Open Access

Maintaining the unmethylated state

Clinical EpigeneticsThe official journal of the Clinical Epigenetics Society20135:17

DOI: 10.1186/1868-7083-5-17

Received: 30 May 2013

Accepted: 6 August 2013

Published: 30 September 2013

Abstract

Background

A remarkable correspondence exists between the cytogenetic locations of the known fragile sites and frequently reported sites of hypermethylation. The best-known features of fragile sites are sequence motifs that are prone to the spontaneous formation of a non-B DNA structure. These facts, coupled with the known enzymological specificities of DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1), the ATP-dependent and actin-dependent helicases, and the ten-eleven translocation (TET) dioxygenases, suggest that these enzymes are involved in an epigenetic cycle that maintains the unmethylated state at these sites by resolving non-B structure, preventing both the sequestration of DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) and hypermethylation in normal cells.

Presentation of the hypothesis

The innate tendency of DNA sequences present at fragile sites to form non-B DNA structures results in de novo methylation of DNA at these sites that is held in check in normal cells by the action of ATP-dependent and actin-dependent helicases coupled with the action of TET dioxygenases. This constitutes a previously unrecognized epigenetic repair cycle in which spontaneously forming non-B DNA structures formed at fragile sites are methylated by DNMTs as they are removed by the action of ATP-dependent and actin-dependent helicases, with the resulting nascent methylation rendered non-transmissible by TET dioxygenases.

Testing the hypothesis

A strong prediction of the hypothesis is that knockdown of ATP-dependent and actin-dependent helicases will result in enhanced bisulfite sensitivity and hypermethylation at non-B structures in multiple fragile sites coupled with global hypomethylation.

Implications of the hypothesis

A key implication of the hypothesis is that helicases, like the lymphoid-specific helicase and alpha thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked helicase, passively promote accurate maintenance of DNA methylation by preventing the sequestration of DNMTs at sites of unrepaired non-B DNA structure. When helicase action is blocked due to mutation or downregulation of the respective genes, DNMTs stall at unrepaired non-B structures in fragile sites after methylating them and are unable to methylate other sites in the genome, resulting in hypermethylation at non-B DNA-forming sites, along with hypomethylation elsewhere.

Background

Our recent work on the mechanism of action of 2’-deoxyriboguanylurea (GuaUre-dR) [1], the primary breakdown product of 5-aza-2’-deoxycytidine (5azaC-dR) [2], coupled with work from multiple laboratories, as well as our own, on DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) [38], the substrate specificity, mechanism of action and biological effects of helicases, such as the ERCC2, ATRX, HELLS and RecQ family of helicases [915], and the ten-eleven translocation (TET) dioxygenases [1619], suggest that the mechanism responsible for most of the hypermethylation observed during carcinogenesis involves the breakdown of an epigenetic repair cycle that maintains the unmethylated state at and near the common fragile sites.

The classic examples of epigenetic downregulation in human cells and tissues are genes that are often silenced and hypermethylated during tumorigenesis. As demonstrated in Table 1, the vast majority of these genes reside at cytogenetic locations that define well-known fragile sites. This remarkable cytogenetic correspondence strongly suggests that hypermethylation, epigenetic downregulation and chromosomal fragility share common mechanistic features. The best-known feature of fragile sites is the presence of a sequence motif that is prone to the spontaneous formation of a non-B DNA structure. In addition to FRAXA [14], many other fragile sites have been shown to harbor sequences, such as the CCG triplet repeat, which form hairpins, slippage intermediates (Figure 1A) and quadruplex structures. Non-B intermediates are known to be exceptional substrates for de novo methylation by DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) [6, 7, 20] either at its three-nucleotide recognition motif (Figure 1) within the repeat if it contains CG sites or at the same motif at CG sites flanking the non-B sequence if it does not. Consequently, even fragile sites that contain AT-rich sequences with high torsional flexibility and the potential for non-B DNA structure formation are subject to methylation in regions flanking the repeat. Other fragile sites that lack CG dimers, such as the Huntington’s disease CAG repeat, which can also form hairpins and slippage intermediates [7, 21], appear to induce methylation at the flanking and other regions where CG dimers occur [7, 22]; for a review, see Lukusa and Fryns [23].
Table 1

Hypermethylation at known fragile sites

Gene

Gene location

Fragile site

Fragile site type

Fragile site location

Methylation reference

RUNX3

1p36

FRA1A

Aph, C

1p36

[24]

-

-

FRA1B

Aph, C

1p32

-

ARHI

1p31

FRA1C

Aph, C

1p31.2

[25]

PARG1

1p22.1

FRA1D

Aph, C

1p22

[26]

-

-

FRA1E

Aph, C

1p21.2

-

S100A6

1q21

FRA1F

Aph, C

1q21

[27]

-

-

FRA1G

Aph, C

1q25.1

-

PTGS2

1q25.2-25.3

FRA1G

Aph, C

1q25.1

[28, 29]

DISC1

1q42.1

FRA1H

5azaC-R, C

1q42

[30]

-

-

FRA1I

Aph, C

1q44

-

-

-

FRA1J

5azaC-R, C

1q12

-

GLUL

1q31

FRA1K

Aph, C

1q31

[31]

CLCA2

1p31

FRA1L

Aph, C

1p31

[32]

MIR137

1p21.3

FRA1M

Fol, R

1p21.3

[33]

-

-

FRA2A

Fol, R

2q11.2

-

BCL2L11

2q13

FRA2B

Fol, R

2q13

[34]

-

-

FRA2C

Aph, C

2p24.2

-

MSH6

2p16

FRA2D

Aph, C

2p16.2

[35]

DOK1

2p13

FRA2E

Aph, C

2p13

[36]

RASSF1

3p21.3

-

-

-

[37]

MLH1

3p21.3

-

-

-

[38]

VHL

3p25.3

-

-

-

[39]

LRP1B

2q21.2

FRA2F

Aph, C

2q21.3

[40]

HOXD1

2q31.1

FRA2G

Aph, C

2q31

[41]

-

-

FRA2H

Aph, C

2q32.1

-

FLIP

2q33-q34

FRA2I

Aph, C

2q33

[42]

KIF1A

2q37.3

FRA2J

Aph, C

2q37.3

[43]

ZEB2

2q22.3

FRA2K

Fol, R

2q22.3

[44]

RARβ

3p24.2

FRA3A

Aph, C

3p24.2

[45]

FHIT

3p14.2

FRA3B

Aph, C

3p14.2

[46]

-

-

FRA3C

Aph, C

3q27

-

RARRES1

3q25.32

FRA3D

Aph, C

3q25

[47]

PTX3

3q25

FRA3D

Aph, C

3q25

[48]

-

-

FRA4A

Aph, C

4p16.1

-

PDGFRA

4q12

FRA4B

BrdU, C

4q12

[49]

SFRP2

4q31.3

FRA4C

Aph, C

4q31.1

[50]

SLIT2

4p15.2

FRA4D

Aph, C

4p15

[51]

-

-

FRA5A

BrdU, C

5p13

-

-

-

FRA5B

BrdU, C

5q15

-

NR3C1

5q31.3

FRA5C

Aph, C

5q31.1

[52]

GPR150

5q15

FRA5D

Aph, C

5q15

[53]

-

-

FRA5E

Aph, C

5p14

-

APC

5q21-22

FRA5F

Aph, C

5q21

[54]

-

-

FRA5G

Fol, R

5q35

-

SCGB3A1

5q35.3

FRA5G

Fol, R

5q35

[55, 56]

