study may have improved gene transcription; more importantly, gene set enrichment analysis confirmed the involvement of the genes annotated to the identified methylation changes in the physiology of the NAFLD and we were able to find literature references associating more than 70% of the ontology terms from these analyses with NAFLD.

One drawback of studies similar to ours is the inability to obtain liver tissue from the participants due to the risks related to the liver biopsy procedure. We have, however, been able to analyse the methylation at the identified subset of CpG sites in liver biopsies from previous study. This analysis showed that to a large extent the methylation changes in blood reflect methylation changes in the liver of NAFLD patients. Moreover, we have shown that we are able to, with remarkable accuracy, classify the grade of liver fibrosis in biopsies on the bases of the methylation changes at the CpG sites that we identify to undergo diet-related methylation changes in blood. That shows that at least to some extent we can consider methylation changes in blood, a proxy of the changes that occur in liver.

The results of the methylation profiling in our study are in line with the results of absolute measurements of histone acetylation in lymphocytes and monocytes of our study participants, where we observed a decrease in the relative acetylation. As already mentioned, DNA methylation and acetylation interplay in gene transcription regulation and deacetylation of histone H3 on lysines 9 and 14 has long been associated with actively transcribed loci [25, 26] and inversely correlated with the DNA methylation [27].

The specific molecular mechanisms by which diet influences methylation and acetylation of the tissues are not known, and the results of our study only identify a pronounced effect of diet on those processes in blood cells. Undoubtedly, the level of supplementation of the donors necessary in both histone acetylation and DNA methylation in the diet will have an impact on the metabolism of those two processes. The animal studies have repeatedly shown that supplementation or reduction in dietary methyl donors modifies DNA methylation levels in liver cells as well as results in liver fat changes [39, 40]. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to elucidate molecular mechanisms of interaction between diet and epigenome of specific tissues.

One intriguing finding in our study is the observed increase in short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) in stools of participants after diet change. The primary source of the SCFAs is gut microbiome [41] that suggests that the diet in our study affected and improved the gut microbiome of the participants. Moreover, SCFAs have been shown to affect the activity of histone acetylase and histone deacetylase enzymes that would provide an elegant mechanism for the interaction, but this hypothesis needs further investigation.

One limitation of our study is lack of healthy controls following Mediterranean diet, and we only compare methylomes of NAFLD patients before and after intervention to the controls for which we were not able to access the dietary information. In the following study, adequate controls group should be used; nevertheless, the compression that we were able to make clearly indicates the effects of the intervention.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our results clearly indicate a pronounced effect of the diet on the epigenetic mechanism of gene expression regulation and link those changes to the aetiology of the NAFLD.

Materials and methods

Study design

The study was conducted between July and November 2019. Participants were recruited at Sonomed Medical Centre in Szczecin, Poland. After inclusion, participants undergone three rounds of clinical assessments at day 0 (baseline/first timepoint), after 30 days (second timepoint) and 60 days (third timepoint). At each timepoint, specific clinical parameters were recorded and clinical material was collected as illustrated in Fig. 6. Overall, the group of 18 eligible participants that included Caucasian men (n = 8) and women (n = 10) with NAFLD were recruited following the criteria: FibroScan® (CAP ≥ 234 dB/m), age > 18 years old and no diagnosis of inflammatory gut disease. We used Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) [42] (detailed description in Additional file 1: Methods 3) to assess dietary habits of the participants for a 6-month period before enrolment with daily intake of the nutrients calculated using nutrient analysis software Dieta5, version 5.8.2. (Warsaw, Poland) with the reference to the database of the Polish National Institute of Nutrition (https://www.pzh.gov.pl/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Normy_zywienia_2020web-1.pdf). The participants included in the study largely did not comply with the Mediterranean diet as shown by the Mediterranean Diet Quality Index (MDQI) score (detailed description in Additional file 1: Methods 4) (Table 1 part A) [43]. We also excluded participants that at enrolment or during the study were confirmed with: infection with either HBV (hepatitis B virus) or HCV (hepatitis C virus), body mass index (BMI) > 35 kg/m2, displayed increased physical activity before the study or reported changes in physical activity during the study (detailed description of physical activity assessment in Additional file 1: Methods 5), reported the excessive consumption of alcohol (> 30 g in men and 20 g in women per day), excessive drug use or reported any condition that could limit the mobility of the participant. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Pomeranian Medical University (Szczecin, Poland, KB-0012/131/19) and conformed to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki. The volunteers provided written informed consent before the study.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Study design and outline of analyses performed at each timepoint

