Skip to main content

Table 2 Sensitivity analyses of serum iron biomarkers in 2021 datasets with epigenetic aging accelerations

From: Effects of iron homeostasis on epigenetic age acceleration: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Exposure

Outcome

Weighted median

MR-egger regression

Heterogeneitya

MR-PRESSO outlier detectb

Pleiotropyc

Beta (95% CI)

P Value

Beta (95% CI)

P value

Beta (95% CI)

P Value

Ferritin

Grim

− 0.17 (− 0.57, 0.22)

3.86E−01

0.33 (− 0.26, 0.92)

2.77E−01

I2 = 30.9%; Cochrane Q = 101; P = 0.008

No significant outliers

Intercept = -0.010; P = 0.374

Ferritin

Hannum

− 0.08 (− 0.45, 0.30)

6.85E−01

0.35 (− 0.17, 0.87)

1.95E−01

I2 = 17%; Cochrane Q = 84; P = 0.116

No significant outliers

Intercept = -0.012; P = 0.217

Ferritin

IE

0.07 (− 0.35, 0.49)

7.53E−01

0.16 (− 0.43, 0.76)

5.91E−01

I2 = 30.7%; Cochrane Q = 101; P = 0.009

-0.02 (-0.31, 0.27)

8.88E−01

Intercept = -0.003; P = 0.821

Ferritin

Pheno

0.24 (− 0.27, 0.75)

3.58E−01

0.70 (0.02, 1.39)

4.90E−02

I2 = 17%; Cochrane Q = 84; P = 0.117

No significant outliers

Intercept = -0.011; P = 0.418

Iron

Grim

0.53 (0.18, 0.87)

2.82E−03

0.45 (0.06, 0.84)

3.01E−02

I2 = 0%; Cochrane Q = 28; P = 0.743

No significant outliers

Intercept = -0.011; P = 0.374

Iron

Hannum

0.47 (0.12, 0.81)

7.57E−03

0.55 (0.18, 0.93)

6.71E−03

I2 = 0%; Cochrane Q = 28; P = 0.75

No significant outliers

Intercept = -0.019; P = 0.125

Iron

IE

0.67 (0.29, 1.04)

5.01E−04

0.75 (0.30, 1.21)

2.79E−03

I2 = 29.5%; Cochrane Q = 47; P = 0.056

No significant outliers

Intercept = -0.021; P = 0.159

Iron

Pheno

0.24 (− 0.21, 0.68)

2.93E−01

0.45 (− 0.16, 1.07)

1.60E−01

I2 = 35.8%; Cochrane Q = 53; P = 0.02

0.36 (0.03, 0.69)

3.96E−02

Intercept = -0.012; P = 0.534

Iron binding capacity

Grim

− 0.09 (− 0.32, 0.15)

4.71E−01

0.05 (− 0.25, 0.34)

7.66E−01

I2 = 27.8%; Cochrane Q = 78; P = 0.03

No significant outliers

Intercept = -0.007; P = 0.553

Iron binding capacity

Hannum

0.01 (− 0.20, 0.22)

9.18E−01

− 0.11 (− 0.37, 0.14)

3.94E−01

I2 = 6.6%; Cochrane Q = 60; P = 0.333

No significant outliers

Intercept = 0.001; P = 0.951

Iron binding capacity

IE

− 0.02 (− 0.28, 0.23)

8.58E−01

− 0.15 (− 0.49, 0.18)

3.72E−01

I2 = 42.3%; Cochrane Q = 97; P = 0.001

No significant outliers

Intercept = 0.009; P = 0.501

Iron binding capacity

Pheno

− 0.17 (− 0.44, 0.10)

2.19E−01

− 0.06 (− 0.43, 0.30)

7.29E−01

I2 = 22.5%; Cochrane Q = 72; P = 0.071

No significant outliers

Intercept = 0.005; P = 0.728

Transferrin saturation

Grim

0.24 (− 0.01, 0.49)

6.08E−02

0.18 (− 0.13, 0.49)

2.65E−01

I2 = 0%; Cochrane Q = 38; P = 0.547

No significant outliers

Intercept = -0.001; P = 0.909

Transferrin saturation

Hannum

0.26 (0.01, 0.52)

4.38E−02

0.29 (− 0.02, 0.59)

7.63E−02

I2 = 0%; Cochrane Q = 37; P = 0.626

No significant outliers

Intercept = -0.004; P = 0.700

Transferrin saturation

IE

0.22 (− 0.04, 0.47)

9.78E−02

0.35 (− 0.03, 0.73)

7.80E−02

I2 = 29.4%; Cochrane Q = 57; P = 0.042

No significant outliers

Intercept = -0.009; P = 0.490

Transferrin saturation

Pheno

0.38 (0.03, 0.73)

3.13E−02

0.64 (0.11, 1.17)

2.31E−02

I2 = 45.1%; Cochrane Q = 73; P = 0.001

0.38 (0.11, 0.65)

9.17E−03

Intercept = -0.025; P = 0.183

  1. aHeterogeneity in the random effect IVW methods was reported
  2. bMR-PRESSO (NbDistribution = 10,000, P < 0.05)
  3. cMR-Egger was used to detect pleiotropy. There is no pleiotropy was observed among all analyses (P > 0.05)
  4. CI, confidence interval, MR-PRESSO, Mendelian Randomization Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier, IE Intrinsic epigenetic