Zheleznyakova GY, Piket E, Marabita F, et al. Epigenetic research in multiple sclerosis: progress, challenges, and opportunities. Physiol Genomics. 2017;49(9):447–61.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Li X, Xiao B, Chen X-S. DNA methylation: a new player in multiple sclerosis. Mol Neurobiol. 2017;54(6):4049–59.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hedrich CM, Mäbert K, Rauen T, Tsokos GC. DNA methylation in systemic lupus erythematosus. Epigenomics. 2017;9(4):505–25.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Guo S, Xu L, Chang C, et al. Epigenetic regulation mediated by methylation in the pathogenesis and precision medicine of rheumatoid arthritis. Front Genet. 2020;11:811.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Bibikova M, Le J, Barnes B, et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling using Infinium assay. Epigenomics. 2009;1(1):177–200.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bibikova M, Barnes B, Tsan C, et al. High density DNA methylation array with single CpG site resolution. Genomics. 2011;98(4):288–95.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Moran S, Arribas C, Esteller M. Validation of a DNA methylation microarray for 850,000 CpG sites of the human genome enriched in enhancer sequences. Epigenomics. 2016;8(3):389–99.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Aryee MJ, Jaffe AE, Corrada-Bravo H, et al. Minfi: a flexible and comprehensive bioconductor package for the analysis of Infinium DNA methylation microarrays. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(10):1363–9.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Morris TJ, Butcher LM, Feber A, et al. ChAMP: 450k chip analysis methylation pipeline. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(3):428–30.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Fortin J-P, Triche TJ, Hansen KD. Preprocessing, normalization and integration of the Illumina HumanMethylationEPIC array with minfi. Bioinformatics. 2017;33(4):558–60.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Tian Y, Morris TJ, Webster AP, et al. ChAMP: updated methylation analysis pipeline for Illumina BeadChips. Bioinformatics. 2017;33(24):3982–4.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Tan Q, Christiansen L, von Bornemann Hjelmborg J, Christensen K. Twin methodology in epigenetic studies. J Exp Biol. 2015;218(1):134–9.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Maltby VE, Graves MC, Lea RA, et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling of CD8+ T cells shows a distinct epigenetic signature to CD4+ T cells in multiple sclerosis patients. Clin Epigenet. 2015;7(1):118.
Google Scholar
Maltby VE, Lea RA, Sanders KA, et al. Differential methylation at MHC in CD4+ T cells is associated with multiple sclerosis independently of HLA-DRB1. Clin Epigenet. 2017;9(1):71.
Google Scholar
Maltby VE, Lea RA, Graves MC, et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation changes in CD19+ B cells from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):17418.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Kulakova OG, Kabilov MR, et al. Whole-genome DNA methylation analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in multiple sclerosis patients with different disease courses. Acta Nat. 2016;8(3):103–10.
CAS
Google Scholar
Rakyan VK, Down TA, Balding DJ, Beck S. Epigenome-wide association studies for common human diseases. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(8):529–41.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Jamieson E, Korologou-Linden R, Wootton RE, et al. Smoking, DNA methylation, and lung function: a mendelian randomization analysis to investigate causal pathways. Am J Hum Genet. 2020;106(3):315–26.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Martino DJ, Tulic MK, Gordon L, et al. Evidence for age-related and individual-specific changes in DNA methylation profile of mononuclear cells during early immune development in humans. Epigenetics. 2011;6(9):1085–94.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wang D, Liu X, Zhou Y, et al. Individual variation and longitudinal pattern of genome-wide DNA methylation from birth to the first two years of life. Epigenetics. 2012;7(6):594–605.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Acevedo N, Reinius LE, Vitezic M, et al. Age-associated DNA methylation changes in immune genes, histone modifiers and chromatin remodeling factors within 5 years after birth in human blood leukocytes. Clin Epigenet. 2015;7(1):34.