-

-

FRA6A

Fol, R

6p23

-

-

-

FRA6B

Aph, C

6p25.1

-

-

-

FRA6C

Aph, C

6p22.2

-

-

-

FRA6C

Aph, C

6p22.2

-

-

-

FRA6D

BrdU, C

6q13

-

ESR1

6q25.1

-

-

-

[57]

-

 

FRA6E

Aph, C

6q26

-

HACE1

6q21

FRA6F

Aph, C

6q21

[58]

-

-

FRA6G

Aph, C

6q15

-

-

-

FRA7A

Fol, R

7p11.2

-

TWIST1

7p21.2

-

-

-

[56]

-

-

FRA7B

Aph, C

7p22

 

-

-

FRA7C

Aph, C

7p14.2

-

IGFBP3

7p13-p12

FRA7D

Aph, C

7p13

[59]

HIC1

17p13.3

FRA7D

Aph, C

7p13

[60]

ABCB1

7q21.12

FRA7E

Aph, C

7q21.2

[61]

TFPI2

7q22

FRA7F

Aph, C

7q22

[62]

TES

7q31.2

FRA7G

Aph, C

7q31.2

[63]

CFTR

7q31.2

FRA7G

Aph, C

7q31.2

[64]

-

-

FRA7H

Aph, C

7q32.3

-

EN2

7q36

FRA7I

Aph, C

7q36

[65]

HSPB1

7q11.23

FRA7J

Aph, C

7q11

[66]

-

-

FRA8A

Fol, R

8q22.3

-

-

-

FRA8B

Aph, C

8q22.1

-

MYC

8q24.21

FRA8C,

Aph, C

8q24.1

[67]

-

-

FRA8D

Aph, C

8q24.3

-

MYC

8q24.21

FRA8E

Dmy, R

8q24.1

[67]

CDKN2A

9p21

FRA9A,

Fol, R

9p21

[68]

CDKN2B

9p21

FRA9A,

Fol, R

9p21

[69]

BRINP1

9q32-q33

FRA9B,

Fol, R

9q32

[70]

CDKN2A

9p21

FRA9C,

BrdU, R

9p21

[68]

CDKN2B

9p21

FRA9C,

BrdU, R

9p21

[69]

DAPK1

9q21.33

FRA9D

Aph, C

9q22.1

[71]

  

FRA9B,

Aph, C

9q32

 

BARX1

9q12

FRA9F

5azaC-R, C

9q12

[72]

FRA10AC1

10q23.33

FRA10A

Fol, R

10q23.3

[73]

PTEN

10q23.3

FRA10A

Fol, R

10q23.3

[74]

-

 

FRA10B

BrdU, R

10q25.2

 
  

FRA10C

BrdU, R

10q21

 

EGR2

10q21.1

FRA10D

Aph, C

10q21.1

[75]

TYSND1

10q22.1

FRA10D

Aph, C

10q22.1

[76]

-

-

FRA10E

Aph, C

10q25.2

 

MGMT

10q26

FRA10F

Aph, C

10q26.1

[77]

RET

10q11.2

FRA10G

Aph, C

10q11.2

[78]

MRPL48

11q13.4

FRA11A

Fol, R

11q13.3

[79]

AMICA1

11q23.3

FRA11B

Fol, R

11q23.3

[80]

CALCB

11p15.2-

FRA11C

Aph, C

11p15.1

[81]

HRAS

11p15.5

FRA11C,

Aph, C

11p15.1

[81]

MYOD1

11p15.4

FRA11C,

Aph, C

11p15.1

[64]

-

-

FRA11D

Aph, C

11p14.2

 

WT1

11p13

FRA11E

Aph, C

11p13

[82]

CD44

11p13

FRA11E

Aph, C

11p13

[83]

-

-

FRA11F

Aph, C

11p14.2

 

PGR

11q22-q23

FRA11G

Aph, C

11q23.3

[84]

GSTP1

11q13

FRA11H

Aph, C

11q13

[85]

CCND2

12p13

-

-

-

[56]

CALCB

11p15.2-15.1

FRA11I

Aph, C

11p15.1

[81]

HRAS

11p15.5

FRA11I,

Aph, C

11p15.1

[81]

MYOD1

11p15.4

FRA11I,

Aph, C

11p15.1

[64]

-

-

FRA12A

Fol, R

12q13.1

 

SLC6A15

12q21.3

FRA12B

Aph, C

12q21.3

[62]

CHFR

12q24.33

FRA12C

BrdU, R

12q24.2

[86]

-

-

FRA12D

Fol, R

12q24.13

 

SELPLG

12q24

FRA12E

Aph, C

12q24

[87]

BRCA2

13q12.3

FRA13A

Aph, C

13q13.2

[35]

RB1

13q14.2

-

-

-

[88]

PCDH20

13q21.2

FRA13B

BrdU, C

13q21

[89]

PCDH20

13q21.2

FRA13C

Aph, C

13q21.2

[89]

ZIC2

13q32

FRA13D

Aph, C

13q32

[90]

-

-

FRA15A

Aph, C

15q22

 

ABCC6

16p13.1

FRA16A

Fol, R

16p13.11

[64]

CDH1

16q22.1

FRA16B,

Dmy, R

16q22.1

[91]

CDH1

16q22.1

FRA16C

Aph, C

16q22.1

[91]

CDH13

16q23.3

FRA16D

Aph, C

16q23.2

[92]

WWOX

16q23.3-q24.1

FRA16D

Aph, C

16q23.2

[93]

HIC1

17p13.3

-

-

-

[60]

-

-

FRA17A

Dmy, R

17p12

 

BRCA1

17q21.31

-

-

-

[94]

SOX9

17q23

FRA17B

Aph, C

17q23.1

[95]

CDH2

18q12.1

FRA18A

Aph, C

18q12.2

[72]

SERPINB5

18q21.33

FRA18B

Aph, C

18q21.3

[96]

BCL2

18q21.3

FRA18B

Aph, C

18q21.3

[64]

-

-

FRA18C

Aph, C

18q22.2

 

-

-

FRA19A

5azaC-R, C

19q13

 

-

-

FRA19B

Fol, R

19p13

 

-

-

FRA20A

Fol, R

20p11.23

 

-

-

FRA20B

Aph, C

20p12.2

 

-

-

FRA20B

Aph, C

20p12.2

 

FBLN1

22q13

FRA22A

Fol, R

22q13

[97]

-

22q12.1

FRA22B

Aph, C

22q12.2

 

AR

Xq12

-

-

-

[98]

FMR1

Xq27.3

FRAXA

Fol, R

Xq27.3

[14]

VCX

Xp22

FRAXB

Aph, C

Xp22.31

[99]

VCX

Xp22

FRAXC

Aph, C

Xq22.1

[99]

FMR1

Xq27.3

FRAXD

Aph, C

Xq27.2

[100]

FMR2

Xq28

FRAXE,

Fol, R

Xq28

[101]

FMR2

Xq28

FRAXF

Fol, R

Xq28

[101]

