Skip to main content

Finding an easy way to harmonize: a review of advances in clinical research and combination strategies of EZH2 inhibitors


Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 inhibitors (EZH2i) have garnered increased attention owing to their anticancer activity by targeting EZH2, a well-known cancer-promoting factor. However, some lymphomas are resistant to EZH2i, and EZH2i treatment alone is ineffective in case of EZH2-overexpressing solid tumors. The anti-cancer efficacy of EZH2i may be improved through safe and effective combinations of these drugs with other treatment modalities. Preclinical evidence indicates that combining EZH2i with other therapies, such as immunotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and endocrine therapy, has complementary or synergistic antitumor effects. Therefore, elucidating the underlying mechanisms of the individual constituents of the combination therapies is fundamental for their clinical application. In this review, we have summarized notable clinical trials and preclinical studies using EZH2i, their progress, and combinations of EZH2i with different therapeutic modalities, aiming to provide new insights for tumor treatment.


Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) is a classical epigenetic regulator of tumor genesis, metastasis, and prognosis. In recent decades, a series of EZH2 inhibitors (EZH2i) have been discovered, reported, and tested in clinical trials; these include tazemetostat, GSK126, CPI-1205, PF-06821497, and SHR2554. In early 2020, tazemetostat was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in treatment of adults and adolescents with locally advanced or metastatic epithelioid sarcoma. However, clinical trials targeting EZH2 in other solid tumors did not show satisfactory results. For example, at a maximum-tolerated dose (MTD; 2800 mg twice weekly), defined by a dose escalation study, GSK126 showed only moderate antitumor activity [1].

In recent years, combination therapy has become the hallmark of cancer treatment considering the significantly decreased incidence of tumor recurrence and disease progression compared to monotherapies. Therefore, in current review, we summarizes the results of clinical trials using EZH2i and the effects of EZH2i combined with other therapeutic modalities in cancer treatment to enhance treatment efficacy compared to monotherapies. Moreover, this review provides a deeper insight into the clinical potential of the combination therapies against tumors.

Overexpression and mutation of EZH2 is correlated with tumor progression

EZH2 is the catalytic subunit of polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), which catalyzes histone H3K27me3 through its C-terminal SET domain to promote chromatin compression and silence its target genes [2, 3]. EZH2 expression is reportedly increased in murine prostate cancer (PCa) [4] and lymphoma cell lines [5] as well as in human primary tumor cells, such as breast cancer [6], melanoma [7], and pancreatic cancer [8]. Due to its high expression in several cancer cells and the downstream of pPB-E2F pathway, EZH2 is universally recognized as a marker of proliferation and a bona fide oncogene [9].

In addition to overexpression, EZH2 mutation was also confirmed to be highly correlated with tumor progression. A single tyrosine 641 (Tyr641) in the SET domain of EZH2 is replaced in 7.2% follicular lymphoma (FL) and 21.7% germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) subtype diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) [10]. Tyr641 is a functional acquired EZH2 mutation that promotes the growth of B-cell lymphoma and melanoma, characterized by high expression levels of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl2 and loss of the tumor inhibitor p53 [11]. In addition, the mutation of EZH2 alanine 677 to glycine (A677G) in B-cell lymphoma cell lines and primary tumor specimens resulted in aberrantly elevated H3K27me3 [12]. Hypertrimethylation can also be driven by the mutation of EZH2 alanine 687 to valine (A687V) in Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) [13]. Other mutation hot spots of EZH2, including A682 and A692, were identified in FL subsequently [14]. These studies have shown that EZH2 mutations may drive the proliferation of cancer cells, making EZH2 a molecular therapeutic target in patients harboring these site mutations.

Competitive inhibition of EZH2 methyltransferase activity

Overexpression or functional acquired mutations of EZH2 promote cancer progression by enhancing the function of methyltransferase [15]. EZH2 modifies its target genes with the methyl group provided by S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) in the methionine cycle. SAM is demethylated to form S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH), which is decomposed into homocysteine and adenosine, and the follow-up cycle provides a continuous supply of methyl groups to the biochemical reaction. Blocking the production and utilization of methyl groups is a key step in inhibiting the enzyme activity of EZH2. Therefore, various EZH2i has been developed to target the methionine cycle; these include competitive inhibitors with SAM binding to the EZH2 enzyme pocket, decreasing its utilization and suppressing SAH degradation to inhibit SAM production (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Two types EZH2i through suppressed key steps of Methionine cycle. (1) SAH hydrolase inhibitor inhibits SAH degradation into adenosine and homocysteine to cause methyl accumulation, which suppresses methionine cycling production of methyl and inhibits EZH2 enzyme activity indirectly. (2) SAM-competitive inhibitor partially occupies the site for the co‐substrate SAM in the binding pocket of EZH2 to deprive EZH2 the use of methyl, such as tazemetostat, GSK126, CPI-1205, PF-06821497 and SHR2554. These inhibitors have more direct characteristic compared to the SAH hydrolase.

SAH hydrolase inhibitor

DZNep, the first identified EZH2i, inhibits SAH hydrolase. It inhibits the hydrolysis of SAH and causes its accumulation, thus blocking the release of the methyl group from SAM, thereby exerting antitumor effects [16, 17].

SAM-competitive inhibitor

SAM-competitive EZH2i are a series of novel, highly potent small molecules that inhibit EZH2 enzyme activity. These molecules have a 2‐pyridone moiety, which is crucial for enzyme inhibition and partially occupies the site for the co‐substrate SAM in the binding pocket of the enzyme. Different drugs have different linking support substructures of 2‐pyridone warheads, such as a bicyclic heteroaromatic ring, including indazole [18] (e.g., EPZ005687 and UNC1999) and indole [19] (e.g., GSK126, EI1, and CPI‐1205), or a simple monocyclic (hetero) aromatic ring, including tazemetostat and MC3629. Different substitutions at the support moiety influence the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the compounds as well as their water solubility [20].

EZH2i as promising epigenetic drugs

Currently, five EZH2i, including tazemetostat (Tazverik, US); GSK126 (GlaxoSmithKline, UK); CPI-1205 (Constellation, US); SHR2554 (HengRui Medicine Co., LTD, China); and PF-06821497 (Pfizer, US), have entered into clinical trials (Table 1). Among these, tazemetostat was approved by the FDA in January 2020, making it the first EZH2i drug for the treatment of adults and adolescents aged ≥ 16 years with advanced or metastatic epithelioid sarcomas, which are not suitable for surgery and other standard treatments [21, 22].

