Skip to main content
Download PDF

OXTR DNA methylation differentiates men on the obesity spectrum with and without binge eating disorder

Clinical Epigenetics volume 14, Article number: 108 (2022) Cite this article

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

The neuropeptide oxytocin (OXT) plays a role in the regulation of eating behavior and metabolism. OXT functioning is altered in patients with eating and weight disorders, and a variant of the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) has been associated with impulsive eating behavior as it is seen in patients with binge eating disorder (BED). Gene × environment interactions could play a role in BED. One mechanism mediating this interaction is the epigenetic alteration of gene expression. We therefore investigated if DNA methylation of the OXTR differs between individuals with obesity depending on a comorbid BED. We analyzed DNA methylation of the OXTR in peripheral blood of 227 individuals on the obesity spectrum (mean age: 40.3 ± 13.1 yrs; mean BMI: 38.6 ± 7.3 kg/m2), 130 of which were diagnosed with BED.

Results

There were no overall differences in OXTR methylation between participants with and those without BED (p > 0.05), while both subgroups were comparable regarding age and body mass index (BMI), but significantly differed in sex distribution (p = 0.035). We found no relationship between mean DNA methylation and BMI or self-reported eating disorder (ED) pathology. Analyzing potential sex differences revealed a significantly lower OXTR DNA methylation in male participants with BED as compared to those without BED (p = 0.017). No such difference was found in the female subsample (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Clinically significant binge eating pathology might be associated with lower OXTR DNA methylation exclusively in males. The differential DNA methylation of OXTR in males with BED supports the view that BED represents a phenotype within the obesity spectrum that is characterized by specific vulnerability factors. A better understanding of the epigenetic underpinnings of the OXT system might contribute to the refinement of OXT administration approaches as potential interventions in eating and weight disorders.

Background

Binge eating disorder (BED) is the most common eating disorder (ED) in the general population [1]. BED is characterized by recurrent binge eating episodes with subjective loss of control [2], and in contrast to bulimia nervosa (BN), no regularly compensatory behaviors are shown [3]. Thus, affected patients often develop overweight or obesity, and there is a significant overlap between obesity and BED [4]. Patients with BED could therefore constitute a phenotype within the obesity spectrum that is characterized by increased impulsivity [2, 5, 6]. Obesity is one of the most serious global health problems, and it has a complex multifactorial etiology [7]. It has been outlined that the large group of people affected by obesity is characterized by considerable heterogeneity and that it will be important to identify subgroups in order to develop better and more tailored interventions [7]. Patients with BED could constitute such a subgroup within the obesity spectrum [2]; hence, the approach of the present study is to compare individuals on the obesity spectrum with and without a BED diagnosis.

One interesting neuromodulatory system in the context of BED is the oxytonergic system as the regulation of the neuropeptide oxytocin (OXT) is thought to play a role in a broad spectrum of mental disorders [8]. While OXT has initially been primarily known for its role in social relationships and bonding, it turned out that it also directly or indirectly regulates a range of other psychological and physiological functions, including eating behavior and metabolism [9, 10]. Alterations in OXT function have been reported for different populations with eating and weight disorders [11, 12], while most evidence is available for patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) [11, 13, 14]. Yet, there is a scarcity of studies looking at OXT function in relation to undercontrolled eating patterns and across the overweight spectrum [11], including patients with obesity and BED. First evidence points to differential effects of OXT administration on food intake in obesity as compared to normal-weight males [15]. Thus, alterations in the oxytonergic system could also contribute to the BED phenotype and might constitute a delimitation from obesity without BED.

Indeed, preliminary genetic evidence from a large general population-based cohort and from patients with BN suggests a possible genetic risk for BED/BN-type eating disorders associated with the rs53567 variant of the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) [16, 17]. However, studies on the role of the OXTR gene in obesity are scarce [18]. As in other complex mental disorders, an interaction between genetic risk factors and environmental influences could play a significant role in moderating the susceptibility to EDs [19]. Along those lines, a recent study on childhood obesity impressively illustrates the influence of gene × environment (G × E) interactions within the OXTR [18]: Carriers of the A allele of the OXTR rs53576 variant were especially affected by obesity when they grew up in lower socioeconomic background families, but were less affected when their families were characterized by a higher socioeconomic status. Because eating behavior was not assessed in that study, the prevalence of impulsive eating or an ED in the sample remained unclear.

An important molecular mechanism for the mediation of G × E is the epigenetic regulation of gene expression, which might therefore be an interesting target to better understand EDs. The most intensely studied epigenetic mechanism is DNA methylation, the covalent addition of a methyl group to the 5’ position of a cytosine, primarily in the context of a cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) dinucleotide. DNA methylation is most prevalent in regulatory regions of the genome including the gene promoter where it is in most, but not all cases negatively associated with transcription of the respective gene [20, 21]. In contrary, DNA methylation within the gene body is mostly, but also not exclusively, positively associated with gene transcription [22].

