Open Access

Maternal B vitamins: effects on offspring weight and DNA methylation at genomically imprinted domains

  • Lauren E. McCullough1, 2, 6Email author,
  • Erline E. Miller1,
  • Michelle A. Mendez3,
  • Amy P. Murtha4,
  • Susan K. Murphy4 and
  • Cathrine Hoyo5
Clinical EpigeneticsThe official journal of the Clinical Epigenetics Society20168:8

DOI: 10.1186/s13148-016-0174-9

Received: 5 November 2015

Accepted: 14 January 2016

Published: 22 January 2016



Inadequate maternal nutrition during early fetal development can create permanent alterations in the offspring, leading to poor health outcomes. While nutrients involved in one-carbon cycle metabolism are important to fetal growth, associations with specific nutrients remain inconsistent. This study estimates associations between maternal vitamins B12, B6 (pyridoxal phosphate [PLP] and 4-pyridoxic acid [PA]), and homocysteine (Hcy) concentrations, offspring weight (birth weight and 3-year weight gain), and DNA methylation at four differentially methylated regions (DMRs) known to be involved in fetal growth and development (H19, MEG3, SGCE/PEG10, and PLAGL1).


Study participants (n = 496) with biomarker and birth weight data were enrolled as part of the Newborn Epigenetics STudy. Weight gain data were available for 273 offspring. Among 484 mother-infant pairs, DNA methylation at regulatory sequences of genomically imprinted genes was measured in umbilical cord blood DNA using bisulfite pyrosequencing. We used generalized linear models to estimate associations.


Multivariate adjusted regression models revealed an inverse association between maternal Hcy concentration and male birth weight (β = −210.40, standard error (SE) = 102.08, p = 0.04). The offspring of the mothers in the highest quartile of B12 experienced lower weight gain between birth and 3 years compared to the offspring of the mothers in the lowest (β = −2203.03, SE = 722.49, p = 0.003). Conversely, maternal PLP was associated with higher weight gain in males; higher maternal PLP concentrations were also associated with offspring DNA methylation levels at the MEG3 DMR (p < 0.01).


While maternal concentrations of B12, B6, and Hcy do not associate with birth weight overall, they may play an important role in 3-year weight gain. This is the first study to report an association between maternal PLP and methylation at the MEG3 DMR which may be an important epigenetic tag for maternal B vitamin adequacy.


B vitamins Birth weight Childhood weight gain DNA methylation Imprinted genes Epidemiology


Size at birth is a strong predictor of infant growth and survival and has been linked to lifelong health outcomes [1]. Low birth weight (LBW, <2500 g) is associated with augmented risk of adult chronic conditions including the following: obesity, cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and some cancers [2, 3]. The period of intrauterine growth may therefore be characterized by heightened vulnerability from both endogenous and exogenous factors.

While maternal nutrition during fetal development has been shown to have long-term health consequences for the offspring [4], the impact of specific nutrients on fetal and childhood outcomes remains unresolved. Nutrients involved in one-carbon cycle (1-CC) metabolism are essential for nucleic acid synthesis, DNA methylation, and cellular growth [5]. These nutrients are particularly important in fetal tissue differentiation. Thus, deficiencies in this pathway could be associated with fetal growth restriction, LBW, and early-life weight gain (WG). Understanding the association between these nutrients and offspring weight may be crucial in uncovering modifiable ways to prevent LBW and downstream health effects.

The 1-CC metabolism pathway provides methyl groups for DNA methylation reactions and is dependent on several enzymes in the presence of dietary micronutrients. Key micronutrients in this pathway include folate, choline, and co-factors such as vitamins B6 and B12. While the literature supports an association between low maternal blood folate concentrations and small size at birth [6], data regarding associations between fetal growth and maternal levels of vitamins B6, B12, and homocysteine (a marker of impaired folate status) remain equivocal [7]. Further, data linking maternal micronutrient concentrations to early-life outcomes are limited [8].

Inadequate maternal 1-CC nutrients have been linked to lower DNA methylation at the agouti locus [9] during critical periods of early embryonic development, and in this model epigenetic programs, the offspring to adult obesity, diabetes, and cancer [10]. The plasticity of the epigenome may offer a mechanistic link between maternal nutrition and adult disease [11]. DNA methylation is the most widely studied epigenetic modification and is integral in regulating gene expression [12]. Despite the importance of 1-CC nutrients in DNA methylation, few studies have investigated whether maternal micronutrient concentrations influence offspring DNA methylation patterns [1315], and most have primarily focused on folate.

The aim of this study was to examine the association between maternal serum concentrations of vitamin B12 (B12), pyridoxal phosphate (PLP), 4-pyridoxic acid (PA), homocysteine (Hcy), and offspring weight at birth through age 3 years in an ethnically diverse population. We further sought to explore the potential effects of maternal micronutrient concentrations on the methylation patterns of genomically imprinted gene differentially methylated regions (DMRs). While there are more than 80 recognized imprinted genes in humans [16], we selected four DMRs (H19, MEG3, SGCE/PEG10, and PLAGL1) known to be important in fetal growth and development [17, 18] and previously associated with maternal B vitamin concentrations in cross-sectional studies [1315].