Full size image

Guidelines and control of diet adherence

Each participant was then individually instructed by licensed nutritionist about principles of the Mediterranean diet and received pamphlet with detailed dietary recommendations to follow (Additional file 1: Methods 6 and Fig. S5). Additionally, participants were requested to eat two specifically formulated high-fibre rolls (buns) on each day during the study (Additional file 1: Methods 7). Twenty-four-hour food diaries were used to control participants adherence to diet (detailed description in Additional file 1: Methods 8). The changes in diet between timepoints were evaluated using MDQI scale [43]. Moreover, the participants were instructed not to exceed moderate activity (cardio training 5x/week every day, resistance training > 2x/week; no more than 150–300 min/week).

The anthropometric data

Anthropometric assessments were performed routinely at each of the three timepoints of the study. The measurements included: height (m), body weight (kg) and body composition including: fat mass (%), muscle mass (kg) and total body water (%), which was assessed with the multifrequency bioimpedance meter, Tanita BC-601 (Japan).

Liver stiffness and steatosis measurements

Liver stiffness (VCTE) and steatosis (CAP) were measured with FibroScan® at baseline and at third timepoint by the same trained in technology MD (detailed description in Additional file 1: Methods 9).

Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) analysis

Gas chromatography analyses of SCFAs in stool were performed according to procedure described in Additional file 1: Methods 10 and analyses of SCFAs in plasma were performed using Waters Acquity Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography and Waters TQ-S triple quadrupole mass spectrometer as described in Additional file 1: Methods 11.

Histone acetylation analysis

Acetylation of peripheral blood lymphocytes and monocytes was measured using Milli-MarkTM Anti-Acetyl-Histone H3-PE (Milli-Mark, Merck, Germany) and flow cytometry, following the manufacturer’s protocols (detailed description in Additional file 1: Methods 12).

DNA extraction for methylation analysis

The DNA from the blood samples at the first timepoint was extracted using Invisorb® Spin Blood Mini Kit (Stratec Biomedical AG, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions and salting out method from the second and third timepoints.

Genome-wide methylation analysis

The genome-wide methylation changes screening in DNA extracted from whole blood was performed using Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip (EPIC, Illumina Inc.). The raw data were processed with ChAMP pipeline and normalized with BMIQ method. This data processing resulted in 666,589 informative CpGs available for all the participants at each timepoint of the study. Considering the data structure, we developed a specific data processing approach to identify the loci, at which methylation was most affected by the intervention (detailed description in Additional file 1: Methods 1). Briefly, the ∆β representing difference in methylation before and after the intervention was generated by subtracting β value for each CpG site at the first timepoint from averaged β value from the second and third timepoints, for each patient separately. Then, to take into account heterogeneity of the methylation profiles observed at the first timepoint we only included in further analyses CpGs that displayed 10% difference in methylation for more than 3/4 (77%) of the participants. Overall, this procedure resulted in 11,627 CpGs displaying differential methylation before and after intervention. EpiDISH R package [44] was used to assess and compare cell fraction proportion of the blood samples at the first timepoint and the group of healthy individuals from GSE123914 that we used as healthy controls in our study [45].

Gene ontology term enrichment and fold change analyses

We performed gene set enrichment analysis using “GENE2FUNC” function in FUMA [46] to establish which biological pathways may be affected by the identified methylation changes. We also used HOMER v4.11 for motif discovery analysis [47] and ChIP-Atlas to predict multiple histone modifications at the loci where we identified methylation changes. To investigate whether identified methylation changes occupy specific genomic regions, we analysed the distribution of those loci relative to the CpG islands, gene regions feature category (according to the Infinium MethylationEPIC v1.0 B4 Manifest File, UCSC coordinates) and regulatory regions as defined in Ensembl [48].