Definitions for standard gene abbreviations are available at the HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC) website [102]. Aph, aphidicolin; 5azaC-R, 5-azacytidine ; BrdU, bromodeoxyuridine; C, common; Dmy, distamycin; Fol, folate; R, rare.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1868-7083-5-17/MediaObjects/13148_2013_Article_62_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Key systems maintaining the active and unmethylated state of DNA at sequences with the innate potential for non-B DNA structure formation. In this enzymologically-based model, non-B DNA structure forms spontaneously or in response to replication stress or carcinogen-linked damage, inducing DNA methylation de novo[3, 4, 103, 104]. The three-nucleotide recognition motif [4] of DNMT1 (C:G-C) is highlighted in the schematic of the non-B structure in the upper right of the figure. Helicase resolution at non-B structures produces hemimethylated DNA. Hypermethylation is prevented by the action of TET dioxygenase on its preferred hemimethylated substrate [17]. When stress overwhelms the capacity of TET dioxygenase to hydroxymethylate hemimethylated DNA in the affected region, hypermethylation will result. In this model, helicase lesions, DNMT lesions or TET dioxygenase lesions are expected to generate chromosome instability and the selective induction of fragile sites. Methylated unusual DNA structures that are not resolved by helicase action may be removed by excision repair-linked pathways where the unmethylated state is restored by DNA synthesis. (A) Molecular model of the hypermethylated C-rich strand hairpin formed at fragile site FRAXA. The model was constructed in Biograf 3.1 (Molecular Simulations Inc, San Diego, CA, USA) and rendered with the UCSF Chimera package (Resource for Biocomputing, Visualization, and Informatics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA). It is based on NMR data presented by Chen et al.[20]. (B) Activity of human DNA methyltransferase 1 (hDNMT1) on hemimethylated DNA and hemihydroxymethylated DNA. hDNMT1 was purified from nuclear extracts [105] prepared from cultured HeLa S3 cells. Purification and enzyme activity measurements were carried out as previously described [106, 107]. The purified enzyme had a specific activity of 20.96 fmole3HCH3/min/mg. Duplex ODN substrates were synthesized and annealed as previously described [107]. The results confirm the findings of Hashimoto et al. [17] with cloned DNMT1.

Presentation of the hypothesis

The key components of the hypothesis, presented in Figure 1, are: 1) carcinogenesis-linked hypermethylation that occurs primarily at or near fragile sites as a result of the tendency of DNA sequences at these sites to form non-B structures; 2) methylation is applied de novo to these structures and their neighboring sequences not only by DNMT3A/3B but also by DNMT1; 3) during normal replication methylated non-B DNA structures are returned to the B form by ERCC2, ATRX, HELLS and RecQ helicases; 4) sequences that cannot be resolved by helicase action are removed by excision; 5) hydroxymethylation applied to the nascent methyl groups by the action of TET dioxygenases prevents sequences that are resolved by helicase action from undergoing maintenance methylation by DNMT1, regenerating the unmethylated state at these sites in normal cells (in this regard, it is important to recognize that resolution of these structures will result in hemimethylated DNA, and that hemimethylated DNA is the preferred substrate of TET1 dioxygenase [17]); and 6) in addition to DNA damage, carcinogenesis-linked dysfunction among the helicases results in hypermethylation at and near fragile sites, and hypomethylation elsewhere.

Testing the hypothesis

While the existing evidence for the proposed cycle is compelling, currently available experimental approaches permit several additional tests of the hypothesis. For example, transient knockdown by transfection-mediated expression of an ERCC2, ATRX, HELLS or RecQ helicase is predicted to result in a transient hypermethylation, coupled with an increase in local hydroxymethylation content at affected fragile sites. Stable knockdown is expected to result in both hypermethylation at affected fragile sites and global hypomethylation. In particular, the knockdown of the WRN helicase (REQL2) is predicted to result in hypermethylation of the FHIT gene at FRA3B [108], coupled with enhanced bisulfite sensitivity [109] of native DNA associated with the increased presence of non-B DNA structure at this site [109, 110]. Existing studies on the effect of WRN mutations on methylation, for example, do not address early events at fragile sites, since they use cell lines that have been carried in culture or were isolated from adults bearing the WRN mutation [111, 112]. Chromatin immunoprecipitation with antibodies to DNMT1 is expected to yield DNA that is enriched for fragile site sequences after helicase knockdown. Determining the levels of DNMT1 by immunoblotting after helicase knockdown would determine whether or not the removal of stalled DNMT1 involves proteolysis [113]. WRN knockdown coupled with DNMT1 knockdown is expected to produce enhanced bisulfite sensitivity [109, 110] in the absence of hypermethylation, while enhanced bisulfite sensitivity after knockdown of DNMT1 alone would provide evidence for an obligatory role of methylation in non-B structure resolution.

Finally, as a test of the downstream portion of the cycle, overexpression of TET dioxygenases is expected to reduce de novo methylation at fragile sites caused by helicase knockdown, and knockdown of the dioxygenases should enhance de novo methylation at these same sites.

Implications of the hypothesis

The hypothesis is consistent with other suggestions for the genesis of hypermethylation [114, 115]. Disruptions in the histone code might be expected to elicit fragile site formation, since exposure to carcinogens that damage DNA or block the histone modification processes, may also induce fragile sites. Alterations in DNA structure induced by miRNA (possibly via R-loop formation) could have similar effects at these sites. Moreover, the remarkable correspondence between sites of reported hypermethylation and fragile sites suggests that the mutational and epimutational base upon which natural selection can act during carcinogenesis is largely confined to these sites. Their tendency to adopt non-B DNA structures provides a compelling case for how they become available for natural selection.

Each of the tenets of the hypothesis is supported by cytogenetic, DNA methylation and enzymological evidence. Enzymological and biological evidence from our laboratory suggests that DNMTs have evolved to recognize non-B DNA structures, like those associated with FRAXA in fragile X-linked mental retardation, and FRA11I/FRA11C in breast and prostate cancer [20, 107, 110], suggesting that DNMTs play an obligate role in the suppression of non-B DNA structures [116, 117] along with associated repair systems. Given an obligate role for DNMTs in the suppression of non-B structure formation, the role of helicases in the process can be better understood. In general, deficiencies in helicases, such as ATRX, HELLS, BLM and WRN, have been shown to result in either global genomic demethylation [118, 119], gene activation [10], or both global demethylation and gene activation. Two diametrically opposed interpretations of normal function of these helicases have been proposed. In one interpretation, they are viewed as actively promoting DNA methylation [118, 120]. In the alternative interpretation, they are viewed as passively promoting normal DNA methylation by preventing the sequestration of DNMTs [107, 117] at unresolved non-B structures [10]. The enzymological evidence supports the alternative interpretation. For example, the WRN helicase has been shown to resolve quadruplex DNA [15] and deficiency appears to result in the accumulation of non-B structures [10]. The evidence suggests that the DNMTs remain bound to non-B DNA sequences containing mispaired cytosines [107], oxidized bases [121] or DNA containing base analogs, such as deoxyuridine (dU) [122], 5azaC-dR or GuaUre-dR [1]. It follows, that in cases of helicase deficiency, DNMT sequestration at a site of hypermethylation will result in global hypomethylation, much like the effects of 5-azacytidine (5azaC-R), 5azaC-dR and GuaUre-dR result in hypomethylation, since tightly bound DNMTs are unable to maintain normal methylation patterns. Moreover, this model (Figure 1) and the postulated obligatory role for DNMTs suggests that the cytogenetic overlap between 5azaC-R, 5azaC-dR and GuaUre-dR-induced fragile sites FRA1J and FRA9F, and the undercondensations observed in DNMT3B mutants [123] and knockouts [124], is the result of the complete titration of DNMT3B by non-B structures that remain unresolved and unrepaired after exposure to these compounds. The selective effect on DNMT3B as opposed to DNMT1 can be attributed to its low level of expression relative to DNMT1. Estimates from purification data [107] suggest that DNMT1 levels are in the order of several thousand copies per cell. Northern blotting suggests that the abundance of DNMT3B is ten to twentyfold below that of DNMT1 at a few hundred copies per cell [125]. The DNA footprint of DNMT1 is approximately 23 bp [126]. Thus, a single non-B structure involving even 1,000 bases of single-stranded DNA could sequester approximately 2% of the DNMT1 or 20% of the DNMT3B. Replication stress-inducing agents, such as aphidicolin or distamycin, can be expected to induce multiple non-B regions. During carcinogenesis, multiple rounds of sequential induction of fragile sites by replication stress and carcinogen action could result in global hypomethylation. Moreover, the shattering of metaphase that occurs at high concentrations of 5-aza-CR contrasted with the confined induction of fragile sites at low concentration [127] is consistent with the idea that DNMT3B is knocked out at low concentration and DNMT1 at higher concentration, and that both are obligatorily involved in suppressing fragile sites. Finally, work with the TET dioxygenases [1619] and the response of DNMTs to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (hmC) strongly suggest that hydroxymethylation at repaired and methylated genes in fragile sites will act to restore the unmethylated active state of these genes (Figure 1B).