Google Scholar
Urdinguio RG, Torró MI, Bayón GF, et al. Longitudinal study of DNA methylation during the first 5 years of life. J Transl Med. 2016;14(1):160.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Pérez RF, Santamarina P, Tejedor JR, et al. Longitudinal genome-wide DNA methylation analysis uncovers persistent early-life DNA methylation changes. J Transl Med. 2019;17(1):15.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Herbstman JB, Wang S, Perera FP, et al. Predictors and consequences of global DNA methylation in cord blood and at three years. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(9):e72824.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Torow N, Hornef MW. The neonatal window of opportunity: setting the stage for life-long host-microbial interaction and immune homeostasis. J Immunol Baltim Md. 2017;198(2):557–63.
CAS
Google Scholar
Bjornsson HT, Sigurdsson MI, Fallin MD, et al. Intra-individual change in DNA methylation over time with familial clustering. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 2008;299(24):2877–83.
CAS
Google Scholar
Bollati V, Schwartz J, Wright R, et al. Decline in genomic DNA methylation through aging in a cohort of elderly subjects. Mech Ageing Dev. 2009;130(4):234–9.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Talens RP, Christensen K, Putter H, et al. Epigenetic variation during the adult lifespan: cross-sectional and longitudinal data on monozygotic twin pairs. Aging Cell. 2012;11(4):694–703.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Reynolds CA, Tan Q, Munoz E, et al. A decade of epigenetic change in aging twins: genetic and environmental contributions to longitudinal DNA methylation. Aging Cell. 2020;19(8):e13197.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Wang Y, Karlsson R, Lampa E, et al. Epigenetic influences on aging: a longitudinal genome-wide methylation study in old Swedish twins. Epigenetics. 2018;13(9):975–87.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Tan Q, Heijmans BT, von Bornemann Hjelmborg J, et al. Epigenetic drift in the aging genome: a ten-year follow-up in an elderly twin cohort. Int J Epidemiol. 2016;45:1146–58.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gutierrez-Arcelus M, Ongen H, Lappalainen T, et al. Tissue-specific effects of genetic and epigenetic variation on gene regulation and splicing. PLoS Genet. 2015;11(1):e1004958.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Mansell G, Gorrie-Stone TJ, Bao Y, et al. Guidance for DNA methylation studies: statistical insights from the Illumina EPIC array. BMC Genomics. 2019;20(1):366.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Tsai P-C, Bell JT. Power and sample size estimation for epigenome-wide association scans to detect differential DNA methylation. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44(4):1429–41.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Saffari A, Silver MJ, Zavattari P, et al. Estimation of a significance threshold for epigenome-wide association studies. Genet Epidemiol. 2018;42(1):20–33.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Henderson-Smith A, Fisch KM, Hua J, et al. DNA methylation changes associated with Parkinson’s disease progression: outcomes from the first longitudinal genome-wide methylation analysis in blood. Epigenetics. 2019;14(4):365–82.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Johnson RK, Vanderlinden LA, Dong F, et al. Longitudinal DNA methylation differences precede type 1 diabetes. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):3721.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020.
Chen Y, Lemire M, Choufani S, et al. Discovery of cross-reactive probes and polymorphic CpGs in the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 microarray. Epigenetics. 2013;8(2):203–9.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Nordlund J, Bäcklin CL, Wahlberg P, et al. Genome-wide signatures of differential DNA methylation in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Genome Biol. 2013;14(9):r105.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Pidsley R, Zotenko E, Peters TJ, et al. Critical evaluation of the Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip microarray for whole-genome DNA methylation profiling. Genome Biol. 2016;17(1):208.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Du P, Zhang X, Huang C-C, et al. Comparison of Beta-value and M-value methods for quantifying methylation levels by microarray analysis. BMC Bioinform. 2010;11:587.
