Skip to main content

Table 3 Findings of summary-level MR investigating effects of eGFR on EAA

From: Effects of epigenetic age acceleration on kidney function: a Mendelian randomization study

Outcome

Main analysis

Sensitivity analysisa

Genetic instruments

Egger intercept P

Primary method

Effect (95% CI)b

P

Genetic instruments

Egger intercept P

Primary method

Effect (95% CI)b

P

eGFR (eGFRcr + eGFRcys)c

IEAA

133 SNPs

0.91

IVW

− 1.55 (− 3.50, 0.40)

0.12

119 SNPs

0.78

IVW

− 1.57 (− 3.66, 0.52)

0.14

HannumAA

133 SNPs

0.23

IVW

− 3.14 (− 5.23, − 1.05)

0.003e

119 SNPs

0.24

IVW

− 2.78 (− 4.99, − 0.57)

0.01e

GrimAA

133 SNPs

0.17

IVW

− 1.99 (− 3.94, − 0.04)

0.05d

119 SNPs

0.40

IVW

− 1.79 (− 3.87, 0.28)

0.09

PhenoAA

133 SNPs

0.40

IVW

− 2.88 (− 5.21, − 0.54)

0.02e

119 SNPs

0.73

IVW

− 2.83 (− 5.28, − 0.37)

0.02e

eGFR (eGFRcr + BUN)c

IEAA

45 SNPs

0.98

IVW

− 2.08 (− 4.95, 0.79)

0.16

39 SNPs

0.83

IVW

− 1.99 (− 5.06, 1.07)

0.20

HannumAA

45 SNPs

0.35

IVW

− 3.24 (− 6.15, − 0.34)

0.03d

39 SNPs

0.37

IVW

− 3.27 (− 6.43, − 0.11)

0.04d

GrimAA

45 SNPs

0.53

IVW

− 1.31 (− 3.90, 1.29)

0.32

39 SNPs

0.52

IVW

− 1.53 (− 4.28, 1.22)

0.28

PhenoAA

45 SNPs

0.90

IVW

− 0.88 (− 4.29, 2.54)

0.62

39 SNPs

0.81

IVW

− 0.59 (− 4.24, 3.06)

0.75

  1. BUN Blood urea nitrogen; CI Confident interval; eGFR Estimated glomerular filtration rate; SNP Single nucleotide polymorphism; IVW Inverse variance weighted
  2. aSensitivity analysis using genetic instruments derived from variants after excluding SNPs with relatively weak EAA associations and significant pleiotropic effects with known confounders
  3. bEffect sizes were from genetically predicted 1 unit increase in log-transformed eGFR to year in EAA
  4. cGenetic instrument for kidney function is developed from a GWAS for creatinine-based eGFR, with an additional filter to only keep SNPs that are associated with a second marker of kidney function (cystatin C-based eGFR or BUN) after Bonferroni correction
  5. dNominally significant
  6. eSignificant after FDR correction