Skip to main content

Table 1 Studies of cadmium exposure biomarkers and DNA methylation outcomes (6 studies available)

From: Environmental chemicals and DNA methylation in adults: a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence

First author, year

Design

Population

Size

Men (%) a

Age Range (yr) a

Exposure assessment

Exposure categories

DNA methylation Assessment

DNA methylation endpoint

Association

95% Confidence Interval or p-value

Adjustment Factors

Hanna, 2012 [29]

CS

U.S. (Study of Metals and Assisted Reproductive Technologies [SMART])

42

0

Mean 36 (28 to 44)

Urine by DRC- ICPMS

Above and below the median

Whole blood

1,505 CpG sites percent methylation

  

Normalization. QC reported. BEE NR. CH partially addressed. Data unadjusted. MCC NR.

Median = 0.38 μg/L

 

Site specific Illumina GoldenGate and bisulfite pyrosequencing of significant regionsb

A trend towards hypermethylation if difference score > |30| (p < 0.05)No significant regionb.

Global by bisulfite pyrosequencing of LINE-1

Approximately 0.2 % increase in median DNAm

p = 0.39

Hossain, 2012 [54]

CS

Andean plateau, Northern Argentina

202

0

Median 34 (18-64)

 

Per log-unit increase

Whole blood

Average percent methylation

Difference

 

QC reported. CH not addressed. Only 4 participants were smokers. Regression models adjusted for age, coca chewing, and arsenic in urine. Cadmium concentrations corrected to the mean specific gravity of urine.

Bisulfite pyrosequencing

Blood by DRC-ICPMS (Median = 0.36 μg/L)

Site specific

MLH1

0.19

−0.53, 0.91

CDKN2A

0.24

−0.29, 0.77

Global LINE-1

0.45

−0.23, 1.12

Urine by DRC-ICPMS (Median = 0.23 μg/L)

Site specific

  

MLH1

−0.073

−0.50, 0.36

CDKN2A

−0.11

−0.42, 0.21

Global LINE-1

−0.42

−0.82, –0.025

Zhang, 2013 [55]

CS

Southern China

81

39.5

53.9 (IQR 48.0–59.0)

Graphite Furnace-AAS

Per log-unit increase

Whole blood

   

QC reported. CH not addressed. Regression models adjusted for age, sex, BMI, smoking, alcohol drinking, albumin, B2M, eGFR, N-acetyl-b-d glucosaminidase (NAG).

Site specific by bisulfite pyrosequencing in:

Average percent methylation

Difference

 

Blood (Median = 2.62 μg/L)

 

RASAL1

0.49

0.21, 0.77

KLOTHO

1.18

0.54, 1.83

Urine by (Median = 5.20 μg/g creatinine)

RASAL1

0.88

0.57, 1.20

KLOTHO

1.55

0.75, 2.35

Tajuddin, 2013 [30]

CS

Spain (EPICURO study)

659

89

66

Toenail by ICPMS (Median = 0.01 μg/g)

Per 1 μg/g increase

Blood granulocytes

Average percent methylation

Difference

 

QC reported. CH addressed. Adjusted for age, sex, study region, and smoking status

Global by bisulfite pyrosequencing in LINE-1

0.1

−0.3, 0.6

Sanders, 2014 [53]

Nested sub-CO

Durham county, US (CEHI study)

17

0

Maternal age: 28 (19–42)

Blood Median = 0.2 μg/L

Above and below the median

Blood leukocytes

Average percent methylation in 16 421 CpG islands

General pattern toward increased methylation with increased cadmium in 92 significantc genes

 

Normalization. BEE NR. CH addressed. No adjustment conducted, but evaluation of participant characteristics by cadmium and DNAm levels, with no significant differences reported. FDR corrected q-value provided. SNP-related clustering of DNA methylation not evaluated.

Site specific MBD2b/ MBD3L1 enrichment in Affymetrix Human Promoter 1.0R array

Fold-change of DNAm in top 5 significant sites:

 

TWSG1 = 1.79

0.0007

USP30 = 1.70

0.0023

FAM83H = 1.52

0.0052

PPP2R5B = 1.56

0.0060

PRKCG = 1.44

0.0068

Tellez-Plaza, 2014 [19]

CS

13 American Indian communities, US (SHS)

48

31.3

55 ± 7.3

Urine by ICPMS Median = 0.87 μg/g

Above and below the median in 1989-1991

Global by ELISA-like commercial kit

Logit-transformed percent methylation relative to cytosine genomic content

Odds ratio

 

QC reported. Models adjusted for age, sex,smoking status, BMI and, in prospective analyses only, log-transformed total count of white blood cells and percent of neutrophils.

Blood leukocytes in 1989–1991

1.75

0.96, 3.20

CO

Whole blood in 1997–1999

1.03

0.50, 2.11

  1. AAS: atomic absorption spectometry; BEE: batch effects evaluation; BMI: body mass index; CC: case-control; CH: Cell heterogeneity; CI: confidence interval; CO: cohort; CS: cross-sectional; DNAm, DNA methylation; FDR: false discovery rate; MCC: multiple comparison correction; NR: not reported; LOD: limit of detection; QC: quality control.
  2. aSociodemographic data available in the article, not necessarily in the subsample without missing values in DNA methylation or exposures.
  3. bSignificance was defined as a difference score > |13| (p < 0.05) and >10% absolute difference between the means for each group.
  4. cSignificance defined as a minimum absolute change of 30% comparing exposure groups and a p-value < 0.05.