Table 1 Current EZH2 inhibitors in clinical


Tazemetostat, the first EZH2i approved by the FDA, is a potent, selective, and orally bioavailable small-molecule inhibitor of EZH2 enzymatic activity [23]. It can effectively inhibit the enzymatic activity of both wild-type EZH2 and EZH2 with catalytic domain mutation. In vitro, tazemetostat inhibits human lymphoma cell lines in a dose- and time-dependent manner. In vivo, tazemetostat inhibits tumor growth in xenograft-bearing mice with EZH2-mutant NHL, resulting in complete and sustained tumor regressions with lower H3K27me3 levels. Mice were dosed orally 2 or 3 times daily with tazemetostat for 28 days until the tumor volumes were about 120 mm3. Even 63 days after completion of EZH2i treatment, previously tumor-bearing mice remained tumor free in the two EZH2-mutant xenograft models. These data portend the utility of tazemetostat as a potential treatment for these genetically defined cancers [24]. Moreover, a phase II study of tazemetostat in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell NHL harboring EZH2 mutations is ongoing (NCT03456726).

Until now, two results of tazemetostat clinical trials have been reported:

  1. 1.

    One is a first-in-human, open-label, phase I study of EZH2i in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell NHL and advanced solid tumors. The report indicated that tazemetostat was effective against B-cell NHL and solid tumors. 8 of 21 patients with B-cell NHL and 2 of 43 patients with solid tumors had durable objective responses, including complete responses, supported by negative 18F-FDG-PET [25].

  2. 2.

    Another positive result for tazemetostat in patients with EZH2 mutation relapsed or refractory FL was reported at the 23rd European Hematology Association Congress. The study results indicated that patients who carried EZH2 mutations were more sensitive to tazemetostat compared to those with wild-type EZH2. Of 28 patients, 3 patients with EZH2 mutations responded completely, while 17 responded partially. This study also supported the notion that the EZH2 mutation status may be a biomarker to identify patients with FL who might benefit from tazemetostat treatment [26].

In these two studies, responses in solid tumors among patients were assessed by the investigators according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.128 and the 2007 International Working Group criteria for patients with malignant lymphoma [27].


GSK126, a potent, highly selective, SAM-competitive, small-molecule inhibitor of EZH2 methyltransferase activity, decreases H3K27me3 levels globally and reactivates silenced PRC2 target genes; however, a change in dose does not influence the EZH2 protein level [28]. In 2012, GSK126 was identified as an effective compound that inhibited the proliferation of EZH2 mutant DLBCL cell lines. Moreover, in mice bearing Karpas-422 xenograft tumors, marked tumor regression was noted after treatment with GSK126 [29].

In 2014, the first phase I study of GSK126 clinical trial was carried out. Patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, transformed FL, other NHLs, solid tumors, and multiple myeloma (MM) were recruited in a clinical trial (NCT02082977). However, the outcome of the GSK126 clinical trial was unsatisfactory, as only one patient with GCB-DLBCL partially responded to treatment, while more than half of the patients had progressive disease without any changes of the baseline H3K27me3 in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Only a modest antitumor activity was detected at the tolerable doses of GSK126; thus, further clinical trials for this drug are not recommended [1].


CPI-1205 is a highly potent EZH2i (biochemical IC50 = 0.002 μM, cellular EC50 = 0.032 μM) showing higher selectivity for EZH2 than EZH1. CPI-1205 demonstrated robust antitumor effects in a Karpas-422 xenograft model at a dose of 160 mg/kg twice daily, showing improved cellular activity and good oral bioavailability [30]. Thus, it has been recommended for phase I clinical trials on B-cell lymphomas (NCT02395601).


In 2018, PF-06821497 was first identified as an EZH2i with adequate EZH2 inhibitory potency as well as physical and chemical properties such as thermodynamic solubility. In addition, it also showed robust tumor growth inhibition activity in a mouse Karpas-422 xenograft model when administered at a dose of 100 mg/kg twice daily and a strong association with pharmacodynamic effects, such as decreased H3K27me3 level, in tumors [31]. Currently, PF-06821497 is under phase I clinical trials for treatment of relapsed/refractory small cell lung cancer, castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), and FL (NCT03460977).


SHR2554 is an orally administered small-molecule inhibitor of EZH2 developed by the Chinese pharmaceutical company Hengrui. Although there is no record of preclinical experiment, the safety of a single oral dose of SHR2554 in healthy subjects has already been evaluated (NCT04335266). SHR2554 has been investigated as a single-agent therapy in relapsed or refractory mature lymphoid neoplasms (NCT03603951). Moreover, it was also combined with the androgen receptor (AR) antagonist SHR3680 in patients with metastatic CRPC (mCRPC) (NCT03741712) and combined with SHR1701, inhibiting both programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) II in advanced solid tumors and B-cell lymphomas (NCT04407741).

Combined clinical EZH2i and other cancer treatment modalities

Similar to other tumor treatment modalities, EZH2i has their limitations. EZH2i activates insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R), MEK and phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) pathways, resulting in lymphomas with acquired resistance to EZH2i [32]. In addition, clinical trials have shown that the antitumor activity of EZH2i alone is ineffective in EZH2 overexpressing solid tumors, such as prostate cancer, head and neck cancer, ovarian cancer, and soft tissue sarcoma [1].

Recently, accumulating evidence demonstrated that combinations of EZH2i with other therapies, including immunotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and endocrine therapy, showed more robust antitumor effects that were complementary or synergistic (Table 2).

Table 2 The different therapeutic combinations with EZH2 inhibitor and the EZH2 targeted genes involved combination therapy

EZH2i combined with immunotherapy

Epigenetic modifications can influence the reactivity of immune therapy through DNA or histone modifications [33]. For instance, DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1)-mediated DNA methylation at the promoter regions of the genes encoding the tumor Th1-type chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 represses their transcription and translation in ID8 ovarian cancer in C57/BL6 mice. Consequently, cytotoxic T cell trafficking into the tumor microenvironment decreases. Similarly, through epigenetic reprogramming, EZH2 regulates differentiation and plasticity of T cells to shape the immune landscape in tumor microenvironments [34]. Based on this study, combing EZH2i with immunotherapy could provide a more effective cancer treatment.