The majority of women included in these analyses were aged 20–29 years (56 %), were black (42 %), and had low income (55 %). Notably, 26 % of the study participants smoked prior to or during pregnancy, and a large proportion of women supplemented with folic acid (FA) (89 %). Blood draw occurred during the first trimester for most participants (64 %). Table 1 provides the median (range) for maternal micronutrient concentrations of B12, PLP, PA, and Hcy by maternal and offspring characteristics. Concentrations of PLP and PA were substantially (p < 0.05) lower among Black than White mothers.
Table 1

Study participant characteristics by maternal B vitamin concentrations: Newborn Epigenetic STudy (N = 496)



B12 (ng/L)

PLP (nM/L)

PA (nM/L)

Hcy (umoL/L)

N = 489

N = 496

N = 496

N = 480


N (%)

Median (range)

Age at delivery (year)



278 (56%)

428.44 (56.13–2628.11)

6.66 (0.00–54.90)

2.85 (0.00–179.19)

0.69 (0.30–1.34)

 18–< 20

22 (4%)

419.05 (216.96–834.27)

7.30 (1.25–32.19)

3.43 (0.00–24.92)

0.75 (0.44–0.98)


147 (30%)

495.38 (151.24–3664.91)

8.46 (0.00–173.86)

3.70 (0.00–218.44)

0.70 (0.33–1.54)


50 (10%)

411.46 (148.62–2779.17)

9.02 (0.41–76.90)

2.85 (0.00–122.61)

0.71 (0.35–1.07)




186 (42%)

431.76 (109.44–1249.75)

5.62 (0.00–34.58)

2.41 (0.00–130.60)

0.70 (0.30–1.54)


133 (30%)

493.67 (56.13–3664.91)

8.87 (0.00–173.86)

4.85 (0.00–218.44)

0.73 (0.44–1.19)


121 (28%)

432.25 (93.47–2779.17)

8.07 (1.60–30.24)

2.94 (0.00–30.01)

0.69 (0.33–1.22)

Preterm birth



468 (94%)

444.02 (56.13–3664.91)

7.35 (0.00–173.86)

3.21 (0.00–218.44)

0.70 (0.30–1.54)


29 (6%)

485.71 (162.05–891.89)

7.91 (0.00–34.58)

3.24 (0.00–30.01)

0.66 (0.33–1.08)

Marital status



186 (38%)

485.98 (148.62–3664.91)

8.89 (0.00–173.86)

4.25 (0.00–218.44)

0.71 (0.30–1.22)

 Never married

141 (29%)

443.03 (56.13–2628.11)

5.86 (0.95–34.58)

2.57 (0.00–130.60)

0.70 (0.35–1.34)

 Living with partner

136 (28%)

406.87 (133.52–1570.18)

7.73 (0.00–31.59)

2.94 (0.00–35.09)

0.69 (0.44–1.54)


28 (5%)

398.20 (128.05–2779.17)

7.55 (0.00–35.12)

2.55 (0.00–11.38)

0.71 (0.33–1.10)

Parity (at enrollment)



320 (65%)

443.89 (56.13–3664.91)

6.74 (0.00–173.86)

2.77 (0.00–218.44)

0.69 (0.33–1.54)


176 (35%)

454.01 (109.44–1600.50)

9.02 (0.00–63.59)

4.34 (0.00–186.65)

0.71 (0.30–1.21)

Household income



215 (55%)

414.91 (128.05–2779.17)

6.66 (0.00–56.00)

2.71 (0.00–30.01)

0.68 (0.35–1.34)


54 (14%)

426.39 (162.05–855.61)

6.25 (0.00–173.86)

3.20 (0.00–218.44)

0.72 (0.30–1.54)


73 (18%)

500.13 (143.07–3664.91)

9.92 (0.00–76.90)

4.67 (0.00–179.19)

0.73 (0.43–1.19)


50 (13%)

507.86 (148.62–1600.50)

11.32 (1.34–63.59)

5.52 (0.79–186.65)

0.68 (0.44–1.10)



 College graduate

145 (29%)

508.50 (148.62–3664.91)

9.15 (0.00–173.86)

4.60 (0.00–218.44)

0.70 (0.30–1.21)

 High school/GED

108 (22%)

381.84 (56.13–1038.75)

6.02 (0.00–54.90)

2.63 (0.00–179.19)

0.70 (0.40–1.14)

 Less than high school

166 (34%)

437.94 (93.47–2779.17)

6.78 (0.00–35.12)

2.74 (0.00–30.01)

0.68 (0.33–1.34)

 Some college

75 (15%)

415.24 (195.26–1600.50)

7.08 (0.00–56.00)

3.18 (0.00–119.67)

0.72 (0.48–1.54)

Body Mass Index (kg/m2)



195 (41%)

482.78 (93.47–2779.17)

8.35 (0.00–173.86)

3.95 (0.00–218.44)

0.70 (0.40–1.22)


149 (31%)

436.88 (140.80–3664.91)

6.92 (0.41–52.23)

2.75 (0.00–130.60)

0.69 (0.30–1.34)


135 (28%)

392.29 (56.13–1570.18)

5.85 (0.00–39.70)

2.78 (0.00–36.57)

0.71 (0.40–1.54)

Smoking status


 No smoking

358 (74%)

450.11 (93.47–2779.17)

7.91 (0.00–173.86)

3.31 (0.00–218.44)

0.70 (0.30–1.34)

 Smoking prior to pregnancy

49 (10%)

433.03 (195.26–3664.91)

7.71 (0.00–70.22)

3.42 (0.00–129.48)

0.65 (0.44–1.04)

 Smoking during pregnancy

79 (16%)

447.62 (56.13–1570.18)

5.27 (0.35–39.70)

2.74 (0.30–130.60)

0.71 (0.40–1.54)

Folic acid supplementation



433 (89%)

441.19 (56.13–2779.17)

7.04 (0.00–76.90)

3.08 (0.00–186.65)

0.70 (0.30–1.54)


52 (11%)

461.59 (143.07–3664.91)

9.87 (2.34–173.86)

3.49 (0.00–218.44)

0.69 (0.45–1.19)

Gestational diabetes



461 (94%)

447.62 (56.13–3664.91)

7.35 (0.00–173.86)

3.10 (0.00–218.44)

0.69 (0.30–1.54)


30 (6%)

415.23 (195.26–841.23)

9.07 (1.43–33.29)

3.41 (0.93–36.57)

0.72 (0.53–1.07)

Gestational age at blood draw


 1st trimester

316 (64%)

455.71 (56.13–3664.91)

8.85 (0.00–173.86)

3.51 (0.00–218.44)

0.71 (0.30–1.54)

 2nd trimester

166 (33%)

415.23 (109.44–2779.17)

5.77 (0.00–32.19)