However, there is only a limited amount of literature on potential epigenetic changes associated with EDs, with most studies focusing on AN [11, 13, 19, 23,24,25,26,27]. Interestingly, two recent studies reported differential levels of DNA methylation in several sites of the OXTR gene in female patients with AN as compared to females remitted from AN and healthy females, and DNA methylation was correlated with markers of AN severity [13, 26]. However, only two studies so far investigated epigenetic alterations in patients with binge eating, but the OXTR was not included, and samples were heterogeneous [28, 29] and small (< 30 cases) [29].

Therefore, the aim of our study was to fill this research gap by investigating potential epigenetic differences in the OXTR in individuals on the obesity spectrum with BED (BED +) versus without BED (BED −) in order to further elucidate the role of OXT in impulsive eating behavior. We hypothesized that (a) DNA methylation of the OXTR will differ between individuals with BED (BED +) and without BED (BED −) and (b) methylation will be associated with self-reported eating behavior. To the best of our knowledge, previous studies in healthy participants without EDs have demonstrated effects of OXT administration on appetite regulation and eating behavior exclusively in male participants [15, 30,31,32,33]. Moreover, sex dependency of OXTR DNA methylation has been described earlier [34, 35]. Therefore, we additionally performed exploratory analyses of potential sex differences in OXTR methylation.

Results

Participants

Our sample comprised 183 females (BED+: N = 111, BED−: N = 72) and 44 males (BED+: N = 19, BED−: N = 25). Table 1 displays that both groups were comparable in terms of age and BMI; however, there was a significant difference in sex distribution with more females in the BED+ group. Regarding the OXTR rs53567 genotype, there was no significant difference between BED+ and BED− individuals. Data from the EDE-Q show that overall, the BED+ group reported significantly more severe eating pathology than the BED− group (Table 1).

Table 1 Sample characteristics regarding demographic characteristics, genotype and eating disorder psychopathology
Full size table

Epigenetic analyses

The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to assess mean DNA methylation distribution and showed that it departed significantly from normality (W(227) = 0.14, p =  < 0.001). The DNA methylation values of the six individual CpG sites within the OXTR as well as the mean across all sites were not significantly different between BED+ and BED− subgroups when analyzing the entire sample consisting of male and female individuals (Cohen’s d = 3.91 for the entire group) (Table 2 and Fig. 1).

Table 2 DNA methylation values for the individual CpG sites for each study group
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

OXTR DNA methylation for all CpG sites analyzed (1-6) and for the average value across all 6 sites. BED− and BED+ patients were matched according to age and BMI. Values are displayed as means ± SEM

Full size image

The DNA methylation values of all individual sites were in both groups (BED+ and BED −) strongly correlated with the mean across all sites analyzed (r ≥ 0.824; p < 0.001); therefore, subsequent analyses have been conducted using the mean DNA methylation value only.

In the total sample, a correlation could neither be detected between mean DNA methylation and BMI (rpart =  − 0.024; p = 0.767) nor EDE-Q total score (rpart =  − 0.069; p = 0.392) or any of the EDE-Q subscale scores (rpart < 0.108, p > 0.178).

We additionally analyzed potential sex differences in OXTR methylation. ANOVA revealed no significant main effect of sex (F(1, 223) = 1.603; p = 0.207; ƞp2 = 0.007) nor of group (F(1, 223) = 2.221; p = 0.138; ƞp2 = 0.01). However, there was a significant sex × group interaction (F(1, 273) = 4.450; p = 0.036; ƞp2 = 0.02). Post hoc subgroup analyses showed that OXTR DNA methylation was not significantly different between females of the BED+ group (10.16% ± 0.38%) and females of the BED− group (9.76% ± 0.44%; U = 4405.0; p = 0.243; Cohen’s d = 3.91; Fig. 2a), but males of the BED+ group displayed a significantly lower OXTR DNA methylation (7.99% ± 0.5%) than males of the BED− group (10.3% ± 0.72%; U = 141.0; p = 0.022; Cohen’s d = 3.06; Fig. 2b). Post hoc analyses including individual CpG sites revealed that %DNA methylation at CpG site 2-6 was significantly different between BED+ and BED− males, whereas %DNA methylation at CpG 1 site did not differ between groups (Table 3, Fig. 2c). OXTR rs53567 genotype was in neither group associated with DNA methylation levels (data not shown).