CAS
Google Scholar
Teschendorff AE, Marabita F, Lechner M, et al. A beta-mixture quantile normalization method for correcting probe design bias in illumina infinium 450 k DNA methylation data. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(2):189–96.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Maksimovic J, Gordon L, Oshlack A. SWAN: subset-quantile within array normalization for illumina infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChips. Genome Biol. 2012;13(6):R44.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Dedeurwaerder S, Defrance M, Calonne E, et al. Evaluation of the infinium methylation 450K technology. Epigenomics. 2011;3(6):771–84.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Fortin J-P, Labbe A, Lemire M, et al. Functional normalization of 450k methylation array data improves replication in large cancer studies. Genome Biol. 2014;15(11):1–17.
Google Scholar
Wang T, Guan W, Lin J, et al. A systematic study of normalization methods for Infinium 450K methylation data using whole-genome bisulfite sequencing data. Epigenetics. 2015;10(7):662–9.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Dedeurwaerder S, Defrance M, Bizet M, et al. A comprehensive overview of Infinium HumanMethylation450 data processing. Brief Bioinform. 2014;15(6):929–41.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Marabita F, Almgren M, Lindholm ME, et al. An evaluation of analysis pipelines for DNA methylation profiling using the Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChip platform. Epigenetics. 2013;8(3):333–46.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Wu MC, Joubert BR, Kuan P, et al. A systematic assessment of normalization approaches for the Infinium 450K methylation platform. Epigenetics. 2014;9(2):318–29.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
van Rooij J, Mandaviya PR, Claringbould A, et al. Evaluation of commonly used analysis strategies for epigenome- and transcriptome-wide association studies through replication of large-scale population studies. Genome Biol. 2019;20:1–14.
Google Scholar
Price EM, Robinson WP. Adjusting for batch effects in DNA methylation microarray data, a lesson learned. Front Genet. 2018;9:83.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Buhule OD, Minster RL, Hawley NL, et al. Stratified randomization controls better for batch effects in 450K methylation analysis: a cautionary tale. Front Genet. 2014. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00354/full.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Nygaard V, Rødland EA, Hovig E. Methods that remove batch effects while retaining group differences may lead to exaggerated confidence in downstream analyses. Biostat Oxf Engl. 2016;17(1):29–39.
Google Scholar
Zindler T, Frieling H, Neyazi A, et al. Simulating ComBat: how batch correction can lead to the systematic introduction of false positive results in DNA methylation microarray studies. BMC Bioinform. 2020;21:1–15.
Google Scholar
Müller C, Schillert A, Röthemeier C, et al. Removing batch effects from longitudinal gene expression-quantile normalization plus ComBat as best approach for microarray transcriptome data. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(6):e0156594.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Fortin J-P, Parker D, Tunç B, et al. Harmonization of multi-site diffusion tensor imaging data. Neuroimage. 2017;161:149–70.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Yu M, Linn KA, Cook PA, et al. Statistical harmonization corrects site effects in functional connectivity measurements from multi-site fMRI data. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018;39(11):4213–27.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Jones SA, Morales AM, Holley AL, et al. Default mode network connectivity is related to pain frequency and intensity in adolescents. NeuroImage Clin. 2020;27:102326.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Gagnon-Bartsch JA, Speed TP. Using control genes to correct for unwanted variation in microarray data. Biostat Oxf Engl. 2012;13(3):539–52.
Google Scholar
Removing Unwanted Variation from High Dimensional Data with Negative Controls | Department of Statistics. [cited 2021 Jan 20]. https://statistics.berkeley.edu/tech-reports/820.
Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(7):e47–e47.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 1995;57(1):289–300.
Google Scholar
Gerring ZF, McRae AF, Montgomery GW, Nyholt DR. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling in whole blood reveals epigenetic signatures associated with migraine. BMC Genomics. 2018;19:69.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Jaffe AE, Murakami P, Lee H, et al. Bump hunting to identify differentially methylated regions in epigenetic epidemiology studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(1):200–9.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Maltby VE, Lea RA, Ribbons KA, et al. DNA methylation changes in CD4+ T cells isolated from multiple sclerosis patients on dimethyl fumarate. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2018;4(3):2055217318787826.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Spindola LM, Santoro ML, Pan PM, et al. Detecting multiple differentially methylated CpG sites and regions related to dimensional psychopathology in youths. Clin Epigenet. 2019;11(1):146.