2.70 (0.00–36.57)

0.66 (0.40–1.34)

 3rd trimester

15 (3%)

301.80 (216.96–759.84)

3.06 (0.35–11.64)

2.16 (0.00–30.01)

0.62 (0.44–1.03)

Infant sex



248 (50%)

444.75 (109.44–3664.91)

7.33 (0.00–76.90)

3.25 (0.00–179.19)

0.70 (0.33–1.19)


249 (50%)

447.77 (56.13–2779.17)

7.54 (0.00–173.86)

3.18 (0.00–218.44)

0.69 (0.30–1.54)

B 12 vitamin B12, PLP pyridoxal phosphate, PA 4-pyridoxic acid, Hcy homocysteine

Associations between maternal micronutrient concentrations (e.g., B12, PLP, PA, and Hcy) and birth weight

The mean birth weight in our study sample was 3294 g (standard deviation = 541 g). Table 2 presents adjusted regression coefficient estimates (βs) and standard errors (SE) for the multivariate association between maternal micronutrient concentrations and infant birth weight, as well as sex-specific estimates. All models adjusted for race/ethnicity, gestational age at blood draw and delivery, marital status, parity, income, pre-pregnancy BMI, and maternal smoking. While we observed a monotonic increase in birth weight with increasing PLP and decrease in birth weight with increasing Hcy among all participants, our estimates were imprecise.
Table 2

Adjusted regression coefficients for maternal B vitamins and birth weight by infant sex: Newborn Epigenetic STudy (N = 496)


Infant sex


All participants (N = 496)

Male infants (N = 248)

Female infants (N = 248)

Maternal B vitamin

β coefficient, standard error, p value



 ≤322.47 ng/L




 322.48–446.04 ng/L

−12.89,70.83, 0.86

59.38, 104.12,0.58

−29.38, 101.01,0.77

 446.05–575.51 ng/L

−35.89, 69.24, 0.60

−59.18, 105.57,0.58

13.55, 95.10, 0.88

 >575.51 ng/L

1.85, 69.82, 0.98

108.19, 100.01,0.28

−63.02, 99.61,0.53

 p for interaction




 ≤3.76 nM/L




 3.77–7.47 nM/L

−72.75, 71.50, 0.31

3.37, 106.39, 0.97

−126.43, 102.07, 0.22

 7.48–12.05 nM/L

−45.61, 73.22, 0.53

−28.02, 114.15, 0.81

−15.02, 99.25, 0.88

 >12.05 nM/L

39.81, 75.75, 0.60

43.48, 119.08,0.72

56.05, 100.69, 0.58

 p for interaction




 ≤2.06 nM/L




 2.07–3.21 nM/L

−13.80,70.48, 0.84

−50.67, 108.60, 0.64

49.43, 96.66, 0.61

 3.22–5.93 nM/L


−7.31, 107.61,0.95

−36.80, 95.43,0.70

 >5.93 nM/L

9.95, 72.43, 0.89

16.03, 112.20, 0.89

35.43, 97.44, 0.72

 p for interaction




 ≤4.40 umol/L




 4.41–5.10 umol/L

−57.72, 70.94, 0.42

−143.95, 108.74, 0.19

27.65, 95.21, 0.77

 5.11–6.00 umol/L


−275.57, 105.70,0.01

76.91, 98.03, 0.43

 >6.00 umol/L

−87.21, 70.48, 0.22

−210.40, 102.08, 0.04

27.33, 98.14, 0.78

 p for interaction


Adjusted for gestational age at delivery, gestational age at blood draw, maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index, maternal race/ethnicity, parity, household income and maternal smoking

B 12 vitamin B12, PLP pyridoxal phosphate, PA 4-pyridoxic acid, Hcy homocysteine

We found that the inverse association between Hcy and birth weight was most pronounced among male infants. The coefficient estimate among male infants in the highest quartile of maternal Hcy concentration was −210.40 (SE = 102.08, p = 0.04) while the corresponding estimate among female infants was 27.33 (SE = 98.14, p = 0.78). However, the cross-product term was not statistically significant (p = 0.10). Although we observed striking differences in the association between maternal B6 (PLP and PA) concentration and birth weight in infants born to women who reported FA supplementation (Additional file 1: Table S1), the estimates were imprecise due to the low proportion of non-supplementing women. These associations did not vary by race/ethnicity or maternal BMI, and exclusion of preterm infants did not substantially alter our findings.

Associations between maternal micronutrient concentrations (e.g., B12, PLP, PA, and Hcy) and age 3 weight gain

Among all 273 children with anthropometric data at age 3 years, the mean WG was 11,741 g (standard deviation = 2250 g). Table 3 shows the linear associations between maternal micronutrient concentrations and age 3-year WG adjusted for gestational age at blood draw, maternal race/ethnicity, maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, household income, breastfeeding, and age 3-year caloric intake. The children of the mothers in the highest quartile of B12 concentrations experienced lower WG compared to the children of the mothers in the lowest quartile (β = −2203.03, SE = 722.49, p = 0.003). For maternal PLP concentrations, there was some indication of differences in association by offspring sex (β males = 2943.29, SE = 1365.99, p = 0.04 and β females = −1737.49, SE = 936.33, p = 0.08), but the differences were not significant at the 0.05 alpha level.
Table 3

Maternal B vitamins and 3-year weight gain by infant sex: Newborn Epigenetics STudy (N = 273)


Infant sex


All participants (N = 273)

Male children (N-137)

Female children (N = 136)