Fig. 2
figure 2

OXTR DNA methylation analyzed separately in females and males. Average DNA methylation in females (A) and males (B) with obesity without BED (BED −) versus with BED (BED +) as well as individual OXTR DNA methylation levels for CpG sites 1-6 is displayed (C). Values are displayed as means ± SEM

Full size image
Table 3 DNA methylation values for the individual CpG sites in males of each study group
Full size table

Genotype distribution did neither differ between BED+ and BED− females (X2 (2), N = 183) = 2.89, p = 0.24) nor BED+ and BED− males (X2 (2), N = 44) = 1.6, p = 0.45).

Discussion

In the present study, we investigated potential epigenetic differences in the OXTR gene in a sample of individuals with obesity with and without a comorbid BED in order to further elucidate the potential contribution of the OXT system to disordered eating behavior and body weight regulation.

Overall, we did not find between-group differences in OXTR methylation when analyzing the complete sample. However, subgroup analyses of females and males revealed that male patients with obesity and BED (BED +) showed a significantly lower OXTR DNA methylation than male individuals with obesity but without BED (BED −) of comparable age and BMI. No such difference was found in the female subsample. Hence, our first hypothesis regarding group differences in DNA methylation of the OXTR gene was partly supported. We additionally performed correlational analyses to investigate our second hypothesis on associations between methylation and indicators of eating behavior, but found no relationship between mean DNA methylation and BMI nor with self-reported ED pathology according to EDE-Q. Hence, our second hypothesis was not supported.

It is not straightforward to interpret the implications of these epigenetic findings differentiating male individuals with and without BED without functional data. In a previous study, high levels of DNA methylation within the analyzed CpG island of the OXTR gene were found to downregulate gene expression [36]. However, as OXTR gene expression was not analyzed in our study, we can only speculate whether the observed methylation differences might be associated with an overexpression of OXTR. On the other hand, there is ongoing controversy on the relationships between OXTR concentration, body weight regulation and eating behavior. When comparing circulating OXT concentrations between individuals with obesity and normal weight, higher [37], unchanged [38] or decreased [39] concentrations have been reported for obesity. This inconsistent evidence might partly be due to sampling approaches, but also due to heterogeneity of investigated samples which were partly characterized by somatic comorbidities [37]. Our study adds to this discussion by showing that male individuals with obesity also differ in the OXT system on grounds of a comorbid ED, pointing toward a complex interplay of OXT signaling, body weight regulation and eating behavior. Based on a data set across the whole spectrum of body weight, Schorr et al. [37] have recently suggested that OXT is a ‘marker of energy availability’ and that obesity represents a particular OXT-sensitive state. The latter assumption is supported by findings that acute OXT administration results in a stronger decrease in food intake in males with obesity as compared to males with normal weight [15], a pattern previously suggested to reflect a compensatory response of a OXT-sensitive system [37]. Differential regulation of DNA methylation of the OXTR gene might contribute to this OXT-sensitive state in obesity, and this might be of particular relevance for the subgroup of individuals with BED showing impulsive eating behavior. In this context, it is also important to consider that the anorexigenic effect of OXT might be partly communicated via effects on reward-system functioning as well as cognitive control circuits [9, 10, 31, 40], and both of these regulatory systems are supposed to play a pivotal role in BED and partly differentiate obese individuals with from those without BED [5, 6, 41]. Interestingly, a recent study showed that a single dose of intranasal OXT improves performance on an inhibitory control task in males with overweight and obesity [31]. Differential DNA gene methylation might play a role in OXT signaling along this cognitive control pathway, especially in the highly impulsive phenotype which is represented by BED on the obesity spectrum.

The observed sex difference in OXTR methylation could be explained with different functions of OXT in females versus males, for instance, as it has been described for the regulation of anxiety-related and social behaviors [42]. Besides, OXT generally plays a prominent role in the female organism. Sex differences in the role of OXT in the regulation of eating behavior have previously been described in animal models [43]. In line with the specificity of our results for males, only male mice with OXT deficiency due to ablated OXT neurons were more likely to develop obesity when put on a high-fat diet [43]. However, there is up to now a scarcity on data on sex differences in OXT function associated with the regulation of eating behavior [40], and it has been emphasized that taking sex context into account is warranted [10].

Regarding our second hypothesis, two previous epigenetic studies performed in samples of patients with AN reported correlations of OXTR methylation with measures of illness severity as well as measures assessing attachment and social behavior [13, 26]. The lack of findings in our sample could be due to the variables used, i.e., although representing an objective measure, BMI is only a very rough indicator of eating behavior, and regarding more behavioral constructs, it could be that measures that are more closely related to impulsive aspects of eating would have yielded different results. It is also possible that other measures associated with OXT functions related to attachment, stress or anxiety would have been insightful. As the anorexigenic effects of OXT might partly be communicated by influencing reward-related brain circuits and inhibitory control networks [10, 31], it will be important for future studies to investigate interactions of OXT function and dimensions of impulsivity versus cognitive control to understand the underlying mechanisms especially in the spectrum of under controlled eating behavior and along the obesity spectrum. Two recent studies suggest that there might be a specific and positive influence of OXT administration on inhibitory control in men on the obesity spectrum [31] and in women characterized by impulsive eating behavior [44]. This might also translate to food intake, but a recent study in women with BED could not find any effects of a single dose of OXT on eating behavior [45]. As discussed above, this could partly be due to sex differences in OXT functioning.

