Skip to main content

Table 3 Correlations between downregulation of NEARS and poor prognostic factors in clinical prostate tumors

From: Polycomb-mediated silencing in neuroendocrine prostate cancer

Clinical parameters associated with NEARS

Analysis

Concept

Dataset

Odds ratio

P value

Percentile

Samples

1° vs Met

Metastasis

Lapointe Prostate

2.4

1.3E-04

Top 10%

71

Metastasis

LaTulippe Prostate

2.4

4.5E-04

Top 10%

32

Metastasis

Yu Prostate

3.5

2.0E-07

Top 10%

88

Metastasis

Grasso Prostate

3.8

5.6E-13

Top 10%

94

Metastasis

Vanaja Prostate

4.6

8.4E-18

Top 10%

32

Metastasis

Taylor Prostate 3

6.0

2.0E-26

Top 10%

150

Grade

Advanced Gleason Score

Wallace Prostate

2.2

3.4E-04

Top 10%

65

Advanced Gleason Score

Vanaja Prostate

2.4

6.6E-06

Top 10%

27

Advanced Gleason Score

Lapointe Prostate

3.4

1.8E-05

Top 5%

61

Advanced Gleason Score

Tomlins Prostate

3.6

1.9E-08

Top 10%

30

Advanced Gleason Score

Taylor Prostate 3

3.6

4.4E-08

Top 5%

130

Advanced Gleason Score

Yu Prostate

4.4

4.1E-07

Top 5%

61

Advanced Gleason Score

Setlur Prostate

7.6

2.8E-04

Top 1%

353

High Grade

Bittner Prostate

2.5

3.3E-04

Top 5%

46

Outcome

Dead at 3 years

Setlur Prostate

2.4

2.0E-03

Top 10%

358

Recurrence at 5 years

Taylor Prostate 3

3.1

1.3E-09

Top 10%

61

Recurrence at 3 years

Taylor Prostate 3

3.5

1.0E-11

Top 10%

107

Recurrence at 5 years

Nakagwa Prostate

10.1

1.0E-03

Top 10%

592

Dead at 5 years

Setlur Prostate

10.7

2.9E-06

Top 1%

363

Recurrence at 3 years

Nakagwa Prostate

15.2

7.9E-04

Top 5%

594