Google Scholar
Eze IC, Jeong A, Schaffner E, et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation in peripheral blood and long-term exposure to source-specific transportation noise and air pollution: the SAPALDIA study. Environ Health Perspect. 2020;128(6):67003.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Nilsson EE, Thorson JLM, Ben Maamar M, et al. Epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) for potential transgenerational disease epigenetic biomarkers in sperm following ancestral exposure to the pesticide methoxychlor. Environ Epigenet. 2020;6(1):dvaa020.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Sherwood WB, Kothalawala DM, Kadalayil L, et al. Epigenome-wide association study reveals duration of breastfeeding is associated with epigenetic differences in children. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(10):E3569.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Li QS, Sun Y, Wang T. Epigenome-wide association study of Alzheimer’s disease replicates 22 differentially methylated positions and 30 differentially methylated regions. Clin Epigenet. 2020;12(1):149.
CAS
Google Scholar
Abeni E, Salvi A, Marchina E, et al. Sorafenib induces variations of the DNA methylome in HA22T/VGH human hepatocellular carcinoma-derived cells. Int J Oncol. 2017;51(1):128–44.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Mallik S, Odom GJ, Gao Z, et al. An evaluation of supervised methods for identifying differentially methylated regions in Illumina methylation arrays. Brief Bioinform. 2019;20(6):2224–35.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Peters TJ, Buckley MJ, Statham AL, et al. De novo identification of differentially methylated regions in the human genome. Epigenet Chromatin. 2015;8:6.
Google Scholar
Pedersen BS, Schwartz DA, Yang IV, Kechris KJ. Comb-p: software for combining, analyzing, grouping and correcting spatially correlated p values. Bioinform Oxf Engl. 2012;28(22):2986–8.
CAS
Google Scholar
Butcher LM, Beck S. Probe Lasso: a novel method to rope in differentially methylated regions with 450K DNA methylation data. Methods San Diego Calif. 2015;72:21–8.
CAS
Google Scholar
Chen J, Bardes EE, Aronow BJ, Jegga AG. ToppGene suite for gene list enrichment analysis and candidate gene prioritization. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(Web Server issue):W305–11.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Maksimovic J, Oshlack A, Phipson B. Gene set enrichment analysis for genome-wide DNA methylation data. Bioinformatics. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.24.265702.
Article
Google Scholar
Oshlack A, Wakefield MJ. Transcript length bias in RNA-seq data confounds systems biology. Biol Direct. 2009;4:14.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Dong D, Tian Y, Zheng SC, Teschendorff AE. ebGSEA: an improved gene set enrichment analysis method for epigenome-wide-association studies. Bioinformatics. 2019;35(18):3514–6.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Parks MM. An exact test for comparing a fixed quantitative property between gene sets. Bioinform Oxf Engl. 2018;34(6):971–7.
CAS
Google Scholar
Safari-Alighiarloo N, Taghizadeh M, Rezaei-Tavirani M, et al. Protein-protein interaction networks (PPI) and complex diseases. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2014;7(1):17–31.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Szklarczyk D, Gable AL, Lyon D, et al. STRING v11: protein–protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(Database issue):D607–13.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Jiao Y, Widschwendter M, Teschendorff AE. A systems-level integrative framework for genome-wide DNA methylation and gene expression data identifies differential gene expression modules under epigenetic control. Bioinform Oxf Engl. 2014;30(16):2360–6.
