Skip to main content

DNA methylation analysis of tumor suppressor genes in liquid biopsy components of early stage NSCLC: a promising tool for early detection

Abstract

Purpose

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis represents a liquid biopsy approach for real-time monitoring of tumor evolution. DNA methylation is considered to be an early event in the process of cancer development and progression. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether detection of DNA methylation of selected tumor suppressor genes in CTC and matched ctDNA provides prognostic information in early stage NSCLC.

Experimental design

The methylation status of five selected gene promoters (APC, RASSFIA1, FOXA1, SLFN11, SHOX2) was examined by highly specific and sensitive real-time methylation specific PCR assays in: (a) a training group of 35 primary tumors and their corresponding adjacent non-cancerous tissues of early stage NSCLC patients, (b) a validation group of 22 primary tumor tissues (FFPEs) and 42 peripheral blood samples of early stage NSCLC patients. gDNA was isolated from FFPEs, CTCs (size-based enriched by Parsortix; Angle and plasma, and (c) a control group of healthy blood donors (n = 12).

Results

All five gene promoters tested were highly methylated in the training group; methylation of SHOX2 promoter in primary tumors was associated with unfavorable outcome. RASSFIA and APC were found methylated in plasma-cfDNA samples at 14.3% and 11.9%, respectively, whereas in the corresponding CTCs SLFN11 and APC promoters were methylated in 7.1%. The incidence of relapses was higher in patients with a) promoter methylation of APC and SLFN11 in plasma-cfDNA (P = 0.037 and P = 0.042 respectively) and b) at least one detected methylated gene promoter in CTC or plasma-cfDNA (P = 0.015).

Conclusions

DNA methylation of these five gene promoters was significantly lower in CTCs and plasma-cfDNA than in the primary tumors. Combination of DNA methylation analysis in CTC and plasma-cfDNA was associated with worse DFI of NSCLC patients. Additional studies are required to validate our findings in a large cohort of early stage NSCLC patients.

Introduction

Lung cancer remains globally a leading cause of death from cancer, due to its high incidence and late-stage diagnosis. Annual imaging was recommended for screening high risk individuals, since early diagnosis of lung cancer at an early stage before it has been spread, could result to more successful treatments. However, less than 10% of those eligible adhere to guidelines [1] and about 45% of NSCLC patients even diagnosed at an early stage develop local or distant recurrence within 8–18 months. Moreover, 30% to 80% of patients with early stage NSCLC will die within 5 years of diagnosis [2].

Liquid biopsy (LB) analysis is nowadays a novel highly promising and very important tool in clinical oncology. LB is based on the analysis of several types of tumor-derived biomarkers that circulate in the bloodstream such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs), exosomes, and tumor-derived circulating nucleic acids, such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), microRNAs (miRNAs) and non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) [3, 4]. In 2005 the first LB test that was approved by the FDA was CTC enumeration in metastatic breast cancer based on the CellSearch® system [5] (Menarini, Silicon Biosystems, Italy) while in 2017 the first cfDNA-based liquid biopsy test was approved for EGFR mutations in plasma-cfDNA [6]. The number of FDA-approved tests that are based on the analysis of plasma-cfDNA in order to predict response and resistance to therapy is constantly growing [7, 8]. CancerSEEK and CancerEMC are newly developed liquid biopsy blood tests that have been proposed for early cancer detection based on a combination of circulating protein biomarkers and mutations in cfDNA from the blood [9, 10].