Finally, we did not detect an effect of the OXTR variant rs53567 in our sample. This is not overly surprising because our study, although of decent sample size with regard to epigenetic analyses, might have been underpowered to detect genetic associations [46].

Strengths and limitations

Evidence on potential epigenetic changes associated with EDs is still very limited and there is a specific lack of studies in BED [24]. Our data stem from a well-characterized treatment-seeking sample with severe ED pathology, a high BMI and a confirmed ED diagnosis, and we have compared the BED group with a treatment-seeking sample of age- and BMI-matched patients with obesity who were not diagnosed with ED. This offers the opportunity to gain more knowledge on phenotypes within the heterogeneous spectrum of obesity, which points toward more individualized treatment targets for sub-populations. Our sample size of N > 200 is decent compared to most previous studies, but still might be underpowered to detect more subtle differences [24]. BED diagnoses were based on DSM-IV criteria allowing for a consistent diagnostic approach; notably, the BED criteria according to DSM-IV as compared to DSM-5 are narrower due to a more conservative time criterion [3, 47]. However, limitations of the study comprise that we did not assess and control for some variables known to potentially confound epigenetic profiles, including medication, smoking and socioeconomic status [18, 24]; that we did not include a self-report instrument assessing impulsivity; that we have no information about mental comorbidities; and that we had missing self-report data in the sample. It should also be noted that the male subgroup of our sample—in which significant findings regarding BED+/BED− and DNA methylation were detected—was smaller than the female subgroup. Furthermore, it would have been very interesting to investigate DNA methylation differences between individuals with and, respectively, without BED on an epigenome-wide scale in order to gain more insight into the dysregulation of epigenetic processes underlying BED. However, due to the moderate sample size, we decided to perform a targeted analysis rather than a hypothesis-free screening.

Further studies, that also assess OXTR expression and OXT directly, are needed to fully unravel the contribution of the OXT system, and dysfunctions thereof, to the spectrum of poorly controlled eating behavior and overweight. It is a limitation of the present study that these mechanistic questions remain unanswered as we did not collect RNA and serum samples. Moreover, DNA methylation patterns are tissue- and cell type-specific [48], and results obtained in blood samples may not directly reflect DNA methylation alterations in the brain [49], i.e., the decisive organ in the control of eating behavior (which is generally not available for tissue molecular analyses in living individuals). The CpG sites we investigated in our study are not represented on the Illumina 450 K array and are therefore not included in common online tools designed for the comparison of DNA methylation patterns between blood and brain (e.g., BECon [50]). However, correlations between other intragenic OXTR CpG sites represented in BECon are variable (reaching, e.g., values of 0.67 for cg27501759 in blood vs. BA10), so that we cannot draw direct conclusions on whether our results observed in the peripheral blood of male individuals with BED are mirrored by changes within the brain. Nevertheless, OXTR DNA methylation in peripheral blood may still be a useful biomarker to identify different subtypes of BED+ individuals.

Future studies should ideally also include control groups of normal-weight individuals with or without BED, and they should also shed light on the question why OXTR methylation is impaired in males with BED, e.g., if this pattern is caused by impaired DNA methyltransferase activity and specific for BED. In addition, as DNA methylation is a reversible epigenetic signal, it would be a promising avenue to investigate reversibility of the observed OXTR DNA methylation in the context of a therapeutic intervention such as psychotherapy in patients with BED. Furthermore, effects of intranasal OXT administration on OXTR DNA methylation should be addressed in order to gain insight into potential mechanisms underlying the observed differential OXTR DNA methylation in male patients with BED. Previous studies using intranasal OXT administration have been performed partly in male and female samples, and some of them have demonstrated effects on inhibitory control [31, 44]. The investigation of putative interactions of intranasal OXTR administration with different epigenetic profiles would be an interesting next step and may inform tailored interventions.

Conclusions

Our data from an epigenetic analysis of DNA methylation of the OXTR gene in the obesity spectrum suggest that clinically significant binge eating pathology is associated with lower OXTR DNA methylation exclusively in males. This supports previous evidence that OXT (dys)function might play a role in impulsive eating behavior, potentially predominantly in males. Additionally, the data support the view that individuals with BED represent a distinct phenotype within the obesity spectrum that is characterized by specific vulnerability factors, potentially also depending on the respective sex [5, 6]. The sex differences in OXTR DNA methylation pose further questions concerning the complex influence of OXT on the regulation of eating behavior in females versus males that has gained little attention so far [10]. The OXT system has been identified and piloted as a potential treatment target in eating and weight disorders, especially for those EDs associated with impulsive eating patterns [3, 9, 11, 51], as short-term intranasal administration of OXT has anorexigenic effects [52]. A better data basis on genetic and epigenetic underpinnings of the OXT system in ED populations will also contribute to this interventional field of research as it may reveal how and for whom OXT administration might work best as a potential adjunctive treatment.