CAS
Google Scholar
Odintsova VV, Rebattu V, Hagenbeek FA, et al. Predicting complex traits and exposures from polygenic scores and blood and buccal DNA methylation profiles. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:688464.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Onwuka JU, Li D, Liu Y, et al. A panel of DNA methylation signature from peripheral blood may predict colorectal cancer susceptibility. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):692.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Westerman K, Fernández-Sanlés A, Patil P, et al. Epigenomic assessment of cardiovascular disease risk and interactions with traditional risk metrics. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(8):e015299.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Hüls A, Czamara D. Methodological challenges in constructing DNA methylation risk scores. Epigenetics. 2020;15(1–2):1–11.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Abiola O, Angel JM, Avner P, et al. The nature and identification of quantitative trait loci: a community’s view. Nat Rev Genet. 2003;4(11):911–6.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Smith AK, Kilaru V, Kocak M, et al. Methylation quantitative trait loci (meQTLs) are consistently detected across ancestry, developmental stage, and tissue type. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:145.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Zhou F, Shen C, Xu J, et al. Epigenome-wide association data implicates DNA methylation-mediated genetic risk in psoriasis. Clin Epigenet. 2016;8:131.
Google Scholar
Han H, Liu Q, Yang Z, et al. Association and cis-mQTL analysis of variants in serotonergic genes associated with nicotine dependence in Chinese Han smokers. Transl Psychiatry. 2018;8(1):243.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
van Dongen J, Ehli EA, Jansen R, et al. Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation in buccal cells: a study of monozygotic twins and mQTLs. Epigenet Chromatin. 2018;11(1):54.
Google Scholar
Fu X, Wang J, Du J, et al. BDNF gene’s role in schizophrenia: from risk allele to methylation implications. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:564277.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81(3):559–75.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Pan H, Holbrook JD, Karnani N, Kwoh CK. Gene, environment and methylation (GEM): a tool suite to efficiently navigate large scale epigenome wide association studies and integrate genotype and interaction between genotype and environment. BMC Bioinform. 2016;17(1):299.
Google Scholar
Shabalin AA. Matrix eQTL: ultra fast eQTL analysis via large matrix operations. Bioinform Oxf Engl. 2012;28(10):1353–8.
CAS
Google Scholar
Gresle MM, Jordan MA, Stankovich J, et al. Multiple sclerosis risk variants regulate gene expression in innate and adaptive immune cells. Life Sci Alliance. 2020;3(7):e202000650.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Millstein J, Zhang B, Zhu J, Schadt EE. Disentangling molecular relationships with a causal inference test. BMC Genet. 2009;10:23.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Liu Y, Aryee MJ, Padyukov L, et al. Epigenome-wide association data implicate DNA methylation as an intermediary of genetic risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(2):142–7.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Min JL, Hemani G, Hannon E, et al. Genomic and phenotypic insights from an atlas of genetic effects on DNA methylation. Nat Genet. 2021;53(9):1311–21.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Võsa U, Claringbould A, Westra H-J, et al. Large-scale cis- and trans-eQTL analyses identify thousands of genetic loci and polygenic scores that regulate blood gene expression. Nat Genet. 2021;53(9):1300–10.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Houseman EA, Accomando WP, Koestler DC, et al. DNA methylation arrays as surrogate measures of cell mixture distribution. BMC Bioinform. 2012;13:86.
Google Scholar
Zou J, Lippert C, Heckerman D, et al. Epigenome-wide association studies without the need for cell-type composition. Nat Methods. 2014;11(3):309–11.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Houseman EA, Molitor J, Marsit CJ. Reference-free cell mixture adjustments in analysis of DNA methylation data. Bioinform Oxf Engl. 2014;30(10):1431–9.
CAS
Google Scholar
Teschendorff AE, Breeze CE, Zheng SC, Beck S. A comparison of reference-based algorithms for correcting cell-type heterogeneity in epigenome-wide association studies. BMC Bioinform. 2017;18(1):105.
Google Scholar
Teschendorff A. Epigenetic Dissection of intra-sample-heterogeneity. 2017. https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/EpiDISH.html.
Zheng SC, Breeze CE, Beck S, Teschendorff AE. Identification of differentially methylated cell-types in epigenome-wide association studies. Nat Methods. 2018;15(12):1059–66.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Zheng S. CellDMC—a function which allows the identification of differentially methylated cell-types in Epigenome-Wide Association Studies (EWAS). 2018. https://rdrr.io/github/sjczheng/EpiDISH/man/CellDMC.html.