DNA methylation plays an essential role in regulating gene expression and modifying chromatin conformation [11]. Epigenetic biomarkers have been discovered in various types of cancer [12] since DNA methylation alterations are frequently observed and have diverse implications in carcinogenesis, diagnosis and prediction. Beyond DNA mutations, changes in DNA methylation patterns are known to arise early during cancer pathogenesis and in many cases hypermethylation in the promoter region of selected genes is thought to have carcinogenic and prognostic effects [13, 14]. A combination of DNA methylation analysis with LB is very powerful in identifying circulating epigenetic biomarkers of clinical importance [15]. Based on epigenetic alterations two commercially available tests for colorectal cancer and lung cancer detection in plasma-cfDNA levels namely “Epi proColon” (methylation in SEPT9) and “Epi proLung” (methylation in PTGER4 and SHOX2), respectively, were used in clinical practice [16], [17]. Recently, a six-marker panel methylation-based plasma test, namely lung EpiCheck was validated for the detection of lung cancer [18].

Our group was the first to demonstrate epigenetic alterations in CTCs using as a model breast cancer [19, 20]. We have also reported the prognostic significance of DNA methylation markers in plasma-cfDNA of NSCLC patients [21, 22]. Several groups have also reported that promoter methylation of specific genes could be used as noninvasive circulating epigenetic biomarkers for the diagnosis of NSCLC [23,24,25].

In the present study the methylation status of five tumor suppressor genes, involved in some of the hallmarks of cancer [26], was investigated. The selection of the genes was based on a meta-analysis of RNA-seq data from The CancerGenome Atlas (TCGA) Consortium according to their limited expression in patients with NSCLC. The selected genes were: (a) RASSF1A, a tumor suppressor gene involved in cell proliferation and apoptosis [27] (b) SHOX2 acting as transcription factor [28], (c) SLFN11 that is described for its role in differentiation and cell proliferation [29], (d) APC that participates in cell migration, adhesion transcriptional activation and apoptosis [30] and (e) FOXA1, a transcription factor which positively regulates tumor growth and metastasis [31].

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of DNA methylation of these five genes and to evaluate their prognostic significance in primary tumors, corresponding plasma-cfDNA and size-based enriched CTC fractions of patients with early stage NSCLC. Our data strongly suggest that combination of DNA methylation analysis in CTC and plasma-cfDNA provides prognostic significance in patients with early stage NSCLC.

Materials and methods

Clinical samples

Three different groups of clinical samples were analyzed:

  1. (a)

    Training group: consisting of primary NSCLC (fresh-frozen) tissues and corresponding adjacent non-neoplastic tissues of 35 patients, all diagnosed with operable (stage I-III) NSCLC; tumor histology was squamous cell carcinoma (SCC; n = 15), adenocarcinoma (ADC; n = 13) and undifferentiated (NOS; n = 7). In this group the majority of patients (65.7%) were smokers. All patients were treatment naïve when the samples were collected but after surgery all patients received standard chemotherapy protocols for adjuvant NSCLC. A clinical relapse was documented in 19/35 (54.3%) patients during the follow-up period.

  2. (b)

    Validation group: consisting of 42 patients with operable NSCLC (stage IA–IIIA). Plasma-cfDNA samples and the corresponding CTC were analyzed from all patients however corresponding primary FFPEs tumor tissues were available for analysis only for 22 patients. Peripheral blood from the patients was obtained before surgery and before the initiation of any systemic treatment; 14 patients were diagnosed with ADC, 24 with SCC and 4 with NOS NSCLC. In this group the majority of patients (78.6%) were smokers.

  3. (c)

    Control group: consisting of plasma-cfDNA and matched CTC samples isolated from 12 healthy blood donors (HD). All HD had no known illness or fever at the time of blood drawing and were ≥ 35 years old.

All patients gave a written informed consent to participate in the study, which was approved by the Ethics and Scientific Committee of the Thoracic Diseases General Hospital “Sotiria”.

Isolation of genomic DNA from fresh-frozen primary tumor tissues and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues

Genomic DNA (gDNA) from primary NSCLC fresh-frozen tissues and corresponding adjacent tissues was isolated using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA extraction of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues (FFPEs) was performed using QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). DNA concentration in all cases was measured with a NanoDrop 1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA).

