Skip to main content

Table 3 Differentially methylated CGI tiles found in all pair-wise comparisons

From: Genome-wide assessment of DNA methylation in mouse oocytes reveals effects associated with in vitro growth, superovulation, and sexual maturity

Comparison

Total CGI tiles (p value < 0.05)

Genes associated with Hypomethylated CGI (≥ 20% methylation difference)

Genes associated with Hypermethylated CGI (≥ 20% methylation difference)

IFC vs. SO

85

Fzd5, Phf19, Kctd8, Repin1, Iqsec1, Foxp1, Fgfr1, Cnot7, Gm20388, Col13a1, Jmjd1c, Foxred2, Ccnd3, Kcnn2, Csf2ra

Qtrt1, Fam100b, Pick1

SO vs. SOA

107

Slc12a5, Kctd8, Fbxl3

Casz1, Ncor1, Tmem121, Ryr2, Sfrp5

SOA vs. IV

60

–

Nkpd1, Bcan, Krt7, Ncor1, Golim4, Manf

  1. The experimental group in bold is considered the control in the comparison, while the other group is hyper or hypomethylated. The underlined gene names are those previously identified by the 100 CpG window unbiased analysis