Abbreviations

5azaC-dR: 

5-aza-2-deoxycytidine

5azaC-R: 

5-azacytidine

bp: 

base pair

dU: 

deoxyuridine

DNMT: 

DNA methyltransferase

DNMT1: 

DNA methyltransferase 1

DNMT3: 

DNA methyltransferase 3

GuaUre-dR: 

2-deoxyriboguanylurea

hDNMT1: 

human DNA methyltransferase 1

HGNC: 

HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee

hmC: 

5-hydroxymethylcytosine

miRNA: 

microRNA

NMR: 

Nuclear magnetic resonance

ODN: 

Oligodeoxynucleotide

TET: 

Ten-eleven translocation.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Katarzyna Lamparska for unpublished data on the activity of DNMT1 on hemimethylated and hemihydroxymethylated DNA.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
City of Hope

References

  1. Lamparska K, Clark J, Babilonia G, Bedell V, Yip W, Smith SS: 2′-Deoxyriboguanylurea, the primary breakdown product of 5-aza-2′-deoxyribocytidine, is a mutagen, an epimutagen, an inhibitor of DNA methyltransferases and an inducer of 5-azacytidine-type fragile sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40: 9788-9801. 10.1093/nar/gks706.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Rogstad DK, Herring JL, Theruvathu JA, Burdzy A, Perry CC, Neidigh JW, Sowers LC: Chemical decomposition of 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (Decitabine): kinetic analyses and identification of products by NMR, HPLC, and mass spectrometry. Chem Res Toxicol. 2009, 22: 1194-1204. 10.1021/tx900131u.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Smith SS, Hardy TA, Baker DJ: Human DNA (cytosine-5)methyltransferase selectively methylates duplex DNA containing mispairs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987, 15: 6899-6916. 10.1093/nar/15.17.6899.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Smith SS, Kan JL, Baker DJ, Kaplan BE, Dembek P: Recognition of unusual DNA structures by human DNA (cytosine-5)methyltransferase. J Mol Biol. 1991, 217: 39-51. 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90609-A.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Smith SS, Kaplan BE, Sowers LC, Newman EM: Mechanism of human methyl-directed DNA methyltransferase and the fidelity of cytosine methylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992, 89: 4744-4748. 10.1073/pnas.89.10.4744.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Smith SS, Laayoun A, Lingeman RG, Baker DJ, Riley J: Hypermethylation of telomere-like foldbacks at codon 12 of the human c-Ha-ras gene and the trinucleotide repeat of the FMR-1 gene of fragile X. J Mol Biol. 1994, 243: 143-151. 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1640.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Smith SS, Baker DJ: Stalling of human methyltransferase at single-strand conformers from the Huntington’s locus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997, 234: 73-78. 10.1006/bbrc.1997.6581.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Smith SS, Baker DJ, Jardines LA: A G4-DNA/B-DNA junction at codon 12 of c-Ha-ras is actively and asymmetrically methylated by DNA(cytosine-5)methyltransferase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1989, 160: 1397-1402. 10.1016/S0006-291X(89)80159-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mohaghegh P, Karow JK, Brosh RM, Bohr VA, Hickson ID: The Bloom’s and Werner’s syndrome proteins are DNA structure-specific helicases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29: 2843-2849. 10.1093/nar/29.13.2843.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnson JE, Cao K, Ryvkin P, Wang LS, Johnson FB: Altered gene expression in the Werner and Bloom syndromes is associated with sequences having G-quadruplex forming potential. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38: 1114-1122. 10.1093/nar/gkp1103.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibbons RJ, Picketts DJ, Villard L, Higgs DR: Mutations in a putative global transcriptional regulator cause X-linked mental retardation with alpha-thalassemia (ATR-X syndrome). Cell. 1995, 80: 837-845. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90287-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fan L, Fuss JO, Cheng QJ, Arvai AS, Hammel M, Roberts VA, Cooper PK, Tainer JA: XPD helicase structures and activities: insights into the cancer and aging phenotypes from XPD mutations. Cell. 2008, 133: 789-800. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.04.030.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Myant K, Termanis A, Sundaram AY, Boe T, Li C, Merusi C, Burrage J, de Las Heras JI, Stancheva I: LSH and G9a/GLP complex are required for developmentally programmed DNA methylation. Genome Res. 2011, 21: 83-94. 10.1101/gr.108498.110.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Oberlé I, Rousseau F, Heitz D, Kretz C, Devys D, Hanauer A, Boué J, Bertheas M, Mandel J: Instability of a 550-base pair DNA segment and abnormal methylation in fragile X syndrome. Science. 1991, 252: 1097-1102. 10.1126/science.252.5009.1097.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fry M, Loeb LA: Human werner syndrome DNA helicase unwinds tetrahelical structures of the fragile X syndrome repeat sequence d(CGG)n. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 12797-12802. 10.1074/jbc.274.18.12797.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ficz G, Branco MR, Seisenberger S, Santos F, Krueger F, Hore TA, Marques CJ, Andrews S, Reik W: Dynamic regulation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse ES cells and during differentiation. Nature. 2011, 473: 398-402. 10.1038/nature10008.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hashimoto H, Liu Y, Upadhyay AK, Chang Y, Howerton SB, Vertino PM, Zhang X, Cheng X: Recognition and potential mechanisms for replication and erasure of cytosine hydroxymethylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40: 4841-4849. 10.1093/nar/gks155.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Inoue A, Zhang Y: Replication-dependent loss of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse preimplantation embryos. Science. 2011, 334: 194-10.1126/science.1212483.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ito S, D’Alessio AC, Taranova OV, Hong K, Sowers LC, Zhang Y: Role of Tet proteins in 5mC to 5hmC conversion, ES-cell self-renewal and inner cell mass specification. Nature. 2010, 466: 1129-1133. 10.1038/nature09303.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Chen X, Mariappan SV, Catasti P, Ratliff R, Moyzis RK, Laayoun A, Smith SS, Bradbury EM, Gupta G: Hairpins are formed by the single DNA strands of the fragile X triplet repeats: structure and biological implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995, 92: 5199-5203. 10.1073/pnas.92.11.5199.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gacy AM, Goellner G, Juranic N, Macura S, McMurray CT: Trinucleotide repeats that expand in human disease form hairpin structures in vitro. Cell. 1995, 81: 533-540. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90074-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ng CW, Yildirim F, Yap YS, Dalin S, Matthews BJ, Velez PJ, Labadorf A, Housman DE, Fraenkel E: Extensive changes in DNA methylation are associated with expression of mutant huntingtin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013, 110: 2354-2359. 10.1073/pnas.1221292110.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lukusa T, Fryns JP: Human chromosome fragility. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008, 1779: 3-16. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2007.10.005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Jeong P, Min BD, Ha YS, Song PH, Kim IY, Ryu KH, Kim JH, Yun SJ, Kim WJ: RUNX3 methylation in normal surrounding urothelium of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Potential role in the prediction of tumor progression. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012, 38: 1095-1100. 