Isolation of plasma-cfDNA

Plasma was isolated from peripheral blood (in EDTA) within 2 h to 4 h from sample collection by centrifugation at 530xg for 10 min at room temperature. Once isolated, plasma samples were centrifuged again at 2.000xg for 10 min, before transferring into clean 2-mL tubes and freezing at − 70 °C until time of processing. cfDNA was extracted from 2.00 mL plasma using the QIAamp® Circulating Nucleic Acid kit 50 (Qiagen®, Germany), as previously described [32].

CTCs enrichment using a size-based microfluidic device

The micro-fluidic device Parsortix (ANGLE plc, United Kingdom) [33] was used for the isolation of CTCs from 20 mL of peripheral blood in EDTA. A microscope slide sized disposable cassette was used for the division of blood components [34,35,36]. After this step, enriched CTCs were collected in a total volume of 200μL of PBS into Eppendorf tubes. The isolation of gDNA from enriched CTCs was performed using TRIZOL-LS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States) as previously described [19, 20].

Sodium bisulfite conversion

Up to 500 ng cfDNA were chemically modified with sodium bisulfite (SB) as previously described [20, 22, 32, 34]. In each SB-reaction negative and positive controls were included. The Universal Methylated Human DNA Standard (ZYMO Research) was used as fully methylated (100%) positive control. SB-converted DNA samples were stored at − 70 °C until further use.

Whole bisulfite amplification

Whole genome amplification (WGA) of SB-converted DNA was performed using the EpiTect Whole-Bisulfitome Kit (Qiagen) as previously described [37]. This protocol is optimized for the amplification of > 50 ng of SB-converted DNA, diluted with nuclease-free water to a final volume of 10μL. The amplification was performed in a thermal cycler (Mastercycler® pro, Eppendorf) (28 °C/8 h, 95 °C/5 min, and 4 °C until storage; lid temperature set to 70 °C).

Quality control

Positive and negative controls were included in all steps to ensure the quality and reproducibility of results. Human placental gDNA (Sigma-Aldrich) was used as a negative control after SB conversion. Universal Methylated Human DNA Standard (ZYMO Research) was used as fully methylated positive control. DNA integrity from all DNAs samples was checked by amplifying a region in exon 20 of the PIK3CA gene as previously described [38]. The quality of amplified SB-DNA was checked by a real-time PCR assay for β-actin (ACTB); only samples with positive amplification of ACTB were used for further analysis [39].

Real-time MSP assays

DNA methylation of RASSFIA, SLFN11 and FOXA1 was detected by using sensitive and specific real-time MSP assays based on specific primers pairs for methylated promoter sequences as previously described [40]. For the detection of APC and SHOX2 DNA methylation we designed in silico primers for using Primer Premier 5.00 software (Premier Biosoft) avoiding the formation of stable hairpin structures, primer dimers, cross dimers, and false priming sites. Optimization of experimental conditions including annealing temperature, time, concentrations of the primer pair, and finally buffer, MgCl2, dNTPs, and BSA concentrations (data not shown) was performed in order to develop sensitive and specific real-time MSP assays for APC and SHOX2 promoter methylation.

One microliter of SB-converted DNA was added to 9 μL reaction mixture containing 0.05 U/μL − 1 GoTaq® Hot Start Polymerase (Promega, Maddison, WI, USA), 0.2 × of the supplied PCR buffer, 2 mM of MgCl2, 0.2 mM of each dNTP (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 0.3 μg/μLBSA, 0.3 μM of the forward and reverse primers, and 1 × LCGreen Plus Dye (Idaho Technology, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA). Finally, deionized water was added to a final volume of 10μL. Real-time MSP protocol began with one cycle at 95 °C for 2 min followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 63 °C for 20 s, and 72 °C for 20 s. Immediately after amplification, a rapid cooling cycle to 40 °C for 30 s was introduced in order to prepare the melting curve acquisition step. Real-time fluorescence acquisition was set at the elongation step (72 °C). The following melting curve analysis included the steps of 55 °C for 10 s, 92 °C for 0 s with a ramp rate 0.11 °C/s (acquisition mode: continuous), 92 °C for 1 min, and 40 °C for 1 min.

