Skip to main content
Download PDF

Leptin promoter methylation in female patients with painful multisomatoform disorder and chronic widespread pain

Clinical Epigenetics volume 14, Article number: 13 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Different functional somatic syndromes (FSS), fibromyalgia (FMS) and other unexplained painful conditions share many common clinical traits and are characterized by troubling and functionally disabling somatic symptoms. Chronic pain is most frequently reported and at the center of patients’ level of disease burden. The construct of multisomatoform disorder (MSD) allows to subsume severely impaired patients suffering from FSS, FMS and other unexplained painful conditions to be examined for common underlying processes. Altered leptin levels and a pathological response of the HPA-axis as a result of chronic stress and childhood trauma have been suggested as one of the driving factors of disease development and severity. Previous studies have demonstrated that methylation of the leptin promoter can play a regulatory role in addiction. In this study, we hypothesized that methylation of the leptin promoter is influenced by the degree of childhood traumatization and differs between patients with MSD and controls. A cohort of 151 patients with MSD and 149 matched healthy volunteers were evaluated using clinical and psychometric assessment while methylation level analysis of the leptin promoter was performed using DNA isolated from whole blood.

Results

In female controls, we found CpG C-167 to be negatively correlated with leptin levels, whereas in female patients CpG C-289, C-255, C-193, C-167 and methylation cluster (C-291 to C-167) at putative bindings sites for transcription factors Sp1 and c/EBPalpha were negatively correlated with leptin levels. Methylation levels were significantly lower in female patients CpG C-289 compared with controls. When looking at female patients with chronic widespread pain methylation levels were significantly lower at CpG C-289, C-255 and methylation cluster (C-291 to C-167).

Conclusion

Our findings support the hypothesis that epigenetic regulation of leptin plays a role in the regulation of leptin levels in patients with MSD. This effect is more pronounced in patients with chronic widespread pain.

Background

In patients presenting with painful symptoms often a sufficient underlying explanation in terms of a somatic diagnosis cannot be found. In these cases, the chronic pain can be characterized as the leading symptom of a functional somatic syndrome (FSS) such as fibromyalgia (FMS) or somatoform pain disorder. In such syndromes, functionally disabling and bothersome physical symptoms are also frequently present. This constellation of symptoms is also present in multisomatoform disorder (MSD) [1, 2] which is a diagnostic construct to better characterize these patients across different somatic and psychological specialties [1, 3]. A diagnosis of MSD can be made in the presence of more than three currently distressing physical symptoms in addition to a long (greater than 2 years) history of somatization. The prevalence of MSD is 8% and thus posts a relevant disease burden [3] The pathophysiology of functional somatic syndromes, fibromyalgia, and MSD is incompletely understood but a complex interplay of biographic, environmental, genetic, and epigenetic factors influencing allostasis seems likely [4, 5], especially as the similarity in symptoms and patients suggest common mechanisms which lends validity to the construct of MSD. In a population-based twin study, genetic influences have been shown to play a role especially in painful FSS, whereas inconsistent results suggest a role of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of serotonergic and dopaminergic genes [6,7,8]. Our group recently demonstrated common sensory alterations through quantitative sensory testing in patients with MSD [9] similar to those found in patients with fibromyalgia (FMS) [10, 11]. In this context, the construct of chronic widespread pain is of particular interest. Since its systematic introduction as part of the diagnostic criteria for FMS in 1990 [12] numerous studies have included patients with CWP not fulfilling criteria for FMS. However, different interpretations of the criteria as well as adaptations over time [13, 14] have made comparisons not straightforward [15]. DNA methylation describes a modification through covalent binding of a methyl group to cytosine residues that are followed by guanine nucleotide in the DNA strand (CpG Island). This has among others been shown to be influenced in a model of early stress through reduced neonatal maternal care in rodent models [16,17,18] as well as in chronic pain states [19, 20]. We could also demonstrate the influence of transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) receptor promoter methylation on heat and pressure pain thresholds which was significantly influenced by the level of childhood traumatization [21].

