Skip to main content

Table 3 Associations between socioeconomic position and DNA methylation from epigenome-wide association studies (n = 12)

From: Associations between indicators of socioeconomic position and DNA methylation: a scoping review

References

N

SEP indicator

DNAm

Effecta

Exposure age(s)b

SEP domain(s)c

Assessment age(s)b

Targeted CpGs

↑↓

Associated CpGs

Associated SEP indicator

Significance threshold

Santos et al. [76]

426

 ~ Birth

Comp., Ed., Misc., Sub

Birth

856,832

1

Ed

q < 0.05

↑↓

3

Misc

q < 0.05

↑↓

6

Comp

q < 0.05

↑↓

10

Misc

q < 0.05

Laubach et al. [73]

609

Prenatal

Comp., Ed., In., Misc., Neigh., Sub

Birth, Child 2×

Birth: 394,460

↑↓

3

Comp

pbonf < 0.05

3 yr: 394,460

1

Comp

pbonf < 0.05

7 yr: 394,460

 

0

 

pbonf < 0.05

Alfano et al. [67]

860

Prenatal

Ed., Occ

Birth, Child 2×

Birth: 285,021

↑↓

4

Ed

q < 0.05

7 yr: 285,994

 

0

 

q < 0.05

15 yr: 285,721

↑↓

20

Ed

q < 0.05

Bush et al. [70]

178

Child

Ed., In

Child

409,878

↑↓

1

Ed

q ≤ 0.05, delta ≥ 0.10

↑↓

8

In

q ≤ 0.05, delta ≥ 0.10

Dunn et al. [71]

650

Child 5×

Neigh., Misc

Child

473,929

↑↓

10

Neigh

pbonf < 1 × 10−7

↑↓

9

Misc

pbonf < 1 × 10−7

Beach et al. [68]

398

Child 3×

Comp

Adult

47,311

↑↓

2032

Comp

q < 0.05

Borghol et al. [69]

40

Life course

Comp

Adult

223,359

↑↓

1252

Comp. (Child)

q ≤ 0.20

↑↓

545

Comp. (Adult)

q ≤ 0.20

Lam et al. [72]

92

Life course

Occ

Adult

22,922

 

0

 

q < 0.05

McDade et al. [75]

489

Life course

Ed., In., Misc

Adult

110,631

↑↓

2546

Comp

q < 0.05

↑↓

1437

Ed

q < 0.05

↑↓

817

Misc

q < 0.05

↑↓

107

In

q < 0.05

Suderman et al. [77]

28

Life course

Comp., Ed., Misc

Adult

361,419

2

Comp. (Child)

q < 0.20

↑↓

3

Comp. (Adult)

q < 0.20

Karlsson Linnér et al. [74]d

10,767

Adult

Ed

Adult

442,227

↑↓

37

Ed

pbonf < 1 × 10−7

van Dongen et al. [78]d

4152

Adult

Ed

Adult

410,746

58

Ed

pbonf < 1.2 × 10−7

  1. Studies presented in this table are shown in order of DNAm assessment age, then by SEP exposure age followed by alphabetically. For individual-level study details, see Additional file 2: Table S3
  2. Comp. composite, CpGs CpG sites, DNAm DNA methylation, Ed. Education, In income, Misc. miscellaneous (i.e., “other” domain), Neigh. neighborhood, Sub. subsidy, SEP socioeconomic position, Yr years
  3. aEffects reported from the most stringent significance test within the simplest (or unadjusted) model. General direction of effect for association between DNAm and SEP measure reported by arrows, indicating increased or decreased DNAm levels for low SEP. Associated SEP domain reported with exposure age provided in parenthesis if both child and adult SEP exposures were analyzed. Here, q-values and pbonf-values indicate significance threshold after p values were corrected for multiple testing using the false discovery rate (FDR) and Bonferroni methods, respectively; delta value indicates delta beta (DNAm difference between the minimum and maximum levels of SEP measure) threshold
  4. bSEP exposure and DNAm assessment ages are reported by life course group: prenatal (< 0 years), birth (~ 0 years), child (0–18 years), adult (18+ years). Number of assessments indicated (e.g., 2×, 3×) if SEP or DNAm was measured at more than one timepoint per life course group. “Life course” indicates ages of exposure spanned prenatal, birth, or childhood to adulthood
  5. cThe type of SEP domain covered by SEP indicators included in each study to assess socioeconomic factors. For full list of SEP indicators and domains included by individual studies, see Additional file 2: Table S3
  6. dMeta-analysis