Statistical analysis

Correlations between methylation status and clinico-pathological features of the patients were assessed by using the Chi-square test. Disease-free interval (DFI) and overall survival (OS) curves were calculated by using the Kaplan–Meier method and comparisons were performed using the log-rank test. P-values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed by using the SPSS Windows version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

The outline of the study is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Outline of the experimental procedure

DNA methylation analysis

Training group

The methylation status of APC, FOXA1, SHOX2, SLFN11 and RASSFIA gene promoters was first assessed in a training group of 35 pairs of primary NSCLC tissues and their adjacent non-cancerous tissues (Fig. 2a). In the primary fresh-frozen NSCLC tissue samples and the adjacent non-cancerous tissue, promoter DNA methylation was detected as follows: APC 82.8% and 85.7%, respectively, FOXA1 60% and 48.6%, respectively, SHOX2 65.7% and 42.8%, respectively, SLFN11 80% and 94.3%, respectively, and RASSFIA 60% and 45.7%, respectively. At least one gene was found methylated in all primary tumor tissues.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Methylation status of five selected genes in a a training group of NSCLC paired tissues (n = 35) and b in a validation group consisting of: 42 samples of size-based CTC fractions, 42 samples of corresponding plasma-cfDNA and 22 samples of corresponding FFPEs tumor tissues of early stage NSCLC patients

Validation group

Promoter methylation of these five genes was evaluated in an independent group of 42 patients with early NSCLC both in CTC and the corresponding plasma-cfDNA. For 22 of these patients, FFPEs from the primary tumor were also available.

DNA methylation analysis in primary tumors

Promoter methylation for at least one of these genes was detected in 12/22 (54.5%) of the primary tumor samples, in 2/22 (9.0%) of corresponding CTC and in 12/22 (54.5%) of corresponding plasma-cfDNA. APC was highly methylated in 7/22 (31.8%) of primary NSCLC tissues when compared to SLFN11, SHOX2 and FOXA1 (4/22: 18.2% each of them), whereas DNA methylation of RASSF1a was detected in only two samples (Fig. 2b).

In two patients (2/22, 9%), APC promoter methylation was detected both in the primary tumor and in the corresponding plasma-cfDNA. In 12 patients, at least one promoter of the tested genes was detected in the primary tumor but not in CTCs or plasma-cfDNA, whereas in six patients all tested gene promoters were negative for DNA methylation both in the primary tumor as well as in the in the size-based CTCs and plasma-cfDNA. In addition, in three patients promoter methylation was identified in the CTC or plasma-cfDNA but not in the corresponding primary tumor (Fig. 2b).

DNA methylation analysis in CTCs

APC and SLFN11 promoter methylation was detected in genomic DNA (gDNA) derived from CTCs in 3/42 (7.1%) cases while FOXA1 and SHOX2 promoters were detected in 2/42 (4.7%) and 1/42 (2.4%) patients, respectively. In contrast, RASSFIA promoter methylation was not detected in any of the gDNA derived from CTC samples. In total, at least one gene promoter was found methylated in 8/42 (19.0%) CTC fractions. In two patients two different gene promoters were methylated in the same sample. These patients had squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), were ex-smokers and one of them relapsed 15 months after surgery (Fig. 2b). The diagnostic specificity of real-time MSP assays for each gene was evaluated by analyzing the size-based enriched CTC fractions of 12 HD used as control group and revealed the absence of any methylated gene.

