Skip to main content

Table 1 Clinical and demographic parameters of the study sample, with global methylation change in participants stratified according to early weight gain status

From: DNA methylation may partly explain psychotropic drug-induced metabolic side effects: results from a prospective 1-month observational study

 

N

Total sample

Controlsa (n = 40)

Casesa (n = 39)

p-valueb

Age, median (range), y

79

37 (16–84)

37 (17–84)

39 (16–83)

0.56

Men, n (%)

79

40 (50.6)

20 (50.0)

20 (51.3)

0.9

Smoking, n (%)

79

40 (50.6)

26 (65.0)

14 (35.9)

0.01

Main diagnosis, n (%)

79

   

0.33

 Psychotic disorders (F20-F24; F28-F29)

 

36 (45.6)

17 (42.5)

19 (48.7)

 

 Schizoaffective disorders (F25)

 

10 (12.7)

6 (15.0)

4 (10.3)

 

 Bipolar disorders (F30–F31)

 

18 (22.8)

12 (30.0)

6 (15.4)

 

 Depressive disorders (F32–F33)

 

8 (10.1)

2 (5.0)

6 (15.4)

 

 Other

 

7 (8.9)

3 (7.5)

4 (10.3)

 

Psychotropic treatment group, n (%)c

79

   

0.74

 Low risk of WG

 

13 (16.5)

6 (15.0)

7 (18.0)

 

 Medium risk of WG

 

42 (53.2)

23 (57.5)

19 (48.7)

 

 High risk of WG

 

24 (30.4)

11 (27.5)

13 (33.3)

 

BMI, median (range), kg/m2

79

    

 Baseline

 

23.1 (15.2–37.5)

23.5 (17.1–36.5)

21.9 (15.2–37.5)

0.16

 First month

 

23.9 (17.0–39.5)

23.8 (17.1–36.5)

24.1 (17.0–39.5)

0.81

 p-valued

 

 < 10–4

 < 10–4

 < 10–4

 

WG, median (range), %

 

2.4 (0–23.0)

0.5 (0–2.4)

7 (5.2–23.0)

 < 10–4

Metabolic syndrome prevalence, n (%)e

51

    

 Baseline

 

3 (5.9)

3 (11.1)

0 (0.0)

0.09

 First month

 

8 (15.7)

4 (14.8)

4 (16.7)

0.86

 p-valued

 

0.23

0.32

0.05

 

Global baseline (T0) methylation (β-value), mean (range), %

79

61.78 (58.52–64.01)

61.80 (58.52–64.01)

61.77 (59.20–63.86)

0.87

Global methylation (β-value) increase (T1–T0), mean (95%CI), %

79

0.187 (0.185–0.190)

0.201 (0.198–0.204)

0.174 (0.170–0.177)

 < 2.2 × 10–16

  1. BMI body mass index, WG weight gain
  2. aPatients who gained 5% or more of their initial weight were considered cases, and patients whose weight remained stable were considered controls
  3. bStatistical significance for differences between groups was tested using the Wilcoxon Mann–Whitney rank-sum test for continuous variables (except for the differences in methylation levels which were assessed using Student’s t-test) and Pearson χ2 test of independence for categorical variables. Significant p-values (< 0.05) are indicated in bold
  4. cPsychotropic drugs are considered to confer a low, medium and high risk of metabolic side effects for amisulpride and aripiprazole; risperidone, quetiapine, mirtazapine and lithium; and valproate, clozapine and olanzapine, respectively
  5. dStatistical significance for differences between baseline and 1-month values was tested using the Wilcoxon signed rank test for matched pairs for continuous variables and McNemar test for categorical variables. Significant p values (< 0.05) are indicated in bold
  6. eMetabolic syndrome was evaluated according to the definition of the International Diabetes Federation [28]