Maternal B vitamin

β coefficient, standard error, p value



 ≤322.47 ng/L




 322.48–446.04 ng/L

−381.14, 732.87, 0.60

33.23, 1199.92, 0.98

−625.74, 891.01, 0.49

 446.05–575.51 ng/L

−1395.75, 673.18, 0.04

−1010.30, 1086.31, 0.36

−1782.25,711.58, 0.02

 >575.51 ng/L

−2203.03, 722.49, 0.003

−2154.17, 1224.31, 0.09

−1626.59, 837.17, 0.07

 p for interaction




 ≤3.76 nM/L




 3.77–7.47 nM/L

448.65, 839.88, 0.60

1116.26, 1213.31,0.37

−1964.83, 1063.30, 0.08

 7.48–12.05 nM/L

694.16, 897.50, 0.44

1220.60, 1530.15, 0.43

−1778.70, 1006.86, 0.09

 >12.05 nM/L

1181.95, 866.33, 0.18

2943.29, 1365.99, 0.04

−1737.49, 936.33, 0.08

 p for interaction




 ≤2.06 nM/L




 2.07–3.21 nM/L

−268.93, 891.83, 0.76

391.05, 1476.59, 0.79

−1041.07,938.43, 0.28

 3.22–5.93 nM/L

−997.02, 778.44, 0.20

784.35, 1434.70, 0.59

−2307.87, 718.25, 0.005

 >5.93 nM/L

−294.59, 826.98, 0.72

983.67, 1525.03, 0.52

−1334.04, 689.14, 0.07

 p for interaction




 ≤4.40 umol/L




 4.41–5.10 umol/L

227.32, 755.24, 0.76

−692.64, 1335.38, 0.61

63.93,715.18, 0.93

 5.11–6.00 umol/L

71.24,793.17, 0.93

−1992.29, 1505.14,0.20

730.08, 837.30, 0.40

 >6.00 umol/L

−217.90,795.33, 0.79

−1256.44, 1479.32, 0.40

554.96, 878.78, 0.54

 p for interaction


Adjusted for gestational age at blood draw, maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index, household income, maternal race/ethnicity, breastfeeding, and caloric intake at age 3

BMI body mass index, B 12 vitamin B12, PLP pyridoxal phosphate, PA 4-pyridoxic acid, Hcy homocysteine

Associations between maternal micronutrient concentrations and DNA methylation at DMRs regulating imprinted genes

We examined whether maternal micronutrient concentrations were associated with imprinted DMR methylation at the H19, MEG3, SGCE/PEG10, and PLAGL1 DMRs, previously shown to associate with fetal growth in our study population [17, 18]. Mean methylation % (standard deviation) for differentially methylated regions by quartile of maternal B-vitamin status are provided in Additional file 2: Table S2. After adjusting for gestational age at delivery, gestational age at blood draw, maternal race/ethnicity, maternal smoking, and pre-pregnancy BMI, we found that PLP was positively associated with methylation at the MEG3 DMR, consistent with a threshold effect (β Quartile 3 = 2.01 and β Quartile 4 = 3.24, p ≤ 0.05) (Table 4). No association was found between maternal micronutrient levels and DNA methylation at other DMRs. It is possible that intraindividual variability between replicate measures could be greater than the interindividual variability across samples, which would make it difficult to decipher true differences due to exposure versus differences that occur naturally in the population. For each of the DMRs analyzed herein, the interindividual variability exceeded the intraindividual variability (Fig. 1), supporting the validity of the association identified.
Table 4

Adjusted regression coefficients for maternal B vitamins and infant differentially methylated regions: Newborn Epigenetic STudy (N = 429)







mean methylation % (standard deviation)


47.93 (3.82)

72.64 (5.55)

45.98 (5.17)

57.79 (6.33)

Maternal B vitamins

β coefficient, Standard Error, p value



 ≤322.47 ng/L





 322.48–446.04 ng/L

0.53, 0.57, 0.35

0.53, 0.85, 0.53

0.01, 0.66, 0.98

0.39, 0.95, 0.68

 446.05–575.51 ng/L

0.68, 0.56, 0.22

0.01, 0.82, 0.99

0.26, 0.66, 0.70

0.58, 0.94, 0.54

 >575.51 ng/L

−0.41, 0.57, 0.48

−0.93, 0.85, 0.27

0.47, 0.67, 0.48

1.79, 0.96, 0.06



 ≤3.76 nM/L





 3.77–7.47 nM/L

−0.15, 0.60, 0.80

0.23, 0.83, 0.79

0.99, 0.75, 0.19

−0.02, 0.98, 0.99

 7.48–12.05 nM/L

−0.68, 0.62, 0.28

2.01, 0.89, 0.03

−0.33, 0.79, 0.68

−0.26, 1.02, 0.80

 >12.05 nM/L

−0.07, 0.63, 0.91

3.24, 0.89, <0.01

−0.30, 0.81,0.71

−0.11, 1.04, 0.91



 ≤2.06 nM/L





 2.07–3.21 nM/L

−0.45, 0.58, 0.44

−0.18,0.84, 0.83

1.46, 0.74, 0.05

1.27, 0.95,0.18

 3.22–5.93 nM/L

−0.09, 0.60, 0.88

−0.24, 0.87, 0.79

0.79, 0.75, 0.29

1.54, 0.98, 0.12

 >5.93 nM/L

−0.57, 0.61,0.35

1.62, 0.87, 0.06

0.08, 0.78, 0.92

−0.15, 0.99, 0.88



 ≤4.40 umol/L





 4.41–5.10 umol/L

1.01, 0.59, 0.09

1.49, 0.87, 0.09

1.43, 0.77, 0.06

1.46, 0.98, 0.14

 5.11–6.00 umol/L

−0.97, 0.58, 0.10

1.07, 0.86, 0.21

1.19, 0.76, 0.12

1.77, 0.97, 0.07

 >6.00 umol/L

0.19, 0.60, 0.75

1.60, 0.87, 0.07

1.36, 0.79, 0.09

1.10, 0.98, 0.27

Adjusted for gestational age at delivery, gestational age at blood draw, maternal race/ethnicity, maternal smoking and pre-pregnancy body mass index

DMR differentially methylated region, B 12 vitamin B12, PLP pyridoxal phosphate, PA 4-pyridoxic acid, Hcy homocysteine

Fig. 1

Interindividual variability exceeds intraindividual variability in DNA methylation at imprinted DMRs. Shown are the mean methylation levels, ± standard deviation for the four DMRs analyzed, alongside the means for technical replicates that were run alongside for a subset of the samples (~2 % of the total)


Our study did not find evidence of an association between maternal micronutrient concentrations and birth weight overall, but we observed that higher maternal Hcy concentration was associated with lower birth weight in male infants. The offspring of the mothers in the highest concentrations of B12 had lower WG compared to the offspring of the mothers in the lowest quartile, and higher WG was observed among male offspring of the mothers in the highest quartile of maternal PLP. Maternal PLP concentrations were positively associated with methylation at the MEG3 DMR.