Methylation analysis in corresponding plasma cfDNA

All available corresponding plasma-cfDNA samples from these 42 NSCLC patients were analyzed. Promoter methylation was detected in 5/42 (11.9%) for APC, in 2/42 (4.7%) for SHOXA and in 4/42 (9.5%) for SLFN11. RASSF1a promoter was the most frequently methylated in plasma-cfDNA samples (6/42: 14.3%), whereas FOXA1 promoter methylation was not detected in any sample (0/42: 0%). In total, at least one gene promoter was methylated in 14/42 (33.3%) plasma-cfDNA samples (Fig. 2b). Promoter methylation of APC was observed in 2/12 (16.7%) HD whereas none of the HD plasma-cfDNA samples were methylated at the other tested promoters (0/12).

Direct comparison of APC, FOXA1, SHOX2, SLFN11 and RASSFIA promoter methylation in CTC, corresponding plasma-cfDNA and primary FFPEs tissues

A direct comparison of the methylation status of these five gene promoters in CTCs, corresponding plasma-cfDNA and paired FFPEs was performed. There was no any concordance between the DNA methylation status of CTC and plasma-cfDNA for any of the five studied genes (Additional file 1: Table S1). Moreover, there was no association between CTC fractions and 22 available paired primary tumors and the paired plasma-cfDNA regarding the promoter methylation status of any of the five studied genes (Additional file 1: Table S2).

Clinical significance of APC, FOXA1, SHOX2, SLFN11 and RASSFIA promoter methylation in early stage NSCLC

Training group

During the follow-up period (73 months), 3 out of 35 patients without disease relapse died from other reasons and were thus not included in the survival analysis. In the remaining group, 19/32 (59.4%) patients relapsed and 16/32 (50%) died from the disease, (median follow-up: 39 months; (range 1–74 months). Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that SHOX2 methylation was significantly correlated with worse DFI (P = 0.036, log-rank test) and OS (P = 0.030, log-rank test) (Fig. 3a, b), while APC, FOXA1, SHOX2, SLFN11 and RASSFIA methylation were not associated with clinical outcome.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Kaplan–Meier estimates of a disease-free interval (DFI) in months for training group of tumor tissues of early NSCLC patients in respect to SHOX2 promoter methylation status (P = 0.036), b overall survival (OS) in months for training group of tumor tissues of early NSCLC patients in respect to SHOX2 promoter methylation status in tumor tissues (P = 0.030), c disease-free interval (DFI) in months for validation group of early NSCLC patients in respect to SLFN11 promoter methylation in plasma-cfDNA (P = 0.042), d Disease-free interval (DFI) in months for validation group of early NSCLC patients in respect to APC promoter methylation in plasma-cfDNA (P = 0.037), e DFI in months for validation group of early stage NSCLC patients, in respect to the methylation of at least one gene in plasma-cfDNA or size-based CTC (P = 0.015)

Validation group

Kaplan–Meier estimates of the cumulative DFI of SLFN11 or APC promoter methylation for NSCLC patients in plasma cfDNA were significantly different in favor of patients with non-methylated (P = 0.048 and P = 0.037, log-rank test, respectively, Fig. 3c, d). It is worth mentioning that the incidence of relapses was higher when at least one gene promoter was methylated in CTC or plasma-cfDNA in respect to patients where gene promoter methylation was not detected (Fig. 3e).

Discussion

The current study describes for the first time the prognostic significance of DNA promoter methylation of a panel of five selected tumor suppressor genes in early stage NSCLC. Our analysis was performed firstly in a training group of primary NSCLC fresh-frozen tumor tissues and secondly in a validation group consisting of liquid biopsy components (size-based enriched CTC fractions and corresponding plasma-cfDNA) and the paired primary NSCLC tumor (FFPEs).