EZH2i improves the efficiency of immune therapies

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies, such as treatments with anti-programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD-1), anti-programmed cell death-ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1), and anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (anti-CTLA-4), have achieved remarkable success in treating multiple types of cancer [35]. However, due to the heterogeneity of tumors and the differences in individual immune systems, primary and acquired resistance to ICB therapies limit their efficacy [36]. Epigenetic alterations may be a major factor underlying the heterogeneity of tumors and the differences in individual immune systems. Thus, an effective combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and therapeutic agents targeting epigenetic changes may have potential to retrain the immune system and improve the clinical outcomes of ICB therapy [37] (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

Inhibition of EZH2 improved the effect of blocking immune checkpoint. (1) In tumor cell, high level EZH2 can inhibit CD274, the transcription factor of PD-L1. Tumor cell with low expression of PD-L1 showed resistance to anti-PD-L1 therapy, which can recover the sensitivity after inhibition EZH2. (2) In iTregs, EZH2 overexpression enhances its suppression to CD8+T cells that cannot kill tumor cells. Addition of EZH2 inhibitors can restore CD8+T cells activity to enhance antitumor ability. 3) EZH2 overexpression in tumor cells inhibits the expression of MHC I, and influences the efficacy of anti-PD-1 treatment. Treatment with EZH2 inhibitor improves the efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy.

Ipilimumab, an anti-CTLA-4 antibody, increases EZH2 expression in peripheral CD4+ T cells in patients; thus, inhibiting EZH2 expression in T cells may increase the effectiveness of anti-CTLA-4 therapy. As expected, a mouse model with genetic depletion of EZH2 in Tregs (FoxP3creEZH2fl/fl mice) exhibited robust anti-tumor ability and more infiltration of effective CD8+ T cells secreting high levels of interferon (IFN)-γ, granzyme B, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). Pharmacological inhibition of EZH2 using CPI-1205 could also enhance the activity of effector T cells by diminishing the suppressive activity of Tregs. Moreover, treatment of tumor bearing mice with CPI-1209 and anti-CTLA-4 resulted in a smaller tumor volume and longer survival duration than in those in the control groups [38, 39].

Anti-PD-L1 is another immune checkpoint inhibitor, which is based on the expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells. Recently, in vitro experiments revealed that EZH2 negatively regulated PD-L1 expression on hepatoma cells by upregulating the H3K27me3 levels in the promoter regions of CD274, which encodes PD-L1, and IFN regulatory factor 1 (IRF1). Inhibition of EZH2 can increase PD-L1 expression on the surfaces of tumor cells to improve the efficiency of anti-PD-L1 therapy [40]. Thus, the combination of EZH2i and PD-L1 blocker showed greater effectiveness in treating liver cancer.

Although anti-PD-1 therapeutics improve survival in patients with recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), patients with other types of cancer do not benefit from this treatment due to low response rates. Researchers have found that the addition of EZH2i to the therapeutic regimen can improve the efficacy of anti-PD-1 treatment. In an anti-PD-1-resistant model of HNSCC, tumor growth was suppressed through treatment with a combination of EZH2i and anti-PD-1. Inhibition of EZH2 significantly up-regulated MHC I expression by enhancing antigen presentation both in vitro in HNSCC lines and in vivo in a mouse model. In addition, EZH2 inhibition increased antigen-specific CD8+ T cell proliferation, IFN-γ production, and tumor cell cytotoxicity [41]. Moreover, another study showed that EZH2 inhibition relieved the suppression of NLRC5 and CIITA expression mechanistically, leading to the restoration of MHC expression and T cell infiltrates in DLBCL [42]. Thus, combination therapy using EZH2i and anti-PD-1 may improve anti-tumor treatment efficacy.

Besides ICB, adoptive cell transfer therapies have become new strategies to initiate and improve the treatment efficacy for anti-hematological cancers, such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia [43]. However, clinical treatments of solid tumors with these approaches have been less impressive due to difficulty in selecting a suitable target antigen and lower T cell infiltration [44]. To overcome this problem, a study evaluated combination therapy with EZH2i and adoptive T cell transfer and found that the tumor growth suppression was better after combination therapy than after either approach alone in ovarian tumor-bearing mice. Moreover, EZH2 expression in tumors is negatively associated with the population of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells and patient outcome, thus providing a rationale for the combination of EZH2i and adoptive T cell transfer therapy [45].

Immune therapy compensates for the disadvantages of EZH2i

In multiple NHL cell lines, B cell maturation and activation are highly related to tumor progression. One study found that inhibition of EZH2 in both mutant and wild-type NHL leads to increased B-cell maturation and a greater dependence on B-cell activation signaling, as evidenced by the increased expression of B-cell maturation regulators such as PRDM1/BLIMP1 [46]. Interestingly, combining tazemetostat with B cell activation inhibitors (e.g., BTKi, SYKi, GRAGs, ibrutinib) showed synergistic benefits in both EZH2 mutant and wild-type DLBCL [47].

Moreover, EZH2i can re-shape the tumor immune environment, where effector T cells are suppressed but suppressor immune cells are activated. One study found that the anti-tumor ability of GSK126 showed different tendencies in wild-type mice and an immune-deficient mouse model bearing LCC and MC38 cell lines. Analysis of the change in immune cells infiltrating the tumor microenvironment revealed increased numbers of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and decreased numbers of CD4+ T cells and IFN+ CD8+ T cells in WT-mice. Therefore, inhibition of MDSCs infiltrating the tumor immune environment can recover the activity of CD8+ T cells. A previous study reported that gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil inhibit MDSCs. Therefore, the combination of GSK126 and MDSC-suppressors, such as anti-Gr1 antibody and gemcitabine/5-fluorouracil, can improve the anti-tumor ability of the treatment and overcome the deficiency of EZH2i [48].

EZH2i combined with chemotherapy

Chemotherapy is considered the gold standard for the treatment of most cancers, including cervical cancer [49], breast cancer [50, 51], and prostate cancer [52]. However, chemo-resistance results in poor treatment efficacy and needs to be overcome.

Histone modification and chromatin remodeling are important events in response to DNA damage. However, cancer cells acquire resistance through epigenetic events ensuing DNA damage and repair, thus facilitating the evasion of cancer cells from programmed cell death [53, 54]. Therefore, a combination of targeted therapy and chemotherapy is likely an effective approach to overcome monotherapy resistance.

EZH2i improves cytotoxicity of chemotherapy

Overexpression of EZH2 has been confirmed in different cancer types, such as prostate cancer, and is involved in drug resistance [55]. Targeting EZH2 could overcome chemotherapeutic drug resistance.

After a certain period of docetaxel (Doc) treatment, both LNCaP and CWR22Rv1 prostate cell lines exhibited Doc resistance accompanied by upregulated EZH2 expression. Interestingly, EZH2 inhibition by DNZep or its miRNA mimics can re-sensitize resistant cell lines to Doc treatment [55]. Thus, targeting EZH2 may improve the efficacy of Doc treatment.

