Skip to main content

Table 2 The association between LINE-1 methylation status and clinical variables of the study population (stage III and high-risk stage II CRCs)

From: Associations and prognostic implications of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and tumoral LINE-1 methylation status in stage III colon cancer patients

Parameters

LINE-1 methylation levels (low vs. high)a

Cancer sample (n = 336)

Normal lymph node sample (n = 336)

OR

(95 % C.I.)

P b

OR

(95 % C.I.)

P b

Gender

 (Male vs. female)

1.49

(0.921–2.406)

0.104

1.06

(0.670–1.677)

0.803

Age

 (≥60 years vs. <60 years)

1.20

(0.752–1.899)

0.450

0.95

(0.611–1.480)

0.823

BMI

 (Overweight vs. normal)

1.24

(0.775–1.996)

0.366

1.76

(1.118–2.765)

0.015

Tumor location

 (Distal vs. proximal)

0.81

(0.474–1.373)

0.429

1.26

(0.762–2.079)

0.370

Pathology

 (Mucinous vs. non-mucinous)

0.83

(0.196–3.521)

0.802

1.44

(0.349–5.926)

0.616

Differentiation

 (High grade vs. low grade)

0.37

(0.111–1.211)

0.100

0.68

(0.213–2.173)

0.515

T stage

 (T4 vs. T1, 2, 3)

0.81

(0.403–1.629)

0.555

0.68

(0.347–1.324)

0.255

N stage

 (N2 vs. N 0, 1)

1.24

(0.715–2.156)

0.443

1.15

(0.681–1.938)

0.602

Microsatellite status

 (MSI-H vs. MSS + MSI-L)

0.33

(0.106–1.008)

0.052

0.76

(0.283–2.026)

0.580

Performance status

 (PS ≥1 vs. PS = 0)

2.56

(1.601–4.102)

<0.001

1.12

(0.718–1.752)

0.615

  1. BMI body mass index, MSI-H microsatellite instability, MSS microsatellite stable, MSI-L microsatellite instability-low, PS performance status
  2. aCut-off points of LINE-1 methylation proportion were 54.62 % in cancer tissue samples and 77.00 % in normal lymph node samples
  3. bUnconditional logistic regression, adjusted for other selected covariates