The selection of these five genes was based on their involvement in major hallmarks that lead to the development of cancer and on our meta-analysis of RNA-seq data from TCGA. To the best of our knowledge this is the first time that DNA methylation of these five genes is studied in CTCs of early stage NSCLC patients. Moreover, only a few studies have reported so far on the methylation status of these genes in plasma-cfDNA of early NSCLC patients. Detection of RASSF1a and FOXA1 promoter methylation in plasma-cfDNA was a specific indication for the early detection of NSCLC [41]. Detection of APC and RASSF1a promoter methylation independently predicted disease-specific mortality in lung cancer patients [41]; these results are in line with our finding regarding the prognostic value of APC methylation in plasma-cfDNA. Detection of SHOX2 methylation in serum has been shown to be a predictive marker for early stage NSCLC in combination with traditional markers [42].

According to our results, varying frequencies of promoter methylation has been found for these five genes. Our results clearly indicate that all tested genes are highly methylated in NSCLC tumor tissues, indicating that loss of expression of these tumor suppressor genes by methylation mechanisms is an early event in NSCLC tumorigenesis. SLFN11 and APC were frequently methylated at high levels in both cancerous and adjacent tissues suggesting that hypermethylation of these genes may be associated with some environmental factors, such as chronic smoking as previously mentioned [43]. Moreover, there were some cases where methylation was detected in the adjacent tissues but not in the matched tumor tissues suggesting that these methylation changes were preneoplastic.

Our results indicated that in CTC and plasma-cfDNA all these five genes were methylated at significantly lower percentages than in primary tissues. It is worth mentioning that in plasma the number of samples found positive for almost all genes (except FOXA1) were higher than in CTC as the release of methylated DNA from apoptotic cells and necrotic cells seems to be significantly higher than DNA found in CTCs. This is also a possible explanation for the discrepancies detected between CTCs and plasma-ctDNA.

According to our findings, there was no concordance between the size-based enriched CTCs and paired primary tumors in respect to the promoter methylation status of any of the genes studied. A lack of concordance was also found for the same DNA methylation markers between plasma-cfDNA and matched primary tumors. A possible explanation for this finding could be based on tumor heterogeneity and rapid evolution through time, indicating that LB is reflecting the actual phase of tumor evolution [44, 45].

Τhe methylation of SHOX2 promoter in primary tissues is associated with unfavorable prognosis in early stage NSCLC patients and the methylation of SLFN11 and APC promoter in cfDNA is associated with decreased DFI. There was no any association between the methylation status of RASSF1a and FOXA1 in CTCs, ctDNA and primary tumors. Finally Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that the incidence of relapses was higher when at least one gene promoter was methylated in size-based CTC fractions or plasma-cfDNA in respect to patients where gene promoters were not methylated.

In conclusion, our findings indicate that the combination of DNA methylation analysis of tumor suppressor genes in CTCs and matched plasma-cfDNA provides significant prognostic information in patients with early stage NSCLC.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Additional files).

Abbreviations

CTCs:

Circulating tumor cells

ctDNA:

Circulating tumor DNA

LB:

Liquid biopsy

miRNAs:

MicroRNAs

ncRNAs:

Non-coding RNAs

TCGA:

The CancerGenome Atlas

NSCLC:

Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

SCC:

Squamous Cell Carcinoma

ADC:

AdenomaCarcinoma

HD:

Healthy Donors

gDNA:

Genomic DNA

FFPEs:

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues

SB:

Sodium bisulfate

WGA:

Whole genome amplification

ACTB:

β-Actin

DFI:

Disease free interval

OS:

Overall survival

References

  1. Henley SJ, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, part II: progress toward Healthy People 2020 objectives for 4 common cancers. Cancer. 2020;126:2250–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chansky K, et al. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging Project: prognostic factors and pathologic TNM stage in surgically managed non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2009;4:792–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lianidou ES, Pantel K. Liquid biopsies. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2019;58:219–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alix-Panabières C, Pantel K. Liquid biopsy: from discovery to clinical application. Cancer Discov. 2021;11:858–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cristofanilli M, et al. Circulating tumor cells, disease progression, and survival in metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:781–91.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang W, Song Z, Zhang Y. A comparison of ddPCR and ARMS for detecting EGFR T790M status in ctDNA from advanced NSCLC patients with acquired EGFR-TKI resistance. Cancer Med. 2017;6:154–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharma P, et al. Clinical and biomarker results from phase I/II study of PI3K inhibitor alpelisib plus Nab-paclitaxel in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:3896–904.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Woodhouse R, et al. Clinical and analytical validation of FoundationOne Liquid CDx, a novel 324-Gene cfDNA-based comprehensive genomic profiling assay for cancers of solid tumor origin. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:2564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rahaman S, Li X, Yu J, Wong K-C. CancerEMC: frontline non-invasive cancer screening from circulating protein biomarkers and mutations in cell-free DNA. Bioinformatics. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTAB044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen JD, et al. Detection and localization of surgically resectable cancers with a multi-analyte blood test. Science. 2018;359:926–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zeng Y, et al. Parent of origin genetic effects on methylation in humans are common and influence complex trait variation. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Martinez-Useros J, Martin-Galan M, Florez-Cespedes M, Garcia-Foncillas J. Epigenetics of most aggressive solid tumors: pathways, targets and treatments. Cancers. 2021;13:3209.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li XF, et al. Promoter methylation of the MGRN1 gene predicts prognosis and response to chemotherapy of high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients. Front Oncol. 2021;11:659254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li W, et al. Identification of DNA methylation biomarkers for risk of liver metastasis in early-stage colorectal cancer. Clin Epigenet. 2021;13:126.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lianidou ES. Gene expression profiling and DNA methylation analyses of CTCs. Mol Oncol. 2016;10:431–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Payne SR. From discovery to the clinic: the novel DNA methylation biomarker (m)SEPT9 for the detection of colorectal cancer in blood. Epigenomics. 2010;2:575–85.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Weiss G, Schlege A, Kottwit D, Köni T, Tetzner R. Validation of the SHOX2/PTGER4 DNA methylation marker panel for plasma-based discrimination between patients with malignant and nonmalignant lung disease. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12:77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gaga M, et al. Validation of Lung EpiCheck, a novel methylation-based blood assay, for the detection of lung cancer in European and Chinese high-risk individuals. Eur Respir J. 2021;57:2002682.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chimonidou M, Strati A, Malamos N, Georgoulias V, Lianidou ES. SOX17 promoter methylation in circulating tumor cells and matched cell-free DNA isolated from plasma of patients with breast cancer. Clin Chem. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2012.191551.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chimonidou M, et al. DNA methylation of tumor suppressor and metastasis suppressor genes in circulating tumor cells. Clin Chem. 2011;57:1169–77.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Balgkouranidou I, et al. Breast cancer metastasis suppressor-1 promoter methylation in cell-free DNA provides prognostic information in non-small cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.104.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Balgkouranidou I, et al. SOX17 promoter methylation in plasma circulating tumor DNA of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016;54:1385–93.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang X, et al. DNA methylation-based diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of nonsmoking lung adenocarcinoma patients. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120:13520–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li R, et al. Methylation and transcriptome analysis reveal lung adenocarcinoma-specific diagnostic biomarkers. J Transl Med. 2019;17:324.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu W, et al. Genome-wide plasma cell-free DNA methylation profiling identifies potential biomarkers for lung cancer. Dis Markers. 2019;2019:4108474.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Fouad YA, Aanei C. Revisiting the hallmarks of cancer. Am J Cancer Res. 2017;7:1016–36.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Iwasa H, Hossain S, Hata Y. Tumor suppressor C-RASSF proteins. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018;75:1773–87.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Binder G. Short stature due to SHOX deficiency: genotype, phenotype, and therapy. Horm Res Paediatr. 