In addition, high EZH2 expression correlates with a poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). Inhibiting EZH2 enzyme activity makes two NSCLC cell lines more sensitive to etoposide, which is a common chemotherapeutic drug. Moreover, if the lung cancer cells harbor inactivating mutations in BRG1 (SMARCA4) or activating mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), combination treatment with etoposide and EZH2i shows better efficacy with respect to impeding tumor growth both in vitro and in xenograft models than in cancer cells with wild-type EGFR and BRG1 [56, 57].

Another study showed that inhibiting endogenous EZH2 expression effectively reversed cisplatin resistance and increased cisplatin sensitivity in cisplatin-resistant cervical cancer cells by upregulating Dicer expression [58]. In ovarian cancer, c-Myc enhances the expression of EZH2 by directly suppressing miR-137, which targets EZH2 mRNA in resistant cells. Thus, increased expression of EZH2 activates cellular survival pathways, resulting in cisplatin resistance. Inhibition of the c-Myc-miR-137-EZH2 pathway leads to re-sensitization of resistant cervical cells to cisplatin [59]. Similar to cervical cancer, inhibition of EZH2 enhances cisplatin-induced apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells by improving the cisplatin-mediated cytotoxic effect [60].

In temozolomide (TMZ)-resistant U251 and U87 clones, EZH2 is highly expressed, suggesting that it plays an important role in multi-drug resistance and that EZH2i can enhance the effect of TMZ in multi-drug-resistant glioblastoma [61]. In patients with pancreatic cancer, the combination of DZNep and gemcitabine enhances the anti-proliferation effect of gemcitabine compared to gemcitabine monotherapy [62].

EZH2i increases chemotherapy efficacy by influencing DNA damage

Eliciting DNA damage and preventing DNA repair are the main effects of chemotherapeutic drugs, including doxorubicin and melphalan [63]. Consequently, enhancing DNA damage in tumor cells could improve the anti-tumor effect. Recently, in vitro experiments confirmed that targeting EZH2 with minimal toxic concentrations of GSK126 markedly aggravated the DNA damage response associated with apoptosis in MM cells, thus forming the rationale for the combination regimen of EZH2i with DNA-damaging agents in the treatment of MM [64].

Epirubicin and mitomycin C are used in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our previous study investigated the biological and mechanistic roles of EZH2 in the DNA damage response induced by epirubicin and mitomycin C in HCC, revealing that EZH2 targeted genes involved in DNA damage, such as p53, Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), and Forkhead box O3 (FOXO3). Inhibition of EZH2 by shRNA or its inhibitor GSK126 significantly promoted chemotherapeutic drug-induced genotoxicity and increased HepG2 cell chemosensitivity. Therefore, targeting EZH2-induced p53 expression was associated with increased drug sensitivity in HCC cells [65]. These findings suggest that the link between epigenetic modifications by EZH2 and DNA damage induced by chemotherapeutic drugs may represent a new strategy for increasing the sensitivity of chemotherapeutic agents.

Overall, the combination of EZH2i and chemotherapies have synergistic efficacy, which provides a guideline for the use of EZH2i and chemotherapeutic drugs more rationally and effectively.

EZH2i combined with other targeted therapies

Targeted therapy refers to revolutionized therapeutics that interfere with specific molecules to block cancer growth, progression, and metastasis [66]. Many of the FDA approved molecular targeted therapies have shown clinical success in the treatment of myriad cancer types, including breast cancer [67], leukemia [68], colorectal cancer [69], lung cancer [70], and ovarian cancer [71]. At the same time, a combination of two targeted treatments has become a trend in current clinical therapy.

EZH2i combined with poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor

PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have been used to treat patients with BRCA-mutant cancers lacking homology-directed DNA repair; however, drug resistance remains a clinical hurdle [72]. Research has revealed the epigenetic mechanism of PARPi resistance, and combining PARPi with EZH2i can improve the therapeutic effect [73].

For example, a recent study reported that the inhibition of EZH2 can sensitize ovarian cancer cells with CARM1-high expression, a homologous recombination (HR) proficient ovarian cancer, to PARPi in both orthotopic and patient-derived xenografts. Moreover, CARM1 promotes MAD2L2 silencing by driving the switch from the SWI/SNF complex to EZH2 through methylation of the BAF155 subunit in the SWI/SNF complex on the MAD2L2 promoter. Therefore, EZH2 inhibition can up-regulate MAD2L2 expression to decrease DNA end resection, ultimately causing mitotic catastrophe in PARPi-treated HR-proficient cells [74].

Another rationale for combining PARPi and EZH2i is that PARP1 interacts with and attaches poly-ADP-ribose (PAR) chains to EZH2 mechanistically. Protein poly ADP-ribosylation (PARylation) of EZH2 by PARP1 induces PRC2 complex dissociation and downregulation of EZH2 expression and H3K27me3. In contrast, alkylating DNA damage-induced EZH2 downregulation is attenuated in PARPi-treated cells, thereby promoting EZH2-mediated gene silencing unlike in PARPi-untreated cells. Moreover, the addition of EZH2i further sensitizes BRCA-mutant breast cells to PARPi [75].

EZH2i combined with histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors

Histone acetylation, another modification of histones, regulates the function of targeted genes via HDAC and histone acetyltransferases (HATs). HDAC inhibitors (HDACi) induce cancer cell cycle arrest, differentiation, and death; reduce angiogenesis; and modulate immune responses [76]. A previous study found that the HDACi panobinostat can downregulate EZH2 and other core proteins of the PRC2 complex [77]. Co-treatment with DZNep and panobinostat caused further depletion of EZH2 compared to treatment with each agent alone, increasing apoptosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Based on these findings, the combination of DZNep and panobinostat is an effective epigenetic treatment approach against AML cells [78].

For histone modification, increasing methylation level and decreasing acetylation level contribute to gene silencing and thereby induce tumor progression [79]. EZH2 gain-of-function mutations as well as CREBBP and EP300 inactivating histone acetyltransferases mutations are implicated in the pathogenesis of germinal center (GC)-derived lymphomas. Recent research showed that co-treatment with EZH2i and HDACi has synergistic effect in GC-derived lymphoma cell lines. Combination of the EZH2i GSK126 and the HDACi romidepsin disrupts the integrity of the PRC2 complex via promotes acetylation of RbAP 46/48 and inhibition of EZH2 enzyme activity, leading to decreased methylation and increased acetylation of H3K27. Combination treatment effectively inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in lymphoma cell lines in vitro. Moreover, the combination of GSK126 and romidepsin can not only inhibit tumor growth but also improve overall survival in the SU-DHL-10 xenograft model. This finding is corroborated by MetaVIPER analysis, because synergistic cell lines share a common basal gene expression level and protein activity profile, as confirmed by the TCGA database and cBioPortal [80].

