Skip to main content

Table 1 Level of evidence (LoE) of methylation markers assessed in two or more study series

From: Prognostic DNA methylation markers for sporadic colorectal cancer: a systematic review

Marker

Population

Reported association

LoE

REMARK score Median (range)c

Consistent resultsa

 IGFBP3

TNM stages 2–3

Poor prognosis

II

13.8 (11–14)

 CDKN2A (p16)

TNM stages 1–3b

Poor prognosis

II

11.5 (6.5–17.5)

 WNT5a

TNM stages 1–4

No influence on prognosis

II

12.5 (−)

 HPP1

TNM stage 4

Poor prognosis

II

12.5 (10–15)

 RET

TNM stage 2

Poor prognosis

II–III

15.5 (−)

 TFPA2E

TNM stages 1–4

Good prognosis

III

7.8 (5–10.5)

 Multimarker panel by Gaedcke et al. [40]

Locally advanced rectal cancer

Poor prognosis

III

12 (−)

 Multimarker panel by Kandimalla et al. [45]

TNM stage II

Poor prognosis

III

15

 HLTF

TNM stages 1–4

Poor prognosis

III–IV

15 (10–17.5)

 HPP1

TNM stages 1–4

Poor prognosis

IV

12.5 (10–15)

 EVL

TNM stages 1–4

Poor prognosis

IV

11

 CD109

TNM stages 1–4

Poor prognosis

IV

11

 NRCAM

TNM stages 1–4

Poor prognosis

IV

11

 FLNC

TNM stages 1–4

Poor prognosis

IV

11

Inconclusive results

 BNIP3

   

11.5 (17.5–9)

 MLH1

   

11.3 (10–15)

 MGMT

   

12 (5–17.5)

 RASSF1A

   

10.5 (5–17.5)

 CDKN2A (p14)

   

8 (5–17.5)

 APC

   

8.5 (5–17.5)

 CHFR

   

16 (17.5–14.5)

 ID4

   

9.5 (−)

 MYOD1

   

9.5 (9–10)

 SEPT9

   

14.75 (14.5–15)

 SFRP2

   

11 (10.5–11.5)

 MLH1 & CDKN2A

   

11 (10–12)

  1. a≥ 2 studies in similar populations showing consistent results
  2. b“Summarized definition”; subgroup definitions differ between specific studies
  3. cAll studies included that contribute to LoE, or all overall results if LoE was inconclusive