2011;75:81–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zoppoli G, et al. Putative DNA/RNA helicase Schlafen-11 (SLFN11) sensitizes cancer cells to DNA-damaging agents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:15030–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fodde R, et al. Mutations in the APC tumour suppressor gene cause chromosomal instability. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3:433–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Li J, Zhang S, Zhu L, Ma S. Role of transcription factor FOXA1 in non-small cell lung cancer. Mol Med Rep. 2018;17:509–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mastoraki S, et al. KMT2C promoter methylation in plasma-circulating tumor DNA is a prognostic biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer. Mol Oncol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.12848.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Hvicha GE, et al. A novel microfluidic platform for size and deformability based separation and the subsequent molecular characterization of viable circulating tumor cells. Int J Cancer. 2016;138:2894–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zavridou M, et al. Direct comparison of size-dependent versus EpCAM-dependent CTC enrichment at the gene expression and DNA methylation level in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Sci Rep. 2020;10:6551.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ntzifa A, et al. Gene expression in circulating tumor cells reveals a dynamic role of EMT and PD-L1 during osimertinib treatment in NSCLC patients. Sci Rep. 2021;11:2313.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Porras TB, Kaur P, Ring A, Schechter N, Lang JE. Challenges in using liquid biopsies for gene expression profiling. Oncotarget. 2018;9:7036–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zavridou M, et al. Evaluation of preanalytical conditions and implementation of quality control steps for reliable gene expression and DNA methylation analyses in liquid biopsies. Clin Chem. 2018;64:1522–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Vorkas PA, et al. PIK3CA hotspot mutation scanning by a novel and highly sensitive high-resolution small amplicon melting analysis method. J Mol Diagn. 2010;12:697–704.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chimonidou M, et al. Direct comparison study of DNA methylation markers in EpCAM-positive circulating tumour cells, corresponding circulating tumour DNA, and paired primary tumours in breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8:72054–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zavridou M, et al. Prognostic significance of gene expression and dna methylation markers in circulating tumor cells and paired plasma derived exosomes in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Constancio V, et al. Early detection of the major male cancer types in blood-based liquid biopsies using a DNA methylation panel. Clin Epigenet. 2019;11:175.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Huang W, et al. A novel diagnosis method based on methylation analysis of SHOX2 and serum biomarker for early stage lung cancer. Cancer Control. 2020;27:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073274820969703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Feng Q, et al. DNA methylation in tumor and matched normal tissues from non-small cell lung cancer patients. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2008;17:645–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. De Mattos-Arruda L, et al. Capturing intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity by de novo mutation profiling of circulating cell-free tumor DNA: a proof-of-principle. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2014;25:1729–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Gremel G, et al. Distinct subclonal tumour responses to therapy revealed by circulating cell-free DNA. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2016;27:1959–65.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project has received funding from the Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation (HFRI) and the General Secretariat for Research and Technology (GSRT), under Grant Agreement No. 1964.

Funding

From the Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation (HFRI) and the General Secretariat for Research and Technology (GSRT), under Grant Agreement No. 1964.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AM conceived and planned the experiments. DL, IK carried out the experiments. VT contributed to sample preparation. KP, ET, IV, IP contributed to patients selections and the performance of clinical samples. AM took the lead in writing the manuscript. EL, VG, AK and AM provided critical feedback and helped shape the research, analysis and manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Α. Markou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participants

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics and Scientific Committee of the Metropolitan General hospital (308/28-12-2017).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent has been obtained from the patients to publish this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

. Comparison between SLFN11, SHOX2, FOXA1, RASSFIA and APC gene promoter methylation in CTC and corresponding paired plasma-cfDNA samples in early stage NSCLC (n = 42).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Markou, Α., Londra, D., Tserpeli, V. et al. DNA methylation analysis of tumor suppressor genes in liquid biopsy components of early stage NSCLC: a promising tool for early detection. Clin Epigenet 14, 61 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-022-01283-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-022-01283-x

Keywords

  • CTCs
  • cfDNA
  • DNA methylation
  • NSCLC
  • Biomarkers
  • Liquid biopsy
  • Tumor suppressor genes