In addition, the synergistic effect has also been reported in the NSCLC model. A study showed that co-treatment with EZH2i DZNep and the HDACi vorinostat synergistically suppressed the proliferation of all tested NSCLC cell lines, regardless of their EGFR status [81]. Synergistic effects were observed in a model of small cell carcinoma of the ovary consequently in vivo and in vitro [82]. These synergistic effects were associated with decreased H3K27me3, increased histone acetylation, and depletion of EZH2 and other PRC2 components. Therefore, decreasing EZH2 enzyme activity and its expression are the main goals for suppressing cancer progression.

EZH2i combined with endocrine therapy

Endocrine therapy, a major modality in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer [83] and PCa [84], has achieved good clinical results. However, patients with PCa still progress to CRPC and the cancer becomes untreatable. Enzalutamide is a typical anti-androgen drug for treating PCa that can block androgen binding to the AR as well as prevent AR nuclear translocation and AR-mediated DNA binding. However, a considerable proportion of tumors eventually develop resistance during enzalutamide treatment. A recent study has shown that EZH2 inhibition/depletion enhances the efficacy of enzalutamide in enzalutamide-resistant PCa cells and xenograft models. Moreover, EZH2 and AR are up-regulated in enzalutamide-resistant PCa cells. Mechanically, in enzalutamide-resistant cells, EZH2 remains an epigenetic silencer occupying the AR promoter region and blocking AR target genes, such as PSA and TMPRSS2. Therefore, EZH2 inhibition activates AR pathways, resulting in a synergistic effect on the inhibition of EZH2 and enzalutamide in resistant cells [85, 86].

Antisense oligonucleotides (ASO), which have been identified as novel drug candidates to ablate EZH2, exert the same effect on EZH2i. Research suggests that combination treatment with ASO targeting EZH2 and AR transcripts has a better effect on inhibiting PCa cell growth, both in vitro and in vivo, than monotherapy with these agents [87]. These studies indicate that EZH2 is a critical epigenetic regulator involved in anti-androgen therapy resistance. At the same time, these studies provide a rationale for the combination of enzalutamide with EZH2i. Notably, the study of clinical treatment with the EZH2i tazemetostat and enzalutamide in patients with CRPC has entered clinical trials recently (NCT04179864).

The estrogen receptor (ER) is the most important factor in the pathophysiology of breast cancer [88]. Therefore, modulation of ER activity has been exploited to develop drugs against ER+ breast cancer, such as tamoxifen, representing important endocrine therapies [89].

Epigenetic reprogramming also influences ERs. A recent study discovered that tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer is driven by the epigenetic regulator EZH2, which silences the expression of the growth regulation by estrogen in breast cancer 1(GREB1), an ERα co-factor that is a critical regulatory protein of the ERα pathway. The GREB1-ERα axis plays a pivotal role in determining cell fate in response to anti-estrogen treatment. Researchers have observed a dramatic increase in EZH2 protein levels in clinical samples that are resistant to tamoxifen compared to clinical samples that are sensitive, suggesting that EZH2 causes tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer. Pharmacologic inhibition of EZH2 by GSK126 and tazemetostat retard the growth of xenograft tumors in mouse models, although GREB1 expression continues to increase. The negative correlation of EZH2 with GREB1 can also predict patient responses to endocrine therapy. Interestingly, EZH2-negative and GREB1-positive patients have better clinical outcomes compared to EZH2-positive and GREB1-negative tumors, and the combination of EZH2i with tamoxifen has synergistic effects [90].


Epigenetic regulation usually has a profound impact on the whole transcriptome and causes further global alteration in upstream transcription. Alterations induced by EZH2i may have favorable as well as unfavorable consequences in cancer treatment. For instance, EZH2i improves the infiltration of suppressive immune cells in the tumor microenvironment but induces chemotherapy and endocrine therapy resistance. Therefore, combination with other therapies may be an effective way to exert synergistic and compensatory effects in different cancer types to improve the final clinical outcome. Our previous study also summarized the correlation between EZH2 and the key genes involved cellular metabolic pathways to propose a potential strategy that combination of EZH2i with metabolic regulators will be useful for future cancer therapy [91]. One of the more canonical study demonstrated that a triple combination therapy with EZH2, BRD4, and MAPK pathway inhibitors showed significantly improve the treatment efficacy of solid tumor models with abnormally high levels of EZH2 [92].

To determine whether EZH2i should be used for priming, intermittently with other methods, or sequentially in combination therapies, the constituent treatment strategies need to be precisely and comprehensively studied. A better understanding of the therapeutic mechanisms, either alone or in combination, can further facilitate the development of a strategy to utilize EZH2i easily, effectively and safely with other medications or therapies.

Availability of supporting data

Not applicable.



Enhancer of zeste homolog 2


Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 inhibitors


Food and Drug Administration


Maximum-tolerated dose


Polycomb repressive complex 2


Tyrosine 641 site


Follicular lymphoma


Germinal center B-cell


Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma


Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma






Multiple myeloma


Castration resistant prostate cancer


Metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer


Androgen receptor


Programmed cell death ligand-1


Transforming growth factor-β


Insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor




DNA methyltransferase 1


Immune checkpoint blockade


Anti-programmed cell death-1


Anti-programmed cell death-ligand 1


Anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4




Tumor necrosis factor-α


Interferon regulatory factor 1


Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma


Myeloid-derived suppressor cells


Prostate cancer


Non-small cell lung cancers


Epidermal growth factor receptor






Hepatocellular carcinoma


Ataxia telangiectasia mutated


Forkhead box O3


Poly ADP-ribose


Poly ADP-ribose polymerase


Poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors


Poly ADP-ribosylation


Homologous recombination


Histone deacetylases


Histone deacetylases inhibitors


Histone acetyltransferases


Acute myeloid leukemia


Germinal center


Antisense oligonucleotides


Estrogen receptor


Growth regulation by estrogen in breast cancer 1


Estrogen receptor


  1. 1.

