Skip to main content

Table 3 Mediation analysis of metabolic parameters on the association between dietary glycaemic parameters and methylation/hydroxymethylation measures

From: Association of nutritional glycaemic indices with global DNA methylation patterns: results from the Moli-sani cohort

Potential mediator

5mC versus GI

5hmC versus GI

5mC versus GL

Glucose

− 0.017 [− 0.119; 0.020],

0.37

− 0.007 [− 0.082; 0.020],

0.52

0.060 [− 0.014; 0.330],

0.10

C-peptide

0.002 [− 0.030; 0.050],

0.74

0.010 [− 0.039; 0.080],

0.56

1.69e−03 [− 4.97e−02; 0.06],

0.80

Insulin

− 3.32e−04 [− 3.87e−02; 0.03],

0.94

0.002 [− 0.026; 0.05],

0.77

9.30e−04 [− 4.99e−02; 0.07],

0.86

Total cholesterol

0.0002 [− 0.0308; 0.03],

0.93

7.02e−05 [− 2.66e−02; 0.03],

0.97

− 8.22e−03 [− 1.53e−01; 0.07],

0.65

LDL

0.002 [− 0.027; 0.06],

0.75

− 0.006 [− 0.076; 0.03],

0.68

− 1.06e−04 [− 3.95e−02; 0.04],

0.98

HDL

4.46e−04 [− 3.29e−02; 0.04],

0.90

3.91e−05 [− 2.63e−02; 0.03],

0.98

1.41e−03 [− 9.13e−02; 0.12],

0.93

CRP (log-scale)

5.69e−04 [− 3.45e−02; 0.04],

0.88

9.63e−04 [− 3.22e−02; 0.04],

0.83

− 2.48e−04 [− 5.30e−02; 0.04],

0.93

  1. Proportion of the association mediated (along with 95% Confidence Interval in squared brackets) and relevant p value is reported for each potential mediator tested. Note: since the proportion of mediated effect is computed as the proportion of average causal mediation effect (ACME) over total effect of the exposure on the outcome (TE), this may have also negative values when ACME and TE are not concordant. This scenario suggests no proportions of the association are mediated, as further supported by p values
  2. LDL low-density lipoprotein, HDL high-density lipoprotein, CRP C-reactive protein, GL Glycaemic Load, GI Glycaemic Index