Statistical analysis

The change in the parameters recorded for each of the participants at all study timepoints was tested with repeated measures ANOVA test. If the data did not meet the conditions for parametric test, then the Friedman test was used. For the parameters with significant associations, the post hoc paired t test or Wilcoxon test was performed. For the comparison of the parameters between two timepoints, we used paired t test or Wilcoxon test. Independent t test or Mann–Whitney tests were used for comparison of parameters from each of the timepoints to healthy controls and Pearson test to calculate the correlation between median methylation levels and clinical parameters. All analyses were corrected for the multiple testing using Bonferroni correction. The missing data points were imputed with mean of the parameter. Statistical significance was declared at p-value less than 0.05. All analyses were performed in R 4.0.3 environment.  Chi-square test and TPOT tool was used for testing the classification accuracy of liver fibrosis grade based on identified methylation changes [33].

Controls and validation data

Publicly available EPIC methylation profiles were used as healthy blood controls (GSE123914, n = 60) [45], and this group did not undergo the dietary intervention. To validate final results, we used GSE180474—NAFLD liver samples with defined fibrosis stage (n = 341) [32], and GSE136380—pathologically confirmed healthy livers (n = 23) [49].

Availability of data and materials

The microarray data generated in this study will be deposited in GEO and will be released upon publication. Accession numbers of the publicly available data used in this study are as follows: GSE123914, GSE180474, and GSE136380.

Abbreviations

NAFLD:

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

LD:

Lipid droplets

MBC2:

Make better choices 2

FFQ:

Food frequency questionnaire

MDQI:

Mediterranean diet quality index

HBV:

Hepatitis B virus

HCV:

Hepatitis C virus

BMI:

Body mass index

SCFA:

Short-chain fatty acid

UCSC:

University of California Santa Cruz

GGTP:

Gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase

LDL:

Low-density lipoprotein

HDL:

High-density cholesterol

PCA:

Principal component analysis

UTR:

Untranslated region

TSS:

Transcriptional start site

ML:

Machine learning

References

  1. Anstee QM, Reeves HL, Kotsiliti E, Govaere O, Heikenwalder M. From NASH to HCC: current concepts and future challenges. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16(7):411–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rich NE, Oji S, Mufti AR, Browning JD, Parikh ND, Odewole M, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease prevalence, severity, and outcomes in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16(2):198–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hartleb M, Baranski K, Zejda J, Chudek J, Wiecek A. Non-alcoholic fatty liver and advanced fibrosis in the elderly: results from a community-based polish survey. Liver Int. 2017;37(11):1706–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gluchowski NL, Becuwe M, Walther TC, Farese RV Jr. Lipid droplets and liver disease: from basic biology to clinical implications. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14(6):343–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. 2016;64(1):73–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Younossi ZM, Golabi P, de Avila L, Paik JM, Srishord M, Fukui N, et al. The global epidemiology of NAFLD and NASH in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hepatol. 2019;71(4):793–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Negi CK, Babica P, Bajard L, Bienertova-Vasku J, Tarantino G. Insights into the molecular targets and emerging pharmacotherapeutic interventions for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Metabolism. 2022;126: 154925.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, Charlton M, Cusi K, Rinella M, et al. The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guidance from the American association for the study of liver diseases. Hepatology. 2018;67(1):328–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Meroni M, Longo M, Rustichelli A, Dongiovanni P. Nutrition and genetics in NAFLD: the perfect binomium. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(8):2986.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Mandaviya PR, Joehanes R, Brody J, Castillo-Fernandez JE, Dekkers KF, Do AN, et al. Association of dietary folate and vitamin B-12 intake with genome-wide DNA methylation in blood: a large-scale epigenome-wide association analysis in 5841 individuals. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;110(2):437–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ruan HB, Crawford PA. Ketone bodies as epigenetic modifiers. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2018;21(4):260–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Barchitta M, Maugeri A, Quattrocchi A, Barone G, Mazzoleni P, Catalfo A, et al. Mediterranean diet and particulate matter exposure are associated with LINE-1 methylation: results from a cross-sectional study in women. Front Genet. 2018;9:514.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Fasanelli F, Giraudo MT, Vineis P, Fiano V, Fiorito G, Grasso C, et al. DNA methylation, colon cancer and Mediterranean diet: results from the EPIC-Italy cohort. Epigenetics. 2019;14(10):977–88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Maugeri A. the effects of dietary interventions on DNA methylation: implications for obesity management. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(22):8670.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hibler E, Huang L, Andrade J, Spring B. Impact of a diet and activity health promotion intervention on regional patterns of DNA methylation. Clin Epigenet. 2019;11(1):133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gensous N, Garagnani P, Santoro A, Giuliani C, Ostan R, Fabbri C, et al. One-year Mediterranean diet promotes epigenetic rejuvenation with country- and sex-specific effects: a pilot study from the NU-AGE project. Geroscience. 2020;42(2):687–701.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ma J, Rebholz CM, Braun KVE, Reynolds LM, Aslibekyan S, Xia R, et al. Whole blood DNA methylation signatures of diet are associated with cardiovascular disease risk factors and all-cause mortality. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2020;13(4): e002766.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Arpon A, Riezu-Boj JI, Milagro FI, Marti A, Razquin C, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, et al. Adherence to Mediterranean diet is associated with methylation changes in inflammation-related genes in peripheral blood cells. J Physiol Biochem. 2016;73(3):445–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cuevas-Sierra A, Ramos-Lopez O, Riezu-Boj JI, Milagro FI, Martinez JA. Diet, gut microbiota, and obesity: links with host genetics and epigenetics and potential applications. Adv Nutr. 2019;10(suppl_1):S17–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ma J, Nano J, Ding J, Zheng Y, Hennein R, Liu C, et al. A Peripheral blood DNA methylation signature of hepatic fat reveals a potential causal pathway for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Diabetes. 2019;68(5):1073–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ebrahimi P, Luthman H, McGuigan FE, Akesson KE. Epigenome-wide cross-tissue correlation of human bone and blood DNA methylation - can blood be used as a surrogate for bone? Epigenetics. 2021;16(1):92–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hewitt AW, Januar V, Sexton-Oates A, Joo JE, Franchina M, Wang JJ, et al. DNA methylation landscape of ocular tissue relative to matched peripheral blood. Sci Rep. 2017;7:46330.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Gadd DA, Stevenson AJ, Hillary RF, McCartney DL, Wrobel N, McCafferty S, et al. Epigenetic predictors of lifestyle traits applied to the blood and brain. Brain Commun. 2021;3(2):fcab082.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Olsson Lindvall M, Angerfors A, Andersson B, Nilsson S, Davila Lopez M, Hansson L, et al. Comparison of DNA methylation profiles of hemostatic genes between liver tissue and peripheral blood within individuals. Thromb Haemost. 2021;121(5):573–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Roh TY, Cuddapah S, Zhao K. Active chromatin domains are defined by acetylation islands revealed by genome-wide mapping. Genes Dev. 2005;19(5):542–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Mizzen CA, Allis CD. Linking histone acetylation to transcriptional regulation. Cell Mol Life Sci. 1998;54(1):6–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cedar H, Bergman Y. Linking DNA methylation and histone modification: patterns and paradigms. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10(5):295–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Aran D, Sabato S, Hellman A. DNA methylation of distal regulatory sites characterizes dysregulation of cancer genes. Genome Biol. 2013;14(3):R21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ordonez R, Martinez-Calle N, Agirre X, Prosper F. DNA methylation of enhancer elements in myeloid neoplasms: Think outside the promoters? Cancers (Basel). 2019;11(10):1424.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ma Q, Xu Z, Lu H, Xu Z, Zhou Y, Yuan B, et al. Distal regulatory elements identified by methylation and hydroxymethylation haplotype blocks from mouse brain. Epigenet Chromatin. 2018;11(1):75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Watanabe K, Umicevic Mirkov M, de Leeuw CA, van den Heuvel MP, Posthuma D. Genetic mapping of cell type specificity for complex traits. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):3222.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Johnson ND, Wu X, Still CD, Chu X, Petrick AT, Gerhard GS, et al. Differential DNA methylation and changing cell-type proportions as fibrotic stage progresses in NAFLD. Clin Epigenet. 2021;13(1):152.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Le TT, Fu W, Moore JH. Scaling tree-based automated machine learning to biomedical big data with a feature set selector. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(1):250–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Martin-Nunez GM, Cabrera-Mulero R, Rubio-Martin E, Rojo-Martinez G, Olveira G, Valdes S, et al. Methylation levels of the SCD1 gene promoter and LINE-1 repeat region are associated with weight change: an intervention study. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2014;58(7):1528–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Loomba R, Gindin Y, Jiang Z, Lawitz E, Caldwell S, Djedjos CS, et al. DNA methylation signatures reflect aging in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. JCI Insight. 2018;3(2): 1-9.