    Yap TA, Winter JN, Giulino-Roth L, Longley J, Lopez J, Michot JM, et al. Phase I study of the novel enhancer of Zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) inhibitor GSK2816126 in patients with advanced hematologic and solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(24):7331–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kim KH, Roberts CW. Targeting EZH2 in cancer. Nat Med. 2016;22(2):128–34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Conway E, Healy E, Bracken AP. PRC2 mediated H3K27 methylations in cellular identity and cancer. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2015;37:42–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Varambally S, Dhanasekaran SM, Zhou M, Barrette TR, Kumar-Sinha C, Sanda MG, et al. The polycomb group protein EZH2 is involved in progression of prostate cancer. Nature. 2002;419(6907):624–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Visser HP, Gunster MJ, Kluin-Nelemans HC, Manders EM, Raaphorst FM, Meijer CJ, et al. The Polycomb group protein EZH2 is upregulated in proliferating, cultured human mantle cell lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 2001;112(4):950–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Chien YC, Liu LC, Ye HY, Wu JY, Yu YL. EZH2 promotes migration and invasion of triple-negative breast cancer cells via regulating TIMP2-MMP-2/-9 pathway. Am J Cancer Res. 2018;8(3):422–34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Zingg D, Debbache J, Schaefer SM, Tuncer E, Frommel SC, Cheng P, et al. The epigenetic modifier EZH2 controls melanoma growth and metastasis through silencing of distinct tumour suppressors. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6051.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Wang A, Dai H, Gong Y, Zhang C, Shu J, Luo Y, et al. ANLN-induced EZH2 upregulation promotes pancreatic cancer progression by mediating miR-218-5p/LASP1 signaling axis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38(1):347.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bracken AP, Pasini D, Capra M, Prosperini E, Colli E, Helin K. EZH2 is downstream of the pRB-E2F pathway, essential for proliferation and amplified in cancer. EMBO J. 2003;22(20):5323–35.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Morin RD, Johnson NA, Severson TM, Mungall AJ, An J, Goya R, et al. Somatic mutations altering EZH2 (Tyr641) in follicular and diffuse large B-cell lymphomas of germinal-center origin. Nat Genet. 2010;42(2):181–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Souroullas GP, Jeck WR, Parker JS, Simon JA-O, Liu JY, Paulk J, et al. An oncogenic Ezh2 mutation induces tumors through global redistribution of histone 3 lysine 27 trimethylation. (1546–170X (Electronic)).

  12. 12.

    McCabe MT, Graves AP, Ganji G, Diaz E, Halsey WS, Jiang Y, et al. Mutation of A677 in histone methyltransferase EZH2 in human B-cell lymphoma promotes hypertrimethylation of histone H3 on lysine 27 (H3K27). P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109(8):2989–94.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Majer CR, Jin L, Scott MP, Knutson SK, Kuntz KW, Keilhack H, et al. A687V EZH2 is a gain-of-function mutation found in lymphoma patients. Febs Lett. 2012;586(19):3448–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Bodor C, Grossmann V, Popov N, Okosun J, O’Riain C, Tan K, et al. EZH2 mutations are frequent and represent an early event in follicular lymphoma. Blood. 2013;122(18):3165–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Italiano A. Role of the EZH2 histone methyltransferase as a therapeutic target in cancer. Pharmacol Ther. 2016;165:26–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Miranda TB, Cortez CC, Yoo CB, Liang G, Abe M, Kelly TK, et al. DZNep is a global histone methylation inhibitor that reactivates developmental genes not silenced by DNA methylation. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009;8(6):1579–88.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Sha M, Mao G, Wang G, Chen Y, Wu X, Wang Z. DZNep inhibits the proliferation of colon cancer HCT116 cells by inducing senescence and apoptosis. Acta pharmaceutica Sinica B. 2015;5(3):188–93.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Konze KD, Ma A, Li F, Barsyte-Lovejoy D, Parton T, Macnevin CJ, et al. An orally bioavailable chemical probe of the Lysine Methyltransferases EZH2 and EZH1. ACS Chem Biol. 2013;8(6):1324–34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Gehling VS, Vaswani RG, Nasveschuk CG, Duplessis M, Iyer P, Balasubramanian S, et al. Discovery, design, and synthesis of indole-based EZH2 inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2015;25(17):3644–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Fioravanti R, Stazi G, Zwergel C, Valente S, Mai A. Six years (2012–2018) of researches on catalytic EZH2 inhibitors: the boom of the 2-pyridone compounds. Chem Rec. 2018;18(12):1818–32.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    First EZH2 Inhibitor Approved-for Rare Sarcoma. Cancer Discov. 2020;10(3):333–4.

  22. 22.

    Hoy SM. Tazemetostat: first approval. Drugs. 2020;80(5):513–21.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Knutson SK, Warholic NM, Wigle TJ, Klaus CR, Allain CJ, Raimondi A, et al. Durable tumor regression in genetically altered malignant rhabdoid tumors by inhibition of methyltransferase EZH2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(19):7922–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Knutson SK, Kawano S, Minoshima Y, Warholic NM, Huang K-C, Xiao Y, et al. Selective inhibition of EZH2 by EPZ-6438 leads to potent antitumor activity in EZH2-mutant non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13(4):842–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Italiano A, Soria J-C, Toulmonde M, Michot J-M, Lucchesi C, Varga A, et al. Tazemetostat, an EZH2 inhibitor, in relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and advanced solid tumours: a first-in-human, open-label, phase 1 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(5):649–59.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Positive Results for Tazemetostat in Follicular Lymphoma. Cancer Discovery. 2018;8(8):OF3.

  27. 27.

    Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME, Gascoyne RD, Specht L, Horning SJ, et al. Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(5):579–86.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Tan J, Yan Y, Wang X, Jiang Y, Xu HE. EZH2: biology, disease, and structure-based drug discovery. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2014;35(2):161–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    McCabe MT, Ott HM, Ganji G, Korenchuk S, Thompson C, Van Aller GS, et al. EZH2 inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for lymphoma with EZH2-activating mutations. Nature. 2012;492(7427):108–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Vaswani RG, Gehling VS, Dakin LA, Cook AS, Nasveschuk CG, Duplessis M, et al. Identification of (R)-N-((4-Methoxy-6-methyl-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridin-3-yl)methyl)-2-methyl-1-(1-(1 -(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)piperidin-4-yl)ethyl)-1H-indole-3-carboxamide (CPI-1205), a potent and selective inhibitor of histone methyltransferase EZH2, suitable for phase I clinical trials for B-cell lymphomas. J Med Chem. 2016;59(21):9928–41.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kung PP, Bingham P, Brooun A, Collins M, Deng YL, Dinh D, Fan C, Gajiwala KS, Grantner R, Gukasyan HJ, Hu W. Optimization of Orally Bioavailable Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 (EZH2) Inhibitors Using Ligand and Property-Based Design Strategies: Identification of Development Candidate (R)-5,8-Dichloro-7-(methoxy(oxetan-3-yl)methyl)-2-((4-methoxy-6-methyl-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridin-3-yl)methyl)-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-1(2H)-one (PF-06821497). (1520–4804 (Electronic)).