Vitamin B12 is essential for cellular growth and differentiation, as well as for DNA methylation, and could be an independent factor for fetal development [19]. Pregnancy-associated declines in B12 are common but are likely attributed to increased fetal absorption and placental transport [20]. The literature on the association between maternal vitamin B12 status and adverse pregnancy outcomes are mixed. A single study conducted among a cohort of pregnant women in Bangalore, India, showed that low maternal B12 concentrations were associated with elevated risk of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) [21]. However, several other investigations report no significant association between maternal B12 status (measured at various time points during the prenatal period) and birth weight or IUGR [7, 8, 22]. We similarly found no association with birth weight. To our knowledge, we are the first to report on the association between maternal concentrations of vitamin B12 and offspring WG at age 3 years. Our finding of an inverse association between maternal B12 concentrations and WG could suggest that maternal B vitamins during the prenatal period have downstream effects on offspring body size, and these associations may, in part, drive the inverse relationship between childhood B12 concentrations and obesity [23].

Plasma PLP, the best single indicator of vitamin B6 status, is involved in many aspects of macronutrient metabolism and is known to decline during gestation [24]. Several studies report positive associations between maternal B6 supplementation and birth weight, including a recent meta-analysis where a 217-g difference (95 % CI: 130–304; p = 0.009) was observed [24]. We observed a monotonic increase in birth weight with increasing maternal PLP concentration, but the effect was small and insignificant. We found no previous studies that examined the association between maternal PLP and offspring WG, and anthropometric data on children whose mothers received vitamin B6 supplements during pregnancy are not available.

The concentrations of Hcy, a sulfur-containing amino acid, are tightly regulated by two enzymatic pathways: (1) Hcy can be remethylated to methionine by a pathway requiring folate and vitamin B12 as a methyl donor and co-factor, respectively, or (2) Hcy may be removed by transsulfuration, a pathway reliant on vitamin B6 [25]. Therefore, deficiencies of folate, vitamin B12, or vitamin B6 are likely to lead to increase Hcy. Blood concentrations of Hcy during pregnancy are variable: a slight decrease during early gestation; a nadir between 20 and 32 weeks; and subsequent rise after delivery [26]. Investigations of the association between maternal total Hcy and birth weight have yielded diverging results. Many, but not all [7], studies have observed an increased risk of LBW or IUGR in women with elevated levels of total Hcy [27, 28] and a recent meta-analysis showed that hyperhomocysteinaemia (>90th percentile) was associated with a 25 % increased odds of being SGA (95 % CI: 1.09, 1.44) [29]. While we found no statistically significant associations between Hcy and birth weight overall, we did observe a novel inverse association among male infants. No previous study had evaluated WG or BMI with prenatal maternal Hcy concentrations, and our study found no significant associations.

The association between nutrients in the one-carbon pathway and offspring methylation are well-documented in animal models [30, 31], but studies among humans are limited. A cross-sectional study assessing maternal vitamin B12 status at the time of parturition found inverse associations with umbilical cord blood IGF2 DMR methylation [13]. Another study showed associations between plasma levels of Hcy and cord blood DNA methylation of 289 CpG sites [32]. A recent investigation of dietary nutrients showed maternal vitamin B2 intake was positively correlated with PLAGL1 DMR methylation in umbilical cord blood, although no association was found with B6 or B12 [15]. These investigations were limited by cross-sectional data collection, small samples, and inadequate assessment of maternal micronutrient status. While these associations may be by chance, our study is the first to show an association between maternal PLP and offspring methylation at the MEG3 DMR which could be an important epigenetic tag for maternal B vitamin adequacy. Vitamin B6 is integrally involved in the 1-CC metabolism pathway and acts as a co-factor for epigenetic processes including DNA methylation [10]. Insufficient maternal micronutrients may affect the efficiency of the one-carbon pathway, interfering with DNA methylation and epigenetic regulation of genes such as MEG3 during critical periods of development. MEG3 produces a long non-coding RNA and altered expression is associated with multiple disorders including the chromosome 14 uniparental disomies [33].

Strengths of our study include its large population-based sample, prospective design, and use of blood biomarkers to assess maternal micronutrient status. We were additionally able to consider adjustment for and present results stratified by FA supplementation—although cells became small. Although we observed associations between maternal micronutrients, birth weight, childhood WG, and the MEG3 DMR, these findings should be interpreted in context of the study limitations. While our findings could be due to chance, by considering a small number of DMRs (N = 4) for which we had strong biologic rationale, we (1) mitigate concerns regarding multiple comparisons; (2) reduce the likelihood of type II error; and (3) generate data which may be replicated in future studies. We assessed maternal micronutrient concentrations at a single time point and for a large proportion of women data were unavailable. Further, LBW and macrosomia were infrequent in our study population and were unable to examine associations with birth weight extremes. While we are the first to estimate associations between maternal B vitamin and Hcy concentrations and childhood WG, in some, strata sample size was reduced considerably. Finally, while there is an urgent need to better understand how maternal micronutrients involved in the 1-CC metabolism pathway affect developmental epigenetics, redundancy in methyl-donor supply pathways may indicate that alterations of one substrate could, through compensatory mechanisms, perturb others [34]. A more comprehensive approach is necessary to gain a complete understanding of how these nutrients affect DNA methylation in a larger number of regulatory regions.