Methods

Sample description

We investigated DNA methylation in a group of 227 individuals with obesity. Participants were recruited between 2014 and 2020 from the inpatient, day-patient and outpatient services of the Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy at the University Hospital Tübingen. Inclusion criteria for study participation were a diagnosis of obesity or BED and providing written informed consent; no specific exclusion criteria applied. All participants underwent a structured and standardized diagnostic assessment in which, among others, height and weight were assessed by study staff in order to calculate BMI, a structured clinical examination was conducted in order to assess or exclude a potential eating disorder diagnosis according to DSM-IV [47], self-reported eating disorder pathology was assessed using the EDE-Q [53], and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) peripheral venous blood samples were collected and kept at − 80 °C until further usage. For the epigenetic analysis, we compared two subgroups of the sample: participants with obesity and excluded comorbid BED (BED −) and participants with obesity and a diagnosed BED (BED +). All participants provided written informed consent. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of the Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany (218/2018BO2).

Epigenetic analyses

Extraction of genomic DNA from EDTA anti-coagulated venous blood for genetic and epigenetic analysis was performed using the QIAamp DNA Blood Maxi-Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The analyzed region lies within the CpG island spanning exons 1 to 3 (Chr3:8 808 962–8 811 280, GRCh37/hg19) [54] of the OXTR gene. This locus has been investigated with regard to several psychiatric phenotypes [55,56,57,58] and has provided evidence for a negative association between DNA methylation and gene expression (36, 55). Due to the technical limitations of our pyrosequencing approach which enables the analysis of only short reads with good quality, we further narrowed down our sequence of interest to (Chr3:8 809,414–8 809,444, GRCh37/hg19) in order to include the sequence analyzed by Ziegler et al. [57] in the context of social anxiety and by Schiele et al. [58] in the context of obsessive–compulsive disorder. SNP rs53576 is located in the intronic region downstream of the analyzed region. 500 ng genomic DNA was bisulfite converted using the EpiTect Fast Bisulfite Conversion Kit (Qiagen), and the region of interest within the OXTR gene was amplified using the PyroMark PCR Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR and sequencing primer (Metabion, Planegg, Germany) were as follows: PCR forward primer: 5′-TGTTGTTGTTTATGTTTTTGGAT-′3, PCR reverse primer: Biotin-5′- -CCTTAAATCCCCAAAACTAAAT-′3, sequencing primer: 5′-GTTTGGTTATTTGTTAG-3′.

Successful amplification as well as specificity of the PCR products was verified via agarose gel electrophoresis. Several PCR runs were performed as technical replicates for each sample (minimum two replications). Processing of the PCR amplicons for pyrosequencing analysis was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and PCR products were then sequenced using the PyroMark Q24 system and the PyroMark GoldReagents (Qiagen). The level of methylation in every sample was quantified using the PyroMark Q24 software version 2.0.6 (Qiagen). The pyrosequencing assay contained six CpG sites. Only samples with standard deviation of < 3% between technical replicates were included in the analysis. To detect potentially biased amplification of differentially methylated fragments, DNA samples with known methylation levels (0%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100%) were included as controls (EpiTect Control DNA, Qiagen) in the amplification and the pyrosequencing analysis. In all steps of the DNA methylation analysis (bisulfite conversion, PCR and pyrosequencing), samples were processed in balanced design in order to avoid batch effects.

Genotyping

OXTR rs53567 was genotyped on a StepOne system (ThermoFisher Scientific; Waltham; USA) using TaqMan® SNP Genotyping Assay (ThermoFisher Scientific) and the standard protocol for allelic discrimination. Accuracy was assessed by duplicating 15% of the original sample, and reproducibility was 100%. The genotype frequencies did not deviate from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE; p = 0.69).

Statistical analyses

An a priori power analyses using GPower 3.1 [59] and calculating an ANOVA (fixed-effects, omnibus, one-way) revealed that a sample size of 180 individuals in total would be sufficient to detect a significant difference between the investigated groups (BED+ versus BED −) with a power of 0.80 assuming a moderate effect size of f = 0.25. Therefore, with our sample of 227 individuals we would be able to detect a moderate effect of f = 0.22 with a power of 0.80.