  32. 32.

    Bisserier M, Wajapeyee N. Mechanisms of resistance to EZH2 inhibitors in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. Blood. 2018;131(19):2125–37.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Xiao Q, Nobre A, Piñeiro P, Berciano-Guerrero M-Á, Alba E, Cobo M, et al. Genetic and epigenetic biomarkers of immune checkpoint blockade response. J Clin Med. 2020;9(1):286.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Tumes DJ, Onodera A, Suzuki A, Shinoda K, Endo Y, Iwamura C, et al. The polycomb protein Ezh2 regulates differentiation and plasticity of CD4(+) T helper type 1 and type 2 cells. Immunity. 2013;39(5):819–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Abril-Rodriguez G, Ribas A. SnapShot: immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer Cell. 2017;31(6):848.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kalbasi A, Ribas A. Tumour-intrinsic resistance to immune checkpoint blockade. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20(1):25–39.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Chen X, Pan X, Zhang W, Guo H, Cheng S, He Q, et al. Epigenetic strategies synergize with PD-L1/PD-1 targeted cancer immunotherapies to enhance antitumor responses. (2211–3835 (Print)).

  38. 38.

    Goswami S, Apostolou I, Zhang J, Skepner J, Anandhan S, Zhang X, et al. Modulation of EZH2 expression in T cells improves efficacy of anti-CTLA-4 therapy. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(9):3813–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wang D, Quiros J, Mahuron K, Pai C-C, Ranzani V, Young A, et al. Targeting EZH2 reprograms intratumoral regulatory T cells to enhance cancer immunity. Cell Rep. 2018;23(11):3262–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Xiao G, Jin LL, Liu CQ, Wang YC, Meng YM, Zhou ZG, et al. EZH2 negatively regulates PD-L1 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7(1):300.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Zhou L, Mudianto T, Ma X, Riley R, Uppaluri R. Targeting EZH2 enhances antigen presentation, antitumor immunity, and circumvents anti-PD-1 resistance in head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(1):290–300.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Ennishi D, Takata K, Béguelin W, Duns G, Mottok A, Farinha P, et al. Molecular and genetic characterization of MHC deficiency identifies EZH2 as therapeutic target for enhancing immune recognition. Cancer Discov. 2019;9(4):546–63.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Gill S, Maus MV, Porter DL. Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy: 25years in the making. Blood Rev. 2016;30(3):157–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Subklewe M, von Bergwelt-Baildon M, Humpe A. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells: a race to revolutionize cancer therapy. Transfus Med Hemother. 2019;46(1):15–24.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Peng D, Kryczek I, Nagarsheth N, Zhao L, Wei S, Wang W, et al. Epigenetic silencing of TH1-type chemokines shapes tumour immunity and immunotherapy. Nature. 2015;527(7577):249–53.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Caganova M, Carrisi C, Varano G, Mainoldi F, Zanardi F, Germain P-L, et al. Germinal center dysregulation by histone methyltransferase EZH2 promotes lymphomagenesis. J Clin Investig. 2013;123(12):5009–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Brach D, Johnston-Blackwell D, Drew A, Lingaraj T, Motwani V, Warholic NM, et al. EZH2 inhibition by tazemetostat results in altered dependency on B-cell activation signaling in DLBCL. Mol Cancer Ther. 2017;16(11):2586–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Huang S, Wang Z, Zhou J, Huang J, Zhou L, Luo J, et al. EZH2 inhibitor GSK126 suppresses antitumor immunity by driving production of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Cancer Res. 2019;79(8):2009–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Falcetta FS, Medeiros LR, Edelweiss MI, Pohlmann PR, Stein AT, Rosa DD. Adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy for early stage cervical cancer. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2016;11:CD005342.

  50. 50.

    Mano MS, Awada A. Primary chemotherapy for breast cancer: the evidence and the future. Ann Oncol. 2004;15(8):1161–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Findlay M, von Minckwitz G, Wardley A. Effective oral chemotherapy for breast cancer: pillars of strength. Ann Oncol. 2008;19(2):212–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Nader R, El Amm J, Aragon-Ching JB. Role of chemotherapy in prostate cancer. Asian J Androl. 2018;20(3):221–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Choi SJ, Jung SW, Huh S, Chung YS, Cho H, Kang H. Alteration of DNA methylation in gastric cancer with chemotherapy. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;27(8):1367–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Jackson SP, Bartek J. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature. 2009;461(7267):1071–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Qiu X, Wang W, Li B, Cheng B, Lin K, Bai J, et al. Targeting Ezh2 could overcome docetaxel resistance in prostate cancer cells. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):27.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    A potential epigenetic therapy for NSCLC. Cancer Discovery. 2015;5(4):341.

  57. 57.

    Fillmore CM, Xu C, Desai PT, Berry JM, Rowbotham SP, Lin Y-J, et al. EZH2 inhibition sensitizes BRG1 and EGFR mutant lung tumours to TopoII inhibitors. Nature. 2015;520(7546):239–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Cai LQ, Wang ZH, Liu DH. Interference with endogenous EZH2 reverses the chemotherapy drug resistance in cervical cancer cells partly by up-regulating Dicer expression. Tumor Biol. 2016;37(5):6359–69.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Sun J, Cai X, Yung MM, Zhou W, Li J, Zhang Y, et al. miR-137 mediates the functional link between c-Myc and EZH2 that regulates cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer. Oncogene. 2019;38(4):564–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Zhu Z, Tang J, Wang J, Duan G, Zhou L, Zhou X. MiR-138 acts as a tumor suppressor by targeting EZH2 and enhances cisplatin-induced apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells. (1932–6203 (Electronic)).

  61. 61.