Lastly, the complex interplay between obesity in chronic pain states as well as FMS, leptin and the HPA-axis has been investigated with growing interest by the scientific community [22], whereas obesity is a common comorbidity in FMS and has also been shown to increase symptom severity [23,24,25,26], Leptin levels in relation to painful conditions have been found to be either unaltered [27], elevated [28,29,30,31] or reduced [32] compared with controls. Leptin is a 16 kDa protein predominantly secreted by adipose tissue or in the brain [33, 34]. Its main function lies in the regulation of energy homeostasis and conveying a feeling of satiety [35,36,37]. It has also been shown to have an inhibitory function on the HPA-axis [38]. In a reverse manner, however, its synthesis is stimulated by cortisol in adipose tissue [39]. Additionally, leptin has been demonstrated to play a role in the pathophysiology of neuropathic pain [40,41,42] . The expression of leptin has been previously shown to be influenced by epigenetic mechanisms, namely hypomethylation in the promoter region at binding sites for Sp1 and C/EBPalpha [43,44,45,46] which typically act as activators of gene expression.

Our group recently demonstrated in the current patient collective a distinct alteration of the neuroendocrine profile of patients with MSD (publication under review) with a significantly higher level of leptin and lower levels of cortisol in female patients compared with controls. We, therefore, hypothesized that in patients with MSD the difference in measured leptin levels is influenced by alterations in leptin promoter methylation due to the influence of childhood trauma.

Materials and methods

Subjects

Participants in this study have been previously evaluated with regards to the presence of SNPs of different genes [6,7,8], the presence of sensory alterations using standardized quantitative sensory testing as well as methylation status of the TRPA1 promoter [9, 21]. Altogether, 151 MSD patients and 149 healthy controls were included in the study. Patients were recruited through the outpatient pain clinic of the Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany, and the Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy of the Hannover Medical School over a period of 12 months. Additional patients were contacted through local fibromyalgia support groups while healthy age- and gender-matched participants without physical pain were included in the control group. Exact records of the place of recruitment were not kept; most patients however were partaking in regular treatments at Hannover Medical School. Severe somatic or psychiatric conditions were excluded through expert clinician assessment while psychometric evaluations through questionnaires were also performed. All patients’ chief complaint was chronic widespread pain. Diagnosis of MSD was supported by means of a modified interview of the somatoform disorders section of the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder IV (DSM-IV) (SCID) as well as the German version of the 36-item Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire, i.e., the Physical Component Summary score needed to be ≤ 40 as sign of strong psychophysiological strain [1, 2, 6,7,8, 47]. The presence of chronic widespread pain fulfilling the strict criteria of pain present in three out of four body quadrants in addition to axial pain [15] was systematically assessed by a 34-item pain localization questionnaire.

Exclusion criteria were defined as age < 18 years, insufficient German language ability, insufficient cognitive abilities, severe and chronic somatic diseases (e.g., severe heart failure, encephalitis disseminata, dementia), and severe comorbid mental disorders which cause major impairment of social functioning (e.g., schizophrenia, severe mood disorders, personality disorders, substance abuse) as previously described [6,7,8]. Psychometric questionnaires are beyond the scope of the current manuscript.

Blood samples were collected and used for DNA extraction, laboratory, and epigenetic analysis [48, 49]. In all investigations, the revised Declaration of Helsinki in 2000 (Edinburgh, 52. general meeting) was adhered to and there was approval by the Ethical Committee of Hannover Medical School (study protocol number 4757). All subjects gave informed consent for blood sampling, genotyping, and clinical measurements [6,7,8].

Determination of Leptin levels

A radioimmunoassay was performed using the human leptin RIA kit (LINCO Research, St. Charles, Missouri, USA). Blood was collected between 8.00 and 9.00 am for each participant to be in keeping with the circadian rhythm of hormone release of the HPA-axis. EDTA vials (4 ml) and Serum vials (5 ml) were used (S-Monovette, Sarstedt). Measurements were performed through the Department of Endocrinology of the Hannover Medical School (MHH).