Horvath S. DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol. 2013;14(10):R115.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Hannum G, Guinney J, Zhao L, et al. Genome-wide methylation profiles reveal quantitative views of human aging rates. Mol Cell. 2013;49(2):359–67.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zhang Q, Vallerga CL, Walker RM, et al. Improved precision of epigenetic clock estimates across tissues and its implication for biological ageing. Genome Med. 2019;11(1):54.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Levine ME, Lu AT, Quach A, et al. An epigenetic biomarker of aging for lifespan and healthspan. Aging. 2018;10(4):573–91.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Yang Z, Wong A, Kuh D, et al. Correlation of an epigenetic mitotic clock with cancer risk. Genome Biol. 2016;17(1):205.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Lu AT, Quach A, Wilson JG, et al. DNA methylation GrimAge strongly predicts lifespan and healthspan. Aging. 2019;11(2):303–27.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Yang R, Wu GWY, Verhoeven JE, et al. A DNA methylation clock associated with age-related illnesses and mortality is accelerated in men with combat PTSD. Mol Psychiatry 2020;1–11.
Nejman D, Straussman R, Steinfeld I, et al. Molecular rules governing de novo methylation in cancer. Cancer Res. 2014;74(5):1475–83.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Tomasetti C, Vogelstein B. Cancer etiology. Variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions. Science. 2015;347(6217):78–81.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Teschendorff AE. A comparison of epigenetic mitotic-like clocks for cancer risk prediction. Genome Med. 2020;12:1–17.
Google Scholar
Horvath S. DNA methylation age calculator. http://dnamage.genetics.ucla.edu/.
Edgar R, Domrachev M, Lash AE. Gene expression omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(1):207–10.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
EWAS Datahub—National Genomics Data Center. [cited 2021 Apr 11 ]. https://bigd.big.ac.cn/ewas/datahub.
Xiong Z, Li M, Yang F, et al. EWAS Data Hub: a resource of DNA methylation array data and metadata. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(D1):D890–5.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
EWAS Atlas. [cited 2021 Apr 11]. http://bigd.big.ac.cn/ewas.
Li M, Zou D, Li Z, et al. EWAS Atlas: a curated knowledgebase of epigenome-wide association studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(Database issue):D983–8.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Domingo-Relloso A, Huan T, Haack K, et al. DNA methylation and cancer incidence: lymphatic-hematopoietic versus solid cancers in the Strong Heart Study. Clin Epigenet. 2021;13(1):43.
CAS
Google Scholar
Husquin LT, Rotival M, Fagny M, et al. Exploring the genetic basis of human population differences in DNA methylation and their causal impact on immune gene regulation. Genome Biol. 2018;19(1):222.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Galanter JM, Gignoux CR, Oh SS, et al. Differential methylation between ethnic sub-groups reflects the effect of genetic ancestry and environmental exposures. Elife. 2017;6:e20532.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Bayega A, Fahiminiya S, Oikonomopoulos S, Ragoussis J. Current and future methods for mRNA analysis: a drive toward single molecule sequencing. Methods Mol Biol Clifton NJ. 2018;1783:209–41.
Google Scholar
Nakato R, Sakata T. Methods for ChIP-seq analysis: a practical workflow and advanced applications. Methods San Diego Calif. 2021;187:44–53.
CAS
Google Scholar
Zhou L, Ng HK, Drautz-Moses DI, et al. Systematic evaluation of library preparation methods and sequencing platforms for high-throughput whole genome bisulfite sequencing. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):10383.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Carmona JJ, Accomando WP, Binder AM, et al. Empirical comparison of reduced representation bisulfite sequencing and Infinium BeadChip reproducibility and coverage of DNA methylation in humans. NPJ Genomic Med. 2017;2:13.
Google Scholar
Simpson JT, Workman RE, Zuzarte PC, et al. Detecting DNA cytosine methylation using nanopore sequencing. Nat Methods. 2017;14(4):407–10.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar