Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of the investigation into associations between CpG sites associated with metabolic measures and clinical outcomes, and the effect on associations when adjusting for lipid-lowering drug intake

From: DNA methylation and lipid metabolism: an EWAS of 226 metabolic measures

CpG

Gene

Outcome

Model 1: Without adjustment for intake of lipid-lowering drugs

Model 2: Adjustment for intake of lipid-lowering drugs

Significant in

Beta value

M1

P_M1

Bonf P

M1

OR (95% CI)

M1

Beta

value

M2

P_M2

Bonf P M2

OR (95%_CI)

M2

cg19693031

TXNIP

Diabetes

 − 0.56

4.33E−09

2.08E−07

0.57

(0.47–0.69)

 − 0.59

1.32E−09

6.32E−08

0.55

(0.46–0.67)

M1 and M2

cg06500161a

ABCG1

MI

0.70

2.87E−05

1.38E−03

2.02

(1.45–2.8)

0.41

2.56E−02

1

1.5

(1.05–2.15)

M1 only

cg17901584

DHCR24

MI

 − 0.65

4.37E−04

2.10E−02

0.52

(0.37–0.75)

 − 0.17

4.04E−01

1

0.85

(0.57–1.25)

M1 only

cg06500161b

ABCG1

obesity

0.35

3.94E−08

1.89E−06

1.42

(1.25–1.61)

0.36

2.54E−08

1.22E−06

1.43

(1.26–1.63)

M1 and M2

cg27243685b

ABCG1

Obesity

0.29

5.56E−06

2.67E−04

1.34

(1.18–1.52)

0.30

3.96E−06

1.90E−04

1.35

(1.19–1.53)

M1 and M2

cg00574958b

CPT1A

Obesity

 − 0.29

3.30E−06

1.58E−04

0.75

(0.66–0.85)

 − 0.29

2.86E−06

1.37E−04

0.75

(0.66–0.84)

M1 and M2

cg07504977b

LINC00263

Obesity

0.21

1.02E−03

4.87E−02

1.23

(1.09–1.39)

0.21

1.04E−03

4.98E−02

1.23

(1.09–1.39)

M1 and M2

cg16246545b

PHGDH

Obesity

 − 0.29

5.88E−07

2.82E−05

0.74

(0.66–0.84)

 − 0.29

1.27E−06

6.11E−05

0.75

(0.67–0.84)

M1 and M2

cg06690548b

SLC7A11

Obesity

 − 0.31

2.75E−07

1.32E−05

0.73

(0.65–0.83)

 − 0.30

3.76E−07

1.80E−05

0.74

(0.66–0.83)

M1 and M2

cg11024682b

SREBF1

Obesity

0.34

1.26E−06

6.03E−05

1.4

(1.22–1.6)

0.34

1.34E−06

6.45E−05

1.4

(1.22–1.6)

M1 and M2

  1. Associations of CpG site-clinical outcome in the KORA F4 cohort. Clinical outcomes: previous myocardial infarction, prevalent type 2 diabetes, obesity, and prevalent hypertension. Model 1: logistic regression model with clinical outcome as dependent variable and technically adjusted methylation value as independent variable, adjusted for the following covariates: age, sex, BMI (except for obesity model), C-reactive protein levels, hemoglobin A1c levels (except for diabetes model), history of myocardial infarction (except for the myocardial infarction model), smoking status, alcohol intake, current hypertension (except for the hypertension model), physical activity, white blood cell count, and estimated proportions of white blood cell types. Model 2: additionally adjusted for intake of lipid-lowering drugs (yes/no). Only statistically significant results are shown. P: p value; M1: model 1; M2: model 2; OR: odds ratio for a 1 standard deviation increase in methylation; CI: confidence interval
  2. aAssociation using KORA F4 data in [15]
  3. bAssociation using KORA F4 data in [25]