10.1016/j.ejso.2012.07.116.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Yuan J, Luo RZ, Fujii S, Wang L, Hu W, Andreeff M, Pan Y, Kadota M, Oshimura M, Sahin AA, Issa JP, Bast RC, Yu Y: Aberrant methylation and silencing of ARHI, an imprinted tumor suppressor gene in which the function is lost in breast cancers. Cancer Res. 2003, 63: 4174-4180.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ripperger T, von Neuhoff N, Kamphues K, Emura M, Lehmann U, Tauscher M, Schraders M, Groenen P, Skawran B, Rudolph C, Callet-Bauchu E, van Krieken JH, Schlegelberger B, Steinemann D: Promoter methylation of PARG1, a novel candidate tumor suppressor gene in mantle-cell lymphomas. Haematologica. 2007, 92: 460-468. 10.3324/haematol.10337.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lindsey JC, Lusher ME, Anderton JA, Gilbertson RJ, Ellison DW, Clifford SC: Epigenetic deregulation of multiple S100 gene family members by differential hypomethylation and hypermethylation events in medulloblastoma. Br J Cancer. 2007, 97: 267-274. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603852.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Toyota M, Shen L, Ohe-Toyota M, Hamilton SR, Sinicrope FA, Issa JP: Aberrant methylation of the Cyclooxygenase 2 CpG island in colorectal tumors. Cancer Res. 2000, 60: 4044-4048.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Woodson K, O’Reilly KJ, Ward DE, Walter J, Hanson J, Walk EL, Tangrea JA: CD44 and PTGS2 methylation are independent prognostic markers for biochemical recurrence among prostate cancer patients with clinically localized disease. Epigenetics. 2006, 1: 183-186. 10.4161/epi.1.4.3530.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ghoshal K, Motiwala T, Claus R, Yan P, Kutay H, Datta J, Majumder S, Bai S, Majumder A, Huang T, Plass C, Jacob ST: HOXB13, a target of DNMT3B, is methylated at an upstream CpG island, and functions as a tumor suppressor in primary colorectal tumors. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e10338-10.1371/journal.pone.0010338.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Cavicchioli F, Shia A, O’Leary K, Haley V, Crook TR, Thompson AM, Lackner M, Lo NC, Schmid P: Epigenetic silencing of glutamine synthetase (Glul) defines glutamine depletion therapy. Cancer Res. 2012, 72: p4-10-10-doi:10.1158/0008-5472.SABCS12-P4-06-10Google Scholar
  32. Li X, Cowell JK, Sossey-Alaoui K: CLCA2 tumour suppressor gene in 1p31 is epigenetically regulated in breast cancer. Oncogene. 2004, 23: 1474-1480. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207249.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kozaki K, Imoto I, Mogi S, Omura K, Inazawa J: Exploration of tumor-suppressive microRNAs silenced by DNA hypermethylation in oral cancer. Cancer Res. 2008, 68: 2094-2105. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5194.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Fernandez SV, Huang Y, Snider KE, Zhou Y, Pogash TJ, Russo J: Expression and DNA methylation changes in human breast epithelial cells after bisphenol A exposure. Int J Oncol. 2012, 41: 369-377.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Moelans CB, Verschuur-Maes AH, van Diest PJ: Frequent promoter hypermethylation of BRCA2, CDH13, MSH6, PAX5, PAX6 and WT1 in ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer. J Pathol. 2011, 225: 222-231. 10.1002/path.2930.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Saulnier A, Vaissière T, Yue J, Siouda M, Malfroy M, Accardi R, Creveaux M, Sebastian S, Shahzad N, Gheit T, Hussain I, Torrente M, Maffini FA, Calabrese L, Chiesa F, Cuenin C, Shukla R, Fathallah I, Matos E, Daudt A, Koifman S, Wünsch-Filho V, Menezes AM, Curado MP, Zaridze D, Boffetta P, Brennan P, Tommasino M, Herceg Z, Sylla BS: Inactivation of the putative suppressor gene DOK1 by promoter hypermethylation in primary human cancer. Int J Cancer. 2012, 130: 2484-2494. 10.1002/ijc.26299.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Dammann R, Li C, Yoon JH, Chin PL, Bates S, Pfeifer GP: Epigenetic inactivation of a RAS association domain family protein from the lung tumour suppressor locus 3p21.3. Nat Genet. 2000, 25: 315-319. 10.1038/77083.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Herman JG, Umar A, Polyak K, Graff JR, Ahuja N, Issa JP, Markowitz S, Willson JK, Hamilton SR, Kinzler KW, Kane MF, Kolodner RD, Vogelstein B, Kunkel TA, Baylin SB: Incidence and functional consequences of hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation in colorectal carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998, 95: 6870-6875. 10.1073/pnas.95.12.6870.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Herman JG, Latif F, Weng Y, Lerman MI, Zbar B, Liu S, Samid D, Duan DS, Gnarra JR, Linehan WM: Silencing of the VHL tumor-suppressor gene by DNA methylation in renal carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994, 91: 9700-9704. 10.1073/pnas.91.21.9700.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Sonoda I, Imoto I, Inoue J, Shibata T, Shimada Y, Chin K, Imamura M, Amagasa T, Gray JW, Hirohashi S, Inazawa J: Frequent silencing of low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1B (LRP1B) expression by genetic and epigenetic mechanisms in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2004, 64: 3741-3747. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0172.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Faryna M, Konermann C, Aulmann S, Bermejo JL, Brugger M, Diederichs S, Rom J, Weichenhan D, Claus R, Rehli M, Schirmacher P, Sinn HP, Plass HP, Gerhauser C: Genome-wide methylation screen in low-grade breast cancer identifies novel epigenetically altered genes as potential biomarkers for tumor diagnosis. FASEB J. 2012, 26: 4937-4950. 10.1096/fj.12-209502.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. van Noesel MM, van Bezouw S, Voûte PA, Herman JG, Pieters R, Versteeg R: Clustering of hypermethylated genes in neuroblastoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2003, 38: 226-233. 10.1002/gcc.10278.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Ostrow KL, Park HL, Hoque MO, Kim MS, Liu J, Argani P, Westra W, Van Criekinge W, Sidransky D: Pharmacologic unmasking of epigenetically silenced genes in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009, 15: 1184-1191. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1304.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Walter K, Holcomb T, Januario T, Du P, Evangelista M, Kartha N, Iniguez L, Soriano R, Huw L, Stern H, Modrusan Z, Seshagiri S, Hampton GM, Amler LC, Bourgon R, Yauch RL, Shames DS: DNA methylation profiling defines clinically relevant biological subsets of non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2012, 18: 2360-2373. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2635-T.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Virmani AK, Rathi A, Zöchbauer-Müller S, Sacchi N, Fukuyama Y, Bryant D, Maitra A, Heda S, Fong KM, Thunnissen F, Minna JD, Gazdar AF: Promoter methylation and silencing of the retinoic acid receptor-beta gene in lung carcinomas. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000, 92: 1303-1307. 10.1093/jnci/92.16.1303.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Zöchbauer-Müller S, Fong KM, Maitra A, Lam S, Geradts J, Ashfaq R, Virmani AK, Milchgrub S, Gazdar AF, Minna JD: 5′ CpG island methylation of the FHIT gene is correlated with loss of gene expression in lung and breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 3581-3585.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Youssef EM, Chen XQ, Higuchi E, Kondo Y, Garcia-Manero G, Lotan R, Issa JP: Hypermethylation and silencing of the putative tumor suppressor Tazarotene-induced gene 1 in human cancers. Cancer Res. 2004, 64: 2411-2417. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-0164.