DNA Isolation

Blood was collected from each subject using two 4-mL EDTA tubes that were then stored at − 80° until extraction. Genomic DNA from patients and controls was extracted using a standard high-salt extraction method. A small subset of DNA samples was isolated by using a commercially available DNA isolation kit (QiAamp® blood kit, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Determination of methylation rates

DNA was bisulfite-converted using the Epitect conversion kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to manufacturer recommendations.

Bisulfite-converted DNA was used for PCR amplification using specific primer sets (see Additional file 1: Table S1) in a Touchdown PCR approach [50]. Resulting amplicons were subjected to linear sequencing PCR using BigDye Terminator according to manufacturer instructions (ABI Life Technologies, Grand Island, USA). For Sequence cleanup prior to sequencing we used AMPure beads on a Biomek NxP liquid handling platform (Beckman Coulter, Brea, USA). Purified reactions were sequenced using a 3500xl 24 capillary Sequencer (ABI Life Technologies, Grand Island, USA).

CpG position is provided in relation to the transcriptional start site located at GRCh38:7:128241278 according to ENSEMBL gene accession # ENSG00000174697. All reported locations are in the proximal promoter upstream of the gene locus. Sequence analysis and determination of methylation rates for each CpG site were conducted using the Epigenetic Sequencing Methylation analysis software [51]. The methylation rate of each CpG site per subject was estimated by determining the ratio between normalized peak values of cytosine and thymine.

Quality control

Raw sequences were checked for quality and integrity by using the Sequence Scanner 2 Software (ABI Life Technologies, Grand Island, USA) and alignment in Geneious 11 (Biomatters, Auckland, New Zealand).

The resulting values were processed further if 95% of the CpGs of each specimen and 95% of the respective CpG position were available.

We successfully measured other genes in this collective (TRPA1) [21] as well as unpublished data. The overall variance of measured results for TRPA1 and other genes was very low indicating a high level of precision of the collected data.

Prediction of transcription factor binding sites

Potential binding sites for transcription factors (TFs) were predicted using Geneious 11 (Biomatters, Auckland, New Zealand) allowing for 1 mismatch base. The findings were confirmed using the Alggen Promo tool (http://alggen.lsi.upc.es/cgi-bin/promo_v3/promo/promoinit.cgi?dirDB=TF_8.3) on the same sequence. Both tools access the freely available resources at the Transfac public database: (http://gene-regulation.com/cgi-bin/pub/databases/transfac/search.cgi) [52].

Statistical analysis

All statistical calculations were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Version 26 (SPSS, IBM, Armonk, NY). We used GraphPad Prism for Mac Version 9 for data illustration (Graphpad Software Inc, La Jolla, CA). Sequence Scanner v1.0 software (ABI Life Technologies) was used to assess sequence quality. After sample quality estimation 151 Patients and 149 controls were used for data analysis. CpG sites were measured successfully without need for exclusion from analysis. Distribution of data was checked according to Shapiro–Wilk. For normally distributed data parametric tests were chosen, in all other instances nonparametric tests were used. Pearson correlations were used to characterize association of methylation with serum leptin levels. Differences between patients and controls were assessed using a two-sided t test for independent samples. Adjustment for multiple comparisons was not made as comparisons were preplanned before the study was commenced. Equality of variance was determined automatically using the Levene test. Interpretation of the results was conducted accordingly. Results are given as mean and standard deviation.

Results

Diagnostic criteria for MSD according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder-IV (DSM-IV) were fulfilled by all patients. As previously reported, there were no differences between gender and age (p > 0.05) (control group: mean age, 52.1 ± 9.9 years; 73% women and 27% men; MSD group: mean age, 54.4 ± 10.1 years; 82% women and 18% men) [6,7,8,9, 21]. As expected the physical component summary score of the SF-36 demonstrated a significant difference between patients and controls (28.75 ± 7.81 vs 54.0 ± 5.74) (p < 0.0001). The sample size of male participants proved too small to provide satisfactory explanatory power. At the same time, no significant findings could be demonstrated so that further investigation focused mainly on female study participants. Leptin measurements were obtained in 244 participants (129 female controls, 91 female patients as well as 12 male patients and controls each (data submitted for publication).