Our study, in a large ethnically diverse cohort of mothers and their offspring, suggests that with the exception of a sex-specific effect for Hcy, B vitamins are not associated with birth weight. However, both B12 and PLP appear to be associated with 3-year WG. We further showed that maternal PLP concentrations were positively associated with methylation at the MEG3 DMR and may be important for understanding the effects of prenatal nutrition on adult health outcomes. The association between specific maternal micronutrients on the 1-CC metabolism pathway and adverse pregnancy outcomes continue to be an area of clinical and public health significance. Additional studies in large prospective birth cohorts may aid in understanding their independent and cooperative effects on fetal health, childhood outcomes, and adult disease risk. Additional mechanistic insights on the role of these nutrients and DNA methylation could provide epigenetic targets for surveillance and intervention.


Ethics, consent, and permissions

The study protocol was approved by the Duke University, Durham Regional Hospital and North Carolina State University Institutional Review Boards. Written, informed consent was obtained for all study participants prior to data collection.

Study participants

The study participants were enrolled as part of the Newborn Epigenetics STudy (NEST), a prospective study of women and their offspring. Methods for enrollment of the study participants have been previously described [35]. Briefly, between 2009 and 2011, English- or Spanish-speaking pregnant women ≥18 years were identified from clinic logs of five prenatal clinics and obstetric facilities in Durham County, NC, USA. Women were excluded from the study if they did not intend to use one of the participating obstetric facilities for delivery, planned to relinquish custody of the child, move from the area in the subsequent 3 years, or had established HIV infection. Among 2548 eligible women, 1700 (66.7 %) were consented and enrolled. Women enrolled in the study were similar to those who declined with respect to age (p = 0.66) but dissimilar with respect to race (p < 0.001), where non-participating women were more likely to be Asian and Native American. Among the 1700 consenting women, 115 were excluded due to infant deaths before, during, or soon after birth. An additional 281 who were illiterate, underage, refused further participation or could not be located were excluded, such that 1304 (76.7 %) remained in the study. Of the remaining women, we measured B vitamin/Hcy concentrations from the maternal venous blood of the first 528, 63 % of which was drawn during the first trimester. These analyses are restricted to the 496 singleton infant-mother pairs in whose blood draw and birth weight data were available.

Data collection

Data collection occurred at multiple time points throughout the study period as follows: (1) upon enrollment, participants provided peripheral blood samples (gestational age at enrollment: range = 4.0–32.5 weeks, mean = 12 weeks) and completed a self-administered questionnaire which queried women on their sociodemographic, reproductive, and lifestyle characteristics in the 6 months prior; (2) upon delivery, birth outcomes were abstracted from medical records and infant cord blood specimens were obtained to assess offspring methylation; and (3) at age 3 years, data on child anthropometry and dietary characteristics were obtained for 273 of the 496 offspring for whom maternal B vitamins were measured. The participants with and without childhood data did not differ with respect to key variables (e.g., maternal age, micronutrient concentrations, and birth weight [p > 0.05]).

Measurement of maternal micronutrient concentrations (e.g., B12, PLP, PA and Hcy)

Quantitative analysis of plasma B12 was performed using the commercial kit, ID-Vit Vitamin B12 (Immundiagnostic-ALPCO; Salem, NH, Ref KIF012) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The kit uses the vitamin B12-dependent strain Lactobacillus delbruekii subsp. lactis (ATCC 7830) in a 96-well format. After processing, L. delbruekii growth was measured by turbidimetry at 610 nm using the Molecular Devices, Versa-Max Tunable Plate Reader. Data analysis was performed using the commercially available software Soft-Max version 3.1, Molecular Devices. PLP and PA were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) which requires the removal of plasma protein, conversion of the liberated PLP to 4-pyridoxic acid 5′-phosphate in alkaline medium containing cyanide (derivatization), followed by acidification. The acidified samples were subjected to reversed phase HPLC separation, and detection was carried out with fluorescence with excitation at 320 nm; emission at 416. A Thermo Separation Products System, pump model P200, autosampler model AS300, fluorescence detector model FL300 was used. Plasma Hcy was similarly assessed using HPLC with UV detection at 384 nm. Maternal micronutrient concentrations were right skewed and quartiled.

Assessment of birth and childhood outcomes

Trained personnel abstracted parturition data from medical records after delivery. These data included birth weight, gestational age at birth (week), and infant sex. Infant birth weight (grams [g]) showed no evidence of departure from normality and was analyzed as a continuous variable. Age 3 WG (g) was slightly right skewed and calculated using the following formula: ((age 3 weight [g]/age at which weight was obtained [months])*36 months) − birth weight [g] and assessed continuously.

Assessment of covariates and effect measure modifiers

The participants self-reported maternal age at delivery, race/ethnicity, marital status, parity, diabetes, and weight and height at last menstrual period (LMP), all of which were subsequently verified with abstracted medical records. Household income, maternal education, cigarette smoking, FA supplementation, and infant feeding practices were self-reported via questionnaire.

We considered maternal race/ethnicity, infant sex, maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, and FA supplementation as potential modifiers of the association between maternal micronutrient concentrations and birth weight. Race/ethnic categories were assigned based on women’s self-identification as Black/African American, non-Hispanic White, or Hispanic White. Infant sex was abstracted from medical records. Maternal BMI was calculated from self-reported weight (kg) and height (m) at LMP and expressed as kg/m2. FA supplementation was self-reported at baseline.

DNA methylation analysis

Infant genomic DNA (800 ng) was modified by treatment with sodium bisulfite using the Zymo EZ DNA Methylation kit (Zymo Research; Irvine, CA, USA). Bisulfite treatment of denatured DNA converts all unmethylated cytosines to uracils but leaves methylated cytosines unchanged, allowing quantitative definition of cytosine methylation status. Pyrosequencing was performed using Pyromark Q96 MD pyrosequencers (Qiagen) to measure DNA methylation at four imprint regulatory regions known to associate with fetal growth and development in NEST study participants [17, 18] including the following: the H19 DMR regulating the IGF2/H19 domain, the MEG3 DMR regulating the DLK1/MEG3 domain, the SGCE/PEG10 DMR positioned between epsilon sarcoglycan and paternally expressed gene 10, and the PLAGL1 DMR [36]. Assays were designed to query established DMRs using the Pyromark Assay Design Software (Qiagen). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) conditions were optimized to produce a single, robust amplification product by adjusting annealing temperature and magnesium chloride concentrations. The primers, chromosomal location, and coordinates along with the PCR conditions for all four regions investigated here were previously provided [36]. Defined mixtures of fully methylated and unmethylated control DNAs were used to show a linear increase in detection of methylation values as the level of input DNA methylation increased (Pearson r > 0.99 for all DMRs). Once the optimal conditions were defined, each DMR was analyzed using the same amount of input DNA from each specimen (40 ng, assuming complete recovery following bisulfite modification), keeping the thermocycler and pyrosequencer constant. Controls to determine the bisulfite conversion efficiency were included for each DMR with every sample run. For all data included in the analysis, the conversion efficiency exceeded 97 %. Percent methylation for each CpG cytosine was determined using Pyro Q-CpG Software (Qiagen). We interrogated between four and eight CpG sites per DMR: four for H19, eight for MEG3, six for SGCE/PEG10, and six for PLAGL1.

Statistical analysis

We compared the distribution of demographic and obstetric characteristics across quartiles of B12, PLP, PA, and Hcy using chi-squared tests [37]. Generalized linear models were used to estimate the association between maternal micronutrient concentrations (at enrollment) and birth weight as well as age 3 WG [38] (a priori two-sided p ≤ 0.05). For all models, we considered adjustment for the following covariates: maternal age, race/ethnicity, gestational age at delivery, marital status, parity upon enrollment, household, maternal education, maternal BMI at LMP, maternal smoking, maternal FA supplementation, gestational diabetes, gestational age at blood draw, and infant sex. For childhood WG analyses, we additionally considered adjustment for every breastfeeding, in-home smoking, height, and caloric intake at age 3 years. Final confounders were selected based on directed acyclic graphs [39] and backward elimination [40].

Among 429 term mother-infant pairs where methylation data for at least one of four DMRs was available and nutrient data were measured, we examined associations with maternal micronutrient concentrations. Study participants with DMR data available were similar to those without DMR data with respect to maternal age, micronutrient concentrations, and birth weight (p values >0.05). Cronbach’s alphas were >0.89 for all DMRs considered, suggesting mean methylation levels for each DMR could be used in our models [35]. We used F tests [40] for parametric analyses and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests [37] to examine DNA methylation levels by maternal micronutrient concentration, adjusting for factors shown to influence DNA methylation [41] (a priori p ≤ 0.05). All statistical analyses were conducted in SAS v9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Availability of Supporting Data

The data set supporting the results of this epidemiologic research will be available with appropriate human subject protection in a separate file.



We thank the participants of the NEST study project. We also acknowledge Stacy Murray, Kennetra Irby, Siobhan Greene, and Anna Tsent for their recruiting efforts and Carole Grenier, Erin Erginer, Cara Davis, and Allison Barratt for the technical assistance.

This work was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health (Grant no. R01-ES016772) via Cathrine Hoyo and National Cancer Institute (R25CA057726) via Lauren McCullough. Funders had no role in the design, analysis, or writing of this article.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine
Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University
Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University