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang JX, He YL, Zhu ST, Yang S, Zhang ST: Aberrant methylation of the 3q25 tumor suppressor gene PTX3 in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2011, 17: 4225-4230. 10.3748/wjg.v17.i37.4225.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Saito K, Sakurai S, Sano T, Sakamoto K, Asao T, Hosoya Y, Nakajima T, Kuwano H: Aberrant methylation status of known methylation-sensitive CpG islands in gastrointestinal stromal tumors without any correlation to the state of c-kit and PDGFRA gene mutations and their malignancy. Cancer Sci. 2008, 99: 253-259. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00682.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Kinoshita T, Nomoto S, Kodera Y, Koike M, Fujiwara M, Nakao A: Decreased expression and aberrant hypermethylation of the SFRP genes in human gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011, 58: 1051-1056.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Beggs AD, Jones A, Shepherd N, Arnaout A, Finlayson C, Abulafi AM, Morton DG, Matthews GM, Hodgson SV, Tomlinson IP: Loss of expression and promoter methylation of SLIT2 are associated with sessile serrated adenoma formation. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9: e1003488-10.1371/journal.pgen.1003488.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Lind GE, Kleivi K, Meling GI, Teixeira MR, Thiis-Evensen E, Rognum TO, Lothe RA: ADAMTS1, CRABP1, and NR3C1 identified as epigenetically deregulated genes in colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell Oncol. 2006, 28: 259-272.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Cai LY, Abe M, Izumi S, Imura M, Yasugi T, Ushijima T: Identification of PRTFDC1 silencing and aberrant promoter methylation of GPR150, ITGA8 and HOXD11 in ovarian cancers. Life Sci. 2007, 80: 1458-1465. 10.1016/j.lfs.2007.01.015.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Esteller M, Sparks A, Toyota M, Sanchez-Cespedes M, Capella G, Peinado MA, Gonzalez S, Tarafa G, Sidransky D, Meltzer SJ, Baylin SB, Herman JG: Analysis of adenomatous polyposis coli promoter hypermethylation in human cancer. Cancer Res. 2000, 60: 4366-4371.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Mehrotra J, Vali M, McVeigh M, Kominsky SL, Fackler MJ, Lahti-Domenici J, Polyak K, Sacchi N, Garrett-Mayer E, Argani P, Sukumar S: Very high frequency of hypermethylated genes in breast cancer metastasis to the bone, brain, and lung. Clin Cancer Res. 2004, 10: 3104-3109. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Fackler MJ, McVeigh M, Mehrotra J, Blum MA, Lange J, Lapides A, Garrett E, Argani P, Sukumar S: Quantitative multiplex methylation-specific PCR assay for the detection of promoter hypermethylation in multiple genes in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2004, 64: 4442-4452. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3341.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Ottaviano YL, Issa JP, Parl FF, Smith HS, Baylin SB, Davidson NE: Methylation of the estrogen receptor gene CpG island marks loss of estrogen receptor expression in human breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 1994, 54: 2552-2555.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Sakata M, Yokomizo K, Kitamura Y, Sakuraba K, Shirahata A, Goto T, Mizukami H, Saito M, Ishibashi K, Kigawa G, Nemoto H, Hibi K: Methylation of the HACE1 gene is frequently detected in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology. 2013, 60: 781-783.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Cortés-Sempere M, de Miguel MP, Pernía O, Rodriguez C, de Castro Carpeño J, Nistal M, Conde E, López-Ríos F, Belda-Iniesta C, Perona R, de Caceres II: IGFBP-3 methylation-derived deficiency mediates the resistance to cisplatin through the activation of the IGFIR/Akt pathway in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncogene. 2013, 32: 1274-1283. 10.1038/onc.2012.146.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Wales MM, Biel MA, el Deiry W, Nelkin BD, Issa JP, Cavenee WK, Kuerbitz SJ, Baylin SB: p53 activates expression of HIC-1, a new candidate tumour suppressor gene on 17p13.3. Nat Med. 1995, 1: 570-577. 10.1038/nm0695-570.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Bebek G, Bennett KL, Funchain P, Campbell R, Seth R, Scharpf J, Burkey B, Eng C: Microbiomic subprofiles and MDR1 promoter methylation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Hum Mol Genet. 2012, 21: 1557-1565. 10.1093/hmg/ddr593.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Kim YH, Lee HC, Kim SY, Yeom YI, Ryu KJ, Min BH, Kim DH, Son HJ, Rhee PL, Kim JJ, Rhee JC, Kim HC, Chun HK, Grady WM, Kim YS: Epigenomic analysis of aberrantly methylated genes in colorectal cancer identifies genes commonly affected by epigenetic alterations. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011, 18: 2338-2347. 10.1245/s10434-011-1573-y.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Wang LJ, Bai Y, Bao ZS, Chen Y, Yan ZH, Zhang W, Zhang QG: Hypermethylation of testis derived transcript gene promoter significantly correlates with worse outcomes in glioblastoma patients. Chin Med J (Engl). 2013, 126: 2062-2066.Google Scholar
  64. Yu J, Zhu T, Wang Z, Zhang H, Qian Z, Xu H, Gao B, Wang W, Gu L, Meng J, Wang J, Feng X, Li Y, Yao X, Zhu J: A novel set of DNA methylation markers in urine sediments for sensitive/specific detection of bladder cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007, 13: 7296-7304. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0861.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Bennett LB, Schnabel JL, Kelchen JM, Taylor KH, Guo J, Arthur GL, Papageorgio CN, Shi H, Caldwell CW: DNA hypermethylation accompanied by transcriptional repression in follicular lymphoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2009, 48: 828-841. 10.1002/gcc.20687.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Vasiljević N, Ahmad AS, Beesley C, Thorat MA, Fisher G, Berney DM, Møller H, Yu Y, Lu YJ, Cuzick J, Foster CS, Lorincz AT: Association between DNA methylation of HSPB1 and death in low Gleason score prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2013, 16: 35-40. 10.1038/pcan.2012.47.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Papaggeli PC, Kortsaris AC, Matsouka PT: Aberrant methylation of c-myc and c-fos protooncogenes and p53 tumor suppressor gene in myelodysplastic syndromes and acute non-lymphocytic leukemia. J BUON. 2003, 8: 341-350.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Herman JG, Merlo A, Mao L, Lapidus RG, Issa JP, Davidson NE, Sidransky D, Baylin SB: Inactivation of the CDKN2/p16/MTS1 gene is frequently associated with aberrant DNA methylation in all common human cancers. Cancer Res. 1995, 55: 4525-4530.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Herman JG, Jen J, Merlo A, Baylin SB: Hypermethylation-associated inactivation indicates a tumor suppressor role for p15INK4B. Cancer Res. 1996, 56: 722-727.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Habuchi T, Takahashi T, Kakinuma H, Wang L, Tsuchiya N, Satoh S, Akao T, Sato K, Ogawa O, Knowles MA, Kato T: Hypermethylation at 9q32-33 tumour suppressor region is age-related in normal urothelium and an early and frequent alteration in bladder cancer. Oncogene. 2001, 20: 531-537. 10.1038/sj.onc.1204122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Tang X, Khuri FR, Lee JJ, Kemp BL, Liu D, Hong WK, Mao L: Hypermethylation of the death-associated protein (DAP) kinase promoter and aggressiveness in stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000, 92: 1511-1516. 10.1093/jnci/92.18.1511.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Kober P, Bujko M, Oledzki J, Tysarowski A, Siedlecki JA: Methyl-CpG binding column-based identification of nine genes hypermethylated in colorectal cancer. Mol Carcinog. 2011, 50: 846-856. 10.1002/mc.20763.