Methylation

Leptin levels and methylation status at the following CpGs were negatively correlated: in female controls at C-167 (rp = − 0.205, p = 0.046) and in female patients at C-289 (rp = − 0.232, p = 0.047), C-255 (rp = − 0.242, p = 0.038), C-193 (rp = − 0.294, p = 0.022), C-167 (rp = − 0.242, p = 0.043) and the mean methylation at the cluster with binding sites for Sp1, c/EBPalpha and CREB (C-291 til C-167) (rp = − 0.239, p = 0.039). The observed correlations affected CpGs that were in close proximity to one another and have been previously shown to have particular relevance as binding motifs for Sp1, c/EBPalpha and CREB which are well known to be involved in the regulation of leptin expression. We, therefore, decided to further characterize only these highly thematic CpGs. There was a significant difference in the methylation levels of CpG C-289 between female patients (0.1449 ± 0.9554) and controls (0.1766 ± 0.1000), t(211) = 2.366, p = 0.019 (see Fig. 1 for most relevant CpGs). For a graphical representation of the methylation level at each individual CpG see Additional file 2: Fig. S1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Methylation levels of most relevant CpGs comparing female patients and female controls. Data represented as mean + 95% CI. There was a significant difference observed only at CpG C-289

Full size image

Significant differences between female patients and controls despite significant correlation with leptin levels could surprisingly only be found at CpG C-289. To focus on patients with the highest pain burden, we re-examined a subset of female patients (120/138) fulfilling the strict criteria for chronic widespread pain (pain in three out of four quadrants as well as axial pain). Incomplete data to determine pain distribution were present in 5 female controls and 10 female patients. Significant differences were observed at CpG C-289 (t(182) = 2.990, p = 0.003), C-255 (t(182) = 2.202, p = 0.029) and methylation cluster (t(183) = 2.228, p = 0.024). A graphical representation is given in Fig. 2, whereas exact methylation levels are given in Table 1.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Methylation levels of most relevant CpGs comparing female patients fulfilling strict criteria for chronic widespread pain and female controls. Data represented as mean + 95% CI. There was a significant difference observed CpG C-289, C-255 and methylation cluster

Full size image
Table 1 Mean methylation levels of female patients with chronic widespread pain (CWP) and female controls without CWP; SD: standard deviation
Full size table

Discussion

Hormones regulating dysfunctional responses of the HPA-axis to chronic stress have been implied in the etiology of most disorders that can be subsumed under the construct of MSD [53,54,55,56]. In addition, the role of leptin and its influence on the HPA-axis and its role with painful disorders have been investigated. In our study, we characterized female patients with MSD in comparison with healthy controls with regards to the methylation status of the leptin promoter region. We focused on female subjects as women are known to have a higher prevalence of MSD [57, 58] because methylation patterns were found to be gender-dependent in genome-wide association studies [59]. We performed a methylation analysis of the leptin promoter region that revealed significant negative correlations between methylation at C-289, C-255, C-193, C-167 and leptin levels in female patients, i.e., less methylation is correlated with higher leptin levels. This is plausible as these CpGs are located at binding sites for transcription factors and higher methylation is often associated with repressive effects on gene expression [60]. Transcription factors Sp1 and c/EBPalpha whose binding is favored in states of reduced methylation and increases transcription of the gene upon binding to DNA [61,62,63,64].

After only observing significantly lower methylation in CpG-289 in female patients further analysis revealed that in patients fulfilling strict criteria for CWP had significantly lower methylation levels at CpGs -289, -255 and methylation cluster while -167 trended toward significance (p = 0.09) It also serves as further support of our interpretation that lower methylation levels facilitate binding of activating transcription factors Sp1 and c/EBPalpha resulting in higher leptin levels. Previous studies have demonstrated similar findings in psychiatric patients suffering from addiction [43]. Thus, in patients with MSD methylation at C-289 being significantly lower can be contributing to observed elevated leptin levels as this is a known binding site for c/EBPalpha. The lack of significant differences in CpG -255 and the methylation cluster could be attributed to lower pain burden in these patients compared with MSD patients suffering distinctly from CWP. This is plausible as self-reported pain has been shown to be associated with leptin levels [31]. Further significant hypomethylation in CpG -255 and methylation cluster could be a likely corollary, especially as this is a known binding site of Sp1.