    Fan TY, Wang H, Xiang P, Liu YW, Li HZ, Lei BX, et al. Inhibition of EZH2 reverses chemotherapeutic drug TMZ chemosensitivity in glioblastoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7(10):6662–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Avan A, Crea F, Paolicchi E, Funel N, Galvani E, Marquez VE, et al. Molecular mechanisms involved in the synergistic interaction of the EZH2 inhibitor 3-deazaneplanocin A with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012;11(8):1735–46.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Goldstein M, Kastan MB. The DNA damage response: implications for tumor responses to radiation and chemotherapy. Annu Rev Med. 2015;66:129–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Xu L, Tang H, Wang K, Zheng Y, Feng J, Dong H, et al. Pharmacological inhibition of EZH2 combined with DNA-damaging agents interferes with the DNA damage response in MM cells. Mol Med Rep. 2019;19(5):4249–55.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Gao S-B, Li K-L, Qiu H, Zhu L-Y, Pan C-B, Zhao Y, et al. Enhancing chemotherapy sensitivity by targeting PcG via the ATM/p53 pathway. Am J Cancer Res. 2017;7(9):1874–83.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Lee YT, Tan YJ, Oon CE. Molecular targeted therapy: treating cancer with specificity. Eur J Pharmacol. 2018;834:188–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Byler S, Goldgar S, Heerboth S, Leary M, Housman G, Moulton K, et al. Genetic and epigenetic aspects of breast cancer progression and therapy. Anticancer Res. 2014;34(3):1071–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Tamamyan G, Kadia T, Ravandi F, Borthakur G, Cortes J, Jabbour E, et al. Frontline treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in adults. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017;110:20–34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Parizadeh SM, Jafarzadeh-Esfehani R, Ghandehari M, Seifi S, Parizadeh SMR, Moetamani-Ahmadi M, et al. Epigenetic drug therapy in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Curr Pharm Des. 2018;24(23):2701–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Duruisseaux M, Esteller M. Lung cancer epigenetics: from knowledge to applications. Semin Cancer Biol. 2018;51:116–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Natanzon Y, Goode EL, Cunningham JM. Epigenetics in ovarian cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 2018;51:160–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Francica P, Rottenberg S. Mechanisms of PARP inhibitor resistance in cancer and insights into the DNA damage response. Genome Med. 2018;10(1):101.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Kubalanza K, Konecny GE. Mechanisms of PARP inhibitor resistance in ovarian cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2020;32(1):36–41.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Karakashev S, Fukumoto T, Zhao B, Lin J, Wu S, Fatkhutdinov N, et al. EZH2 inhibition sensitizes CARM1-high, homologous recombination proficient ovarian cancers to PARP inhibition. Cancer Cell. 2020;37(2):157–67.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Yamaguchi H, Du Y, Nakai K, Ding M, Chang SS, Hsu JL, et al. EZH2 contributes to the response to PARP inhibitors through its PARP-mediated poly-ADP ribosylation in breast cancer. Oncogene. 2018;37(2):208–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Eckschlager T, Plch J, Stiborova M, Hrabeta J. Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors as Anticancer Drugs. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(7):1414.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Fiskus W, Pranpat M, Balasis M, Herger B, Rao R, Chinnaiyan A, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors deplete enhancer of zeste 2 and associated polycomb repressive complex 2 proteins in human acute leukemia cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006;5(12):3096–104.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Fiskus W, Wang Y, Sreekumar A, Buckley KM, Shi H, Jillella A, et al. Combined epigenetic therapy with the histone methyltransferase EZH2 inhibitor 3-deazaneplanocin A and the histone deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat against human AML cells. Blood. 2009;114(13):2733–43.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Audia JE, Campbell RM. Histone modifications and cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2016;8(4):a019521.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Lue JK, Prabhu SA, Liu Y, Gonzalez Y, Verma A, Mundi PS, et al. Precision targeting with EZH2 and HDAC inhibitors in epigenetically dysregulated lymphomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(17):5271–83.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Takashina T, Kinoshita I, Kikuchi J, Shimizu Y, Sakakibara-Konishi J, Oizumi S, et al. Combined inhibition of EZH2 and histone deacetylases as a potential epigenetic therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer cells. Cancer Sci. 2016;107(7):955–62.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Wang Y, Chen SY, Colborne S, Lambert G, Shin CY, Santos ND, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors synergize with catalytic inhibitors of EZH2 to exhibit antitumor activity in small cell carcinoma of the ovary. Hypercalcemic Type Mol Cancer Therap. 2018;17(12):2767–79.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Harbeck N, Gnant M. Breast cancer. Lancet. 2017;389(10074):1134–50.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Nagaya N, Horie S. Endocrine therapy for prostate cancer. Clin Calcium. 2018;28(11):1527–33.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Bai YF, Zhang ZZ, Cheng LJ, Wang RX, Chen XL, Kong YF, et al. Inhibition of enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) overcomes enzalutamide resistance in castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Biol Chem. 2019;294(25):9911–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Shankar E, Franco D, Iqbal O, Moreton S, Kanwal R, Gupta S. Dual targeting of EZH2 and androgen receptor as a novel therapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. (1096–0333 (Electronic)).

  87. 87.

    Xiao LB, Tien JC, Vo J, Tan MY, Parolia A, Zhang YJ, et al. Epigenetic reprogramming with antisense oligonucleotides enhances the effectiveness of androgen receptor inhibition in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Can Res. 2018;78(20):5731–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Yip C-H, Rhodes A. Estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. Future Oncol. 2014;10(14):2293–301.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Osborne CK. Tamoxifen in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(22):1609–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Wu Y, Zhang Z, Cenciarini ME, Proietti CJ, Amasino M, Hong T, et al. Tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer is regulated by the EZH2-ERα-GREB1 transcriptional axis. Can Res. 2018;78(3):671–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Zhang T, Gong Y, Meng H, Li C, Xue L. Symphony of epigenetic and metabolic regulation-interaction between the histone methyltransferase EZH2 and metabolism of tumor. Clin Epigenetics. 2020;12(1):72.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Huang X, Yan J, Zhang M, Wang Y, Chen Y, Fu X, et al. Targeting epigenetic crosstalk as a therapeutic strategy for EZH2-aberrant solid tumors. Cell. 2018;175(1):186–99.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81972966, 81672091, 91749107).

Author information




CL and YW contributed equally to this work. LX and YW participated in the idea of the article; CL, TZ, ZT and JH collected the related papers and drafted the manuscript. LX, YW, and CL were responsible for the final review of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lixiang Xue.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors agree to publish in the magazine. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, C., Wang, Y., Gong, Y. et al. Finding an easy way to harmonize: a review of advances in clinical research and combination strategies of EZH2 inhibitors. Clin Epigenet 13, 62 (2021).

Download citation


  • EZH2
  • EZH2 inhibitors
  • Combination therapy
  • Immunotherapy
  • Chemotherapy
  • Targeted therapy
  • Endocrine therapy
  • Cancer epigenetics