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics Version 26 (IBM, NY, USA). The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to assess data distribution. Independent sample t tests were used to compute group differences in the sample characteristics. Mann–Whitney U test was used to compute group differences in OXTR DNA methylation between BED− and BED+ individuals. Chi-squared tests were used to analyze the distribution of genotypes for each group. A 2 × 2 ANOVA was performed to investigate differences in OXTR DNA methylation between BED+ and BED− individuals with %DNA methylation as depended variable, group (BED+ vs. BED −) and sex as between-group factors. Differences in mean DNA methylation in the female and male subgroup were calculated using Mann–Whitney U tests. Correlation between DNA methylation levels of the individual sites (CpG 1-6) and the mean across all 6 sites was calculated using Spearman correlation. To analyze relationships between DNA methylation levels and eating behavior, we performed partial Pearson correlations with BMI and EDE-Q scores controlling for patient group. Results were considered significant when p ≤ 0.05. As p values for our two main hypotheses were > 0.05 and as analyses on potential sex differences were exploratory, no adjustment procedure for multiple testing was applied.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Change history

  • 14 October 2022

    Missing Open Access funding information has been added in the Funding Note.

References

  1. Galmiche M, Dechelotte P, Lambert G, Tavolacci MP. Prevalence of eating disorders over the 2000–2018 period: a systematic literature review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;109(5):1402–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Giel KE, Bulik CM, Fernandez-Aranda F, Hay P, Keski-Rahkonen A, Schag K, et al. Binge eating disorder. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022;8(1):16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. American Psychiatric Association, editor. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Udo T, Grilo CM. Psychiatric and medical correlates of DSM-5 eating disorders in a nationally representative sample of adults in the United States. Int J Eat Disord. 2019;52(1):42–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Giel KE, Teufel M, Junne F, Zipfel S, Schag K. Food-related impulsivity in obesity and binge eating disorder-a systematic update of the evidence. Nutrients. 2017;9(11):1170.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Schag K, Schonleber J, Teufel M, Zipfel S, Giel KE. Food-related impulsivity in obesity and binge eating disorder–a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2013;14(6):477–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gonzalez-Muniesa P, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Hu FB, Despres JP, Matsuzawa Y, Loos RJF, et al. Obesity. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kirsch P. Oxytocin in the socioemotional brain: implications for psychiatric disorders. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2015;17(4):463–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Spetter MS, Hallschmid M. Current findings on the role of oxytocin in the regulation of food intake. Physiol Behav. 2017;176:31–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lawson EA. The effects of oxytocin on eating behaviour and metabolism in humans. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2017;13(12):700–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Giel K, Zipfel S, Hallschmid M. Oxytocin and eating disorders: a narrative review on emerging findings and perspectives. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2017;16(8):1111–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Plessow F, Eddy KT, Lawson EA. The neuropeptide hormone oxytocin in eating disorders. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018;20(10):91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim YR, Kim JH, Kim MJ, Treasure J. Differential methylation of the oxytocin receptor gene in patients with anorexia nervosa: a pilot study. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(2):e88673.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Leppanen J, Cardi V, Ng KW, Paloyelis Y, Stein D, Tchanturia K, et al. Effects of intranasal oxytocin on the interpretation and expression of emotions in anorexia nervosa. J Neuroendocrinol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/jne.12458.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Thienel M, Fritsche A, Heinrichs M, Peter A, Ewers M, Lehnert H, et al. Oxytocin’s inhibitory effect on food intake is stronger in obese than normal-weight men. Int J Obes. 2016;40(11):1707–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim YR, Kim JH, Kim CH, Shin JG, Treasure J. Association between the oxytocin receptor gene polymorphism (rs53576) and bulimia nervosa. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2015;23(3):171–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Micali N, Crous-Bou M, Treasure J, Lawson EA. Association between oxytocin receptor genotype, maternal care, and eating disorder behaviours in a community sample of women. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2017;25(1):19–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bush NR, Allison AL, Miller AL, Deardorff J, Adler NE, Boyce WT. Socioeconomic disparities in childhood obesity risk: association with an oxytocin receptor polymorphism. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(1):61–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Steiger H, Thaler L. Eating disorders, gene-environment interactions and the epigenome: roles of stress exposures and nutritional status. Physiol Behav. 2016;162:181–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Choy MK, Movassagh M, Goh HG, Bennett MR, Down TA, Foo RS. Genome-wide conserved consensus transcription factor binding motifs are hyper-methylated. BMC Genomics. 2010;11:519.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Jones PA. Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13(7):484–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Aran D, Toperoff G, Rosenberg M, Hellman A. Replication timing-related and gene body-specific methylation of active human genes. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20(4):670–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Himmerich H, Bentley J, Kan C, Treasure J. Genetic risk factors for eating disorders: an update and insights into pathophysiology. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2019;9:2045125318814734.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hubel C, Marzi SJ, Breen G, Bulik CM. Epigenetics in eating disorders: a systematic review. Mol Psychiatry. 2019;24(6):901–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Boehm I, Walton E, Alexander N, Batury VL, Seidel M, Geisler D, et al. Peripheral serotonin transporter DNA methylation is linked to increased salience network connectivity in females with anorexia nervosa. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2020;45(3):206–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Thaler L, Brassard S, Booij L, Kahan E, McGregor K, Labbe A, et al. Methylation of the OXTR gene in women with anorexia nervosa: Relationship to social behavior. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2020;28(1):79–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Steiger H, Booij L, Thaler L, St-Hilaire A, Israel M, Casey KF, et al. DNA methylation in people with anorexia nervosa: epigenome-wide patterns in actively ill, long-term remitted, and healthy-eater women. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/15622975.2022.2089731.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jia YF, Choi Y, Ayers-Ringler JR, Biernacka JM, Geske JR, Lindberg DR, et al. Differential SLC1A2 promoter methylation in bipolar disorder with or without addiction. Front Cell Neurosci. 2017;11:217.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Rodriguez-Lopez ML, Martinez-Magana JJ, Ruiz-Ramos D, Garcia AR, Gonzalez L, Tovilla-Zarate CA, et al. Individuals diagnosed with binge-eating disorder have DNA hypomethylated sites in genes of the metabolic system: a pilot study. Nutrients. 2021;13(5):1413.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Lawson EA, Marengi DA, DeSanti RL, Holmes TM, Schoenfeld DA, Tolley CJ. Oxytocin reduces caloric intake in men. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015;23(5):950–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Plessow F, Marengi DA, Perry SK, Lawson EA. Oxytocin administration increases proactive control in men with overweight or obesity: a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2020;29(1):56–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Melkonyan A, Liu L, Brown EC, Meyer W, Madipakkam AR, Ringelmann L, et al. Unchanged food approach-avoidance behaviour of healthy men after oxytocin administration. J Neuroendocrinol. 2020;32(12):e12923.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ott V, Finlayson G, Lehnert H, Heitmann B, Heinrichs M, Born J, et al. Oxytocin reduces reward-driven food intake in humans. Diabetes. 2013;62(10):3418–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Rubin LH, Connelly JJ, Reilly JL, Carter CS, Drogos LL, Pournajafi-Nazarloo H, et al. Sex and diagnosis specific associations between DNA methylation of the oxytocin receptor gene with emotion processing and temporal-limbic and prefrontal brain volumes in psychotic disorders. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2016;1(2):141–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nawijn L, Krzyzewska IM, van Zuiden M, Henneman P, Koch SBJ, Mul AN, et al. Oxytocin receptor gene methylation in male and female PTSD patients and trauma-exposed controls. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019;29(1):147–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kusui C, Kimura T, Ogita K, Nakamura H, Matsumura Y, Koyama M, et al. DNA methylation of the human oxytocin receptor gene promoter regulates tissue-specific gene suppression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;289(3):681–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Schorr M, Marengi DA, Pulumo RL, Yu E, Eddy KT, Klibanski A, et al. Oxytocin and its relationship to body composition, bone mineral density, and hip geometry across the weight spectrum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(8):2814–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Coiro V, Passeri M, Davoli C, d’Amato L, Gelmini G, Fagnoni F, et al. Oxytocin response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia in obese subjects before and after weight loss. J Endocrinol Invest. 1988;11(2):125–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Qian W, Zhu T, Tang B, Yu S, Hu H, Sun W, et al. Decreased circulating levels of oxytocin in obesity and newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(12):4683–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. McCormack SE, Blevins JE, Lawson EA. Metabolic effects of oxytocin. Endocr Rev. 2020;41(2):121–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Steward T, Menchon JM, Jimenez-Murcia S, Soriano-Mas C, Fernandez-Aranda F. Neural network alterations across eating disorders: a narrative review of fMRI studies. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2018;16(8):1150–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Bredewold R, Veenema AH. Sex differences in the regulation of social and anxiety-related behaviors: insights from vasopressin and oxytocin brain systems. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2018;49:132–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Wu Z, Xu Y, Zhu Y, Sutton AK, Zhao R, Lowell BB, et al. An obligate role of oxytocin neurons in diet induced energy expenditure. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(9):e45167.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Leslie M, Leppanen J, Paloyelis Y, Nazar BP, Treasure J. The influence of oxytocin on risk-taking in the balloon analogue risk task among women with bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder. J Neuroendocrinol. 2019;31(8):e12771.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Leslie M, Leppanen J, Paloyelis Y, Treasure J. The influence of oxytocin on eating behaviours and stress in women with bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2019;497:110354.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Munafo MR, Clark TG, Moore LR, Payne E, Walton R, Flint J. Genetic polymorphisms and personality in healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry. 2003;8(5):471–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kundaje A, Meuleman W, Ernst J, Bilenky M, Yen A, Heravi-Moussavi A, et al. Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature. 2015;518(7539):317–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Jones MJ, Moore SR, Kobor MS. Principles and challenges of applying epigenetic epidemiology to psychology. Annu Rev Psychol. 2018;69(1):459–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Edgar RD, Jones MJ, Meaney MJ, Turecki G, Kobor MS. BECon: a tool for interpreting DNA methylation findings from blood in the context of brain. Transl Psychiatry. 2017;7(8):e1187-e.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Kim YR, Eom JS, Yang JW, Kang J, Treasure J. The impact of oxytocin on food intake and emotion recognition in patients with eating disorders: a double blind single dose within-subject cross-over design. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(9):e0137514.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Leslie M, Silva P, Paloyelis Y, Blevins J, Treasure J. A systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis of oxytocin’s effects on feeding. J Neuroendocrinol. 2018;30(8):e12584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Hilbert A, Tuschen-Caffier B. Eating disorder examination—questionnaire. Tübingen: dgvt Verlag; 2016.

