Skip to main content

Table 2 Clinical features of TCGA patients based on EDARADD expression and methylation

From: Alterations in the methylome of the stromal tumour microenvironment signal the presence and severity of prostate cancer

TCGA DNA methylation

Bottom 0.25

Top 0.75

Pvalue

Patients, no.

97

290

 

Age, median (range)

62 (47–75)

62 (44–78)

0.5339a

Gleason Grade Group, no. (%)

 GG1

1 (1%)

26 (9%)

< 0.0001b

 GG2

18 (19%)

96 (33%)

 GG3

18 (19%)

63 (21%)

 GG4

16 (16%)

36 (12%)

 GG5

44 (45%)

69 (24%)

Clinical features, no. (%)

Pathologic T stage 2

24 of 96 (25%)

115 of 286 (40%)

0.0072c

Pathologic T stage 3+

72 (75%)

171 (60%)

Lymph node involvement

33 of 91 (36%)

36 of 240 (13%)

< 0.0001d

Patient follow-up

 Relapse, no of events

44

26

 

 Log rank teste

  

0.0095

 Cox modele

  

0.0167

TCGA RNA levels

Top 0.25

Bottom 0.75

Pvalue

Patients, no.

95

285

 

Age, median (range)

62 (46–78)

62 (44–77)

0.7623a

Gleason Grade Group, no. (%)

 GG1

1 (1%)

26 (9%)

< 0.0001b

 GG2

20 (24%)

94 (33%)

 GG3

20 (24%)

61 (21%)

 GG4

13 (15%)

36 (13%)

 GG5

41 (48%)

68 (24%)

Clinical features, no. (%)

 Pathologic T stage 2

16 of 94 (17%)

120 of 281 (43%)

< 0.0001c

 Pathologic T stage 3+

78 (83%)

161 (57%)

 Lymph node involvement

28 of 90 (31%)

34 of 223 (15%)

0.0026d

Patient follow up

 Relapse, no of events

42

27

 

 Log rank testf

  

0.0054

 Cox modelf

  

0.0005

  1. Sample numbers are based on the availability of clinical, methylation (387 samples) and expression (380 samples) data. Numbers in italics denote sample numbers where data was not available for some cases
  2. aUnpaired T test with Welch’s correction
  3. bChi-squared test for trend
  4. cThe Fisher exact test comparing the proportion of patients with T2 versus T3 disease
  5. dChi-squared test
  6. eLog rank HR = 0.48 (0.28–0.84), Cox model HR = 0.10 (0.012–0.66)
  7. fLog rank HR 1.96 (1.13–3.39), Cox model HR = 1.41 (1.16–1.72)