Higher leptin levels in patients with painful conditions are biologically plausible as previous study demonstrated increased leptin levels in patients with FMS [28, 65] despite other studies showing an opposite effect [32, 66]. Leptin also plays a crucial role in the development of neuropathic pain in animal models of nerve injury [40, 67] and has been demonstrated to cause allodynia and hyperalgesia [42] (which are hallmarks of neuropathic pain conditions but also of central sensitization and nociplastic pain). The observation is congruent with the fact that a subset of patients with FMS shows signs of small fiber neuropathy [10, 11]. Similar findings have been previously shown in patients with FMS where BMI and elevated leptin levels are independently associated with self-reported pain [31]. Chronic stress is known to cause a dysregulation of the stress response as mediated by the HPA-axis [68]; here leptin has been found to play a significant role as well [69,70,71,72,73] . Taken together our current findings and the fact that leptin levels are significantly higher in these female patients with MSD (publication under review) confer a plausible interrelational connection with leptin regulation in patients with MSD, especially with CWP.

One of the limitations of our and other epigenetic studies is the utilization of DNA from whole blood cells for analysis. It has been shown that different tissues demonstrate similar methylation levels [74], other cases have reported tissue-specific levels [75], whereas neuronal tissue is preferable, most study designs don’t allow for it being readily available. A further limitation is the lack of data on how many possible participants declined to take part in the study after positive eligibility screening as well as on location of recruitment (support group, Pain Clinic, Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy). A potential for a degree of self-selection bias is however mitigated by stringent selection criteria that led to a study population with a high disease burden.