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Sarafidou T, Kahl C, Martinez-Garay I, Mangelsdorf M, Gesk S, Baker E, Kokkinaki M, Talley P, Maltby EL, French L, Harder L, Hinzmann B, Nobile C, Richkind K, Finnis M, Deloukas P, Sutherland GR, Kutsche K, Moschonas NK, Siebert R, Gécz J, European Collaborative Consortium for the Study of ADLTE: Folate-sensitive fragile site FRA10A is due to an expansion of a CGG repeat in a novel gene, FRA10AC1, encoding a nuclear protein. Genomics. 2004, 84: 69-81. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2003.12.017.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. García JM, Silva J, Peña C, Garcia V, Rodríguez R, Cruz MA, Cantos B, Provencio M, España P, Bonilla F: Promoter methylation of the PTEN gene is a common molecular change in breast cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2004, 41: 117-124. 10.1002/gcc.20062.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Unoki M, Nakamura Y: Methylation at CpG islands in intron 1 of EGR2 confers enhancer-like activity. FEBS Lett. 2003, 554: 67-72. 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)01092-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Kroeger H, Jelinek J, Estécio MR, He R, Kondo K, Chung W, Zhang L, Shen L, Kantarjian HM, Bueso-Ramos CE, Issa JP: Aberrant CpG island methylation in acute myeloid leukemia is accentuated at relapse. Blood. 2008, 112: 1366-1373. 10.1182/blood-2007-11-126227.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Esteller M, Toyota M, Sanchez-Cespedes M, Capella G, Peinado MA, Watkins DN, Issa JP, Sidransky D, Baylin SB, Herman JG: Inactivation of the DNA repair gene O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase by promoter hypermethylation is associated with G to A mutations in K-ras in colorectal tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2000, 60: 2368-2371.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Luo Y, Tsuchiya KD, Il Park D, Fausel R, Kanngurn S, Welcsh P, Dzieciatkowski S, Wang J, Grady WM: RET is a potential tumor suppressor gene in colorectal cancer. Oncogene. 2013, 32: 2037-2047. 10.1038/onc.2012.225.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Suh I, Weng J, Fernandez-Ranvier G, Shen WT, Duh QY, Clark OH, Kebebew E: Antineoplastic effects of decitabine, an inhibitor of DNA promoter methylation, in adrenocortical carcinoma cells. Arch Surg. 2010, 145: 226-232. 10.1001/archsurg.2009.292.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Nordlund J, Milani L, Lundmark A, Lӧnnerholm G, Syvänen AC: DNA methylation analysis of bone marrow cells at diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia and at remission. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e34513-10.1371/journal.pone.0034513.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. de Bustros A, Nelkin BD, Silverman A, Ehrlich G, Poiesz B, Baylin SB: The short arm of chromosome 11 is a “hot spot” for hypermethylation in human neoplasia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988, 85: 5693-5697. 10.1073/pnas.85.15.5693.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Royer-Pokora B, Schneider S: Wilms’ tumor-specific methylation pattern in 11p13 detected by PFGE. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1992, 5: 132-140. 10.1002/gcc.2870050207.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Lou W, Krill D, Dhir R, Becich MJ, Dong JT, Frierson HF, Isaacs WB, Isaacs JT, Gao AC: Methylation of the CD44 metastasis suppressor gene in human prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 1999, 59: 2329-2331.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Gaudet MM, Campan M, Figueroa JD, Yang XR, Lissowska J, Peplonska B, Brinton LA, Rimm DL, Laird PW, Garcia-Closas M, Sherman ME: DNA hypermethylation of ESR1 and PGR in breast cancer: pathologic and epidemiologic associations. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009, 18: 3036-3043. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0678.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Lee WH, Morton RA, Epstein JI, Brooks JD, Campbell PA, Bova GS, Hsieh WS, Isaacs WB, Nelson WG: Cytidine methylation of regulatory sequences near the pi-class glutathione S-transferase gene accompanies human prostatic carcinogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994, 91: 11733-11737. 10.1073/pnas.91.24.11733.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Koga T, Takeshita M, Ijichi K, Yano T, Maehara Y, Sueishi K: CHFR aberrant methylation involves a subset of human lung adenocarcinoma associated with poor clinical outcomes. Hum Pathol. 2013, 44: 1382-1390. 10.1016/j.humpath.2012.11.008.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Old RW, Crea F, Puszyk W, Hultén MA: Candidate epigenetic biomarkers for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007, 15: 227-235. 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60713-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Nakamura M, Yonekawa Y, Kleihues P, Ohgaki H: Promoter hypermethylation of the RB1 gene in glioblastomas. Lab Invest. 2001, 81: 77-82. 10.1038/labinvest.3780213.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Imoto I, Izumi H, Yokoi S, Hosoda H, Shibata T, Hosoda F, Ohki M, Hirohashi S, Inazawa J: Frequent silencing of the candidate tumor suppressor PCDH20 by epigenetic mechanism in non-small-cell lung cancers. Cancer Res. 2006, 66: 4617-4626. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4437.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Pfister S, Schlaeger C, Mendrzyk F, Wittmann A, Benner A, Kulozik A, Scheurlen W, Radlwimmer B, Lichter P: Array-based profiling of reference-independent methylation status (aPRIMES) identifies frequent promoter methylation and consecutive downregulation of ZIC2 in pediatric medulloblastoma. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35: e51-10.1093/nar/gkm094.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Corn PG, Heath EI, Heitmiller R, Fogt F, Forastiere AA, Herman JG, Wu TT: Frequent hypermethylation of the 5′ CpG island of E-cadherin in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2001, 7: 2765-2769.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Sato M, Mori Y, Sakurada A, Fujimura S, Horii A: The H-cadherin (CDH13) gene is inactivated in human lung cancer. Hum Genet. 1998, 103: 96-101. 10.1007/s004390050790.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Iliopoulos D, Guler G, Han SY, Johnston D, Druck T, McCorkell KA, Palazzo J, McCue PA, Baffa R, Huebner K: Fragile genes as biomarkers: epigenetic control of WWOX and FHIT in lung, breast and bladder cancer. Oncogene. 2005, 24: 1625-1633. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208398.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Esteller M, Silva JM, Dominguez G, Bonilla F, Matias-Guiu X, Lerma E, Bussaglia E, Prat J, Harkes IC, Repasky EA, Gabrielson E, Schutte M, Baylin SB, Herman JG: Promoter hypermethylation and BRCA1 inactivation in sporadic breast and ovarian tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000, 92: 564-569. 10.1093/jnci/92.7.564.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Aleman A, Adrien L, Lopez-Serra L, Cordon-Cardo C, Esteller M, Belbin TJ, Sanchez-Carbayo M: Identification of DNA hypermethylation of SOX9 in association with bladder cancer progression using CpG microarrays. Br J Cancer. 2008, 98: 466-473. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604143.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Mardin WA, Petrov KO, Enns A, Senninger N, Haier J, Mees ST: SERPINB5 and AKAP12 - expression and promoter methylation of metastasis suppressor genes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2010, 10: 549-10.1186/1471-2407-10-549.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Kanda M, Nomoto S, Okamura Y, Hayashi M, Hishida M, Fujii T, Nishikawa Y, Sugimoto H, Takeda S, Nakao A: Promoter hypermethylation of fibulin 1 gene is associated with tumor progression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Carcinog. 2011, 50: 571-579. 10.1002/mc.20735.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Jarrard DF, Kinoshita H, Shi Y, Sandefur C, Hoff D, Meisner LF, Chang C, Herman JG, Isaacs WB, Nassif N: Methylation of the androgen receptor promoter CpG island is associated with loss of androgen receptor expression in prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 1998, 58: 5310-5314.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Fukutomi S, Seki N, Koda K, Miyazaki M: Identification of methylation-silenced genes in colorectal cancer cell lines: genomic screening using oligonucleotide arrays. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007, 42: 1486-1494. 10.1080/00365520701491173.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Stӧger R, Kajimura TM, Brown WT, Laird CD: Epigenetic variation illustrated by DNA methylation patterns of the fragile-X gene FMR1. Hum Mol Genet. 1997, 6: 1791-1801. 10.1093/hmg/6.11.1791.Google Scholar