  54. Kumsta R, Hummel E, Chen FS, Heinrichs M. Epigenetic regulation of the oxytocin receptor gene: implications for behavioral neuroscience. Front Neurosci. 2013;7:83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Dadds MR, Moul C, Cauchi A, Dobson-Stone C, Hawes DJ, Brennan J, et al. Methylation of the oxytocin receptor gene and oxytocin blood levels in the development of psychopathy. Dev Psychopathol. 2014;26(1):33–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Jack A, Connelly JJ, Morris JP. DNA methylation of the oxytocin receptor gene predicts neural response to ambiguous social stimuli. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;6:280.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Ziegler C, Dannlowski U, Brauer D, Stevens S, Laeger I, Wittmann H, et al. Oxytocin receptor gene methylation: converging multilevel evidence for a role in social anxiety. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015;40(6):1528–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Schiele MA, Thiel C, Kollert L, Furst L, Putschin L, Kehle R, et al. Oxytocin receptor gene DNA methylation: a biomarker of treatment response in obsessive-compulsive disorder? Psychother Psychosom. 2021;90(1):57–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Lukas Klein, Ronja Lerch and Kristina Overkamp for their help in collecting and preparing the blood samples.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. KS is supported by the Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts Baden-Württemberg; MH is supported by grants from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) to the German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V.; 01GI0925).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical University Hospital Tübingen, Osianderstr. 5, 72076, Tübingen, Germany

    Katrin Elisabeth Giel, Kathrin Schag, Isabelle Mack & Stephan Zipfel

  2. Centre of Excellence for Eating Disorders (KOMET), Osianderstr. 5, 72076, Tübingen, Germany

    Katrin Elisabeth Giel, Kathrin Schag, Isabelle Mack & Stephan Zipfel

  3. Institute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Straße 11, 48149, Münster, Germany

    Elisabeth Johanna Leehr

  4. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University Hospital Tübingen, Calwerstraße 14, 72076, Tübingen, Germany

    Lea-Sarah Schuster, Ariane Wiegand & Vanessa Nieratschker

  5. Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioural Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Straße 25, 72076, Tübingen, Germany

    Manfred Hallschmid

  6. German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Otfried-Müller-Straße 10, 72076, Tübingen, Germany

    Manfred Hallschmid

  7. Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases of the Helmholtz Center Munich at the University of Tübingen (IDM), Otfried-Müller-Straße 10, 72076, Tübingen, Germany

    Manfred Hallschmid

Authors
  1. Katrin Elisabeth Giel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kathrin Schag
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elisabeth Johanna Leehr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Isabelle Mack
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lea-Sarah Schuster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ariane Wiegand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Stephan Zipfel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Manfred Hallschmid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Vanessa Nieratschker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

KEG contributed to conceptualization, methodology, investigation, supervision, project administration and writing—original draft. KS, EJL and IM were involved in investigation, resources and writing—review and editing. LSS and AW contributed to formal analysis and writing—review and editing. SZ was involved in conceptualization, supervision and writing—review and editing. MH contributed to writing—review and editing. VN was involved in conceptualization, methodology, investigation, supervision, validation, resources and writing—review and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katrin Elisabeth Giel.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethic approval was obtained by the ethics committee of the Medical Faculty and the University Hospital Tübingen as the University Clinic is the Sponsor of the trial (reference number 218/2018BO2). All participants provided written informed consent prior to inclusion into the study.

Consent to publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giel, K.E., Schag, K., Leehr, E.J. et al. OXTR DNA methylation differentiates men on the obesity spectrum with and without binge eating disorder. Clin Epigenet 14, 108 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-022-01318-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-022-01318-3

Keywords

Clinical Epigenetics

ISSN: 1868-7083

Contact us