In conclusion, to our knowledge, this is the first study to thoroughly investigate a large collective of patients with MSD and pain as the leading symptom with regards to the epigenetic regulation of leptin expression. Our study demonstrated that transcriptional regulation is in part regulated through methylation on an epigenetic level. Future studies should further validate our results of site-specific promoter methylation of patients compared to controls and increased methylation stratified by degree of widespread pain and stress levels.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, deGruy FV, et al. Multisomatoform disorder. An alternative to undifferentiated somatoform disorder for the somatizing patient in primary care. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997;54:352–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sattel H, Lahmann C, Gündel H, et al. Brief psychodynamic interpersonal psychotherapy for patients with multisomatoform disorder: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;200:60–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kroenke K. Physical symptom disorder: a simpler diagnostic category for somatization-spectrum conditions. J Psychosom Res. 2006;60:335–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McEwen BS. Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:171–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McEwen BS. Redefining neuroendocrinology: epigenetics of brain-body communication over the life course. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2018;49:8–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Harms KC, Kapitza KP, Pahl L, et al. Association of TNF-α polymorphism rs1800629 with multisomatoform disorder in a group of German patients and healthy controls: an explorative study. Cytokine. 2013;61:389–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jakobi J, Bernateck M, Tran AT, et al. Catechol-O-methyltransferase gene polymorphisms are not associated with multisomatoform disorder in a group of German multisomatoform disorder patients and healthy controls. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2010;14:293–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pahl L, Bernateck M, Jakobi J, et al. Interaction of the dopaminergic and serotonergic systems significantly influences the risk for multisomatoform disorder: a controlled pilot study. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2012;16:892–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Achenbach JTAT, Jaeger B, Kapitza K, Bernateck M, Karst M. Quantitative sensory testing in patients with multisomatoform disorder with chronic pain as the leading bodily symptom—a matched case-control study. Pain Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnz195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Üçeyler N, Sommer C. Objective evidence that small-fiber polyneuropathy underlies some illnesses currently labeled as fibromyalgia. Pain. 2013;154:2569.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Üçeyler N, Zeller D, Kahn AK, et al. Small fibre pathology in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Brain. 2013;136:1857–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia report of the multicenter criteria committee. Arthritis Rheum. 1990;33:160–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, et al. Fibromyalgia criteria and severity scales for clinical and epidemiological studies: a modification of the ACR Preliminary Diagnostic Criteria for Fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol. 2011;38:1113–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, et al. 2016 Revisions to the 2010/2011 fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016;46:319–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Butler S, Landmark T, Glette M, Borchgrevink P, Woodhouse A. Chronic widespread pain-the need for a standard definition. Pain. 2016;157:541–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Weaver IC, Cervoni N, Champagne FA, et al. Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7:847–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Weaver IC, Diorio J, Seckl JR, Szyf M, Meaney MJ. Early environmental regulation of hippocampal glucocorticoid receptor gene expression: characterization of intracellular mediators and potential genomic target sites. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1024:182–212.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Szyf M, Bick J. DNA methylation: a mechanism for embedding early life experiences in the genome. Child Dev. 2013;84:49–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hong S, Zheng G, Wiley JW. Epigenetic regulation of genes that modulate chronic stress-induced visceral pain in the peripheral nervous system. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:148-157.e7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pollema-Mays SL, Centeno MV, Apkarian AV, Martina M. Expression of DNA methyltransferases in adult dorsal root ganglia is cell-type specific and up regulated in a rodent model of neuropathic pain. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014;8:217.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Achenbach J, Rhein M, Gombert S, et al. Childhood traumatization is associated with differences in TRPA1 promoter methylation in female patients with multisomatoform disorder with pain as the leading bodily symptom. Clin Epigenet. 2019;11:126.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kargi AY, Iacobellis G. Adipose tissue and adrenal glands: novel pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical applications. Int J Endocrinol. 2014;2014:614074.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Okifuji A, Bradshaw DH, Olson C. Evaluating obesity in fibromyalgia: neuroendocrine biomarkers, symptoms, and functions. Clin Rheumatol. 2009;28:475–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Okifuji A, Donaldson GW, Barck L, Fine PG. Relationship between fibromyalgia and obesity in pain, function, mood, and sleep. J Pain. 2010;11:1329–37.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim CH, Luedtke CA, Vincent A, Thompson JM, Oh TH. Association of body mass index with symptom severity and quality of life in patients with fibromyalgia. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64:222–8.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Timmerman GM, Calfa NA, Stuifbergen AK. Correlates of body mass index in women with fibromyalgia. Orthop Nurs. 2013;32:113–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Ablin JN, Aronov N, Shimon I, et al. Evaluation of leptin levels among fibromyalgia patients before and after three months of treatment, in comparison with healthy controls. Pain Res Manag. 2012;17:89–92.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Fietta P. Counterbalance between leptin and cortisol may be associated with fibromyalgia. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2006;60:529.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rubino E, Vacca A, Govone F, et al. Investigating the role of adipokines in chronic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2017;37:1067–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Perruccio AV, Mahomed NN, Chandran V, Gandhi R. Plasma adipokine levels and their association with overall burden of painful joints among individuals with hip and knee osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol. 2014;41:334–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Younger J, Kapphahn K, Brennan K, Sullivan SD, Stefanick ML. Association of leptin with body pain in women. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016;25:752–60.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Paiva ES, Andretta A, Batista ED, et al. Serum levels of leptin and adiponectin and clinical parameters in women with fibromyalgia and overweight/obesity. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2017;61:249–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wilkinson M, Brown R, Imran SA, Ur E. Adipokine gene expression in brain and pituitary gland. Neuroendocrinology. 2007;86:191–209.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wiesner G, Vaz M, Collier G, et al. Leptin is released from the human brain: influence of adiposity and gender. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:2270–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Brennan AM, Mantzoros CS. Drug Insight: the role of leptin in human physiology and pathophysiology—emerging clinical applications. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2006;2:318–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mantzoros CS, Magkos F, Brinkoetter M, et al. Leptin in human physiology and pathophysiology. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2011;301:E567–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Halaas JL, Gajiwala KS, Maffei M, et al. Weight-reducing effects of the plasma protein encoded by the obese gene. Science. 1995;269:543–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Roubos EW, Dahmen M, Kozicz T, Xu L. Leptin and the hypothalamo-pituitary–adrenal stress axis. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2012;177:28–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Fried SK, Ricci MR, Russell CD, Laferrère B. Regulation of leptin production in humans. J Nutr. 2000;130:3127S-3131S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lim G, Wang S, Zhang Y, Tian Y, Mao J. Spinal leptin contributes to the pathogenesis of neuropathic pain in rodents. J Clin Investig. 2009;119:295–304.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Tian Y, Wang S, Ma Y, Lim G, Kim H, Mao J. Leptin enhances NMDA-induced spinal excitation in rats: a functional link between adipocytokine and neuropathic pain. Pain. 2011;152:1263–71.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Liang Y, Ma Y, Wang J, et al. Leptin contributes to neuropathic pain via extrasynaptic NMDAR-nNOS activation. Mol Neurobiol. 2021;58:1185–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Glahn A, Rhein M, Frieling H, et al. Smoking-induced changes in leptin serum levels and c/EBPalpha-related methylation status of the leptin core promotor during smoking cessation. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2019;100:106–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mosher MJ, Melton PE, Stapleton P, Schanfield MS, Crawford MH. Patterns of DNA methylation across the leptin core promoter in four diverse Asian and North American populations. Hum Biol. 2016;88:121–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Li L, He S, Sun JM, Davie JR. Gene regulation by Sp1 and Sp3. Biochem Cell Biol. 2004;82:460–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Schanton M, Maymó J, Pérez-Pérez A, et al. Sp1 transcription factor is a modulator of estradiol leptin induction in placental cells. Placenta. 2017;57:152–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ware J, John E, Gandek B. The SF-36 Health Survey: Development and use in mental health research and the IQOLA Project. Int J Ment Health. 1994;23:49–73.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Scher CD, Stein MB, Asmundson GJ, McCreary DR, Forde DR. The childhood trauma questionnaire in a community sample: psychometric properties and normative data. J Trauma Stress. 2001;14:843–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Häuser W, Schmutzer G, Brähler E, Glaesmer H. Maltreatment in childhood and adolescence: results from a survey of a representative sample of the German population. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011;108:287–94.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Korbie DJ, Mattick JS. Touchdown PCR for increased specificity and sensitivity in PCR amplification. Nat Protoc. 2008;3:1452.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lewin J, Schmitt AO, Adorján P, Hildmann T, Piepenbrock C. Quantitative DNA methylation analysis based on four-dye trace data from direct sequencing of PCR amplificates. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:3005–12.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Wingender E, Kel AE, Kel OV, et al. TRANSFAC, TRRD and COMPEL: towards a federated database system on transcriptional regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:265–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Coppens E, Kempke S, Van Wambeke P, et al. Cortisol and subjective stress responses to acute psychosocial stress in fibromyalgia patients and control participants. Psychosom Med. 2018;80:317–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Tanriverdi F, Karaca Z, Unluhizarci K, Kelestimur F. The hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis in chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia syndrome. Stress. 2007;10:13–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Chang L, Sundaresh S, Elliott J, et al. Dysregulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis in irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2009;21:149–59.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Aloisi AM, Buonocore M, Merlo L, et al. Chronic pain therapy and hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis impairment. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2011;36:1032–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Leiknes KA, Finset A, Moum T, Sandanger I. Current somatoform disorders in Norway: prevalence, risk factors and comorbidity with anxiety, depression and musculoskeletal disorders. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007;42:698–710.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Jackson JL, Kroenke K. Prevalence, impact, and prognosis of multisomatoform disorder in primary care: a 5-year follow-up study. Psychosom Med. 2008;70:430–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Singmann P, Shem-Tov D, Wahl S, et al. Characterization of whole-genome autosomal differences of DNA methylation between men and women. Epigenet Chromatin. 2015;8:43.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Bird AP. CpG-rich islands and the function of DNA methylation. Nature. 1986;321:209–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Lee M-J, Fried SK. Integration of hormonal and nutrient signals that regulate leptin synthesis and secretion. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2009;296:E1230–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Hwang CS, Mandrup S, MacDougald OA, Geiman DE, Lane MD. Transcriptional activation of the mouse obese (ob) gene by CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:873–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Mason MM, He Y, Chen H, Quon MJ, Reitman M. Regulation of leptin promoter function by Sp1, C/EBP, and a novel factor. Endocrinology. 1998;139:1013–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. He Y, Chen H, Quon MJ, Reitman M. The mouse obese gene. Genomic organization, promoter activity, and activation by CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:28887–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Ataoglu S, Ankarali H, Samanci R, Ozsahin M, Admis O. The relationship between serum leptin level and disease activity and inflammatory markers in fibromyalgia patients. North Clin Istanb. 2018;5:102–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Olama SM, Elsaid TO, El-Arman M. Serum leptin in Egyptian patients with fibromyalgia syndrome: relation to disease severity. Int J Rheum Dis. 2013;16:583–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Maeda T, Kiguchi N, Kobayashi Y, Ikuta T, Ozaki M, Kishioka S. Leptin derived from adipocytes in injured peripheral nerves facilitates development of neuropathic pain via macrophage stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:13076–81.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Carpenter LL, Carvalho JP, Tyrka AR, et al. Decreased adrenocorticotropic hormone and cortisol responses to stress in healthy adults reporting significant childhood maltreatment. Biol Psychiatry. 2007;62:1080–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Bonnavion P, Jackson AC, Carter ME, de Lecea L. Antagonistic interplay between hypocretin and leptin in the lateral hypothalamus regulates stress responses. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6266.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Gioldasi S, Karvela A, Rojas-Gil AP, et al. Metabolic association between leptin and the corticotropin releasing hormone. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2019;19:458–66.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Holmes D. Neuroendocrinology: leptin attenuates HPA-axis activation and stress responses. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015;11:255.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Malendowicz LK, Rucinski M, Belloni AS, Ziolkowska A, Nussdorfer GG. Leptin and the regulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis. Int Rev Cytol. 2007;263:63–102.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Heiman ML, Ahima RS, Craft LS, Schoner B, Stephens TW, Flier JS. Leptin inhibition of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis in response to stress. Endocrinology. 1997;138:3859–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Davies MN, Volta M, Pidsley R, et al. Functional annotation of the human brain methylome identifies tissue-specific epigenetic variation across brain and blood. Genome Biol. 2012;13:R43.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Jiang R, Jones MJ, Chen E, et al. Discordance of DNA methylation variance between two accessible human tissues. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8257.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully thank the patients and controls who participated in this study, and Anh-Thu Tran, Lilly Volkmann, Dennis Buers, Karl Kapitza, Prof. Michael Bernateck, and Katharina Harms, Jana Jakobi, and Prof. Manfred Stuhrmann as well as Nabeela Donaghey for their continuous support.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Nordstadt Krankenhaus Hannover, Haltenhoffstr. 41, 30167, Hannover, Germany

    Johannes Achenbach

  2. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Pain Clinic, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany

    Matthias Karst

  3. Laboratory for Molecular Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany

    Mathias Rhein, Alexander Glahn & Helge Frieling

Authors
  1. Johannes Achenbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mathias Rhein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alexander Glahn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Helge Frieling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Matthias Karst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JA, MR and MK made major contributions to the conception and design of this work and analyzed and interpreted the data. They were also major contributors in the composition of the manuscript. AG and HF also substantially contributed to the design of this work and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. JA, MK and MR were instrumental in the acquisition and analysis of the data. MR and AG substantially contributed to the interpretation of the data. All authors have approved the submitted version of the manuscript. All authors agree to be personally accountable for the manuscript’s content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Achenbach.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study followed the guidelines of the revised UN Declaration of Helsinki in 2000 (Edinburgh, 52. General Meeting). Following approval by the ethics committee of the Hannover Medical School (study protocol number 4757), informed consent was obtained from all patients and controls for blood sampling, genotyping, and clinical measurements.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Leptin primer list.

Additional file 2: Fig. S1.

Methylation levels (mean ± 95% CI) of all CpGs in female patients and female controls.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Achenbach, J., Rhein, M., Glahn, A. et al. Leptin promoter methylation in female patients with painful multisomatoform disorder and chronic widespread pain. Clin Epigenet 14, 13 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-022-01235-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-022-01235-5

Keywords

Clinical Epigenetics

ISSN: 1868-7083

Contact us