  101. Knight SJ, Flannery AV, Hirst MC, Campbell L, Christodoulou Z, Phelps SR, Pointon J, Middleton-Price HR, Barnicoat A, Pembrey ME, Holland J, Oostra BA, Bobrow M, Davies KE: Trinucleotide repeat amplification and hypermethylation of a CpG island in FRAXE mental retardation. Cell. 1993, 74: 127-134. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90300-F.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC): [http://www.genenames.org] 2011
  103. Bestor T: Supercoiling-dependent sequence specificity of mammalian DNA methyltransferase. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987, 15: 3835-3843. 10.1093/nar/15.9.3835.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Smith SS: Stalling of DNA methyltransferase in chromosome stability and chromosome remodelling (Review). Int J Mol Med. 1998, 1: 147-156.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Dignam JD, Lebovitz RM, Roeder RG: Accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983, 11: 1475-1489. 10.1093/nar/11.5.1475.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Okuwaki M, Verreault A: Maintenance DNA methylation of nucleosome core particles. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 2904-2912.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Kho MR, Baker DJ, Laayoun A, Smith SS: Stalling of human DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferase at single-strand conformers from a site of dynamic mutation. J Mol Biol. 1998, 275: 67-79. 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1430.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Pirzio LM, Pichierri P, Bignami M, Franchitto A: Werner syndrome helicase activity is essential in maintaining fragile site stability. J Cell Biol. 2008, 180: 305-314. 10.1083/jcb.200705126.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Raghavan SC, Tsai A, Hsieh CL, Lieber MR: Analysis of non-B DNA structure at chromosomal sites in the mammalian genome. Methods Enzymol. 2006, 409: 301-316.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Clark J, Smith SS: Secondary structure at a hot spot for DNA methylation in DNA from human breast cancers. Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2008, 5: 241-251.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Agrelo R, Cheng WH, Setien F, Ropero S, Espada J, Fraga MF, Herranz M, Paz MF, Sanchez-Cespedes M, Artiga MJ, Guerrero D, Castells A, von Kobbe C, Bohr VA, Esteller M: Epigenetic inactivation of the premature aging Werner syndrome gene in human cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006, 103: 8822-8827. 10.1073/pnas.0600645103.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Heyn H, Moran S, Esteller M: Aberrant DNA methylation profiles in the premature aging disorders Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria and Werner syndrome. Epigenetics. 2013, 8: 28-33. 10.4161/epi.23366.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Ghoshal K, Datta J, Majumder S, Bai S, Kutay H, Motiwala T, Jacob ST: 5-Aza-deoxycytidine induces selective degradation of DNA methyltransferase 1 by a proteasomal pathway that requires the KEN box, bromo-adjacent homology domain, and nuclear localization signal. Mol Cell Biol. 2005, 25: 4727-4741. 10.1128/MCB.25.11.4727-4741.2005.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Estécio MR, Issa JP: Dissecting DNA hypermethylation in cancer. FEBS Lett. 2011, 585: 2078-2086. 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.12.001.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Baylin SB, Herman JG: DNA hypermethylation in tumorigenesis: epigenetics joins genetics. Trends Genet. 2000, 16: 168-174. 10.1016/S0168-9525(99)01971-X.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Smith SS: DNA methylation in eukaryotic chromosome stability. Mol Carcinog. 1991, 4: 91-92. 10.1002/mc.2940040202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Smith SS, Crocitto LE: DNA methylation in eukaryotic chromosome stability revisited: DNA methyltransferase in the management of DNA conformation space. Mol Carcinog. 1999, 26: 1-9. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2744(199909)26:1<1::AID-MC1>3.0.CO;2-P.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Jeddeloh JA, Stokes TL, Richards EJ: Maintenance of genomic methylation requires a SWI2/SNF2-like protein. Nat Genet. 1999, 22: 94-97. 10.1038/8803.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Gibbons RJ, McDowell TL, Raman S, O’Rourke DM, Garrick D, Ayyub H, Higgs DR: Mutations in ATRX, encoding a SWI/SNF-like protein, cause diverse changes in the pattern of DNA methylation. Nat Genet. 2000, 24: 368-371. 10.1038/74191.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Bourc’his D, Bestor TH: Helicase homologues maintain cytosine methylation in plants and mammals. Bioessays. 2002, 24: 297-299. 10.1002/bies.10078.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Turk PW, Laayoun A, Smith SS, Weitzman SA: DNA adduct 8-hydroxyl-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-hydroxyguanine) affects function of human DNA methyltransferase. Carcinogenesis. 1995, 16: 1253-1255. 10.1093/carcin/16.5.1253.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. Wendel JA, Smith SS: Uracil as an alternative to 5-fluorocytosine in addressable protein targeting. Nanotechnology. 1998, 9: 297-304. 10.1088/0957-4484/9/3/021.Google Scholar
  123. Xu GL, Bestor TH, Bourc’his D, Hsieh CL, Tommerup N, Bugge M, Hulten M, Qu X, Russo JJ, Viegas-Péquignot E: Chromosome instability and immunodeficiency syndrome caused by mutations in a DNA methyltransferase gene. Nature. 1999, 402: 187-191. 10.1038/46052.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Dodge JE, Okano M, Dick F, Tsujimoto N, Chen T, Wang S, Ueda Y, Dyson N, Li E: Inactivation of Dnmt3b in mouse embryonic fibroblasts results in DNA hypomethylation, chromosomal instability, and spontaneous immortalization. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280: 17986-17991.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Robertson KD, Uzvolgyi E, Liang G, Talmadge C, Sumegi J, Gonzales FA, Jones PA: The human DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) 1, 3a and 3b: coordinate mRNA expression in normal tissues and overexpression in tumors. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27: 2291-2298. 10.1093/nar/27.11.2291.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. Laayoun A, Smith SS: Methylation of slipped duplexes, snapbacks and cruciforms by human DNA(cytosine-5)methyltransferase. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995, 23: 1584-1589. 10.1093/nar/23.9.1584.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. Schmid M, Haaf T, Grunert D: 5-Azacytidine-induced undercondensations in human chromosomes. Hum Genet. 1984, 67: 257-263. 10.1007/BF00291352.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Smith; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.