  1. Calkins K, Devaskar SU. Fetal origins of adult disease. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2011;41(6):158–76. doi:10.1016/j.cppeds.2011.01.001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Barker DJ. Adult consequences of fetal growth restriction. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;49(2):270–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I, Koupil I, Leon DA, Lithell HO. Birth characteristics and adult cancer incidence: Swedish cohort of over 11,000 men and women. Int J Cancer. 2005;115(4):611–7. doi:10.1002/ijc.20915.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barker DJ, Gluckman PD, Godfrey KM, Harding JE, Owens JA, Robinson JS. Fetal nutrition and cardiovascular disease in adult life. Lancet. 1993;341(8850):938–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Rush EC, Katre P, Yajnik CS. Vitamin B12: one carbon metabolism, fetal growth and programming for chronic disease. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014;68(1):2–7. doi:10.1038/ejcn.2013.232.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. van Uitert EM, Steegers-Theunissen RP. Influence of maternal folate status on human fetal growth parameters. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2013;57(4):582–95. doi:10.1002/mnfr.201200084.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hogeveen M, Blom HJ, van der Heijden EH, Semmekrot BA, Sporken JM, Ueland PM et al. Maternal homocysteine and related B vitamins as risk factors for low birthweight. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2010;202(6):572.e1-6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.045.
  8. Krishnaveni GV, Veena SR, Karat SC, Yajnik CS, Fall CH. Association between maternal folate concentrations during pregnancy and insulin resistance in Indian children. Diabetologia. 2014;57(1):110–21. doi:10.1007/s00125-013-3086-7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Waterland RA, Jirtle RL. Transposable elements: targets for early nutritional effects on epigenetic gene regulation. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23(15):5293–300.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Fall C. Maternal nutrition: effects on health in the next generation. Indian J Med Res. 2009;130(5):593–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mathers JC, McKay JA. Epigenetics—potential contribution to fetal programming. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2009;646:119–23. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9173-5_13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Robertson KD. DNA methylation and human disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6(8):597–610. doi:10.1038/nrg1655.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ba Y, Yu H, Liu F, Geng X, Zhu C, Zhu Q, et al. Relationship of folate, vitamin B12 and methylation of insulin-like growth factor-II in maternal and cord blood. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011;65(4):480–5. doi:10.1038/ejcn.2010.294.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoyo C, Daltveit AK, Iversen E, Benjamin-Neelon SE, Fuemmeler B, Schildkraut J, et al. Erythrocyte folate concentrations, CpG methylation at genomically imprinted domains, and birth weight in a multiethnic newborn cohort. Epigenetics. 2014;9(8):1120–30. doi:10.4161/epi.29332.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Azzi S, Sas TC, Koudou Y, Le Bouc Y, Souberbielle JC, Dargent-Molina P, et al. Degree of methylation of ZAC1 (PLAGL1) is associated with prenatal and post-natal growth in healthy infants of the EDEN mother child cohort. Epigenetics. 2014;9(3):338–45. doi:10.4161/epi.27387.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jirtle RL. Imprinted genes: by species. In: Imprinted gene database. 2012. 2015.
  17. Soubry A, Hoyo C, Jirtle RL, Murphy SK. A paternal environmental legacy: evidence for epigenetic inheritance through the male germ line. BioEssays. 2014;36(4):359–71. doi:10.1002/bies.201300113.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoyo C, Murtha AP, Schildkraut JM, Jirtle RL, Demark-Wahnefried W, Forman MR, et al. Methylation variation at IGF2 differentially methylated regions and maternal folic acid use before and during pregnancy. Epigenetics. 2011;6(7):928–36.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Carmel R, Green R, Rosenblatt DS, Watkins D. Update on cobalamin, folate, and homocysteine. Hematology. 2003;62–81.
  20. Greibe E, Andreasen BH, Lildballe DL, Morkbak AL, Hvas AM, Nexo E. Uptake of cobalamin and markers of cobalamin status: a longitudinal study of healthy pregnant women. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49(11):1877–82. doi:10.1515/cclm.2011.682.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Muthayya S, Kurpad AV, Duggan CP, Bosch RJ, Dwarkanath P, Mhaskar A, et al. Low maternal vitamin B12 status is associated with intrauterine growth retardation in urban South Indians. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006;60(6):791–801. doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602383.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Abraham A, Mathews JE, Sebastian A, Chacko KP, Sam D. A nested case-control study to evaluate the association between fetal growth restriction and vitamin B12 deficiency. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;53(4):399–402. doi:10.1111/ajo.12057.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pinhas-Hamiel O, Doron-Panush N, Reichman B, Nitzan-Kaluski D, Shalitin S, Geva-Lerner L. Obese children and adolescents: a risk group for low vitamin B12 concentration. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160(9):933–6. doi:10.1001/archpedi.160.9.933.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Dror DK, Allen LH. Interventions with vitamins B6, B12 and C in pregnancy. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012;26 Suppl 1:55–74. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3016.2012.01277.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Patrick TE, Powers RW, Daftary AR, Ness RB, Roberts JM. Homocysteine and folic acid are inversely related in black women with preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2004;43(6):1279–82. doi:10.1161/01.HYP.0000126580.81230.da.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Murphy MM, Scott JM, Arija V, Molloy AM, Fernandez-Ballart JD. Maternal homocysteine before conception and throughout pregnancy predicts fetal homocysteine and birth weight. Clin Chem. 2004;50(8):1406–12. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2004.032904.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Parazzini F, Chiaffarino F, Ricci E, Improta L, Monni G. Homocysteine, red cell, and plasma folate concentrations and birth weight in Italian women: results from a prospective study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(3):427–31. doi:10.3109/14767058.2010.501127.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee HA, Park EA, Cho SJ, Kim HS, Kim YJ, Lee H, et al. Mendelian randomization analysis of the effect of maternal homocysteine during pregnancy, as represented by maternal MTHFR C677T genotype, on birth weight. J Epidemiol. 2013;23(5):371–5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hogeveen M, Blom HJ, den Heijer M. Maternal homocysteine and small-for-gestational-age offspring: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;95(1):130–6. doi:10.3945/ajcn.111.016212.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sinclair KD, Allegrucci C, Singh R, Gardner DS, Sebastian S, Bispham J, et al. DNA methylation, insulin resistance, and blood pressure in offspring determined by maternal periconceptional B vitamin and methionine status. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(49):19351–6. doi:10.1073/pnas.0707258104.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. McKay JA, Waltham KJ, Williams EA, Mathers JC. Folate depletion during pregnancy and lactation reduces genomic DNA methylation in murine adult offspring. Genes Nutr. 2011;6(2):189–96. doi:10.1007/s12263-010-0199-1.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Fryer AA, Emes RD, Ismail KM, Haworth KE, Mein C, Carroll WD, et al. Quantitative, high-resolution epigenetic profiling of CpG loci identifies associations with cord blood plasma homocysteine and birth weight in humans. Epigenetics. 2011;6(1):86–94. doi:10.4161/epi.6.1.13392.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Watanabe T, Go H, Kagami M, Yasuda S, Nomura Y, Fujimori K. Prenatal findings and epimutations for paternal uniparental disomy for chromosome 14 syndrome. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015; doi:10.1111/jog.12665.
  34. Dominguez-Salas P, Cox SE, Prentice AM, Hennig BJ, Moore SE. Maternal nutritional status, C(1) metabolism and offspring DNA methylation: a review of current evidence in human subjects. Proc Nutr Soc. 2012;71(1):154–65. doi:10.1017/s0029665111003338.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu Y, Murphy SK, Murtha AP, Fuemmeler BF, Schildkraut J, Huang Z, et al. Depression in pregnancy, infant birth weight and DNA methylation of imprint regulatory elements. Epigenetics. 2012;7(7):735–46. doi:10.4161/epi.20734.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Murphy SK, Huang Z, Hoyo C. Differentially methylated regions of imprinted genes in prenatal, perinatal and postnatal human tissues. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40924. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040924.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Corder GW, Foreman DI. Nonparametric statistics for non-statisticians: a step-by-step approach. Hoboken: Wiley; 2009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Madsen H, Thyregod P. Introduction to general and generalized linear models. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2011.Google Scholar
  39. Greenland S. Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis. Am J Public Health. 1989;79(3):340–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Harrell FE. Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.; 2001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Hoyo C, Murtha AP, Schildkraut JM, Forman MR, Calingaert B, Demark-Wahnefried W, et al. Folic acid supplementation before and during pregnancy in the Newborn Epigenetics STudy (NEST). BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):46. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-46.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© McCullough et al. 2016