  36. Neri F, Rapelli S, Krepelova A, Incarnato D, Parlato C, Basile G, et al. Intragenic DNA methylation prevents spurious transcription initiation. Nature. 2017;543(7643):72–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Teissandier A, Bourc’his D. Gene body DNA methylation conspires with H3K36me3 to preclude aberrant transcription. EMBO J. 2017;36(11):1471–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Yang X, Han H, De Carvalho DD, Lay FD, Jones PA, Liang G. Gene body methylation can alter gene expression and is a therapeutic target in cancer. Cancer Cell. 2014;26(4):577–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Cordero P, Gomez-Uriz AM, Campion J, Milagro FI, Martinez JA. Dietary supplementation with methyl donors reduces fatty liver and modifies the fatty acid synthase DNA methylation profile in rats fed an obesogenic diet. Genes Nutr. 2013;8(1):105–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Tryndyak VP, Han T, Muskhelishvili L, Fuscoe JC, Ross SA, Beland FA, et al. Coupling global methylation and gene expression profiles reveal key pathophysiological events in liver injury induced by a methyl-deficient diet. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2011;55(3):411–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Natarajan N, Pluznick JL. From microbe to man: the role of microbial short chain fatty acid metabolites in host cell biology. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2014;307(11):C979–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Thompson FE, Subar AF. Chapter 1—dietary assessment methodology. In: Coulston AM, Boushey CJ, Ferruzzi MG, Delahanty LM, editors. Nutrition in the prevention and treatment of disease. 4th ed. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2017. p. 5–48.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  43. Aparicio-Ugarriza R, Cuenca-Garcia M, Gonzalez-Gross M, Julian C, Bel-Serrat S, Moreno LA, et al. Relative validation of the adapted Mediterranean diet score for adolescents by comparison with nutritional biomarkers and nutrient and food intakes: the healthy lifestyle in Europe by nutrition in adolescence (HELENA) study. Public Health Nutr. 2019;22(13):2381–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Zheng SC, Breeze CE, Beck S, Dong D, Zhu T, Ma L, et al. EpiDISH web server: epigenetic dissection of intra-sample-heterogeneity with online GUI. Bioinformatics. 2019.

  45. Zaimi I, Pei D, Koestler DC, Marsit CJ, De Vivo I, Tworoger SS, et al. Variation in DNA methylation of human blood over a 1-year period using the Illumina MethylationEPIC array. Epigenetics. 2018;13(10–11):1056–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Watanabe K, Taskesen E, van Bochoven A, Posthuma D. Functional mapping and annotation of genetic associations with FUMA. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1826.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Heinz S, Benner C, Spann N, Bertolino E, Lin YC, Laslo P, et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol Cell. 2010;38(4):576–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Zerbino DR, Wilder SP, Johnson N, Juettemann T, Flicek PR. The ensembl regulatory build. Genome Biol. 2015;16:56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Cerapio JP, Marchio A, Cano L, Lopez I, Fournie JJ, Regnault B, et al. Global DNA hypermethylation pattern and unique gene expression signature in liver cancer from patients with Indigenous American ancestry. Oncotarget. 2021;12(5):475–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Piotr Baszuk for his advice regarding the statistical analyses.

Funding

This study was funded by MSWiA DIALOG 0102/2019 and the Polish Returns grant programme from The Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange, grant number: PPN/PPO/2018/1/00088/U.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Tomasz Kazimierz Wojdacz and Ewa Stachowska shared co-last authorship

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Independent Clinical Epigenetics Laboratory, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252, Szczecin, Poland

    Katarzyna Ewa Sokolowska, Jan Bińkowski, Olga Taryma-Leśniak, Konrad Borowski & Tomasz Kazimierz Wojdacz

  2. Department of Human Nutrition and Metabolomics, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-460, Szczecin, Poland

    Dominika Maciejewska-Markiewicz, Viktoria Hawryłkowicz, Patrycja Załęcka, Karina Ryterska & Ewa Stachowska

  3. Department of Biochemical Sciences, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-460, Szczecin, Poland

    Joanna Palma & Karolina Skonieczna-Żydecka

  4. Translational Medicine Group, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204, Szczecin, Poland

    Katarzyna Kozlowska-Petriczko

  5. Department of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine, SPWSZ Hospital, 71-455, Szczecin, Poland

    Katarzyna Kozlowska-Petriczko

  6. Department of General Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-111, Szczecin, Poland

    Magdalena Baśkiewicz-Hałasa & Bogusław Machaliński

  7. Department of Experimental Physiology and Pathophysiology, Laboratory of Centre for Preclinical Research, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland

    Marcin Ufnal

  8. Biobank Laboratory, Department of Molecular Biophysics, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, 90-237, Lodz, Poland

    Dominik Strapagiel & Justyna Jarczak

  9. Laboratory of Molecular Basis of Behavior, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Science, Warsaw, Poland

    Justyna Jarczak

Authors
  1. Katarzyna Ewa Sokolowska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dominika Maciejewska-Markiewicz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jan Bińkowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Joanna Palma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Olga Taryma-Leśniak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Katarzyna Kozlowska-Petriczko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Konrad Borowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Magdalena Baśkiewicz-Hałasa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Viktoria Hawryłkowicz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Patrycja Załęcka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Marcin Ufnal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Dominik Strapagiel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Justyna Jarczak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Karolina Skonieczna-Żydecka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Karina Ryterska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Bogusław Machaliński
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Tomasz Kazimierz Wojdacz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Ewa Stachowska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ES and TKW conceived the concept and design of the study and obtained funding for this project. DMM recruited participants with support of KR. JP prepared biological samples for analysis. KKP performed medical examinations. KSŻ supervised clinical research. VH and PZ helped establish dietary recommendations, and they prepared spreadsheets for statistical analyses. MBH and BM performed wet-lab acetylation analyses. MU performed wet-lab SCAFAs analyses. KB prepared DNA for methylation analyses and participated in validation, which was supported by KES and OTL. DS and JJ performed wet-lab microarray experiments. KES analysed the quality of data, performed methylation, acetylation and statistical analyses and prepared data visualization, with the support of JB, OTL and TKW. JB formulated and performed ML analyses. TKW, KES and ES wrote, reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors participated in data analysis and wrote the manuscript as well as read and approved the final version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tomasz Kazimierz Wojdacz or Ewa Stachowska.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Pomeranian Medical University (Szczecin, Poland, KB-0012/131/19) and conformed to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki. All participants signed informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Supplementary Methods and Results.

Additional file 2.

11627 CpGs annotated to genes.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sokolowska, K.E., Maciejewska-Markiewicz, D., Bińkowski, J. et al. Identified in blood diet-related methylation changes stratify liver biopsies of NAFLD patients according to fibrosis grade. Clin Epigenet 14, 157 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-022-01377-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-022-01377-6

Keywords

  • Nutrition
  • Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
  • Liver
  • Fibre
  • DNA methylation
  • Epigenetics
  • Acetylation
  • Mediterranean diet

Clinical Epigenetics

ISSN: 1868-7083

Contact us