Skip to main content

Table 4 Findings from nine studies investigating the timing and/or duration of socioeconomic position and DNA methylation

From: Associations between indicators of socioeconomic position and DNA methylation: a scoping review

References

DNAm approach

SEP exposure age(s)a

Reported age(s) at DNAmb

Key findingsc

Sensitive period of child SEP on child or adult DNAm

    

Dunn et al. [71]

EWAS

Child (prospectively measured 5×)

7

Neighborhood disadvantage and financial stress associated with 10 and 9 CpGs (pbonf < 1 × 10−7), respectively, with 8 and 2 of these differentially methylated sites relating to the developmental timing of SEP exposure in very early childhood (birth to age 2)

Lam et al. [72]

EWAS

Child (retrospectively measured) + Adult

Mdn = 33.04

Low child SEP associated with 3 CpGs (q < 0.25), while current (adult) SEP did not

Borghol et al. [69]

EWAS

Child (prospectively measured) + Adult

42 + 45

Child SEP associated with 1252 gene promoters, while adult SEP associated with 545 (q ≤ 0.2). Child and adult SEP-associated promoter sets overlapped at 63 promoters

Sensitive period of adult SEP on adult DNAm

    

Stringhini et al. [61]

Candidate Gene

Child (retrospectively measured) + Adult

~ 45–63

Current (adult) SEP associated with 41 CpGs in 10 genes (q ≤ 5.10 × 10−3), while child SEP did not have any associations when FDR procedure was applied

Subramanyam et al. [46]

Global DNAm

Child (retrospectively measured) + Adult

M = 61

One SD higher adult wealth associated, on average, with 0.09% higher Alu (p < 0.01) and 0.15% lower LINE-1 DNAm (p < 0.01), while adult income, adult education, and child SEP did not associate with LINE-1 or Alu DNAm

Sensitive periods of both child and adult SEP on adult DNAm

    

Tehranifar et al. [47]

Global DNAm

Child (prospectively measured) + Adult

M = 43

For child SEP, lower maternal education and lower family income associated with higher mean levels of Sat-2 DNAm (p < 0.05 and p < 0.10, respectively); single-parent family structure compared to two-parent structure associated with higher Alu methylation (p < 0.05). Adult income associated with increased LINE-1 methylation (p < 0.05)

Suderman et al. [77]

EWAS

Child (prospectively measured) + Adult

45

Child SEP associated with 2 CpGs, while adult SEP associated with 3 CpGs (q < 0.2) in whole blood or LCLs. None of the SEP-associated CpGs were shared between child and adult SEP

Needham et al. [59]

Candidate Gene

Child (retrospectively measured) + Adult

M = 69.55

Low child SEP associated with DNAm in 3 stress- and 2 inflammation-related genes, whereas low adult SEP primarily associated with DNAm in inflammation-related genes (5 inflammation- and 1 stress-related gene; all p < 0.05; q < 0.20). SEP-DNAm associations between child and adult SEP overlapped at 3 of 9 total candidate genes

Effects of life-course SEP trajectories on adult DNAm

    

McDade et al. [75]

EWAS

Child + Adult (prospectively measured 4×)

M = 20.9

Persistently low SEP from infancy to young adulthood associated with 2546 CpGs (q < 0.05), compared to persistently high SEP. One CpG associated with DNAm for upward SEP mobility group and no sites associated with the downward mobility group (q < 0.05)

Stringhini et al. [61]

Candidate Gene

Child (retrospectively measured) + Adult

~ 45–63

Persistently low SEP from childhood to adulthood associated with 12 CpGs in 6 genes, compared to persistently high SEP, while downward SEP and upward SEP mobility groups associated with 5 CpGs in 4 genes and 1 CpG in 1 gene, respectively (q ≤ 1.49 × 10−3)

Needham et al. [59]

Candidate Gene

Child (retrospectively measured) + Adult

M = 69.55

Persistently low SEP from childhood to adulthood associated with DNAm in 5 genes, upward SEP mobility associated with 1 gene, and downward mobility associated with 2 genes in comparison with persistently high SEP (p < 0.05; q < 0.20)

  1. Studies presented in this table are categorized by general findings in support of sensitive periods of child SEP, adult SEP, or both and DNAm, and by findings from SEP trajectory studies. Within these categories, studies are shown in descending order of DNAm assessment age
  2. CpGs CpG site, DNAm DNA methylation, FDR false discovery rate, LCLs lymphoblastoid cell lines, M mean, Mdn median, SEP socioeconomic position, SD standard deviation
  3. aSEP exposure age column reports the life-course period of exposure captured (prenatal, child, adult) and notes whether measure was prospectively or retrospectively assessed. Number of assessments indicated (e.g., 2×, 3×) if same SEP indicator was measured at more than one timepoint per life course group
  4. bReported age at DNAm age column reports the age of DNAm assessment in years (as reported by individual studies)
  5. cp values indicate uncorrected significance thresholds; q-values and pbonf-values indicate p values after adjustment for multiple testing by false discovery rate (FDR) and Bonferroni methods, respectively